Maynard2004
| Maynard2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Maynard2004 |
| Author(s) | Douglas W. Maynard |
| Title | On predicating a diagnosis as an attribute of a person |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA, Diagnosis, Evidence |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 53–76 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445604039439 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article explores the relation between ‘citing the evidence’, or implicating a particular diagnosis, and ‘asserting the condition’, or overtly predicating the diagnosis as an attribute of a person. Clinicians regularly postpone or delay asserting the condition, which is interactionally more confrontational and presumptive. They regularly do the postponement by citing the evidence prior to asserting the condition, using the evidence as kind of predecessor account for predicating the diagnosis as an attribute of the person. Citing the evidence as leading to asserting the condition enhances the likelihood of recipients realizing some bad news or other kind of diagnostic upshot. This study has implications for the relation between interaction and authority in medical discourse.
Notes
