Steensig2016
| Steensig2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Steensig2016 |
| Author(s) | Jakob Steensig, Trine Heinemann |
| Title | Throwing the baby out with the bath water? Commentary on the criticism of the 'Epistemic Program' |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, conversation analysis, criticism, epistemics, methodology, re-analysis, sequential analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 18 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 597–609 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445616659173 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
It is timely and important that new developments in conversation analysis (CA) become the subject of principled debate. John Heritage's recent papers on the role of epistemics constitute one such development, and by re-analysing excerpts from this work, the articles in this Special Issue reveal some significant problems with a programmatic approach to epistemics. This commentary agrees with the critics that there are dangers in an overemphasis on epistemics and in using isolated utterances and proposing abstract scales and terms. But the commentary also warns against totally rejecting epistemics as a domain of inquiry in CA and points to places where the critics exaggerate their criticisms in a way that makes them unnecessarily hostile.
Notes
