EMCA general bibliography

From emcawiki
Revision as of 19:00, 10 July 2014 by SaulAlbert (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

NB: This is a static version of the EMCA bibliography, downloaded from Paul ten Have's site on the 8th July 2014. A new EMCA bibliography database is currently under construction.


  • Aaltonen, Tarja, & Laakso, Minna. (2010). Halting aphasic interaction: Creation of intersubjectivity and spousal relationship in situ, Communication & Medicine, 7(2), 95-106
  • Aaltonen, Tarja, & Raudaskoski, Sanna. (2011). Storyworld evoked by hand-drawn maps, Social Semiotics, 21(2), 317-336
  • Abdallah, Sebastian. (2008). Online chatting in Beirut: Sites of occasioned identity-construction, Ethnographic Studies, 10, 3-22
  • Acklin Muji, Dunya, Bovet, Alain, Gonzalez, Philippe, & Terzi, Cédric. (2007). De la sociologie à l’analyse de discours, et retour en hommage à Jean Widmer, Réseaux, 144, 267-277
  • Adato, Albert. (1979). Unanticipated topic continuations, Human Studies, 2, 171-186
  • Adato, Albert. (1980). "Occasionality" as a constituent feature of the known-in-common character of topics, Human Studies, 3, 47-64.
  • Adkins, Barbara, & Nasarczyk, Jason. (2009). Asynchronicity and the "time envelope" of online annotation: The case of the photosharing website, Flickr, Australian Journal of Communication, 36(3), 115-140 [1]
  • Akers-Porrini, Ruth. (2000). Efficacité féminine, courtoisie masculine - la durée inégale des appels téléphoniques mixtes. In Louis Quéré & Zbigniew Smoreda (Eds.) Le sexe du téléphone. Paris: Editions Hermes Science [numéro 103 de la revue “Réseaux”], 145-82
  • Alac, Morana. (2004). Negotiating pictures of numbers, Journal of Social Epistemology, 18(2), 199-214
  • Alac, Morana. (2005). From trash to treasure: Learning about the brain images through multimodality, Semiotica, 156, 177-202
  • Alac, Morana. (2008). Working with brain scans: Digital images and gestural interaction in fMRI Laboratory, Social Studies of Science, 38, 483-508
  • Alac, Morana. (2009). Moving android: On social robots and body-in-interaction, Social Studies of Science, 39(4), 491-528
  • Alac, Morana. (2011). Handling digital brains: A laboratory study of multimodal semiotic interaction in the age of computers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Alac, Morana, & Hutchins, Edwin. (2004). I see what you are saying: Action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice, Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(3), 629-661
  • Alac, Morana, Movellan, Javier, & Tanaka, Fumihide. (2011). When a robot is social: Spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics, Social Studies of Science, 41(6), 893-926
  • Alby, Francesca, & Zucchermaglio, Cristina. (2006). “Afterwards we can understand what went wrong, but now let’s fix it”: How situated work practices shape group decision making, Organization Studies, 27, 943-966
  • Alby, Francesca, & Zucchermaglio, Cristina. (2007). Embodiment at the interface: Materialization practices in web design, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(2-3), 255-77
  • Alby, Francesca, & Zucchermaglio, Cristina. (2008). Collaboration in web design: Sharing knowledge, pursuing usability, Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 494-506
  • Alby, Francesca, & Zucchermaglio, Cristina. (2009). Time, narratives and participation frameworks in software troubleshooting, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 18(2-3), 129-146
  • Allen-Collinson, Jacquelyn. (2006). Running together: Some ethnomethodological considerations, Ethnographic Studies, 8, 17-29
  • Allen-Collinson, Jacqui, & Hockey, John. (2009). The essence of sporting embodiment: Phenomenological analyses of the sporting body, International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 4(4), 71-81
  • Allen-Collinson, Jacqui, & Hockey, John. (2011). Feeling the way: Notes toward a haptic phenomenology of distance running and scuba diving, International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(3), 330-345
  • Amerine, Ronald, & Bilmes, Jack. (1988). Following instructions, Human Studies, 11, 327-339
  • Amundrud, Thomas. (2011). On observing student silence, Qualitative Inquiry, 17(4), 334-342
  • Anderson, Bob, & Sharrock, Wes. (2014). The inescapability of trust: Complex interactive systems and normal appearances. In Richard H. R. Harper (Ed.) Trust, computing, and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 144-171
  • Anderson, D.C. (1978). Some organizational features in the local production of a plausible text, Philosophy of the social sciences, 8, 113-35
  • Anderson, D.C., & Sharrock, Wes W. (1979). Biasing the news: Technical issues in "Media Studies", Sociology, 13(3), 367-85.
  • Anderson, D.C., & Sharrock, Wes W. (1981). Irony as a methodological theory: A sketch of four sociological variations, Poetics Today, 4(4), 565-79.
  • Anderson, W. Timothy. (1989). Dentistry as an activity system: Sequential properties of the dentist-patient encounter. In David T. Helm, W. Timothy Anderson, Albert Jay Meehan, & Anne Warfield Rawls (Eds.) The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order. New York: Irvington: 81-97
  • Anderson, R.J., Hughes, John A., & Sharrock, Wes W. (1987). Executive problem finding: some material and initial observations, Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 142-59
  • Anderson, R.J., Hughes, John A., & Sharrock, Wes W. (1989). Working for profit: The social organization of calculation in an entrepreneurial firm. Aldershot: Avebury
  • Anderson, R.J., & Sharrock, Wes W. (1982). Sociological work: Some procedures sociologists use for organising phenomena, Social Analysis, 11, 79-93
  • Anderson, R.J., & Sharrock, Wes W. (1984). Analytic work: Aspects of the organization of conversational data, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 14(1), 103-24
  • Anderson, R., Sharrock, Wes. (1993). Can organization afford knowledge?, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 143-61
  • Anderson, R., Sharrock, Wes, & Watson, Rod. (1989). Utterances and operations in air traffic control, Langage et Travail, 1989, 221-34
  • Antaki, Charles. (1998). Identity ascriptions in their time and place: "Fagin" and "The Terminally Dim". In Charles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk. London, Sage: 71-86
  • Antaki, Charles. (1999). Assessing quality of life of persons with a learning disability: How setting lower standards may inflate well-being scores, Qualitative Health Research, 9, 437-454
  • Antaki, Charles. (2000). Two rhetorical uses of the description "Chat", M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture, 3(4), 2000 http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0008/uses.php.
  • Antaki, Charles. (2001). "D’you like a drink?" Dissembling language and the construction of an impoverished life, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 196-213
  • Antaki, Charles. (2002). "Lovely": Turn-initial high-grade assessments in telephone closings, Discourse Studies, 4, 5-23
  • Antaki, Charles. (2002). Personalised revision of "failed" questions. Discourse Studies, 4, 411-428
  • Antaki, Charles. (2004). Reading minds or dealing with interactional implications, Theory & Psychology, 14(5), 667-683
  • Antaki, Charles. (2004). The uses of absurdity. In H van de Berg, H. Houtkoop, & M. Wetherell (Eds.), Analysing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to interview discourse. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 85-102
  • Antaki, Charles. (2004). Conversation Analysis. In S. Becker & A. Bryman (Eds.), Understanding research methods for social policy and Practice. London: Polity Press, 313-317
  • Antaki, Charles. (2006). Producing a "cognition", Discourse Studies, 8, 9-15
  • Antaki, Charles. (2007). Mental-health practitioners' use of idiomatic expressions in summarising clients' accounts, Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 527-541
  • Antaki, Charles. (2008). Discourse analysis and conversation analysis. In Pertti Alasuutari, Leonard Bickman, & Julia Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research methods. London, etc.: Sage, 431-46
  • Antaki, Charles. (2008). Formulations in psychotherapy. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, & Ivan Leudar (Eds.), Conversation Analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 26-42
  • Antaki, Charles. (2008). Identities and discourse. In W. Donsbach (Ed.) The international encyclopaedia of communication. ICA/Basil Blackwell, 2165-2169
  • Antaki, Charles. (2011). Six kinds of Applied Conversation Analysis. In Charles Antaki (Ed.) Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-14
  • Antaki, Charles. (Ed.). (2011). Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Antaki, Charles. (2012). Applying Conversation Analysis to the multiple problems of hearing loss. In Maria Egbert & Arnulf Deppermann (Eds.), Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, 164-166
  • Antaki, Charles. (2012). What actions mean, to whom, and when, Discourse Studies, 14, 493-498 [comment on Hansung et al, 2012]
  • Antaki, Charles. (2012). Pragmatics, linguistic competence, and Conversation Analysis. In Michael Meeuwis & Jan-Ola Östman (Eds.), Pragmaticizing understanding: Studies for Jef Verschueren, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 101-112
  • Antaki, Charles. (2012). Affiliative and disaffiliative candidate understandings, Discourse Studies, 14, 531-547
  • Antaki, Charles. (2012). Seven interactional benefits of physical tasks for adults with intellectual disabilities, Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 311-321
  • Antaki, Charles. (2013). Conversation analysis and identity in interaction. In Carol A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 1000- 1004
  • Antaki, Charles. (2013). Recipient-side test questions, Discourse Studies, 15(1), 3-18
  • Antaki, Charles. (2013). Two conversational practices for encouraging adults with intellectual disabilities to reflect on their activities, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57, 580-588
  • Antaki, Charles. (2014). Repeating a question near-identically may cast the answerer as intellectually impaired. In Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, & Patrick Renaud (Eds.), Identités en interaction. Limoges: Lambert Lucas, 181-192
  • Antaki, Charles, Ardévol, Elisenda, Núñez, Francesc, & Vayreda, Agnès. (2005). "For she who knows who she is:" Managing accountability in online forum messages, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1) [2]
  • Antaki, Charles, Barnes, Rebecca, & Leudar, Ivan. (2005). Diagnostic formulations in psycho-therapy, Discourse Studies, 7, 627-647
  • Antaki, Charles, Barnes, Rebecca, & Leudar, Ivan. (2005). Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice, British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 181-199
  • Antaki, Charles, Barnes, Rebecca, & Leudar, Ivan. (2006). When psychotherapists disclose personal information about themselves to clients, Communication & Medicine, 3(1) 27-41
  • Antaki, Charles, Barnes, Rebecca, & Leudar, Ivan. (2007). Members' and analysts' interests: "Formulations" and "interpretations" in psychotherapy. In Alexa Hepburn & Sally Wiggins (Eds.), Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 166-181
  • Antaki, Charles, Biazzi, Michela, Nissen, Anatte, & Wagner, Johannes. (2008). Managing moral accountability in scholarly talk: The case of a Conversation Analysis data session, Text and Talk, 28, 1-30
  • Antaki, Charles, & Finlay, W.M.L. (2013). Trust in what others mean: Breakdowns in interaction between adults with intellectual disabilities and support staff. In Chris Candlin & Jonathan Crichton (Eds.), Discourses of trust. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 21-35
  • Antaki, Charles, Finlay, W.M.L, Sheridan, E., Jingree, T., & Walton, Chris. (2006). Producing decisions in a self-advocacy group for people with an intellectual disability: two contrasting facilitator styles, Mental Retardation, 44, 322-343
  • Antaki, Charles, Finlay, W.M.L, & Walton, Chris C. (2007). "The staff are your friends": conflicts between institutional discourse and practice, British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(1), 1-18.
  • Antaki, Charles, Finlay, W.M.L., & Walton, Chris. (2007). Conversational shaping: Staff-members' solicitation of talk from people with an intellectual impairment, Qualitative Heath Research, 17, 1403-414
  • Antaki, Charles, Finlay, W.M.L., & Walton, Chris. (2009). Choice for people with an intellectual impairment in official discourse and in practice, Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6(4), 260-266
  • Antaki, Charles, Finlay, W.M.L., Walton, Chris, & Pate, L. (2008). Offering choice to people with an intellectual impairment: An interactional study, Journal of Intellectual Disability research, 52, 1165-1175.
  • Antaki, Charles, & Horowitz, Ava. (2000). Using identity ascription to disqualify a rival version of events as "interested", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 155-177
  • Antaki, Charles, Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke, & Rapley, Mark. (2000). "Brilliant. next question…": High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 235-262
  • Antaki, Charles, & Jahoda, Andrew. (2010). Psychotherapists' practices in keeping a session "on-track" in the face of clients' "off-track" talk, Communication & Medicine, 7(1), 11-21
  • Antaki, Charles, & Kent, Alexandra. (2012). Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments, Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6-7), 876-889
  • Antaki, Charles, & Leudar, Ivan. (2001). Recruiting the record: Using opponents' exact words in Parliamentary argumentation, Text, 21, 467-88
  • Antaki, Charles, Leudar, Ivan, & Barnes, Rebecca. (2004). Trouble in agreeing on a client’s problem in a cognitive-behavioural therapy session, Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 4, 127-138
  • Antaki, Charles, & O'Reilly, Michelle. (2014). Either/or questions in psychiatric assessments: The effect of the seriousness and order of alternatives, Discourse Studies, 16(3), 327-345
  • Antaki, Charles, Walton, Chris, & Finlay, W.M.L. (2007). How proposing an activity to a person with an intellectual disability can imply a limited identity, Discourse & Society 18(4), 393-410
  • Antaki, Charles, & Wetherell, Margaret. (1999). Show concessions, Discourse Studies, 1, 1-32
  • Antaki, Charles, & Widdicombe, Sue. (Eds.) (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage
  • Antaki, Charles, & Widdicombe, Sue. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In Charles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk. London, Sage: 1-14
  • Antaki, Charles, & Wilkinson, Ray. (2012). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, 533-50
  • Antaki, Charles, Young, N., & Finlay, M. (2002). Shaping clients' answers: Departures from neutrality in care staff interviews with people with a learning disability, Disability and Society, 17, 435-455.
  • Anward, Jan. (2003). Own words: On achieving normality through paraphasias. In Charles Goodwin (Ed.) Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press, 189- 210
  • Aoki, Hiromi. (2011). ‘Some functions of speaker head nods’ . In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, C. LeBaron, eds., Embodied interaction: Language and the body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 93-105
  • Archakis, Argiris, Giakoumelou, Maria, Papazachariou, Dimitris, & Tsakona, Villy. (2010). ‘The Prosodic Framing of Humour in Conversational Narratives: Evidence from Greek Data’, Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10/2: 187-212
  • Ariss, Steven. (2009). Asymmetrical knowledge claims in general practice consultations with frequently attending patients: Limitations and opportunities for patient participation’, Social Science and Medicine, 69: 908-919.
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (1996). ‘On the moral and interactional relevancy of self-repairs for life stories of members of Alcoholics Anonymous’, Text 16/4: 449-80
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (1996). ‘The construction of topic in the turns of talk at the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous’. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 16: 5/6, 88-130.
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (1998). ‘Organization of participation in the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous’, Issues in Applied Linguistics 9/2, 59-98.
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (1998). Therapeutic interaction: a study of mutual help in the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous. Helsinki: The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (1998). ‘Sharing experiences: Doing therapy with the help of mutual references in the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous’, The Sociological Quarterly 39/3: 491- 515
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (1999). ‘Conversation analysis: a quest for order in social interaction and language use’. Acta Sociologica 42/3: 251-7
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (2000). ‘On the context sensitivity of institutional interaction’, Discourse & Society 11/4: 435-58
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (2001). ‘Workplace studies: the practical sociology of technology in action’, Acta Sociologica 44/2: 183-9
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (2001) ‘Closing of turns in the meetings of alcoholics anonymous: members’ methods for closing “sharing experiences”’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34/2: 211-51
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (2002). ‘Design-oriented sociology’. Acta Sociologica 45:4. 315-321.
  • Arminen, Ilkka (2002). ‘’Emergentes, divergentes? Les cultures mobiles’, Réseaux 20, 112-3: 79-106
  • Arminen, Ilkka (2004). ‘Second stories: the salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous’, Journal of Pragmatics 36: 319 -47
  • Arminen, Ilkka (2004). ’On the weakness of institutional rules: The case of addiction group therapy’, Discourse & Society 15 (6): 683-704.
  • Arminen, Ilkka (2005). Institutional interaction: studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate [Series: Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Series editors D.Francis and S.Hester]
  • Arminen, Ilkka (2005). ‘Sequential order and sequence structure: the case of incommensurable studies on mobile phone calls’, Discourse Studies 7/6: 649-62
  • Arminen, Ilkka (2006). ‘Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis’. In The handbook of the 21st century sociology, C. Bryant, D. Peck, eds. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage: 8-16, 437-438, 444-445
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (2006). ‘Social functions of location in mobile telephony’, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10: 5, 319-323.
