Deppermann2021b
| Deppermann2021b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Deppermann2021b |
| Author(s) | Arnulf Deppermann |
| Title | Social Actions |
| Editor(s) | Michael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár, Marina Terkourafi |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Social actions, Intersubjectivity |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | Cambridge |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 69–94 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/9781108954105.006 |
| ISBN | 978-1-108-95410-5 |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Social actions are recipient-designed actions that occur in the context of interaction sequences. This chapter focuses on sources and practices for the formation and ascription of social actions. While linguists stress the relevance of linguistic social action formats, conversation analysts highlight the relevance of the sequential position of an action, and sociolinguists point to the influence of social identities for action-formation and -ascription. The combination of these three approaches helps us to solve the analytic problem of indirectness, which, however, only rarely becomes a problem for the participants in an interaction themselves. Social properties which recurrently apply when using verbal and bodily resources of action-formation, i.e. the social actions themselves, inferred meanings, projected next actions, the participation framework, the activity type, speaker's stance, participants' identities, etc. lead to stable pragmatic connotations of those forms, i.e. action-meanings, which become idiomatic and part of our common-sense competence. Still, social actions are multi-layered and can be ambiguous at times. Therefore, their meaning can be open for negotiation. Intersubjectivity of action ascription is ultimately secured neither by conventions nor by speaker's intentions, but is accomplished by their treatment in subsequent discourse.
Notes
