Jones2001

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Jones2001
BibType ARTICLE
Key Jones2001
Author(s) Charlotte M. Jones
Title Missing assessments: lay and professional orientations in medical interview
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Medical EMCA, Medical Interview, Assessments, Conversation Analysis, Social Support
Publisher
Year 2001
Language
City
Month
Journal Text & Talk
Volume 21
Number 1-2
Pages 113–150
URL Link
DOI 10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.113
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This study extends conversation analytic research by Frankel and colleagues on the occurrence (or nonoccurrence) of assessments in physician–patient interviews. As assessments are regularly offered after hearing news or information just asked for in everyday talk (often displaying alignment and as liation for the news bearer), and as reportings commonly occur in both mundane and medical interaction, the post-question–answer slot (after newsworthy answers) was identified as one interactional environment to investigate. Analysis revealed that lay and professional orientations do not mesh. At these points, assessments are absent, unlike in everyday talk. Instead, physicians offer (a) no response, or (b) an acknowledgment token. Patients subsequently exhibit, through pausing and withholding speaking, that they expect a different type of response from physicians. Hence, gaps occur when assessments might be due (from a mundane perspective), marking them as missing. After these gaps, the participants react differently. Physicians disattend the lack of assessments, instead continuing with ‘business at usual’. Patients display an orientation to the absence, using various strategies ‘unsuccessfully’. Implications are discussed in relationship to as liation and social support, important in the delivery of health care. Several explanations for absent assessments in medical interviews are also explored.

Notes