Mondada2013

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Mondada2013
BibType ARTICLE
Key Mondada2013
Author(s) Lorenza Mondada
Title Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Social interaction, Embodied action, Turn-taking, Participation, Institutional context, Political debate, Chairman mediated meeting
Publisher Elsevier B.V.
Year 2013
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 46
Number 1
Pages 39–68
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper addresses a central topic of conversation analysis: turn-taking organization. It describes a specific turn-taking system, characteristic of an institutional setting involving larger groups of participants. Whereas turn-taking has been widely studied and diverse settings have been considered, from informal everyday conversations to formal institutional interactions, turn-taking organization as it is managed by and within larger groups remains understudied. This paper aims to sketch the systematics of turn-taking practices within political meetings that are part of a participatory democracy project. In these meetings, everybody is expected to contribute ideas, opinions, and proposals; controversial topics, disagreements, and political oppositions are also expressed. The analysis focuses on the practical problems encountered by speakers bidding for turns and by the chairman trying to make the floor accessible. The analysis also examines the methodic and timed mobilization of embodied resources and their local accountability, as recognized and treated as situated by the participants. Systematic practices for pre-selecting, announcing and establishing the next speaker, selecting and queuing multiple next speakers, defending speakership in contexts of persistent overlaps, and managing confrontational exchanges during the debate are described in detail. This description casts light on the way in which ‘participatory democracy’ is locally brought into being.

Notes