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (2007). ‘Mobile communication society?’, Acta Sociologica 50:4. 431-437
  • Arminen Ilkka. (2008). ‘Mobile time-space: Arena for new kinds of social actions’, Mobile Communication Research Annual. 1: 89-108
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (2008). ‘Scientific and ‘radical’ ethnomethodology: From incompatible paradigms to ethnomethodological sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38/2: 167-191
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (2009). ‘On comparative methodology in studies of social interaction. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 48-69
  • Arminen, Ilkka. (2013). ‘Ethnomethodology in the analysis of discourse and interaction’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 2051-2056
  • Arminen, Ilkka; Petra Auvinen (2013.) ‘Environmentally coupled repairs and remedies in the airline cockpit: Repair practices of talk and action in interaction’, Discourse Studies 15/1: 19- 41
  • Arminen, Ilkka, Petra Auvinen, Hannele Palukka Koskela (2010). ‘Repairs as the last orderly provided defense of safety in aviation’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/2: 443-465
  • Arminen, Ilkka; Mia Halonen (2007). ‘Laughing with and at patients-the roles of laughter in confrontations in addiction therapy’, The Qualitative Report. 12: 3, 483-512
  • Arminen, Ilkka; Inka Koskela, Hannele Palukka (2014). ‘Multimodal production of second pair parts in air traffic control training’ Journal of Pragmatics 65: 46-62
  • Arminen, Ilkka, Minna Leinonen (2006). ‘Mobile phone call openings: tailoring answers to personalized summonses’, Discourse Studies 8/3: 339-68
  • Arminen, Ilkka, Anna Leppo (2001). ’The dilemma of two cultures in the 12-step treatment: the professional responses for clients who act against their best interests’. In: C. Kullberg, I. Rostila, M. Seltzer, eds. Listening to the welfare state - Social work practices in Nordic countries. Aldershot: Ashgate. 183-212.
  • Arminen, Ilkka, Piia Poikus (2009). ‘Diagnostic Reasoning in the Use of Travel Management System’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 18/2-3: 251-276
  • Arminen, Ilkka, Perälä, Riikka. (2002). ‘Multiprofessional team work in 12-step treatment’. Nordiska Alkohol Tidskrift 19: [English supplement] pp.18-32
  • Arminen, Ilkka, Alexandra Weilenmann. (2009). ’Mobile presence and intimacy—Reshaping social actions in mobile contextual configuration’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 1905-1923
  • Armour, Lou (2000). ‘The socio-logic of colour’. In S. Hester, D. Francis, eds. Local Educational Order: Ethnomethodological Studies of Knowledge in Action. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins:163-95
  • Armstrong, Edward G. (1979). ‘Phenomenologophobia’, Human Studies 2/1: 63-75
  • Arnold, Lynnette (2012). ‘Dialogic embodied action: using gesture to organize sequence and participation in instructional interaction’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45/3: 269-296
  • Asmuß, Birte. (2007). ‘What do people expect from public services? Requests in public service encounters’, Journal of Language and Communication Studies 38: 65-83
  • Asmuß, Birte. (2011). ‘Proposing shared knowledge as a means of pursuing agreement’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Asmuß, Birte. (2013). ‘Conversation analysis and meetings’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1048-1050
  • Asmuß, Birte; Sae Oshima (2012). ‘Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences’, Discourse Studies 14/1: 67-86
  • Asmuß, Birte Jan Svennevig (2009). ‘Meeting talk: An introduction’, Journal of Business Communication 46/1: 3-22.
  • Ashmore, Malcom., Darren Reed (2000). ‘Innocence and nostalgia in conversation analysis: the dynamic relations of Tape and Transcript.’ Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1 (3). Available at: http://qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-00/3-00ashmorereed-e.htm
  • Ashmore, Malcolm, Katie MacMillan, Steven D. Brown (2004). ‘It’s a scream: professional hearing and tape fetishism’, Journal of Pragmatics 36:349 -74
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1978). Discovering suicide: studies in the social organization of sudden death. London: Macmillan/Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1979). ‘Postscript: Notes on practical implications and possibilities’. In: J. Maxwell Atkinson & Paul Drew, Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan: 217-32
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1979). ‘Sequencing and shared attentiveness to court proceedings’. In: George Psathas, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 257-86
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1981). ‘Ethnomethodological approaches to socio-legal studies’ . In A. Podgorecki, W. C. J. Whelan, eds., Sociological approaches to law . London : Croom Helm: 201-223
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1982). ‘Understanding formality: The categorization and production of “formal” interaction’, British Journal of Sociology 33: 86-117
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1983). ‘Two devices for generating audience approval: a comparative study of public discourse and texts’. In: K. Ehlich & H. van Riemsdijk, eds. Connectedness in sentence, discourse and text. Tilburg: Katholieke Hogeschool Tilburg: 199-236
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1984.) Our masters’ voices: the language and body language of politics. London: Methuen
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1984). ‘Public speaking and audience responses: some techniques for inviting audience applause’. In: J. Maxwell Atkinson, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 370-407
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1985). ‘Refusing invited applause: preliminary observations from a case study of charismatic oratory’. In: T.A. van Dijk, ed. Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press Vol. III: 161-81
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1992). ‘Displaying neutrality: formal aspects of informal court proceedings’. In: Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 199-211
  • Atkinson, Mick A. (1980). ‘Some practical uses of “a natural lifetime”’, Human Studies 3/1: 33-46
  • Atkinson, M.A., E.C. Cuff, J.R.E. Lee (1978). ‘The recommencement of a meeting as a member’s accomplishment’. In: J.N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 133-53
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell, Paul Drew, (1979). Order in court: the organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan
  • Atkinson, Paul, Christian Heath, eds. (1981). Medical work: realities and routines. Farnborough: Gower
  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. (1984). Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Auburn, Tim; Christianne Pollock (2013). ‘Laughter and competence: Children with severe autism using laughter to joke and tease’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 135-60
  • Auer, Peter (1990). ‘Rhythm in telephone closings’, Human Studies 13: 361-92
  • Auer, Peter. (1992). ‘A “clash of ideas” or an exercise in scholastic ‘misunderstanding’?: A response to Button’s response’, Human Studies 15: 291-7
  • Austin, Helena. (1996). ‘Reading positions and the student-of-literature in a year six classroom’, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 19: 144-153
  • Austin, Helena. (1997). ‘Literature for school: theorising ‘the child’ in talk and text’, Language and Education 11: 77-95
  • Austin, Helena. (1997). ‘The “child” as enacted in a primary school literature classroom’. In T. Gale, A. Erben and P.A.Danaher, eds., Diversity, Difference and Discontinuity: (Re)mapping teacher education for the next decade. Refereed Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA), Yeppoon, Queensland Australia, 5-8 July, http://www.ed.cqu.edu.au/ATEA
  • Austin, Helena, Bronwyn Dwyer, Peter Freebody (2003). Schooling the child: the making of students in classrooms. London: Routledge Falmer
  • Austin, Helena, & Fitzgerald, Richard (2007). Resisting categorisation: An ordinary mother. In Johanna Rendle-Short & Maurice Nevile (Eds.) Language as action: Australian studies in conversation analysis. Special thematic issue, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3) [3]
  • Austin, Helena, Freebody, Peter, & Dwyer, Bronwyn. (2001). Methodological issues in analysing talk and text: The case of childhood in and for school. In A. McHoul & M. Rapley (Eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods. London: Continuum, 183-195
  • Ayaß, Ruth & Gerhardt, Cornelia. (2012). The appropriation of media in everyday life. Amsterdam: Benjamins
  • Backhaus, Peter. (2010). ‘Time to get up: Compliance-gaining in a Japanese eldercare facility’, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 20:1. 69-89.
  • Baker, Carolyn D. (1984). ‘The “search for adultness”: Membership work in adolescent-adult talk’, Human Studies 7/3-4: 301-23
  • Baker, Carolyn B. (1989). ‘Knowing things and saying things: How a natural world is discoursively fabricated on a documentary film set’, Journal of Pragmatics 13: 381-93
  • Baker, Carolyn. (1991). ‘Literary practices and social relations in classroom reading events’. In: Carolyn D. Baker, A. Luke, eds. Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins: 161-88
  • Baker, Carolyn D. (1992). ‘Description and analysis in classroom talk and interaction’, Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27 (2) 9-14.
  • Baker, Carolyn, (1997). ‘Membership categorization and interview accounts’. In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage: 130-43
  • Baker, Carolyn D. (1997). ‘Ticketing rules: categorization and moral ordening in a school staff meeting’. In: Stephen Hester, Peter Eglin, eds., Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 77-98
  • Baker, Carolyn D. (1997). ‘Ethnomethodological studies of talk in educational settings’. In: B. Davies, D. Corson, eds.,Oral Discourse and Education. Volume 3, Encylopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic: 43-52
  • Baker, Carolyn D. (2000)., ‘Locating culture in action: membership categorisation in texts and talk’. In: A. Lee, C. Poynton, eds. Culture and text: discourse and methodology in social research and cultural studies. St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin: 99-113
  • Baker, Carolyn D. (2002). ‘Ethnomethodological analyses of interviews. In: ‘J. Gubrium, J Holstein, eds., Handbook of Interviewing: Context and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 777–795
  • Baker, Carolyn D, (2004). ‘Membership categorization and interview accounts’. In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, 2nd edn. London: Sage:162-176
  • Baker, Carolyn D., Bronwyn Davies (1989). ‘A lesson on sex roles’, Gender and Education 1: 59-76
  • Baker, Carolyn, Mike Emmison, Alan Firth (2001). ‘Discovering order in opening sequences: calls to a software helpline’. In: Alec McHoul and Mark Rapley, eds. How to analyse talk in institutional settings: a casebook of methods. London: Continuum: 41-56
  • Baker, Carolyn. Michael Emmison and Alan Firth, eds. (2005). Calling for help: Language and social interaction in telephone helplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 143]
  • Baker, Carolyn, Michael Emmison, Alan Firth (2005). ‘Calibrating for competence in calls to technical support’. In: Carolyn Baker, Michael Emmison, Alan Firth eds. Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 39-62.
  • Baker, Carolyn D., Peter Freebody (1989). ‘Talk around text: constructions of texual and teacher authority in classroom discourse’. In: Suzanne de Castell, Allan Luke, Carmen Luke, eds. Language, authority and criticism: Readings on the school textbook. London, etc. Falmer Press: 263-83
  • Baker, Carolyn Jayne Keogh (1995). ‘Accounting for achievement in parent-teacher interviews’, Human Studies 18: 263-300
  • Baker, Carolyn, Jayne Keogh (1997). ‘Mapping moral orders in parent-teacher interviews’. In: A. Marcarino, ed., Analisi della conversatione e prospettive di recerca in etnometodologia. Urbino: Editioni QuattroVenti: 25-42
  • Ball, Mike ed. (2003). Image Work, a Special Issue of Visual Studies 18/1: 3-82
  • Ball, Mike. (2006). ‘Remarks on certain essential problems involved in the analysis of visual data: a case study’, Ethnographic Studies 8: 1-16
  • Ball, Mike. (2011). ‘Images, language and numbers in company reports: a study of documents that are occasioned by a legal requirement for financial disclosure’, Qualitative Research 11: 115-139
  • Bange, Pierre. (1992). Analyse conversationnelle et théorie de l’action.[Conversation analysis and the theory of action] Paris: Hatier/Didier
  • Barnard, Rachel. A.; Madeline Cruice, Elisabeth D. Playford (2010). ‘Strategies used in the pursuit of achievability during goal setting in rehabilitation’, Qualitative Health Research, 20/2: 239-250
  • Barnes, Rebecca (2007). ‘Formulations and the facilitation of common agreement in meetings talk’, Text & Talk 27/3:273-96
  • Barnes, Rebecca, Duncan Moss (2007). ‘Communicating a feeling: the social organization of “private thoughts”’ Discourse Studies 9:123-48
  • Barnes, Scott E. (2011). ‘Claiming mutual stance: on the use of that’s right by a person with aphasia’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44: 359-384
  • Barnes, Scott. (2012). ‘On that’s right and its combination with other tokens’, Journal of Pragmatics 44/3: 243-260
  • Barnes, Scott. (2014). ‘Managing Intersubjectivity in Aphasia’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 47/2: 130–150
  • Barraja-Rohan, Anne-Marie. (1994). ‘A very delayed acceptance to an invitation in a French conversation’. In R. Gardner, ed. Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, series S, 11:153-172.
  • Barraja-Rohan, Anne-Marie. (2003). ’Past troubles-talk in nonnative-native interviews’, Journal of Pragmatics, 35/4: 615-629.
  • Barraja-Rohan, Anne-Marie. (2011). ‘Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence’, Language Teaching Research 15/4: 479-507
  • Barraja-Rohan, Anne-Marie, C. Ruth Pritchard. (1997). Beyond Talk: A course in communication and conversation for intermediate adult learners of English. Melbourne: Western Melbourne Institute of TAFE. [4]
  • Barske, Tobias. (2009). ‘Same token, different actions: a conversation analytic study of social roles, embodied actions, and ok in German business meetings’, Journal of Business Communication 46/1: , 120-149.
  • Barske, Tobias, Andrea Golato (2010). ‘German so: managing sequence and action’, Text &Talk 30/3:245-66
  • Bartesaghi, Mariaelena, Sheryl Perlmutter Bowen (2009). ‘The acquisition of memory by interview questioning: Holocaust re-membering as category-bound activity’ Discourse Studies 11: 223-243.
  • Barthélémy, Michel. (1999). ‘La lecture-en-action: entre la présupposé d’un monde objectif et son accomplissement situé’ [Reading-in-action: between the presupposition of an objective world and its situated accomplishment], langage & société nE 89: 95-121
  • Barthélémy, Michel. (2006). ‘Enquiries into newcasts: the discursive organisation of televised criticism and debate’, Ethnographic Studies 8: 44-60
  • Barthélémy, Michel. (2008). ‘Reception-in-action in a panel interview: the interactional production claims in the media’, Ethnographic Studies, No 10: 89-105
  • Barthélémy, Michel, Bruno Bonu, Lorenza Mondada, Marc Relieu (1999). ‘Enquêtes en ethnométhodologie et en analyse conversationnelle: du texte à la vidéo.’ [Ethnomethodological and conversation analytic investigations: from text to video], langage & société nE 89: 5-8
  • Bateman, Amanda (2012). ‘Forging friendships: The use of collective pro-terms by pre-school children´, Discourse Studies 14: 165-180
  • Beach, Wayne A. (1982). ‘Everyday interaction and its practical accomplishment: Progressive developments in ethnomethodological research’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 68: 314-327
  • Beach, Wayne A. (1985). ‘Temporal density in courtroom interaction: Constraints of the recovery of past events in legal discourse’, Communication Monographs 52: 1-18
  • Beach, Wayne A., ed. (1989). ‘Sequential organization of conversational activities’. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53/2
  • Beach, Wayne A. (1990). ‘On (not) observing behavior interactionally’, Western Journal of Speech Communication 54: 603-612
  • Beach, Wayne A. (1990). ‘Orienting to the phenomenon’. In: J.A. Anderson, ed. Communication Yearbook 13. Newbury Park: Sage: 216-44
  • Beach, Wayne A. (1990). ‘Language as and in technology: facilitating topic organization in a Videotex focus group meeting’. In: M.J. Medhurst, A. Gonzalez, T.R. Peterson, eds. Communication and the culture of technology. Pullman: Washington State University Press
  • Beach, Wayne A. (1991). ‘Avoiding ownership for alleged wrongdoings’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 1-36
  • Beach, Wayne A. (1991). ‘Searching for universal features of conversation’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 351-68
  • Beach, Wayne A. (1993). ‘Transitional regularities for `casual’ “Okay” usages’, Journal of Pragmatics 19: 325-52
  • Beach, Wayne A. (1995). ‘Preserving and constraining options: “Okays” and “official” priorities in medical interviews’. In: G. Morris, R. Cheneil, eds. Talk of the clinic. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum: 259-89
  • Beach, Wayne A. (1996). Conversations about illness: family preoccupations with bulimia. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Beach, Wayne A. (2000). ‘Inviting collaborations in stories about a woman’, Language in Society 29: 379-407
  • Beach, Wayne A. (2001). ‘Stability and ambiguity: managing uncertain moments when updating news about Mom’s cancer’ Text 21: 221-50
  • Beach, Wayne A. (2001). ‘Introduction: Diagnosing ‘Lay Diagnosis’ Text 21: 13-8
  • Beach, Wayne A. (Ed.) (2001). ‘Lay diagnosis’. Special Issue in honour of The late Robert Hopper. Text 21 (1/2)
  • Beach, Wayne A. (2003). ‘Managing optimism’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 175-94
  • Beach, Wayne A. (2005). ‘Disclosing and responding to cancer “fears” during oncology interviews’, Social Science & Medicine, 60, 893-910
  • Beach, Wayne A. (2008). ‘Conversation analysis’ . In W. Donsbach, ed., The international encyclopedia of communication, Vol. 3. Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell: 989-995
  • Beach, Wayne A. (2009). A natural history of family cancer: interactional resources for managing illness. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Beach, Wayne A. (2012). ‘Conversation analysis and communication’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 674-87
  • Beach, Wayne A. (2012). ‘Patients’ efforts to justify wellness in a comprehensive cancer clinic’, Health Communication 28: 1-15.
