Liberman2024
| Liberman2024 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Liberman2024 |
| Author(s) | Kenneth Liberman |
| Title | Autochthony: Abandoning Social Mythologies of Rationality |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Social phenomenology, Autochthonous, Garfinkel, Sacks |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2024 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 47 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 421–438 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10746-024-09715-8 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Two seminal notions of Harold Garfinkel have endured despite some uncertainty and indeterminacy that accompany them: “autochthonous” and “tendentious”. These terms, which respect the dynamic and evolving nature of social interaction, describe how local parties discover, come upon, or develop coherent accounts that can assist them to lay hold of a local orderliness that is governing some mundane interaction. This paper illuminates these two notions, first theoretically and then empirically. Drawing upon the reflections of Garfinkel, Sacks, Schegloff, Mead, Husserl, Schutz, Gurwitsch, and others, the radical consequences of these two notions are elucidated and then applied to two perspicuous conversations where it is possible to witness autochthony and tendentiousness in action. This provides a clearer understanding of the importance that these features of social interaction can play in our everyday lives. The two illustrations reveal occasions where a local orderliness appears on its own, autochthonously, without requiring a heavy dose of deliberate conceptual control by parties.
Notes
