Antaki2003
Antaki2003 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Antaki2003 |
Author(s) | Charles Antaki, Michael Billig, Derek Edwards, Jonathan Potter |
Title | Discourse analysis means doing analysis: a critique of six analytic shortcomings |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | Discursive Psychology |
Publisher | |
Year | 2003 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Discourse Analysis Online |
Volume | 1 |
Number | |
Pages | |
URL | Link |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
A number of ways of treating talk and textual data are identified which fall short of discourse analysis. They are: (1) under-analysis through summary; (2) under-analysis through taking sides; (3) under-analysis through over-quotation or through isolated quotation; (4) the circular identification of discourses and mental constructs; (5) false survey; and (6) analysis that consists in simply spotting features. We show, by applying each of these to an extract from a recorded interview, that none of them actually analyse the data. We hope that illustrating shortcomings in this way will encourage further development of rigorous discourse analysis in social psychology.
Notes