  • Beach, Wayne A. (Ed.) (2012). Handbook of Patient-Provider Interactions: Raising and Responding to Concerns About Life, Illness, & Disease. New York: Hampton Press
  • Beach, Wayne A. (2012). ‘Introduction: Raising and responding to concerns about life, illness, and disease’. In W.A. Beach, ed., Handbook of patient-provider interactions: Raising and responding to concerns about life, illness, and disease. New York: Hampton Press:1-20
  • Beach, Wayne A., J. K. Anderson, (2003). ‘Communication and Cancer? Part I: The noticeable absence of interactional research. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 21/3: 1-23.
  • Beach, Wayne A., J. K. Anderson, (2003). ‘Communication and Cancer? Part II: Conversation Analysis’. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 21/4: 1-22.
  • Beach, Wayne A., Christie N. Dixson (2001). ‘Revealing moments: Formulating understandings of adverse experiences in a health appraisal interview’, Social Science & Medicine 52: 25-44
  • Beach, Wayne A., & Dunning, D. G. (1982). ‘Pre-indexing and conversational organization’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68/2: 170-185
  • Beach, Wayne A.; D.W. Easter,, J.S. Good, E. Pigeron (2005). ‘Disclosing and responding to cancer fears during oncology interviews’, Social Science & Medicine, 60/4: 893-910
  • Beach, Wayne A.; Phillip Glenn (2011). ‘Bids and responses to intimacy as “gendered” enactments’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 210-228
  • Beach, Wayne A., P. Japp (1983). ‘Storifying as timetravelling: the knowledgeable use of temporally structured discourse’. In: R. Bostrum, ed. Communication Yearbook 7. Beverly Hills: Sage: 867-88
  • Beach, Wayne A, Curtis D. LeBaron (2002). ‘Body disclosures: Attending to personal problems and reported sexual abuse during a medical encounter’, Journal of Communication 52/3: 617-39
  • Beach, Wayne A., Alane S. Lockwood. (2003). ‘Making the case for airline compassion fares: the serial organization of problem narratives during a family crisis’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 36: 351-94
  • Beach, Wayne A.; Jenny Mandelbaum, J. (2005). ‘“My mom had a stroke”/: Understanding how patients raise and providers respond to psychosocial concerns’. In L.H. Harter, P.M. Japp, C.M. Beck, eds., Constructing our health: The implications of narrative for enacting illness and wellness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 343-364
  • Beach, Wayne A., Terri R. Metzger. (1997). ‘Claiming insufficient knowledge’, Human Communication Research, 23/4: 562-588.
  • Beck Nielsen, Søren. (2009). ‘Accounts on the behalf of patients during geriatric case conferences’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/3: 231-248
  • Beck Nielsen, Søren. (2012). ‘Patient initiated presentations of additional concerns’, Discourse Studies 14: 549-565
  • Beckman, H. B.; R. M. Frankel (1984). The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Annals of Internal Medicine, 101: 692-696
  • Beeke, Suzanne. (2003). ‘“I suppose” as a resource for the construction of turns at talk in agrammatic aphasia’, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 17/4-5: 291–298
  • Beeke, Suzanne, Jane Maxim, Ray Wilkinson. (2005). ‘Temporal events and reference in aphasia: A comparison of talking and test performance’. Brain and Language 95, 113-114.
  • Beeke, Suzanne, Jane E. Maxim, Ray Wilkinson (2007). ‘Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia’,. Seminars in Speech and Language 28/2: 136-147.
  • Beeke, Suzanne. Jane Maxim, Ray Wilkinson (2008). ‘Rethinking agrammatism: factors affecting the form of language elicited via clinical test procedures’. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 22(4&5), 317-323
  • Beeke, Suzanne , Ray Wilkinson, Jane Maxim. (2001). ‘A case study of a non-fluent aphasic speaker: grammatical aspects of conversation and language testing data’. Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie 10(4), 215-232
  • Beeke, Suzanne , Ray Wilkinson, Jane Maxim. (2001). ‘Context as a resource for the construction of turns at talk in aphasia’. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 15(1), 79-83.
  • Beeke, Suzanne , Ray Wilkinson, Jane Maxim (2002). ‘Interaction and grammar in aphasia: a comparison of conversation and language testing in a non-fluent speaker’. Brain and Language 83(1), 190-192
  • Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson, Jane Maxim (2003). ‘Exploring aphasic grammar 1: a single case analysis of conversation’, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 17: 81-107
  • Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson, Jane Maxim (2003). ‘Exploring aphasic grammar 2: do language testing and conversation tell a similar story?’, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 17: 109-34
  • Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson, Jane Maxim (2007). ‘Grammar without sentence structure: A conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism’,. Aphasiology 21(3/4), 256-282.
  • Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson, Jane Maxim (2007). ‘Individual variation in agrammatism: a single case study of the influence of interaction’. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 42(6), 629-647
  • Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson, Jane Maxim (2009). ‘Prosody as a compensatory strategy in the conversations of people with agrammatism’, Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 23(2), 133-155
  • Bekaert, Stefan (1992). ‘Een interpretatieve kritiek op het etnomethodologisch behaviourisme’ [An interpretative critique of ethnomethodological behaviourism], Tijdschrift voor Sociologie 13: 221-60
  • Bekaert, Stefan (1996). ‘Olifant-transformatie in Zaïre: Een Sakata genezingsritueel etnomethodologisch bekeken’ [Elephant-transformation in Zaire: A Sakata healing ritual, ethnomethodologically considered], Medische Antropologie 8: 278-305
  • Bellman, Beryl L. (1981). ‘The paradox of secrecy’, Human Studies 4/1: 1-24
  • Benjamin, Trevor (2012). ‘When problems pass us by: Using “you mean” to help locate the source of trouble’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 45/1: 82-109
  • Benjamin, Trevor; Harrie Mazeland (2013). ‘Conversation analysis and other-initiated repair’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1068-1075
  • Benjamin, Trevor; Traci Walker (2013). ‘Managing problems of acceptability with high rise fall repetitions’, Discourse Processes, 50/2: 107-38
  • Benson, Doug, Paul Drew (1978). ‘”Was there firing in Sant Row that night?” Some features of the organisation of disputes about recorded facts’, Sociological Inquiry 48: 89-100
  • Benson, Doug, John A. Hughes (1983). The perspective of ethnomethodology. London: Longmans
  • Benson, Doug, John Hughes (1991). ‘Method: evidence and inference-evidence and inference for ethnomethodology’. In: Button, Graham, ed., Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 109-36
  • Benwell, Bethan M., Elizabeth H. Stokoe (2002). ‘The construction of discussion tasks in university tutorials’, Discourse Studies 4/4: 429-53
  • Benwell, Bethan, Elizabeth H. Stokoe (2004). ‘University students resisting academic identity’. In P. Seedhouse & K. Richards, eds., Applying conversation analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave: 124-39
  • Berard, Tim (1998). ‘Attributions and avowals of motive in the study of deviance: resource or topic?’ Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28: 193-213
  • Berard, Tim J. (2002). ‘Moving forward by looking back: Revisiting Melvin Pollner’s “Constitutive and Mundane Versions of Labeling Theory”’, Human Studies 25: 495-98
  • Berard, Tim J. (2002). ‘”Japanese American” identity and the problem of multiple description: disjunctive versions of the Japanese exclusion order’, In Stephen Hester and William Housley, ed., Language, Interaction and National Identity: Studies in the social organisation of national identity and talk-in-interaction. Aldershot: Ashgate:.144-168
  • Berard, Tim J. (2003). ‘Ethnomethodology as radical sociology: An expansive appreciation of Melvin Pollner’s “Constitutive and Mundane Versions of Labeling Theory”’, Human Studies 26/4: 431-48
  • Berard, Tim J. (2005). ‘On multiple identities and educational contexts: remarks on the study of inequalities and discrimination’, Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 4/1: 67-76
  • Berard, Tim J. (2005). ‘Rethinking practices and structures’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35: 196-230.
  • Berard, Tim J. (2005). ‘Evaluative categories of action and identity in non evaluative human studies research: examples from ethnomethodology’, Qualitative Sociology Review 1 (http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org /ENG/archive_eng.php)
  • Berard, Tim J. (2005). ‘Extending hate crime legislation to include gender: explicating an analogical method of advocacy’, Qualitative Sociology Review 1 / 2: 43-64 (http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/archive_eng.php)
  • Berard, Tim J. (2006). ‘From concepts to methods: on the observability of inequality.’ Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35/3: 236-256
  • Berard, Tim J. (2008). ‘The neglected social psychology of institutional racism’, Sociology Compass 2/2: 734-764
  • Berard, Tim J. (2010). ‘Unpacking “Institutional Racism”: Insights from Wittgenstein, Garfinkel, Schutz, Goffman, and Sacks,’ Schutzian Research 2: 109-133
  • Bercelli, Fabrizio, Federico Rossano, Maurizio Viaro (2008). ‘Clients’ responses to therapists’ re-interpretations’. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 43-61
  • Bercelli, Fabrizio, Federico Rossano, Maurizio Viaro (2008). ‘Different place, different action: Clients’ personal narratives in psychotherapy’, Text & Talk 28/ 3: 283-305
  • Bercelli, Fabrizio; Federico Rossano, Maurizio Viaro (2013). ‘Supra-session courses of action in psychotherapy’, Journal of Pragmatics 57 118-137
  • Bergen, Clara; Tanya Stivers (2013). ‘Patient disclosure of medical misdeeds’, Journal of Health and Social Behavior 54/2: 221-240
  • Berger, Israel; John Rae (2012). ‘Some uses of gestural responsive actions’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1821-1835
  • Bergmann, Jörg R. (1981). ‘Ethnomethodologische Konversationsanalyse’. In: P. Schröder, hrsg. Sprache der Gegenwart. Mannheim: 9-51
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (1985). ‘Flüchtigkeit und methodische Fixierung sozialer Wirklichkeit’ [Fleetingness and methodological fixation of social reality]. In: W. Bonss, H. Hartmann, eds., Entzauberte Wissenschaft [Disenchanted science] . Göttingen: Otto Schwarz
  • Bergmann, Jörg R. (1987). Klatsch: zur Sozialform der diskreten Indiskretion. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter
  • Bergmann, Jörg R. (1990). ‘On the local sensitivity of conversation’. In: I. Markovà, K. Foppa, eds. The Dynamics of Dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf: 201-26
  • Bergmann, Jörg R. (1992). ‘Veiled morality: notes on discretion in psychiatry’. In: Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 137-62
  • Bergmann, Jörg R. (1992). ‘Alarmiertes Verstehen: Kommunikation in Feuerwehrnotrufen’. In T. Jung, S. Müller-Doohm, eds., “Wirklichkeit” im Deutungsprocess. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp: 283-328
  • Bergmann, Jörg R. (1993). Discreet indiscretions. The social organization of gossip. New York, Aldine de Gruyter
  • Bergmann, Jörg.R. (1998). ‘Introduction: Morality in Discourse’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 31
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2000). “Traumkonversation”, in: Brigitte Boothe, Hrsg., Der Traum - 100 Jahre nach Freuds Traumdeutung, Zürich: vdf, 41-57.
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2000). “Die Macht des Wortes”, in: Peter Buchheim, Manfred Cierpka, Hrsg., Macht und Abhängigkeit (Lindauer Texte zur psychotherapeutischen Fort- und Weiterbildung), Berlin: Springer, 120-131.
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2000). “Reinszenierungen in der Alltagsinteraktion”, in: Ulrich Streeck, Hrsg., Erinnern, Agieren und Inszenieren: Enactments und szenische Darstellungen im therapeutischen Prozess, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 203-221.
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2000). “Harold Garfinkel und Harvey Sacks”, in: Uwe Flick, Ernst v.Kardorff, Ines Steinke, Hrsg., Qualitative Sozialforschung. Ein Handbuch, Reinbek: Rowohlt, 51-62.
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2000). “Ethnomethodologie”, in: Uwe Flick, Ernst v. Kardorff, Ines Steinke, Hrsg., Qualitative Sozialforschung. Ein Handbuch, Reinbek: Rowohlt, 118-135.
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2000). “Konversationsanalyse”, in: Uwe Flick, Ernst v.Kardorff, Ines Steinke, Hrsg., Qualitative Sozialforschung. Ein Handbuch, Reinbek: Rowohlt, 524-537.
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2005). “Studies of Work”, in: Felix Rauner, Hrsg., Handbuch Berufsbildungsforschung. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag, 639-646.
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2001). “Das Konzept der Konversationsanalyse”, in: Klaus Brinker, Gerd Antos, Wolfgang Heinemann, Sven S. Sager, Hrsg., Text- und Gesprächslinguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, 2. Halbband, Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 919-927
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2001). “Kommunikative Verfahren der Konstruktion des Fremden”,in: Cornelia Bohn, Herbert Willems, Hrsg., Sinngeneratoren: Fremd- und Selbstthematisierung in soziologisch-historischer Perspektive. Festschrift Alois Hahn, Konstanz: UKV Verlagsgesellschaft, 35-56.
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2005). “Beratung und Therapie per Internet und Handy”, in: Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaft: Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung. (Psychosozial-Verlag), 7. Jahrgang, Heft 2/20
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2006). “Studies of Work”, in: Ruth Ayaß, Jörg Bergmann, Hrsg., Qualitative Methoden der Medienforschung. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 391-405
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2007). ‘Flüchtigkeit und methodische Fixierung sozialer Wirklichkeit- Aufzeichnungen als Daten der interpretativen Soziologie’. in: Heiko Hausendorf, Hrsg., Gespräch als Prozess. Studien zur deutschen Sprache. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag: 22-68
  • Bergmann, Jörg. (2010). ‘Die kategoriale Herstellung von Ethnizität - Ethnomethodologische Überlegungen zur Ethnizitätsforschung’. in: Marion Müller/Darius Zifonun, Hrsg., Ethnowissen: Soziologische Beiträge zu ethnischer Differenzierung und Migration. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 155-169
  • Bergmann, Jörg, & Egbert, Maria. (2004). “Angst - Von der Phänomenologie zur Interaktion”, in: Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaft, 6: 227-242.
  • Bergmann, Jörg, & Meier, Christoph. (2000). “Elektronische Prozessdaten”,in: UweFlick, Ernst v.Kardorff, Ines Steinke, Hrsg., Qualitative Sozialforschung. Ein Handbuch, Reinbek: Rowohlt, 429-437.
  • Bergmann, Jörg; Kirsten Nazarkiewicz; Holger Finke; Detlef Dolscius (2008). “‘Das gefällt mir goar nicht’ - Trouble Marking als professionelle Kommunikationsleistung im Cockpit beim Auftreten technischer Zwischenfälle”, in: Ingo Matuschek, Hrsg., Luft-Schichten. Arbeit, Organisation und Technik im Luftverkehr. Berlin: edition sigma, 93-117
  • Berryman, Edward. (2001). ‘Medjugorje’s living icons: making spirit matter (for sociology)’, Social Compass 48: 593-610
  • Betz, Emma; Andrea Golato (2008). ‘Remembering relevant information and withholding relevant next actions: The German token achja’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41/1: 58-98
  • Billig, Michael. (1999). ‘Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis’, Discourse & Society 10: 543-58 [debate with Schegloff]
  • Billig, Michael. (1999). ‘Conversation analysis and the claims of naivety’, Discourse & Society 10: 572-76 [debate with Schegloff]
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1985). ‘“Why that now?”: Two kinds of conversational meaning’, Discourse Processes, 8(3), 319-355
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1988). ‘The concept of preference in conversation analysis’, Language in Society, 17, 161-81
  • Bilmes, Jack .(1988). ‘Category and rules in conversation analysis’, IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 2: 25-59
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1991). ‘Toward a theory of argument in conversation: The preference for disagreement’ In: F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, C.A. Willard, eds., Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation. Amsterdam: SISCAT: International Centre For The Study Of Argumentation: 462-69
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1992). ‘Dividing the rice: a micro analysis of the mediators role in a Northern Thai negotiation’, Language in Society 21: 569-602
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1992). ‘Mishearings’. In: Graham Watson, R.M. Seiler, eds. Text in Context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage: 79-98
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1992). ‘Referring to internal occurrences: a reply to Coulter.’ (Response to Jeff Coulter’s ‘Bilmes on internal states: a critical commentary.’), Journal For The Theory Of Social Behavior: 253-62
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1993). ‘Ethnomethodology, culture, and implicature: Toward an empirical pragmatics’, Pragmatics, 3: 387-409
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1994). ‘Constituting silence: life in the world of total meaning’.Semiotica 98: 73-87
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1995). ‘Negotiation and compromise: a microanalysis of a discussion in the United States Federal Trade Commission’. In: A. Firth, ed. The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon:61-82
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1995). ‘Dividing the rice II: reaching agreement.’ In: L. Bilmes, A. C. Liang, W. Ostapirat, eds., Proceedings of the twenty-first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Braun-Brumfield: 16-32
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1996). ‘Le silence reconstitué: La vie dans un monde de plénitude de sens’, Reseaux 80: 129-42 (a translation of Bilmes, 1994)
  • Bilmes, Jack .(1996). ‘Problems and resources in analyzing Northern Thai conversation for English language readers’, Journal of Pragmatics 26: 171-88
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1997). ‘Being interrupted’, Language in Society 26/4: 507-531
  • Bilmes, Jack. (1999). ‘Questions, answers, and the organization of talk in the 1992 vice presidential debate: Fundamental considerations.’, Research in Language and Social Interaction, 32: 213-42
  • Bilmes, Jack. (2001). ‘Tactics and styles in the 1992 Vice-Presidential Debate: Question placement’, Research In Language And Social Interaction, 34: 151-181.
