Button-etal2012

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Button-etal2012
BibType ARTICLE
Key Button-etal2012
Author(s) Graham Button, David Martin, Jacki O’Neill, Tommaso Colombino
Title Lifting the mantle of protection from Weber’s presuppositions in his theory of bureaucracy
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Max Weber, Bureaucracy
Publisher
Year 2012
Language
City
Month
Journal Human Studies
Volume 35
Number 2
Pages 235–262
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/s10746-012-9229-x
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Early reactions to the publication of Harold Garfinkel’s Studies in Ethnomethodology, which have persisted over the passing decades, was that ethnomethodology could not address what sociology deemed to be socially significant matters such as ‘power’ and ‘the state’. This, however, is not the case. How such matters enter into the practical everyday affairs of members is of equal interest to ethnomethodology when compared to how any matter enters into members’ everyday life, and how they display that. It just does not have more importance. Egon Bittner spelt this out with regard to Weber’s interest in bureaucracy when he reminds sociology that when Weber talked about efficiency he was not referring to an objective standard but as something that is attuned to practical interests as they emerge in the context of everyday life. This paper examines some of the actions and interactions that were encountered in a Governmental Department in one of the European countries. It makes visible how characterisations of bureaucracy such as ‘rational’, and ‘efficient’ are achieved in the actions and interactions of Department employees, and some of the practices involved in that achievement. Garfinkel, and ethnomethodology in general, are not, in principle, to be found wanting where matters of overarching, primordial interest to sociology are concerned.

Notes