Jones2001
Jones2001 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Jones2001 |
Author(s) | Charlotte M. Jones |
Title | Missing assessments: lay and professional orientations in medical interview |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA, Medical Interview, Assessments, Conversation Analysis, Social Support |
Publisher | |
Year | 2001 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Text & Talk |
Volume | 21 |
Number | 1-2 |
Pages | 113–150 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.113 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This study extends conversation analytic research by Frankel and colleagues on the occurrence (or nonoccurrence) of assessments in physician–patient interviews. As assessments are regularly offered after hearing news or information just asked for in everyday talk (often displaying alignment and as liation for the news bearer), and as reportings commonly occur in both mundane and medical interaction, the post-question–answer slot (after newsworthy answers) was identified as one interactional environment to investigate. Analysis revealed that lay and professional orientations do not mesh. At these points, assessments are absent, unlike in everyday talk. Instead, physicians offer (a) no response, or (b) an acknowledgment token. Patients subsequently exhibit, through pausing and withholding speaking, that they expect a different type of response from physicians. Hence, gaps occur when assessments might be due (from a mundane perspective), marking them as missing. After these gaps, the participants react differently. Physicians disattend the lack of assessments, instead continuing with ‘business at usual’. Patients display an orientation to the absence, using various strategies ‘unsuccessfully’. Implications are discussed in relationship to as liation and social support, important in the delivery of health care. Several explanations for absent assessments in medical interviews are also explored.
Notes