Gathman2008

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Gathman2008
BibType ARTICLE
Key Gathman2008
Author(s) DE. Cabell Hankinson Gathman, Douglas W. Maynard, Nora Cate Schaeffer
Title The respondents are all above average: Compliment sequences in a survey interview
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Interviews, Compliments, Survey Interviews
Publisher
Year 2008
Language
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 41
Number 3
Pages 271-301
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351810802237867
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article is an investigation of compliments that follow respondents' performances on cognitive tasks in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study's 2004 wave of survey interviews. During training, interviewers learn that they are to give positive feedback to respondents but are not told exactly how they are to do this or how they are to handle the contingencies of respondents' varying performances. Our study shows that interviewers engage in the social action of complimenting respondents and that they use various devices including second sayings or restatements of compliments, assessments of task difficulty, and comparisons with other “people” to account for those compliments. Laughter plays a role in reducing possible status differences that derive from one party (the younger interviewer) being in a position to evaluate another party (the older respondent). Overall, this study contributes to the understanding of what Maynard and Schaeffer (2000, 2002) have called analytic alternation: ways that interviewers use their tacit knowledge in actual practice to fulfill procedures and protocols of the standardized interview. This study also provides a basis for an interaction coding study that will investigate how compliments in the posttask sequence affect other performances and measures within the interview. In this study, we also expand on Pomerantz's (1978) analysis of compliment sequences, demonstrating ways in which the institutional setting of the survey interview and the asymmetry of knowledge it contains exert further constraints on the production and receipt of compliments.

Notes