Callon2016
Callon2016 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Callon2016 |
Author(s) | Wynne Callon, Somnath Saha, P. Todd Korthuis, Ira B. Wilson, Richard D. Moore, Jonathan Cohn, Mary Catherine Beach |
Title | Which clinician questions elicit accurate disclosure of antiretroviral non-adherence when talking to patients? |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, AIDS, medication, Adherence, Physician-Patient Relations, Counseling, Medical |
Publisher | |
Year | 2016 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | AIDS and Behavior |
Volume | 20 |
Number | 5 |
Pages | 1108–1115 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1007/s10461-015-1231-7 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This study evaluated how clinicians assess antiretroviral (ARV) adherence in clinical encounters, and which questions elicit accurate responses. We conducted conversation analysis of audio-recorded encounters between 34 providers and 58 patients reporting ARV non-adherence in post-encounter interviews. Among 42 visits where adherence status was unknown by providers, 4 providers did not discuss ARVs (10 %), 6 discussed ARVs but did not elicit non-adherence disclosure (14 %), and 32 discussed ARVs which prompted disclosure (76 %). Questions were classified as: (1) clarification of medication (“Are you still taking the Combivir?”); (2) broad (“How’s it going with your meds?”); (3) positively-framed (“Are you taking your medications regularly?”); (4) negatively-framed (“Have you missed any doses?”). Clinicians asked 75 ARV-related questions: 23 clarification, 12 broad, 17 positively-framed, and 23 negatively-framed. Negatively-framed questions were 3.8 times more likely to elicit accurate disclosure than all other question types (p < 0.0001). Providers can improve disclosure probability by asking directly about missed doses.
Notes