  • Bilmes, Jack. (2003). ‘Heavy Duty Responses’. in Alan Firth, ed. Language travels: A festschrift for Torben Vestergaard. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press: 115-29
  • Bilmes, Jack. (2005). ‘The Call-on-Hold as conversational resource’, Text 25: 149-70
  • Bilmes, Jack. (2008). ’Generally speaking: Formulating an argument in the US Federal Trade Commission’, Text & Talk 28/2: 193-217
  • Bilmes, Jack. (2009). ‘Taxonomies are for talking: Reanalyzing a Sacks classic’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/8: 1600-1610
  • Bilmes, Jack. (2009). ‘Kinship categories in a Northern Thai narrative’. In: H. Nguyen, Gabriele Kasper, eds., Talk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives.’ Honolulu, Hawaii: National Foreign Language Resource Center: 29-56
  • Bilmes, Jack. (2011). ‘Occasioned semantics: a systematic approach to meaning in talk’, Human Studies, 34/2: 155-181
  • Bilmes, Jack. (2012). ‘Truth and proof in a lawyer’s story’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1626-1638
  • Bilmes, Jack. (2014). ‘Preference and the conversation analytic endeavor’, Journal of Pragmatics, 64:52-71.
  • Bittner, Egon. (1965). ‘The concept of organization’, Social Research 32: 239-55
  • Bittner, Egon. (1967). ‘The police on skid row: a study of peace keeping’, American Sociological Review 32: 699-715
  • Bittner, Egon. (1967). ‘Police discretion in emergency apprehension of mentally ill persons’, Social Problems 14: 278-92
  • Bittner, Egon. (1973). ‘Objectivity and realism in sociology’. In George Psathas, ed. Phenomenological Sociology: Issues and Applications. New York: John Wiley: 109–125
  • Bjelić, Dušan I. (1992). ‘The praxiological validity of natural scientific practices as a criterion for identifying their unique social object character: The case of ‘Authentication’ of Goethe’s morphological theorem’, Qualitative sociology 15: 221-45
  • Bjelić, Dušan I. (1995). ‘An ethnomethodological clarification of Husserl’s concepts of “Regressive Inquiry” and “Galilean Physics” by means of discovering praxioms’, Human Studies 18: 189-225
  • Bjelić, Dušan I. (1996). ‘Lebenswelt structures of Galilean Physics: The case of Galileo’s Pendulum’, Human Studies 19: 409-32
  • Bjelić, Dušan I. (1999). ‘”Frenching” the “Real” and preaxeological therapy: an ethnomethodological clarification of the new French theory of the media’. In: PaulL. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 231-57
  • Bjelić, Dušan I. (2007). ‘Edited identities and geopolitics of global media’, Ethnographic Studies, No 9: 6 - 18
  • Bjelić, Dušan I. (2004). Galileo’s Pendulum: science, sexuality and the body-instrument link. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Bjelić, Dušan, & Lynch, Michael. (1992). ‘The work of a (scientific) demonstration: respecifying Newton’s and Goethe’s theories of prismatic color’. In: Graham Watson, R.M. Seiler, eds. Text in Context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage: 52-78
  • Bjelic, Dusan, & Lynch, Michael. (1994). ‘Goethe’s “Protestant Reformation” as a textual demonstration: comment on Jackson’, Social Studies of Science 24: 703-24
  • Björk-Willén, Polly, Jakob Cromdal. (2009). ‘When education seeps into ‘free play’: How preschool children accomplish multilingual education’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/8: 1493-1518
  • Bloch, Steven; Ray Wilkinson, (2004). ‘The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria’, Augmentative and Alternative Communication 20(4), 272-282.
  • Bloch, Steven; Ray Wilkinson (2009). ‘Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Identifying sources of understanding problems’, International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 44/5: 769-783
  • Bloch, Steven; Ray Wilkinson (2013). ‘The accomplishment of nonserious talk in severe speech disability: An examination of recipient uptake and delayed other-initiated repair’, Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4/1: 45-70
  • Blum, Alan F. (1970). ‘The sociology of mental illness’. In: Jack D. Douglas, ed. Deviance and respectability: the social construction of moral meanings. New York: Basic Books: 31-60
  • Blythe, Joe. (2010). ‘Self-association in Murriny Patha talk-in-interaction’, Australian Journal of Linguistics, 30/4: 447-469
  • Blythe, Joe. (2013). ‘Preference organization driving structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization’, Language 89/4: 883-919
  • Boden, Deirdre. (1990). ‘The world as it happens: ethnomethodology and conversation analysis’. In: George Ritzer, ed., Frontiers of social theory: the new synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press: 185-213
  • Boden, Deirdre. (1990). ‘People are talking: conversation analysis and symbolic interaction’. In: H. S. Becker and M. McCall (eds), Symbolic Interaction and Cultural Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 244-73
  • Boden, Deirdre. (1994). The business of talk: organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press
  • Boden, Deirdre. (1994). ‘Talk, text and history: President Kennedy and the Mississippi Crisis’. In D. Crowley and D. Mitchell (eds), Communication Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Boden, Deirdre. (1995). ‘Agendas and arrangements: everyday negotiations in meetings’. In: A. Firth, ed. The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon: 83-100
  • Boden, Deirdre. (1997). ‘Temporal frames: time and talk in organizations’ Time & Society 6: 5-33.
  • Boden, Deirdre, D. Bielby. (1983). ‘The past as resource: a conversational analysis of elderly talk’, Human development 26: 308-19
  • Boden, Deirdre, D.B. Bielby. (1986). ‘The way it was: topical organization in elderly conversation’, Language and Communication 6: 12 & 73-89
  • Boden, Deirdre, Harvey L. Molotch. (1994). ‘The compulsion of proximity’. In: R. Friedland, Deirdre Boden, eds. NowHere: space, time and modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press: 257-86
  • Boden, Deirdre, Don H. Zimmerman, eds. (1991). Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press
  • Bogen, David. (1989). ‘A reappraisal of Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action in light of detailed investigations of social praxis’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19/1: 47-77
  • Bogen, David. (1990). ‘Beyond the limits of Mundane Reason’, Human Studies 13: 405-16
  • Bogen, David. (1991). ‘Linguistic forms and social obligations: a critique of the doctrine of literal expression in Searle’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21: 31-62
  • Bogen, David. (1992). ‘The organization of talk’, Qualitative Sociology 15: 273-96
  • Bogen, David. (1995). ‘Do Winograd and Flores have politics?’ Computer Supported Cooperative Work 3/1: 79-83
  • Bogen, David. (1996). ‘The allure of a “Truly General Theory of Knowledge and Science”: A Comment on Pels’, Sociological Theory 14: 187-192
  • Bogen, David. (1999). Order without rules: Critical theory and the logic of conversation. New York: SUNY Press
  • Bogen, David, Michael Lynch (1989). ‘Taking account of the hostile native: plausible deniability and the production of conventional history in the Iran-Contra Hearings’, Social Problems 36: 197224
  • Bogen, David, Michael Lynch (1990). ‘Social critique and the logic of description: a response to McHoul’ Journal of Pragmatics 14: 505-21
  • Bogen, David, Michael Lynch (1993). ‘Do we need a general theory of social problems?’. In: G. Miller, J. Holstein, eds., Reconsidering social constructionism. New York: Aldine de Gruyter: 213-37
  • Böhringer, Daniela (2011). ‘Verabredungen am Gesprächsende-dargestellt am Beispiel von Gesprächen im Jobcenter’, [Bringing Conversations to an End—Examples from German Job Centers] [41 Absätze]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Art. 4. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs110348
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2000). ‘Towards understanding practices of medical interpreting: Interpreters’ involvement in history taking’, Discourse Studies 2: 387-419
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2003). ‘Multiple modalities in collaborative turn sequences’, Gesture 3: 187-212
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2004). ‘The quote and beyond: Defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian’, Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1071-1118
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2006). ‘Little words that matter: Discourse markers “so” and “oh” and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction’, Journal of Communication 56: 661-88
  • Bolden, Galina. (2008). ‘“So what’s up?”: Using the discourse marker “so” to launch conversational business’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(3), 302-327.
  • Bolden, Galina. (2008). ’Reopening Russian conversations: The discourse particle --to and the negotiation of interpersonal accountability in closings’. Human Communication Research, 34(1), 99-136
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2009). ‘Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/6 974-998
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2009). ‘Implementing delayed actions’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 326-54
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2009). ’Beyond answering: Repeat-prefaced responses in conversation’, Communication Monographs, 76/2: 121-143.
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2010). ‘“Articulating the unsaid” via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk’, Discourse Studies 12/1: 5-32
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2011). ‘On the organization of repair in multiperson conversation: the case of “other”-selection in other-initiated repair sequences’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/3: 237-262
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2012). ‘Across languages and cultures: Brokering problems of understanding in conversational repair’, Language in Society 41/1: 97 - 121
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2013). ‘Unpacking “self”: Repair and epistemics in conversation’, Social Psychology Quarterly 76/4: 314-342
  • Bolden, Galina B. (2014). ‘Negotiating understanding in “intercultural moments” in immigrant family interactions’, Communication Monographs 81/2: 208-238.
  • Bolden, Galina B.; Estefania Guimaraes (2012). ‘Grammatical flexibility as a resource in explicating referents’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45/2: 156-174
  • Bolden, Galina B.; Jenny Mandelbaum, Sue Wilkinson (2012). ‘Pursuing a response by repairing an indexical reference’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45/2: 137- 155
  • Bolden, Galina B., Jeffrey D. Robinson (2011). ’Soliciting accounts with why-interrogatives in conversation’, Journal of Communication, 61/1: 94-119
  • Bonu, Bruno. (1992). ‘Analyse de conversation: une discipline de l’action sociale’ [Conversation analysis: a social action discipline], Quaderni, 17: 51-64
  • Bonu, Bruno. (1995). ‘Questions sur la préférence en Analyse de Conversation: hiérarchisation des actions dans les entretiens de recrutement’. Cahiers de l’ILSL 7: 199-230
  • Bonu, Bruno. (1997). ‘Remarques sur le traitement de l’erreur dans la classe’ [Remarks on the treatment of errors in the classroom]. In: A. Marcarino, ed., Analisi della conversatione e prospettive di recerca in etnometodologia. Urbino: Editioni QuattroVenti: 179-86
  • Bonu, Bruno. (1998). ‘Narration et interaction’, in J.-P. Desgouttes, eds.,Les figures du sujet en sciences humaines: motifs de rupture. Paris: L’Harmattan
  • Bonu, Bruno. (1999). ‘Perturbation et négociation dans l’entretient de recrutement’ [Perturbation and negotiation in job interviews],langage & société nE 89: 69-93
  • Bonu, Bruno. (1999). ‘Entre image et parole: le regard dans la narration et l’interaction à la television’. In J.P. Desgoutte, (ed), La mise en scène du discours audiovisuel, Paris, L’Harmattan: 67-87
  • Bonu, Bruno. (Ed.) (2002). Transcrire l’interaction. Cahiers de praxématique, 39, 1-159
  • Bonu, Bruno. (2002). ‘Présentation’, cahiers de praxématique 39: 7-14
  • Bonu, Bruno. (2002). ‘Transcription et analyse: les unités évaluatives de construction de tour’ cahiers de praxématique 39: 135-159
  • Bonu, Bruno. (2007). ‘Connexion continue et interaction ouverte en réunion visiophonique’,Réseaux, 144, 25-57.
  • Bonu, Bruno. (2014). ‘L’interaction de part et d’autre des barreaux :catégorisations dans la vidéocommunication’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 115-136
  • Bonu, Bruno, Lorenza Mondada, Marc Relieu. (1994). ‘Catégorisation: l’approche de Sacks’. In: B. Fradin, L. Quéré, J. Widmer, eds. L’enquête sur les catégories. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]: 129-48
  • Booth, Susan, & Perkins, Lisa. (1999). ‘The use of conversation analysis to guide individualized advice to carers and evaluate change in aphasia: a case study’, Aphasiology 13: 283-303
  • Bovet, Alain. (2009). ‘Configuring a television debate: categorisation, questions and answers’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 27-48
  • Bovet, Alain; Andrew P. Carlin, Philippe Sormani (2011). ‘Discovery Starts Here? The “Pulsar Paper”, Thirty Years On-an Ethno-bibliometric Note’, Ethnographic Studies 12: 126-139
  • Bovet, Alain; Philippe Sormani, Cédric Terzi (2014). ‘The televisual accountability of reality tv: The visual morality of musical performances in talent shows’. In: Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, eds. Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge: 208-233
  • Bowles, Hugo. (2011). ‘The contribution of CA to the study of literary dialogue’, Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5/1: 161-168. Retrieved from http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_5_1/bowles.pdf
  • Bowles Hugo, Paul Seedhouse, eds. (2007). Conversation analysis and language for specific purposes. Bern, etc.: Peter Lang
  • Boyd, Elisabeth (1998). ‘Bureaucratic authority in the “company of equals:” the interactional management of medical peer review’, American Sociological Review 63(2): 200-24
  • Boyd, Elizabeth, John Heritage (2006). ‘Taking the history: questioning during comprehensive history taking’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 151-84
  • Boyle, Ronald (2000). Whatever happened to preference organisation?’, Journal of Pragmatics. 32/5
  • Brannigan, A., Michael Lynch (1987). ‘On bearing false witness: perjury and credibility as interactional accomplishments’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 16: 11546
  • Brewer, J.D., G. McBride, S. Yearley, (1991). ‘Orchestrating an encounter: A note on the talk of mentally handicapped children’, Sociology of Health and Illness 13: 58-68
  • Bridges, Susan, Brendan Bartlett (2009). ‘Moving teachers: public texts and institutional power’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 185-204
  • Broadhurst, Karen (2007). ‘Parental help-seeking and the moral order. Notes for policy makers and parenting practitioners on “the first port of call” and “no one to turn to”’ Sociological Research Online, 12(6) http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/6/4.html
  • Brooker, Phillip; Wes Sharrock (2013). ‘Remixing music together: The use and abuse of virtual studio software as a hobby’. In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds. Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 135-155
  • Broth, Mathias. (2008). ‘The studio interaction as a contextual resource for TV-production’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/5: 904-26.
  • Broth, Mathias. (2008). ‘The “Listening shot” as a collaborative practice for categorizing studio participants in a live TV-production’, Ethnographic Studies, No 10: 69-88
  • Broth, Mathias. (2009). ‘Seeing through screens, hearing through speakers: Managing distant studio space in television control room interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 1998-2016
  • Broth, Mathias. (2011). ‘The theatre performance as interaction between actors and their audience’, Nottingham French Studies, 50/2
  • Broth, Mathias. (2014). ‘Pans,tilts, and zooms. Conventional camera gestures in tv production’. In: Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, eds. Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge: 63-96
  • Broth, Mathias; Leelo Keevallik (2014). ‘Getting ready to move as a couple: Accomplishing mobile formations in a dance class’, Space and Culture, 17/2: 107-121
  • Broth, Mathias; Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada (2014). ‘Introducing Video at Work’. In: Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, eds. Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge: 1-29
  • Broth, Mathias; Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, (Eds.) (2014). Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge
  • Broth, Mathias, Fredrik Lundström (2013). ‘A Walk on the pier: Establishing relevant places in mobile instruction’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 91-122.
  • Broth, Mathias; Lorenza Mondada (2013). ‘Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 47: 41-58
  • Brouwer, Catherine E. (2004). ‘Doing pronunciation: A specific type of repair sequence’. In Rod Gardner, Johannes Wagner, eds., Second language conversations. London: Continuum: 93-113.
  • Brouwer, Catherine E. (2013). ‘Conversation analysis methodology in second language studies’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1055-1061
  • Brouwer, Catherine E. (2012). ‘Talking “cognition” in the audiology clinic*’. In: Gitte, Rasmussen, C.E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds., Evaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 189 - 210
  • Brouwer, Catherine; Dennis Day (2012). ‘WHO/ICF guidelines and compliance in a hearing aid consultation’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 125-37
  • Brouwer, Catherine; Day, Dennis; Ferm, Ulrika; Hougaard, Anders; Rasmussen, Gitte; Thunberg, Gunilla J. (2011). ‘Treating the actions of children as sensible: Investigating structures in interactions between children with disabilities and their parents’, Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 2(2): 153-182.
  • Brouwer, Catherine E., Gitte Rasmussen, Johannes Wagner (2004). ‘Embedded corrections in second language talk’. In Rod Gardner, Johannes Wagner, eds., Second language conversations. London: Continuum:.75-92
  • Brouwer, Catherine. E., Johannes Wagner (2004). ‘Developmental issues in second language conversation’, Journal of Applied Linguistics 1/1: 29-47
  • Brown, Barry. (2001). ‘Representing time: The humble timesheet’, Ethnographic Studies 6: 45- 59
  • Brown, Barry, Eric Laurier (2005). ‘Maps and journeys: an ethnomethodological investigation’, Cartographica 4,3: 17-33
  • Brun-Cottan, Francoise. (1990/1991). ‘Talk in the workplace: occupational relevance’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 277-95
  • Bucholtz, Mary. (2000). ‘The politics of transcription’, Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1439-65.
