Pourhaji-Alavi2015
Pourhaji-Alavi2015 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Pourhaji-Alavi2015 |
Author(s) | Mostafa Pourhaji, Seyed Mohammad Alavi |
Title | Identification and distribution of interactional contexts in EFL classes: the effect of two contextual factors |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Classroom, EFL |
Publisher | |
Year | 2015 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning |
Volume | 7 |
Number | 15 |
Pages | 93–123 |
URL | Link |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This study aims at empirically furthering awareness of the organization of interaction in EFL classes. Informed by the methodological framework of conversation analysis, it draws upon a corpus of 52 three-hour naturally-occurring classroom interaction to identify classroom interactional contexts based on the structuring of the pedagogic goals in turn-taking sequences. Conversation analytic procedures were then paired with quantitative procedures to explore the distribution of the identified contexts within the macro-context of classroom discourse and to investigate the effect of interaction-external factors, i.e., teachers’ training and learners’ levels of language proficiency, on the distribution of the identified contexts. Analyses of extracts from the transcribed data led to the emergence of four interactional contexts: form-oriented, meaning-oriented, skill-oriented, and management-oriented. As to their distribution, form-oriented and skill-oriented contexts were found to be constitutive of the bulk of interaction, with meaning-oriented context comprising the smallest proportion. A two-way multivariate analysis of variance revealed that the distribution of all identified contexts was significantly affected by learners’ levels of language proficiency. Teachers’ training had a significant main effect on just form-oriented and management-oriented contexts. The findings of this study draw teachers and teacher educators’ attention to the necessity of a change in the status quo of EFL classroom interaction.
Notes