Kitzinger2007a

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Kitzinger2007a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Kitzinger2007a
Author(s) Celia Kitzinger
Title Is “woman” always relevantly gendered?
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Membership Categorization Analysis, Gender, Conversation Analysis
Publisher
Year 2007
Language
City
Month
Journal Gender and Language
Volume 1
Number 1
Pages 39–49
URL Link
DOI 10.1558/genl.2007.1.1.39
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The use of categorical person reference terms such as ‘woman’, ‘gentleman’, ‘lady’, etc. (sometimes referred to as ‘membership categorisation devices’) has seemed to offer a solution to the problem of when gender is relevant in talk, since it is widely taken for granted that a speaker who refers to herself (or another) as – for example – a ‘woman’ is showing herself to be oriented to gender, thereby warranting the analyst’s treatment of her as such. Based on conversation analysis of a single recorded interaction, this paper shows that ‘woman’ is not necessarily relevantly gendered for participants, and that – even when it is – it is not only gender, and in fact not most saliently gender, that is always achieved through its use. It suggests that an exclusive preoccupation with the production of the category term ‘woman’ and its associated attributes as the main focus of analysis obscures the actions in which participants are also, or otherwise, engaged.

Notes