Kaur2022
| Kaur2022 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kaur2022 |
| Author(s) | Taneesh Kaur |
| Title | Conversation analysis in a US Senate Judiciary hearing: Questioning Brett Kavanaugh |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | congress, Conversation Analysis, democrat, discourse, political questioning, senate, senate judiciary hearing, Supreme Court, polarization, constitutional rights, abortion, guns, political interaction, politics |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2022 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 24 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 423-444 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/14614456221099175 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Through a ‘micro’ and ‘macro’ level analysis, this study focuses on elements of questioning and question design in the Senate Judiciary hearing conducted for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Specifically, two lines of questioning are analyzed: that of Kamala Harris, D. California, and that of Ted Cruz, R. Texas. Through an analysis that builds heavily on prior research that uses Conversation Analysis (CA) to understand the news interview, this study attempts to expand such research to institutional talk done by politicians in Congress. The analysis portion of the paper investigates, on a ‘micro’ level, the linguistic elements at play in each line of questioning. In the discussion section, a ‘macro’ level analysis situates the findings of this paper within the broader US political climate among the public and in terms of the growing conservatism of the Supreme Court.
Notes
