Enfield2017

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Enfield2017
BibType ARTICLE
Key Enfield2017
Author(s) N.J. Enfield, Jack Sidnell
Title On the concept of action in the study of interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Basic Resources, Action Formation, Action ascription, Accountability, Action, Philosophy of language, Practice, Speech act
Publisher
Year 2017
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 19
Number 5
Pages 515-535
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445617730235
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

What is the relation between words and action? How does a person decide, based on what someone is saying, what would be an appropriate response? We argue that (1) every move combines independent semiotic features, to be interpreted under an assumption that social behavior is goal directed; (2) responding to actions is not equivalent to describing them; and (3) describing actions invokes rights and duties for which people are explicitly accountable. We conclude that interaction does not involve a ‘binning’ procedure in which the stream of conduct is sorted into discrete action types. Our argument is grounded in data from recordings of talk-in-interaction.

Notes