  • Bucholtz, Mary. (2007). ‘Variation in transcription’, Discourse Studies 9: 784-808
  • Bucholtz, Mary. (2007). ‘Reply: variability in transcribers’, Discourse Studies 9: 837-842.
  • Bücker, Jörg. (2013). ‘Position offerings in German radio phone-in talk shows’, Journal of Pragmatics 45: 29-49
  • Burns, Stacy. (1996). Lawyers’ work in the Menendez brothers’ murder trial, Issues in Applied Linguistics, 7, 19-32
  • Burns, Stacy. (1997). Practicing law: a study of pedagogic interchange in a law school classroom. In M. Travers & John F. Manzo (Eds.), Law in Action: Ethnomethodological & Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Co.: 265-287
  • Burns, Stacy. (2001). "Think your darkest thoughts and blacken them". Judicial mediation of large money damage disputes, Human Studies, 24, 227-49
  • Burns, Stacy Lee. (2008). Demonstrating "Reasonable Fear" at trial: Is it science or junk science?, Human Studies, 31(2), 107-131
  • Burns, Stacy Lee. (2009). Doing justice and demonstrating fairness in small claims arbitration, Human Studies 32(2), 109-131
  • Burns, Stacy Lee. (2012). Harold Garfinkel: Memorial remarks, recollections and reflections’, Human Studies 35/2: 159-161
  • Burns, Stacy Lee. (2012). ‘“Lecturing’s Work”: A collaborative Study with Harold Garfinkel’, Human Studies 35/2: 175-192
  • Burns, Stacy Lee; Mark Peyrot (2003). ‘Tough love: nurturing and coercing responsibility and recovery in California drug courts’, Social Problems, 50/3: 416-438
  • Burns, Stacy Lee; Mark Peyrot (2008). ‘Reclaiming discretion: judicial sanctioning strategy in court-supervised drug treatment’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37/4:720-744
  • Büscher, Monika. (2005). ‘Social Life under the microscope?’, Sociological Research Online. 10/1 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/1/buscher.html
  • Büscher, Monika. (2006). ‘Vision in motion’, Environment and Planning A, 38(2) 281-99
  • Büscher, Monika, Gloria Jensen (2007). ‘Sound Sight: Seeing with Ultrasound’, Health Informatics Journal 13(1): 23-36.
  • Büscher, Monika, Jacki O’Neill, John Rooksby (2009). ‘Designing for diagnosing: introduction to the special issue on diagnostic work’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 18/2-3: 109-128
  • Bushnell, Cade. (2012). ‘Talking the talk: the interactional construction of community and identity at conversation analytic data sessions in Japan’, Human Studies 35/4: 583-605
  • Butler, Carly W. (2008). Talk and Social Interaction in the Playground. Aldershot: Ashgate [Series : Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis]
  • Butler, Carly W.; Susan Danby & Michael Emmison (2011). ‘Address terms in turn beginnings: managing disalignment and disaffiliation in telephone counseling’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44: 338-358
  • Butler, Carly W., Susan Danby, Michael Emmison, Karen Thorpe (2009). ‘Managing medical advice seeking in calls to Child Health Line’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31/6: 817-834 [reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010) Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley- Blackwell: 31-47]
  • Butler, Carly W.; Richard Fitzgerald (2010). ‘Membership-in-action: Operative identities in a family meal’, Journal of Pragmatics 42-9: 2462-2474
  • Butler, Carly W.; Richard Fitzgerald (2011). ‘“My f***ing personality”: swearing as slips and gaffes in live television broadcasts’, Text & Talk 31/5: 525-551
  • Butler, Carly W., Richard Fitzgerald, Rod Gardner, eds. (2009). ‘Ethnomethodological Approaches to Communication’, Special Issue: Australian Journal of Communication, 36/3 [ http://aiemca.net/?page_id=229]
  • Butler, Carly W., Richard Fitzgerald, Rod Gardner (2009). ‘Branching out: Ethnomethodological approaches to communication’, Australian Journal of Communication, 36/3: 1-14 [ http://aiemca.net/?page_id=229]
  • Butler, Carly, Jonathan Potter, Susan Danby, Michael Emmison, Alexa Hepburn (2010). ‘Advice-implicative interrogatives: Building ‘‘client-centered’’ support in a children’s helpline’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 73/3: 265-287
  • Butler, Carly, Ann Weatherall (2006). ‘”No, we’re not playing families”: Membership categorization in children’s play’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: 441-70
  • Butler Carly W.; Ann Weatherall (2011). ‘Accomplishing a cross-gender identity: a case of passing in children’s talk-in-interaction, and In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 231-249
  • Butler, Carly W. ; Ray Wilkinson (2013). ‘Mobilising recipiency: Child participation and ‘rights to speak’ in multi-party family interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 50: 37-51
  • Buttny, Richard. (1993). Social accountability in communication. London: Sage
  • Buttny, Richers, Tom L. Isbell (1991). The problem of communicating one’s understanding of Zen: A microanalysis of teacher-student interviews in a North American Zen monastery’, Human Studies 14: 287-309.
  • Button, Graham. (1987). ‘Answers as interactional products: two sequential practices used in interviews’, Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 160-71
  • Button, Graham. (1987) ‘Moving out of closings’. In: Button, Graham, J.R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 101-51
  • Button, Graham. (1988-89) ‘A Short Review of Research on Language and Social Interaction in the United Kingdom.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction 22: 327-45.
  • Button, Graham. (1990). ‘On varieties of closings’. In: George Psathas, ed. Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America: 93-147
  • Button, Graham. (1990). ‘Going up a blind alley: conflating conversation analysis and computational modelling’. In: Paul Luff, G.N. Gilbert, D.M. Frohlich, eds., Computers and conversation. London: Academic Press: 67-90
  • Button, Graham. (1990). ‘A clash of ideas: a response to Auer’, Human Studies 13: 393-404
  • Button, Graham. (1991). ‘Conversation-in-a-series’. In: Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, eds. Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press:251-77
  • Button, Graham. (Ed.). (1991) Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Button, Graham. (1992). ‘Answers as interactional products: two sequential practices used in job interviews’. In: Paul Drew, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 212-31
  • Button, Graham. (Ed.). (1993). Technology in working order: studies of work, interaction and technology. London: Routledge
  • Button, Graham. (1993). ‘The curious case of the vanishing technology’. In Graham Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction and technology. London: Routledge, 10-28
  • Button, Graham. (1995). ‘What’s wrong with Speech-Act Theory’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 3: 39-42
  • Button, Graham. (1997). ‘Cognition in the Wild, Edwin Hutchins’, CSCW 6/4: 391-5
  • Button, Graham. (2000). ‘The ethnographic tradition and design’. Design Studies, 21(4), 319-332.
  • Button, Graham. (2001). ‘L’ethnométhodologie est-elle constructiviste ?’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 161-74
  • Button, Graham. (2007). ‘Book Review: Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Harold Garfinkel, edited and introduced by Anne Warfield Rawls’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 16/6, 619-626
  • Button, Graham. (2008). ‘Against `Distributed Cognition’, Theory, Culture & Society, 25(2): 87- 104
  • Button, Graham, Neil Casey (1985). ‘Topic nomination and pursuit’, Human Studies 9: 355
  • Button, Graham, Neil Casey, (1984). ‘Generating the topic: the use of topic initial elicitors’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 167-90
  • Button, Graham, Neil Casey (1989). ‘Topic initiation: business-at-hand’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 22: 61-92
  • Button, Graham, Jeff Coulter, John R.E. Lee, Wes Sharrock (1995). Computers, minds and conduct. Cambridge: Polity Press
  • Button, Graham, Paul Dourish (1996). ‘Technomethodology: Paradoxes and Possibilities Proceedings of CHI ‘96, Human Factors in Computing Systems, 13-18 April 1996, Vancouver, Canada: 19-26
  • Button, Graham, Richard Harper, (1995/1996). ‘The relevance of `Work-Practice’ for design’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 4: 263-280
  • Button, Graham, John R.E. Lee, eds (1987). Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
  • Button, Graham; David Martin, Jacki O’Neill, Tommaso Colombino (2012). ‘Lifting the mantle of protection from Weber’s presuppositions in his theory of bureaucracy’, Human Studies 35/2: 235-262
  • Button, Graham, David Mason and Wes Sharrock (2003). ‘Disempowerment and resistance in the print industry? Reactions to surveillance-capable technology’, New Technology, Work and Organisations, 18: 50-61
  • Button, Graham, Wes Sharrock (1993). ‘A disagreement over agreement and consensus inconstructionist sociology’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23: 1-25.
  • Button, Graham, Wes Sharrock (1994). ‘Occasioned practices in the work of software engineers’. In: M. Jorotka, J.A. Goguen, eds. Requirements engineering: social and technical issues. London: Academic Press: 217-40
  • Button, Graham, Wes Sharrock (1995). ‘Practices in the work of ordering software development’. In: A. Firth, ed. The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon: 159-80
  • Button, Graham, Wes Sharrock (1995). ‘The mundane work of writing and reading computer programs’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds., Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 231-58
  • Button, Graham, Wes Sharrock (1995). ‘On simulacrums of conversation: toward a clarification of the relevance of conversation analysis for human-computer interaction. In: Peter Thomas, ed., The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 107-25
  • Button, Graham, Wes Sharrock (1996). ‘Project Work: the organisation of collaborative design and development in software engineering’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 5: 369-386
  • Button, Graham, Wes Sharrock (1998). ‘The organizational accountability of technological work’, Social Studies of Science 28: 73-102
  • Button, Graham, Wes Sharrock (2000). Design by problem solving. In Paul Luff, Jon Hindmarsh, & Christian Heath (Eds.), Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing systems design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 46-67
  • Button, Graham, Wes Sharrock (2002). Operating the production calculus: Ordering a production system in the print industry, British Journal of Sociology, 53, 275-90
  • Button, Graham; Wes Sharrock (2013). All at sea: The use of practical formalisms in yachting. In Peter Tolmie & Mark Rouncefield (Eds.), Ethnomethodology at play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate, 105-133
  • Bysouth, Don. (2009). The production-recognition of “cognition” as cultural action in talk-in-interaction, Crossroads of Language, Interaction, and Culture, 7, 3-15
  • Bysouth, Don. (2013). Conversation analysis and therapy. In Carol A. Chapelle (Ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 1111-1114
  • Cahill, Patricia (2010) ‘Child Participation in their primary care consultations’.In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell 128-145
  • Campion, Peter, Mark Langdon (2004) ‘Achieving multiple topic shifts in primary care medical consultations: A conversation analysis study in U.K. general practice’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 26: 81-101
  • Carlgren, Ingrid (2009) ‘CA-studies of learning—from an educational perspective’,
  • Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53/ 2: 203-209
  • Carlin, Andrew (1999) ‘The works of Edward Rose: a bibliography’, Ethnographic Studies 4: 61-77
  • Carlin, Andrew P. (2002) ‘Bibliographic Boundaries and Forgotten Canons.’ In Stefan Herbrechter, ed. Cultural Studies: Interdisciplinarity and Translation. Amsterdam: Rodopi,
  • Carlin, Andrew P. (2002) ‘Biography and bibliography: an intellectual profile of Edward Rose.’
  • Auto/Biography X: 41-54.
  • Carlin, Andrew P. (2003) ‘Some bibliographic practices in interdisciplinary work: accounting for citations in library and information science.’ Accountability in Research 10: 27-45.
  • Carlin, Andrew P. (2003) ‘Observation and membership categorization: recognizing “Normal appearances” in public space’, Journal of Mundane Behavior 4(1): 77-91, URL: http://mundanebehavior.org/issues/v4n1/carlin.htm
  • Carlin, Andrew P. (2003) ‘Pro forma arrangements: the visual availability of textual artefacts’. In: Mike Ball (ed.) Image Work, a Special Issue of Visual Studies 18/1 ( April 2003): 6-20
  • Carlin, Andrew P. (2003) ‘Aspects of spatial arrangement in libraries’. In Tomke Lask, ed.,
  • Constructions sociales de l’espace, Les territoires de l’anthropolgie de la communication. Liège: Les Éditions de l’Université de Liège: 87-99
  • Carlin, Andrew P.(2004) ‘On “Owning” Silence: Talk, Texts and the “Semiotics” of Bibliographies.’ Semiotica 146: 117-38.
  • Carlin, Andrew (2006) ‘”Rose’s Gloss”: Considerations of Natural Sociology and Ethnography in Practice’, Qualitative Sociology Review, 2/3: 65-77 (http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org /ENG/archive_eng.php)
  • Carlin, Andrew P. (2007) ‘Auspices of corpus status: bibliography* as a phenomenon of respecification’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 91-103
  • Carlin, Andrew P. (2009) ‘The temporal organization of bibliographies’, The Library Quarterly, 79/2: 161-73
  • Carlin, Andrew P. (2009) ‘Edward Rose and linguistic ethnography: an Ethno-inquiries approach to interviewing’, Qualitative Research 9/3: 331-354
  • Carlin, Andrew P.(2010) ‘Discussion note: Reading ‘A tutorial on membership categorization’ by Emanuel Schegloff’, Journal of Pragmatics 42: 257-261
  • Carlin, Andrew P.; Roger S. Slack, eds. (2013) ‘Special Memorial Issue: Egon Bittner - Phenomenology in Action’, Ethnographic Studies Issue No. 13: http://www.zhbluzern.ch/index.php?id=2583
  • Carroll, D. (2004) ‘Restarts in novice turn beginnings: Disfluencies or interactional achievements?’ In R. Gardner, J. Wagner, eds., Second language conversations. London: Continuum: 201-220
  • Carroll, D. (2005) ‘Vowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversation’. In K. Richards, P. Seedhouse, eds., Applying conversation analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 214-234 .
  • Castellani, Stefania, Antonietta Grasso, Jacki O’Neill, Frederic Roulland (2009) ‘Designing technology as an embedded resource for troubleshooting’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 18/2-3: 199-227
  • Cefaï,Daniel; Nathalie Depraz (2001) ‘De la méthode phénoménologique dans la démarche ethnométhodologique’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.)
  • L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 99-119
  • Cekaite, Asta (2010) ‘Shepherding the child: embodied directive sequences in parent-child interactions’, Text & Talk 30/1: 1-25
  • Chanial, Philippe (2001) ‘L’ ethnométhodologie comme anticonstructivisme’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale[Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 297-314
  • Chapman, Debra D.; Peter Eglin (2014) ‘“The Machines Don’t Lie”: A Study of the Social Production of Mechanization in the Determination of Voter Intent’, Qualitative Sociology Review X/2
  • Chatwin, John (2008) ‘Pre-empting “trouble” in the homoeopathic consultation’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/2: 244-256
  • Chevalier, Fabienne H. G. (2008) ‘Unfinished turns in french conversation: how context matters’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41/1: 1-30
  • Chevalier, Fabienne H.G. (2009 ) ‘The facework of unfinished turns in French conversation’,
  • Discourse Studies 11: 267-284
  • Chevalier, Fabienne H.G. (2011) ‘Managing impartiality in French tourist offices: Responses to recommendation-seeking questions’, Discourse Studies 13: 139-161
  • Chevalier, Fabienne H. G., ed. (2011) ‘French Language and Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics’, special issue of Nottingham French Studies, 50/2 Copies may be obtained at sue.ruszczynski [at] nottingham.ac.uk
  • Chevalier, Fabienne H. G. (2011) ‘Language and social interaction: An introduction’,
  • Nottingham French Studies, 50/2
  • Chevalier, Fabienne H.G. (2011) ‘On the emergent and interactive character of grammatical resources in interaction: a single-case analysis of a left dislocation in spoken French’,
  • Nottingham French Studies, 50/2
  • Chevalier, Fabienne H.G., Rebecca Clift (2008) ‘Unfinished turns in French conversation: Projectability, syntax and action’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/10: 1731-52
  • Childs, Carrie (2012) ‘‘“I’m not X, I just want Y”: Formulating “wants” in interaction´,
  • Discourse Studies 14: 181-196
  • Childs, Carrie (2012)‘Directing and requesting: two interactive uses of the mental state terms want and need’, Text & Talk 32/6: 727-749
  • Chua, Beng-Huat (1979) ‘Describing a national crisis: An exploration in textual analysis’,
  • Human Studies 2: 47-61
  • Chui, Kawai (2009) ‘Conversational coherence and gesture’, Discourse Studies 11: 661-680
  • Cibulka, Paul (2013) ‘The writing hand: Some interactional workings of writing gestures in Japanese conversation’, Gesture, 13/2: 166-192
  • Cicourel, Aaron V. Method and measurement in sociology. New York: The Free Press
  • Cicourel, Aaron V. (1968) The social organization of juvenile justice. New York: Wiley (London: Heinemann, 1976)
  • Cicourel, Aaron V. (1973) Cognitive sociology: language and meaning in social interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin
  • Cicourel, Aaron V. (1974) Theory and method in a study of Argentine fertility. New York: Wiley
  • Cicourel, Aaron V. (1981) ‘The role of cognitive-linguistic concepts in understanding everyday social interactions’. Annual Review of Sociology 7: 87-106
  • Cicourel, Aaron V. (1985) ‘Doctor-patient discourse’. In: T.A. van Dijk,ed. Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press, vol. III: 193-202
  • Cicourel, Aaron V. et al. (1974) Language use and school performance. New York: Academic Press
  • Christodoulidou, Maria (2010) ‘Complaints about misbehaviour’, Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10/2: 295-316
  • Church, Amelia (2009) Preference organisation and peer disputes: How young children resolve conflict. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Clark, Colin, Paul Drew, Trevor Pinch (1994) ‘Managing customer ‘objections’ during reallife sales negotiations’, Discourse and Society 5: 437-62
  • Clark, Colin, Paul Drew, Trevor Pinch (2003) ‘Managing prospect affiliation and rapport in real-life sales encounters’, Discourse Studies 5: 5-31
  • Clark, Colin, Trevor Pinch (1988) ‘Microsociology and microeconomics: selling by social control’. In: N.G. Fielding, ed. Actions and structure: research methods and social theory. London: Sage: 117-41
  • Clark, Colin, Trevor Pinch (1992) ‘The anatomy of a deception: fraud and finesse in the mock auction sales con’, Qualitative Sociology 15: 151-75
  • Clark, Colin, Trevor Pinch (1995) The hard sell: The language and lessons of street - wise marketing . London: Harper Collins
  • Clark, Colin, Trevor Pinch (2010) ‘Some major organisational consequences of some “minor”, organised conduct: evidence from a video analysis of pre-verbal service encounters in a showroom retail store’.In: Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 140-71
  • Clark, Shannon J.; Pamela L. Hudak (2011) ‘When surgeons advise against surgery’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44: 385-412
  • Clarke, Karen, John Rooksby, and Mark Rouncefield (2007) ’ `You’ve got to take themseriously’: meeting information needs in mental healthcare’, Health Informatics Journal 2007 13: 37-45.
