DingemanseTorreiraEnfield2013
| DingemanseTorreiraEnfield2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | DingemanseTorreiraEnfield2013 |
| Author(s) | Mark Dingemanse, Francisco Torreira, N. J. Enfield |
| Title | Is “Huh?” a universal word?: conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Huh, EMCA, evolution, generalization, NTRI, Repair, OIR, other-initiated repair |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | PLOS ONE |
| Volume | 8 |
| Number | 11 |
| Pages | 1–10 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0078273 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
A word like Huh?–used as a repair initiator when, for example, one has not clearly heard what someone just said– is found in roughly the same form and function in spoken languages across the globe. We investigate it in naturally occurring conversations in ten languages and present evidence and arguments for two distinct claims: that Huh? is universal, and that it is a word. In support of the first, we show that the similarities in form and function of this interjection across languages are much greater than expected by chance. In support of the second claim we show that it is a lexical, conventionalised form that has to be learnt, unlike grunts or emotional cries. We discuss possible reasons for the cross-linguistic similarity and propose an account in terms of convergent evolution. Huh? is a universal word not because it is innate but because it is shaped by selective pressures in an interactional environment that all languages share: that of other-initiated repair. Our proposal enhances evolutionary models of language change by suggesting that conversational infrastructure can drive the convergent cultural evolution of linguistic items.
Notes
