Harris2001
| Harris2001 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Harris2001 |
| Author(s) | Scott R. Harris |
| Title | What can interactionism contribute to the study of inequality? The case of marriage and beyond |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Symbolic interaction, Equality, Marriage |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2001 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Symbolic Interaction |
| Volume | 24 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 455–480 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1525/si.2001.24.4.455 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The equality/inequality dichotomy is a central concept in sociology and in the study of marriage. Almost all researchers, though, use their own preconceived definitions and measurement strategies to identify equal and unequal states of affairs. An alternative approach, one that better accords with interactionist principles, is to privilege people's interpretations of equality over analysts' Drawing on interviews with individuals who define their own marriages as equal or unequal, I compare people's stories about marital equality with scholars' depictions. While some narratives resonate (in part) with the themes propounded by scholars, others do not. If people's experiences of equality and inequality are to be taken seriously, then it is important to listen to what they have to say on the subject, as well as to how they say it. This is the distinctive contribution symbolic interactionists can make to the study of inequality.
Notes