  • Clarke, Michael T., Ray Wilkinson (2005). ‘The usability of AAC in conversation: A case study of interaction between a child using AAC and her classmate’. in: A. Pruski, H. Knops, ed., Assistive Technology: From virtuality to reality. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 3-7.
  • Clarke, Michael T., Ray Wilkinson (2007). ‘Interaction between Children with Cerebral Palsy and their Peers 1: Organising and Understanding VOCA use’. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 23(4), 336-348.
  • Clarke, Michael T, Ray Wilkinson (2008). ‘Interaction between Children with Cerebral Palsy and their Peers 2: Understanding Initiated VOCA Mediated Turns’. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 24(1), 3-15
  • Clarke, Michael; Ray Wilkinson (2009) ‘The collaborative construction of non-serious episodes of interaction by non-speaking children with cerebral palsy and their peers’, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23/8: 583-597
  • Clarke, Michael, Ray Wilkinson (2010) ‘Speaker transfer in non-speaking children’s peer conversation: Time, timing and use of voice output communication aids’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell: 249-266
  • Clayman, Steven E. (1988) ‘Displaying neutrality in television news interviews’, Social Problems 35: 474-92
  • Clayman, Steven E. (1989) ‘The production of punctuality: social interaction, temporal organization, and social structure’, American Journal of Sociology 95: 659-91
  • Clayman, Steven E. (1990) ‘From talk to text: newspaper accounts of reporter-source interactions’, Media, Culture and Society 12: 79-103
  • Clayman, Steven E. (1991) ‘News interview openings: aspects of sequential organization.’ In: Paddy Scannell (ed.), Broadcast Talk: A Reader. Beverly Hills: Sage: 48-75.
  • Clayman, Steven E. (1992) ‘Caveat orator: audience disaffiliation in the 1988 presidential debates.’ The Quarterly Journal of Speech 78: 33-60.
  • Clayman, Steven E. (1992) ‘Footing in the achievement of neutrality: the case of news interview discourse’. In: Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 163-98
  • Clayman, Steven E. (1993) ‘Booing: The anatomy of a disaffiliative response’, American
  • Sociological Review, 58: 110-130
  • Clayman, Steven E. (1993) ‘Reformulating the question: a device for answering/not answering questions in news interviews and press conferences’, Text 13: 159-88
  • Clayman, Steven E. (1995) ‘The dialectic of ethnomethodology,’ Semiotica 107(1/2): 105-123.
  • Clayman, Steven E. (1995) ‘Defining moments, presidential debates, and the dynamics of quotability,’ Journal of Communication 45(3): 118-146.
  • Clayman, Steven (1998) ‘Gatekeeping in action: editorial conferences and assessments of newsworthiness’, American Sociological Review 63: 178-99
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2001) ‘Answers and evasions’, Language and Society 30: 403-42
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2002) ‘Sequence and solidarity.’ In: Edward J. Lawler, Shane R. Thye, eds. Advances in Group Processes: Group Cohesion, Trust, and Solidarity.. Elsevier Science: 229-53
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2002) ‘Tribune of the people: maintaining the legitimacy of aggressive journalism,’ Media, Culture, and Society 24: 191-210.
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2002) ‘Disagreements and third parties: dilemmas of neutralism in panel news interviews.’ Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1385-1401.
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2004) ‘Arenas of interaction in the mediated public sphere,’ Poetics73-98.
  • Clayman, Steven E (2006) ‘Understanding news media: the relevance of interaction’. In Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, Darin Weinberg, eds. Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London, etc. Sage: 135-54
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2006) ‘Arenas of interaction in the new media era.’ In: Mats Ekstrom, Asa Kroon, and Mats Nylund, eds. News From the Interview Society.. Gothenburg: Nordicom: 239-64.
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2007) ‘Speaking on behalf of the public in broadcast news interviews’. In: Elizabeth, Holt, Rebecca Clift, eds. Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 221-43
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2008) ‘Broadcast Talk’. In Wolfgang Donsbach, ed. International Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell: 372-376
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2008) ‘Interview as Journalistic Form.’ In Wolfgang Donsbach, ed.
  • International Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell: 2509-2513
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2008) ‘Talk in interaction as a locus for media studies.’ In Marcel Burger, ed. L’Analyse Linguistique des Discours des Médias: Théories, Méthodes, et Perspectives. Quebec: Nota Bene: 83-109
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2010) ‘Questions in Broadcast Journalism’. In Alice Freed, Susan Ehrlich, eds. ‘Why Do You Ask’: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 256-278
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2010) ‘Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview talk’, Discourse & Communication 4: 161-183
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2012) ‘Turn-constructional units and the transition-relevance place’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 150-66
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2012) ‘Conversation analysis in the news interview’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 630-56
  • Clayman, Steven E. (2012) ‘Address terms in the organization of turns at talk: The case of pivotal turn extensions’, Journal of Pragmatics 44:1853-1867
  • Clayman, Steven E.(2013) ‘Agency in response: The role of prefatory address terms’, Journal of Pragmatics 57: 290-302
  • Clayman, Steven, Marc Elliott, John Heritage, Laurie McDonald (2006) ‘Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents, 1953-2000’, Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(4): 561-83
  • Clayman, Steven E., Virginia T. Gill, (2004) ‘Conversation analysis’. In A. Bryman & M. Hardy, eds., Handbook of data analysis. London: Sage: 589-606
  • Clayman, Steven E.; Virginia Teas Gill (2012). ‘Conversation analysis’. In James Gee and Michael Handford, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford, UK: Routledge:120-134
  • Clayman, Steven E., John Heritage (2009) ‘Question design as a comparative and historical window into president-press relations’. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 299-315
  • Clayman, Steven, John Heritage (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Clayman, Steven, John Heritage (2002) ‘Questioning Presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of Eisenhower and Reagan’, Journal of Communication 52: 749-77
  • Clayman, Steven, John Heritage, Marc Elliott and Laurie McDonald (2007) ‘When does the watchdog bark?: Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences’,
  • American Sociological Review 72: 23-41
  • Clayman, Steven E., Douglas W. Maynard (1995) ‘Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds., Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 1-30
  • Clayman, Steven E., Ann Reisner (1998) ‘Gatekeeping in action: editorial conferences and assessments of newsworthiness,’ American Sociological Review 63: 178-199.
  • Clayman, Steven E.; Tanya Romaniuk (2011) ‘Questioning candidates’. In Mats Ekström, Marianna Patrona, eds., Talking politics in broadcast media: Cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam : John Benjamins: 15-32
  • Clayman, Steven E., Jack Whalen (1988/89) ‘When the medium becomes the message: the case of the Rather-Bush encounter’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 22: 241-72
  • Clemente, Ignasi (2007) ‘Clinicians’ routine practices of non-disclosure: Prioritizing “protection” over the information needs of adolescents with cancer’. Canadian Journal of Research Nursing, 39/4: 18-34
  • Clemente, Ignasi (2009) ‘Progressivity and participation: children’s management of parental assistance in paediatric chronic pain encounters’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31/6: 872-888 [reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010) Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley- Blackwell: 83-98]
  • Clemente, Ignasi (2012) ‘Conversation analysis and anthropology’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 688-700
  • Clift, Rebecca (1999) ‘Irony in conversation’, Language in Society 28, 523-53
  • Clift, Rebecca (2001) ‘Meaning in interaction: the case of “actually”’. Language, 77/2: 245-291.
  • Clift, Rebecca (2003) ‘Synonyms in action’. International Journal of English Studies, 3/1: 167-187.
  • Clift, Rebecca (2005) ‘Discovering Order’. Lingua, 115: 1641-65
  • Clift, Rebecca (2006) ‘Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential’.
  • Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10/5: 569-95.
  • Clift, Rebecca (2007) ‘Getting there first: non-narrative reported speech in interaction’. In: Elizabeth, Holt, Rebecca Clift, eds. Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 120-49
  • Clift, Rebecca (2012) ‘Who knew?: A view from linguistics’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 45/1: 69-75
  • Clift, Rebecca (2013) ‘No laughing matter: laughter and resistance in the construction of identity’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 223-236
  • Clift, Rebecca, Paul Drew, Ian Hutchby (2006) ‘Conversation Analysis’. In J-O. Ostman and J. Verschueren, eds. in collaboration with ElineVersluys. Handbook of Pragmatics. John Benjamins
  • Clift, Rebecca; Paul Drew, Ian Hutchby (2009) ‘Conversation analysis’. In: Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Ola Östman, Jef Verschueren, eds. The Pragmatics of Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 40-54
  • Clift, Rebecca, Fadi Helani (2010) ‘Inshallah: Religious invocations in Arabic topic transition’, Language in Society, 39/3: 357-382
  • Clift, Rebecca, Elisabeth Holt (2007) ‘Introduction’ to E. Holt and R. Clift, eds., Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1-15.
  • Clifton, Jonathan (2009) ‘Beyond taxonomies of influence: “doing” influence and making decisions in management team meetings’, Journal of Business Communication 46/1: 57-79.
  • Clifton, Jonathan (2009) ‘A membership categorization analysis of the Waco siege: Perpetrator-victim identity as a moral discrepancy device for ‘doing’ subversion’, Sociological Research Online, 14/5 [5]
  • Coates, Sally (1999) ‘Analysing the physical: an ethnomethodological study of boxing’,
  • Ethnographic Studies 4: 14-26
  • Cobb-Moore, Charlotte, Susan Danby, Ann Farrell (2008) ‘“I told you so”: justification used in disputes in young children’s interactions in an early childhood classroom’, Discourse Studies 10: 595-614.
  • Cobb-Moore, Charlotte, Susan Danby, Ann Farrell (2009) ‘Young children as rule makers’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics 41/8: 1477-1492
  • Collins, Sarah (2005) ‘Communicating for a clinical purpose: Strategy in interaction in healthcare consultations’, Communication & Medicine 2; [Special issue ‘Professional theories and institutional interaction’]: 111-22
  • Collins, Sarah (2005) ‘Explanations in consultations: the combined effectiveness of doctors’ and nurses’ communication with patients’. Medical Education, 39, 785-796.
  • Collins, Sarah; Nicky Britten, Johanna Ruusuvuori, A. Thompson (2007) Patient participation in health care consultations: Qualitative perspectives. New York : McGraw Hill
  • Collins, Sarah, Paul Drew, I. Watt, V, Entwhistle (2005) ‘ “Unilateral” and “bilateral” practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment’, Social Science & Medicine, 61/ 12: 2611-2627
  • Collins, Sarah, Ivana Marková, (1999) ‘Interactions between impaired and unimpaired speakers: intersubjectivity and the interplay of culturally shared and situation specific knowledge.’ British Journal of Social Psychology 38:339-68
  • Collins, Sarah, Ivana Markova, Joan Murphy (1997) ‘Bringing conversations to a close: the management of closings in interactions between AAC users and “natural” speakers’, Journal of Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 11: 467-93
  • Collins, Sarah, Joan Murphy (1994) ‘The development of news-tellings in conversations between AAC users and ‘natural’ speakers’, Communication Matters 8: 20-4
  • Conein, Bernard (1993) ‘L’ethnométhodologie comme sociologie descriptive: réflexivité et sui-réferentialité des catégories sociales’, Cahiers de Recherches Ethnométhodologique 1: 73- 88
  • Conein, Bernard (2001) ‘Classification sociale et catégorisation’. In: Michel de Fornel, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 239-58
  • Conein, Bernard (2005) ‘Agir dans et sur l’ espace de travail avec des objets ordinaires ‘, intellectica nE 41-42 “Espace, inter/action & cognition”: 163-79
  • Conein, Bernard, et al. (1986) Lexique et faits sociaux. (Lexique 5). Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille
  • Conein, Bernard, Michel de Fornel, Louis Quéré, (1990) Les formes de la conversation, vol. 1.
  • Issy les Moulineaux: CNET “Reseaux”
  • Conein, Bernard, Michel de Fornel, Louis Quéré, (1991) Les formes de la conversation, vol. 2. Issy les Moulineaux: CNET “Reseaux”
  • Conein, Bernard, B. Laks (1989) ‘A quoi servent les recettes? Savoir et savoir faire dans la cuisine domestique’. In: Langage et travail, 1989: 24-42
  • Conroy, Thomas Michael (1999) ‘”I Don’t Want to Burst Your Bubble”: Affiliation and Disaffiliation in a Joint Accounting by Affiliated Pair Partners’, Human Studies 22: 339-59
  • Cooren, François (2009) ‘The haunting question of textual agency: Derrida and Garfinkel on iterability and eventfulness’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/1: 42-67
  • Corrin, Juliette (2010) ‘A young child’s experience of maternal open-class repair initiation: learning about talk and learning about talk-in-interaction’, In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell: 23-41
  • Corrin, Juliette; Clare Tarplee, B. Wells, B. (2001) ‘Interactional linguistics and language development: A conversation analytic perspective on emergent syntax’.. In M. Selting, E. Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam : John Benjamins: 199- 225
  • Costello, Brian A.; Felicia Roberts. (2001) ‘Medical recommendations as joint social practice’,
  • Health Communication 13/3: 241-260
  • Coulon, Alain (1987) L’ethnométhodologie. Paris: P.U.F. (Que saisje?)
  • Coulon, Alain (1993) Ethnométhodologie et éducation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
  • Coulon, Alain (1995) Ethnomethodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage [Qualitative Research Methods 36] (translation of Coulon, 1987)
  • Coulter, Jeff (1973) ‘Language and the conceptualization of meaning’, Sociology 7:173-89
  • Coulter, Jeff (1973) Approaches to Insanity. Bath, UK: Martin Robertson
  • Coulter, Jeff (1975) ‘Perceptual accounts and interpretive asymmetries’, Sociology 9:385-96
  • Coulter, Jeff (1976) ‘Harvey Sacks: a preliminary appreciation’, Sociology 10: 507-12
  • Coulter, Jeff (1979) The social construction of mind: studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy. London: Macmillan
  • Coulter, Jeff (1979) ‘Beliefs and practical understanding’. In: George Psathas, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 163-86
  • Coulter, Jeff (1979) ‘The brain as agent’, Human Studies 2/4: 335-348
  • Coulter, Jeff (1982) Rethinking cognitive theory. London: Macmillan
  • Coulter, Jeff. (1982) ‘Remarks on the conceptualization of social structure’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12:33-46.
  • Coulter Jeff (1983) ‘Contingent and a priori structures in sequential analysis’, Human Studies 6: 361-74
  • Coulter, Jeff (1985) ‘Two concepts of the mental’. In: K.J. Gergen, K.E. Davis, ed. The social construction of the person. New York: Springer:
  • Coulter, Jeff (1986) ‘Affect and social context: emotion definition as a social task’. In: R. Harré, ed. The social construction of emotions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell: 120-34
  • Coulter, Jeff (1989) Mind in action. Cambridge: Polity Press
  • Coulter, Jeff (1990) Ethnomethodological sociology. Edward Elgar
  • Coulter, Jeff (1990) ‘Elementary properties of argument sequences’. In: George Psathas, ed.
  • Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America: 181-203
  • Coulter, Jeff (1991) ‘Logic: ethnomethodology and the logic of language’. In: Graham Button, ed. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 20- 50
  • Coulter, Jeff (1991) ‘Cognition: cognition in an ethnomethodological mode’ In: Graham Button, ed. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 176-95
  • Coulter, Jeff (1991) ‘The Grammar of Schizophrenia.’ In: William F. Flack, D. Miller and M. Wiener, eds., What is Schizophrenia? London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Coulter Jeff (1995) ‘Conceptual transformations’, Sociological theory 13: 163-77
  • Coulter Jeff (1996) ‘Human practices and the observability of the “macrosocial”’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 25:337-45
  • Coulter, Jeff (1999) ‘Discourse and Mind’, Human Studies 22: 163-81
  • Coulter, Jeff (2001) ‘The social construction of what?’, Science Technology & Human Values 26: 82-6
  • Coulter, Jeff. (2001) ‘Human practices and the observability of the “macro-social.”’ In: Theodore Schatzki, Karin Knorr-Cetina, Eike von Savigny, eds. The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge: 29-41.
  • Coulter, Jeff (2004) ‘What is “discursive psychology”?’, Human Studies 27: 335-40
  • Coulter, Jeff (2005) ‘Language without mind’. In: Hedwig te Molder, Jonathan Potter, eds.
  • Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 79-92
  • Coulter, Jeff (2008) ’Twenty-five theses against Cognitivism’, Theory, Culture & Society, 25(2): 19-32
  • Coulter, Jeff (2009) ‘Rule-following, rule-governance and rule-accord: reflections on rules after Rawls’, Journal of Classical Sociology November 9/4: 389-403
  • Coulter, Jeff, E.D. Parsons (1991) ‘The praxiology of perception: visual orientations and practical action’, Inquiry 33: 251-72
  • Coulter, Jeff; Wes Sharrock (1998). ‘On what we can see’. Theory and Psychology, 8/2: 147- 164.
  • Coulter, Jeff, Wes Sharrock (2007) Brain, mind and human behavior in contemporary cognitive science: critical assessments of the philosophy of psychology. Ceredigion U.K.; Lewiston, New York, U.S.A.: The Edwin Mellen Press
  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elisabeth (2004) ‘Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation: The case of new beginnings . In E. Couper-Kuhlen, C. E. Ford, eds., Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 335 - 376
  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elisabeth (2007) ‘Assessing and accounting’. In: Elizabeth Holt, Rebecca Clift, eds., Reporting Talk: Reported speech in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 81-119.
  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2009) ‘A sequential approach to affect: The case of “disappointment”’. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 94-123
  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2010) ‘Commentary on Stivers and Rossano: “Mobilizing Response”’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43/1: 32-37
  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elisabeth (2012). ‘Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories’. In M-L. Sorjonen, A. Peräkylä, eds., Emotion in interaction. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2012) ‘Some truths and untruths about final intonation in conversational questions’. In J. P. De Ruiter, ed., Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Coupland, Justine; Nikolas Coupland, Jeffrey D. Robinson, (1992) ‘“How are you?”: Negotiating phatic communion’, Language in Society, 21: 207-230.
  • Coupland Justine; Jeffrey D. Robinson, Nikolas Coupland (1994). ‘Frame negotiation in doctor-elderly patient consultations’, Discourse and Society, 5: 89-124.
  • Couture, Shari J. (2007) ‘Multiparty talk in family therapy: Complexity breeds opportunity’,
  • Journal of Systemic Therapies, 26/1: 63-82
  • Couture, S Shari J.; Olga Sutherland (2006) ‘Giving advice on advice-giving: A conversation analysis of Karl Tomm’s practice’, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 32: 329-45.
  • Cowley, Sarah, Jan Mitcheson, Anna Houston (2004) ‘Structuring health needs assessments: the medicalisation of health visiting’, Sociology of Health and Illness 26: 503-26
  • Crabtree, Andy (2000) ‘Talking Work: Language-games, Organisations and Computer- Supported Cooperative Work’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 9/2: 215-37
  • Crabtree, Andy (2000) ‘Remarks on the social organisation of space and place’, Journal of Mundane Behavior 1/1 [www.mundanebehavior.org]
  • Crabtree, Andy (2001) ‘On the practical availability of work-practice’, Ethnographic Studies. 6: 7-16
  • Crabtree, Any. (2003) Designing Collaborative Systems: A Practical Guide to Ethnography. London: Springer-Verlag
  • Crabtree, Andy (2004) ‘Taking technomethodology seriously: Hybrid change in the ethnomethodology-design relationship’, European Journal of Information Systems 13: 195- 209
  • Crabtree, Andy, Steve Benford, Mauricio Capra, Martin Flintham, Adam Drozd, Nick
  • Tandavanitj, Matt Adams, Ju Row Farr (2007) ‘The Cooperative work of gaming: orchestrating a mobile SMS game’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 16/1-2: 167-198
  • Crabtree, Andy, Andrew French, Chris Greenhalgh, Steve Benford, Keith Cheverst, Dan Fitton, Mark Rouncefield, Connor Graham ‘Developing digital records: early experiences of record and replay’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 15/4: 281-319
  • Crabtree, Andy, Tom Rodden (2004) ‘Domestic routines and design for the home’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 13/2: 191-220
  • Crabtree, Andy, Tom Rodden and Steve Benford (2005) ‘Moving with the times: IT research and the boundaries of CSCW’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 14/ 3 217-251
  • Crabtree, Andy; Mark Rouncefield, Peter Tolmie (2011) ‘The temporal order of work’. In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 91-108
  • Crabtr ee, Andy; Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield (2013) ‘Cooking for pleasure’. In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds. Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 21-51
  • Craven, Alexandra; Jonathan Potter (2010) ‘Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action’, Discourse Studies 12: 419-442
  • Crist, Eileen (1996) ‘Naturalists’ portrayals of animal life: engaging the Verstehen approach’,
  • Social studies of Science 26: 799-838
  • Crist, Eileen (2000) Images of Animals: Anthropomorphism and Animal Mind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press
  • Crist, Eileen (2002) ‘The Inner Life of Earthworms: Darwin’s Argument and Its Implications’. In M. Bekoff, C. Allen and G. M. Burghardteds. The Cognitive Animal, Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition. London: MIT Press.
  • Crist, Eileen (2004) ‘Can an insect speak? The case of the honeybee dance language’, Social Studies of Science 34: 7-43
  • Christodoulidou Maria (2011) ‘Lexical markers within the university lecture’, Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5/1: 143-160
  • Cromdal, Jakob (2000) ‘Creating a monolingual story in bilingual conversation’. In: J. N.Jørgensen & A. Holmen, red. Det er Conversation 801, degil mi? Perspectives on the bilingualism of Turkish-speaking children and adolescents in North Western Europe.
  • Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism, Køge Series, K7. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.
  • Cromdal, Jakob (2001) ‘”Can I be with?” Negotiating play entry in a bilingual school’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 515-43
  • Cromdal, Jakob (2001) ‘Overlap in bilingual play: Some implications of code-switching for overlap resolution’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 34: 421-51
  • Cromdal, Jakob (2003) ‘The creation and administration of social relations in bilingual group work’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24: 56-75
  • Cromdal, Jakob (2004) ‘Building bilingual oppositions: Code-switching in children’s play’,
  • Language in Society 33: 33-58
  • Cromdal, Jakob, ed. (2009) ‘Childhood and Social interaction in everyday life, special issue’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics 41/8:
  • Cromdal, Jakob (2009) ‘Childhood and social interaction in everyday life: Introduction to the special issue’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/8: 1473-1476
  • Cromdal, Jakob (2011) ‘Gender as a practical concern in children’s management of play participation’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 294-309
  • Cromdal, Jakob (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and emergency calls’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed.
  • The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 982-985
  • Cromdal, Jakob; Håkan Landqvist, Daniel Persson-Thunqvist, Karin Osvaldsson (2012) ‘Finding out what’s happened: Two procedures for opening emergency calls’, Discourse Studies: 371-397
  • Cromdal, Jakob; Karin Osvaldsson (2012) ‘Working towards trouble: Some categorial resources for accomplishing disputes in a correctional youth facility’. In Susan Danby, Maryanne Theobald, eds.. Disputes in everyday life: The social and moral orders of children and young people. American Sociological Association & Emerald: 141-163.
  • Cromdal, Jakob, Karin Osvaldsson, Daniel Persson-Thunqvist (2008) ‘Context that matters: Producing "thick-enough descriptions" in initial emergency reports’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/5: 927-59.
  • Cromdal, Jakob; Daniel Persson-Thunqvist, Karin Osvaldsson (2012) ‘SOS one-one-two what has occurred?: Managing openings in children’s emergency calls’, Discourse, Context &
  • Media, 1, 183-202.
  • Cruz, Fernanda Miranda Da (2014) ‘Categorizations of patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s: alternative membership categorization devices displayed by participants in talk-in-interaction’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 193-214
  • Cuff, E.C. (1993) Problems of Versions in Everyday Situations. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America
  • Cuff, E.C., M.A. Atkinson, John R.E. Lee (1978) ‘The recommencement of a meeting as a member’s accomplishment’. In: J.N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 133-53
  • Cuff, E.C., D.W. Francis (1978) ‘Some features of “invited stories” about marriage breakdown’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 18
  • Cuff, E.C., D. Hustler (1982) ‘Stories and storytime in an infant classroom’, Semiotica 42: 119-54
  • Cuff, E.C., Wes Sharrock (1985) ‘Meetings’. In: T.A. van Dijk,ed. Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press. Vol. III: 149-59
  • Curl, Traci S. (2004) ‘”Repetition” repairs: The relationship of phonetic structure and sequence organization’. In: Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Cecilia E. Ford, eds. (2004) Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 273-98
  • Curl, Traci S. (2005) ‘Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of repetitions’, Discourse Processes 39/1: 1-44
  • Curl, Traci S. (2006) ‘Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design’ Journal of Pragmatics 38/8: 1257-80
  • Curl, Traci S., Paul Drew (2008) ‘Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41/2: 129-53
  • Curl, Traci S., John Local, Gareth Walker (2006) ‘Repetition and the prosody-pragmatics interface’, Journal of Pragmatics 38 1721-51
  • Curley, Carleen Ann (1998) ‘Teaching the body to make tea within social interaction’, Issues in Applied Linguistics, 9: 151-78
  • Czyzewski, Marek (1989) ’Garfinkel, “cognitive revolution”, and conversation analysis.
  • International Journal of the Sociology of Language 78, pp. 43-55
  • Czyzewski, Marek (1994) ‘Reflexivity of actors versus reflexivity of accounts’, Theory, Culture & Society 11: 161-8 [reprinted in: Michael Lynch & Wes Sharrock, eds. (2003)
  • Harold Garfinkel, London, etc. Sage, Vol. 1]
  • Czyzewski, Marek (1995) ‘Mm Hm tokens as interactional devices in the psychotherapeutic in-take interview’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds., Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 73-90
  • Dallmayr, Fred R (2006) ‘Book Symposium: Kenneth Liberman on Tibetan Debating Practice’, Human Studies 29: 381-386
  • Damico, J.S., M., Oelschlaeger, N.N. Simmons-Mackie (1999) ‘Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Conversation analysis’, Aphasiology. 13: 667-680
  • Danby, Susan (1998) ‘The serious and playful work of gender: talk and social order in a preschool classroom’. In: N. Yelland (ed.), Gender in Early Childhood. London: Routledge, 175-205
  • Danby. Susan (2009) ‘Childhood and social interaction in everyday life: An epilogue’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/8: 1596-1599
  • Danby, Susan, Carolyn D. Baker (1998). ‘What’s the problem? Restoring social order in the preschool classroom’. In: I. Hutchby, J. Moran-Ellis, eds., Children and Social Competence: Arenas of Action. London, Falmer: 157-86
  • Danby, Susan,. Carolyn Baker (1998) ‘How to be masculine in the block area’, Childhood 5: 151-75
  • Danby, Susan, Carolyn D. Baker (2000) ‘Unravelling the fabric of social order in block area’. In: S. Hester & D. Francis, eds., Local educational order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 91-140
  • Danby, Susan, Carolyn Baker, Michael Emmison (2005) ‘Four observations on openings in calls to Kids Help Line’. In: Carolyn Baker, Michael Emmison, Alan Firth eds. Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 133–151
  • Danby, Susan, Carly W. Butler, Michael Emmison (2009) ‘When ‘listeners can’t talk’: Comparing active listening in opening sequences of telephone and online counselling’,
  • Australian Journal of Communication, 36/3: 91-114 [ http://aiemca.net/?page_id=229]
  • Danby Susan, Lynette Ewing, Karen Thorpe (2011) ‘The novice researcher: interviewing young children’, Qualitative Inquiry 17/1: 74–84
  • Dant, Tim, Dave Francis (1998) ‘ Planning in Organisations: Rational Control or Contingent Activity?’ Sociological Research Online, vol. 3, no. 2
  • Dausendschön-Gay; Ulrich, Ulrich Krafft (2009) ‘Preparing next actions in routine activities’,
  • Discourse Processes, 46: 247-268
  • Davey, B. and Gramkow Andersen, K. (1996) ‘Some practical and legal aspects concerning the collection of empirical data’. In: Jensen, K.A. and Steensig, J., eds.,: Datadag. Aarhus: ADLA (Danish Association for Applied Linguistics)
  • David, Gary C., Angela Cora Garcia, Anne Warfield Rawls, Donald Chand (2009) ’ Listening to what is said – transcribing what is heard: the impact of speech recognition technology (SRT) on the practice of medical transcription (MT)’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31/6: 924-938 [reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010)
  • Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell: 133-47]
  • David, Gary, Paul Jalbert (2008) ‘Undoing degradation: the attempted “rehumanization” of Arab and Muslim Americans’, Ethnographic Studies, No 10: 23-47
  • Davidson, Judy A. (1978) ‘An instance of negotiation in a call closing’, Sociology 12: 123-33
  • Davidson, Judy A. (1984) ‘Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds.
  • Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.: 102-28
  • Davidson, Judy Arlene (1990) ‘Modifications of invitations, offers and rejections’. In: George Psathas, ed., Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America: 149-79
  • Davis, Kathy (1986) ‘The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 8/1: 44-74
  • Day, Dennis (1994). ‘Tang’s dilemma and other problems: Ethnification processes at some multicultural workplaces’. Pragmatics, 4, 315-336.
  • Day, Dennis (1998) ‘Being ascribed and resisting membership in an ethnic group’. In: Charles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe, eds. Identities in Talk. London, Sage: 151-70
  • Day, Dennis (2006) ‘Ethnic and social groups and their linguistic categorization’. In Kristin Bührig, Jan D. ten Thije, eds. Beyond misunderstanding: Linguistic analyses of intercultural communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 217 - 244
  • Day, Dennis (2008) ‘In a bigger, messo, context’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/5: 979-96.
  • Day, Dennis (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and membership categories’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1050-1055
  • Day, Dennis; Susanne Kjaerbeck (2012) ‘Treating student contributions as displays of understanding in group supervision’. In: Gitte, Rasmussen, C.E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds.,
  • Evaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 67 - 88
  • Day, Dennis; Susanne Kjaerbeck (2013) ‘“Positioning” in the conversation analytic approach’,
  • Narrative Inquiry, 23/1: 16-39
  • Day, Dennis ; Johannes Wagner (2008) ‘Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis’. In: Gerd Antos; Elja Ventola, eds. Interpersonal Communication. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter: 33-52 [Handbooks of Applied Linguistics]de Kok, Bregje Christina (2008) ‘The role of context in conversation analysis: Reviving an interest in ethno-methods’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/ 5: 886-903.
  • Dean, Michelle; Gail Fox Adams, Connie Kasari (2013)‘How narrative difficulties build peer rejection: A discourse analysis of a girl with autism and her female peers’, Discourse Studies15/2: 147-166
  • Demosthenous, Catherine .M. (2010). Social Inclusion and Exclusion in Universities: Linguistics, Categories and Conversational Resources. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag,.
  • Demosthenous Catherine M.(2012) ‘Inclusion/exclusion for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students: Understanding how ‘We’ matters’, Journal of Social Inclusion 3/1: 71-85
  • Dennis, Alex (2003) ‘Skepticist philosophy as ethnomethodology’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (2): 151-73.
  • Dennis, Alex (2004) ‘Lynch on Schutz and Science: Postanalytic Ethnomethodology Reconsidered’, Theory & Science [ISSN: 1527-5558] http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol5.1/dennis.html
  • Denvir, Paul; Anita M. Pomerantz (2009) ‘A qualitative analysis of a significant barrier to organ and tissue donation: Receiving less-than-optimal medical care’, Health Communication, 24/7: 597-607
  • Deppermann, Arnulf (2005). ‘Conversational interpretation of lexical items and conversational contrasting’. In: A. Hakulinen & M. Selting, eds., Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 289-306
  • Deppermann, Arnulf (2011) ‘The study of formulations as a key to an interactional semantics’,
  • Human Studies, 34/2: 115-128
  • Deppermann, Arnulf (2011) ‘Notionalization: The transformation of descriptions into categorizations’, Human Studies, 34/2: 155-181
  • Deppermann, Arnulf (2012) ‘Negotiating hearing problems in doctor-patient interaction: Practices and problems of accomplishing shared reality’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies.
  • Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 90-103
  • Deppermann, Arnulf, ed. (2013) ‘Special Issue: Conversation analytic studies of multimodal interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 46/1: 1-172
  • Deppermann, Arnulf (2012) ‘How does ‘cognition’ matter to the analysis of talk-in-interaction?’, Language Sciences 34 746-767
  • Deppermann, Arnulf (2013) ‘Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German’,Journal of Pragmatics 46/1: 91-121
  • Deppermann, Arnulf (2013) ‘Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics 46/1: 1-7
  • Deppermann, Arnulf (2013) ‘Interview als Text vs. Interview als Interaktion’ [61 Absätze].
  • Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(3), Art. 13, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1303131
  • Deppermann, Arnulf. (2013) ‘(What) does “Positioning” offer more than “Membership Categorization”? Evidence from a mock story’, Narrative Inquiry, 23/1: 62-88
  • Deppermann, Arnulf; Maria Egbert (2012) ‘Conclusions and future perspectives for application and innovation’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 159-63
  • Deppermann, Arnulf; Reinhold Fiehler, Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, eds. (2006) Grammatik und Interaktion. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung
  • Deppermann, Arnulf; Reinhold Schmitt, Lorenza Mondada (2010) ‘Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/6: 1700-1718
  • Deppermann, Arnulf; Thomas Spranz-Fogasy (2011) ‘Doctors’ questions as displays of understanding’, Communication & Medicine, 8/2: 111-122
  • Dersley; Ian, Anthony Wootton (2000) ‘Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 375-406
  • Dersley; Ian, Anthony Wootton (2001) ‘In the heat of the sequence: interactional features preceding walkouts from argumentative talk’, Language in Society 30: 611-38
  • De Stefani, Elwys (2006) ‘Le chiusure conversazionali nell’interazione al banco di un supermercato’ [Closings in interactions at the counter of a supermarket]. In Y. Bürki & E. De Stefani (eds.) Trascrivere la lingua. Dalla filologia all’analisi conversazionale. Bern: Peter Lang: 369-403
  • De Stefani, Elwys (2009) ‘Per un’onomastica interazionale. I nomi propri nella conversazione’ [Towards an interactional onomastics. Proper names in conversation] Rivista Italiana di Onomastica, 15/1: 9-40
  • De Stefani, Elwys (2010) ‘Reference as an interactively and multimodally accomplished practice. Organizing spatial reorientation in guided tours’. In M. Pettorino, A. Giannini, I. Chiari, F. M. Dovetto, eds., Spoken communication. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 137-170
  • De Stefani, Elwys (2011) “Ah petta ecco, io prendo questi che mi piacciono”. Agire come coppia al supermercato. Un approccio conversazionale e multimodale allo studio dei processi decisionali. [Doing being a couple at the supermarket. A conversational and multimodal approach to decision-making processes], Roma, Aracne
  • De Stefani, Elwys (2013) ‘The collaborative organisation of next actions in a semiotically rich environment: Shopping as a couple’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 123-151.
  • De Stefani, Elwys; Anne-Danièle Gazin (2014) ‘Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions’ Journal of Pragmatics 65: 63-79
  • De Stefani, Elwys, Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2008) ‘Topical and sequential backlining in a French radio-phone-in program: Turn shapes and sequential placements’ Pragmatics 18/3: 381-406
  • De Stefani, Elwys, Mondada, Lorenza (2007) ‘L’organizzazione multimodale e interazionale dell’orientamento spaziale in movimento’ [The multimodal and interactional organisation of spatial orientation in mobile settings] Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, 85: 131-159
  • De Stefani, Elwys, Mondada, Lorenza (2010) ‘Die Eröffnung von sozialen Begegnungen im öffentlichen Raum. Die emergente Koordination der räumlichen, visuellen und verbalen Handlungen’ [The openings of social encounters in public space. The emerging coordination of spatial, visual, and verbal actions]. In L. Mondada, R. Schmitt, eds., Situationseröffnungen. Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion. Tübingen: Narr: 103-170
  • De Stefani, Elwys; Lorenza Mondada (2014) ‘Reorganizing mobile formations: When ’guided’ participants initiate reorientations in guided tours’, Space and Culture, 17/2: 157-175
  • D’Hondt, Sigurd (2002) ‘Framing gender: Incongruous gendered identities in Dar es Salaam adolescents’ talk’. In: Paul McIlvenny, ed., Talking Gender and Sexuality. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 207-36
  • D’hondt, Sigurd (2009) ‘Others on trial: The construction of cultural otherness in Belgian first instance criminal hearings’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/4: 806-828
  • D’hondt, Sigurd (2009) ‘Calling the stops in a Dar-es-Salaam minibus: Embodied understandings of place in a drop-off routine’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 1962-1976
  • D’hondt, Sigurd (2009) ‘Good Cops, Bad Cops: Intertextuality, agency, and structure in criminal trial discourse’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/3: 249-275
  • D’Hondt, Sigurd (2011). ‘Ah-prefacing in Kiswahili second pair parts’, Language in Society,40: 563-590
  • D’hondt, Sigurd (2013) ‘Analyzing equivalalences in discourse: Are discourse theory and membership categorization analysis compatible?’, Pragmatics 23/3: 421-445
  • Diaz, F.; Charles Antaki (2001) ‘Análisis de la conversación e intersubjetividad’., in Crespo, E.; C. Soldevilla, eds., La constitución social de la subjetividad. Madrid: Catarata: 32-48
  • Dickerson, Paul; Penny Stribling, John Rae (2007) ‘Tapping into interaction: How children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders design and place tapping in relation to activities in progress’,
  • Gesture, 7, 271-303
  • DiDomenico, Stephen M.; Jeffrey Boase (2013). ’Bringing mobiles into the conversation: Applying a conversation analytic approach to the study of mobiles in co-present interaction’, in D. Tannen & A. M. Trester, eds., Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. Georgetown, D.C.: Georgetown University Press: 119-132
  • Dillon, Patrick J.(2011) ‘Moral accounts and membership categorization in primary care medical interviews’, Communication & Medicine, 8/3: 211-22
  • Dingwall, Robert (1998) `Empowerment or enforcement? Some questions about power and control in divorce mediation’. In Dingwall, R. and Eekelaar, J.M., eds., Divorce Mediation and the Legal Process: British Practice and International Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press:150-67
  • Dingwall, Robert (2000) ‘Language, law and power: ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and the politics of law and society studies’, Law and Social Inquiry 25: 885-911.
  • Djordjilovic, Olga (2012) ‘Displaying and developing team identity in workplace meetings-a multimodal perspective’, Discourse Studies 14/1: 111-127
  • Dobbinson , Sushie; Michael R. Perkins , Jill Boucher (1998) ‘Structural patterns in conversations with a woman who has autism: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis’, Journal of Communication Disorders , 31/ 2: 113 – 134
  • Dobbinson , Sushie; Michael R. Perkins, Jill Boucher (2003) ‘The interactional significance of formulas in autistic language . Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics , 17/4-5: 299-307
  • Dodier, Nicolas (2001) ‘Une éthique radicale de l’indexicalité’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 315-30
  • Douglas, Jack D. ed. (1971) Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1970)
  • Dourish, Paul, Graham Button (1998). ‘On “Technomethodology”: Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design’. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4), 395- 432.
  • Drew, Paul (1978) ‘Accusations: the occasioned use of members’ knowledge of “religious geography” in describing events’, Sociology 12: 1-22
  • Drew, Paul (1981) ‘Adults’ corrections of children’s mistakes: A response to Wells and Montgoaulmery’ . In P. French, M. MacLure, eds., Adult-child conversation: Studies in structure and process. London: Croom Helm: 244-267 .
  • Drew, Paul (1984) ‘Speakers’ reporting in invitation sequences’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 129-51
  • Drew, Paul (1985) ‘Analyzing the use of language in courtroom interaction’. In: T.A. van Dijk,ed. Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press, vol. III: 133-47
  • Drew, Paul (1987) ‘Po-faced receipts of teases’, Linguistics 25: 219-53
  • Drew, Paul (1989) ‘Recalling someone from the past’. In: Roger, D., Peter Bull, eds.,
  • Conversation: an interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 96-115
  • Drew, Paul (1990) ‘Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in crossexamination’. In: N. Levi & A.G. Walker, eds. Language in the judicial process, New York: Plenum: 39-64
  • Drew, Paul (1990) ‘Conversation Analysis: Who needs it?’, Text 10: 27-35
  • Drew, Paul (1991) ‘Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions’. In: In: I. Markovà, K. Foppa, eds. Asymmetries in dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Whetsheaf: 29-48
  • Drew, Paul (1992) ‘Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape’. In: Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 470-520
  • Drew, Paul (1995) ‘Interaction sequences and anticipatory interactional planning’. In: E.N. Goody (ed.) Social intelligence and interaction: expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 111-38
  • Drew, Paul (1997) ‘”Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 28: 69-101
  • Drew, Paul (1998) ‘Complaints about transgressions and misconduct’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 295-325
  • Drew, Paul (2001) ‘Spotlight on the patient’ Text 21: 261B268
  • Drew, Paul (2002) ‘Out of context: an intersection between domestic life and the workplace, as contexts for (business) talk’, Language and Communication 22: 477-94
  • Drew, Paul (2003) ‘Conversation analysis’. In Smith, J. (ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, London, Sage:132-58
  • Drew, Paul (2003) ‘Precision and exaggeration in interaction’, American Sociological Review, 68: 917-38
  • Drew, Paul (2003) ‘Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings: a sketch’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 293-308
  • Drew, Paul (2004) ‘Conversation analysis’. In K. Fitch, R. Sanders, eds. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum: 71-102
  • Drew, Paul (2005) ‘Conversation analysis’. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders, eds., Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 71-102
  • Drew, Paul (2005) ‘Is confusion a state of mind?’. In: Hedwig te Molder, Jonathan Potter, eds.
  • Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 161-83
  • Drew, Paul (2005) ‘The interactional generation of exaggerated versions in conversation’. in: Hakulinen, Auli, Margret Selting, eds. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 233-255
  • Drew, Paul (2006) ‘Mis-alignments in ‘after-hours’ calls to a British GP’s practice: a study in telephone medicine’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 416-44
  • Drew, Paul (2006) ‘When documents “speak”: documents, language and interaction’. In Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, Darin Weinberg, eds. Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London, etc. Sage: 63-80
  • Drew, Paul (2009) ‘“Quit talking while I’m interrupting”: A comparison between positions of overlap onset in conversation. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 70-93
  • Drew, Paul (2010) ‘Commentary’. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication (special issue on medical interactions), 20/2: 303-305.
  • Drew, Paul (2012)‘What drives sequences?’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 45/1: 61-68
  • Drew, Paul (2012) ‘Turn design’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 131-49
  • Drew, Paul, Alan Backhouse (1992) ‘The design implications of social interaction in a workplace setting’, Environment and Planning B, 19: 573-84
  • Drew, Paul, John Chatwin, Sarah Collins (2001) ‘Conversation analysis: a method for researchinto interactions between patients and health-care professionals’, Health Expectations 4:58-70
  • Drew, Paul, Kathy Chilton (2000) ‘Calling just to keep in touch: regular and habitualised telephone calls as an environment for small talk’. In: Justine Coupland, ed., Small Talk. Longman, New Jersey: 138-62
  • Drew, Paul, John Heritage (1992) ‘Analyzing talk at work: an introduction’. In: Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 3-65
  • Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. (1992) Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. (2006) Conversation Analysis (4 Volumes), London: Sage. http://www.uk.sagepub.com/booksProdDesc.nav?prodId=Book228355&
  • Drew, Paul, John Heritage (2006) ‘Editors’ introduction’. In Paul Drew, John Heritage, eds.
  • Conversation Analysis (Volume 1), London: Sage: xxi-xxxvii.
  • Drew, Paul, Elisabeth Holt (1988) ‘Complainable matters: the use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints’, Social Problems 35: 398-417
  • Drew, Paul, Elisabeth Holt (1995) ‘Idiomatic expressions and their role in the organization of topic transition in conversation’. In: M. Everaert, E-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, R. Schreuder, eds. Idioms, structural and psychological perspectives. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum: 117-32
  • Drew, Paul, Elisabeth Holt (1998) ‘Figures of speech: idiomatic expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation’, Language in Society 27: 495-522
  • Drew, Paul, Elizabeth Holt (2005) ‘Figurative pivots: the use of figurative expressions in pivotal topic transitions’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38: 35-61
  • Drew, Paul, Geoffrey Raymond, Darin Weinberg, eds. (2006) Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London, etc. Sage
  • Drew, Paul, Marja-Leena Soronjen (1997) ‘Institutional Dialogue’. In: T. A van Dijk, ed.,
  • Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage: 92-118
  • Drew, Paul, Traci Walker (2009) ‘Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics, 41/12: 2400-2414
  • Drew, Paul; Traci Walker (2010) ‘Requesting assistance in calls to the police’. In
  • M.Coulthard, A.Johnson, eds. Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. Routeledge: 95-110
  • Drew, Paul; Traci Walker, Richard Ogden (2013) ‘Self-repair and action construction’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Driessen, J.J. (1997) ‘Worldly interpretations of a suspicious story’, Ethnographic Studies 2: 3-15.
  • Drummond, Kent (1989) ‘A backward glance at interruptions’, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53:150-166 .
  • Drummond, Kent, Hopper, Robert (1993). ‘Backchannels Revisited: Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 157-77
  • Drummond, Kent, Hopper, Robert (1993) ‘Acknowledgement tokens in series’,
  • Communication Reports 6: 47-53
  • Drummond, Kent, Hopper, Robert (1993) ‘Some uses of Yeah’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 26; 203-12
  • Dulong, Renaud (1994) ‘Quand l’histoire disqualifie les catégories: la perspective historiale de W. Schapp’. In: B. Fradin, L. Quéré, J. Widmer, eds. (1994) L’enquête sur les catégories.Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]: 273-96
  • Dulong, Renaud (1998) Le témoin oculaire: les conditions de l’attestation personnelle. [The eye witness: social conditions of personal testimony] Paris: Editions de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales [Recherches d’histoire et de sciences sociales / Studies in History and the Social Sciences, 79]
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2001) ‘Présentation’. In: Dupret, Baudouin (ed.) ‘Le droit en action et en contexte. Ethnométhodologie et analyse de conversation dans la recherche juridique’ [Law in action and in context: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis in research in the field of law] Droit et Société, No 48: 343-48
  • Dupret, Baudouin (ed.) (2001) ‘Le droit en action et en contexte. Ethnométhodologie et analyse de conversation dans la recherche juridique’ [Law in action and in context: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis in research in the field of law] Droit et Société, No 48
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2001) ‘L’intention en acte. Approche pragmatique de la qualification pénale dans un contexte égyptien’. In: Dupret, Baudouin (ed.) ‘Le droit en action et en contexte. Ethnométhodologie et analyse de conversation dans la recherche juridique’ [Law in action and in context: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis in research in the field of law] Droit et Société, No 48: 439-67
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2002) ‘Sexual Morality at the egyptian bar: female circumcision, sex change operations, and motives for suing’, Islamic Law and Society 9: 41-69
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2003) ‘The Person in an Egyptian judicial context: An Ethnomethodological analysis of courtroom proceedings’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law / Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique: 5-44
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2004) ‘L’autorité de la référence : Usages de la sharî`a islamique dans le contexte judiciaire égyptien’ [The Authority of Reference: Uses of Islamic Sharia in an Egyptian Judicial Context], Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions, 125: 189-209
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2004) ‘Morale ou nature : Négocier la qualification de la faute dans une affaire égyptienne d’homosexualité’ [Morality or Nature: Negociating the Characterization of the Offense in an Egyptian Case of homosexuality], Négociation 2: 41-57
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2004) ‘Intention in action: a pragmatic approach to criminal characterization in an Egyptian context’, in B. Dupret (ed.), Standing trial: law and the person in the modern Middle East, London, I.B.: Tauris
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2005) ‘The Practice of Judging: The Egyptian Judiciary at Work in a Personal Status Case’, in M.K. Masud, R. Peters and D. Powers (ed.), Dispensing justice in Muslim courts: Qadis, procedures and judgments, Leiden, E.J. Brill
  • Dupret, Baudouin, ed. (2005) Droit et expertise dans une perspective praxéologique [Law and Expertise in a praxiological perspective], special issue of Droit et Société, 61, 2005
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2005) ‘Présentation: Droit et expertise dans une perspective praxéologique’ [Introduction: Law and Expertise in a Praxiological Perspective], Droit et Société #61: 619-26
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2005) ‘Le corps mis au langage du droit. Comment conférer à la nature une pertinence juridique’ [The Body in the Language of the Law: How to Ascribe Legal Relevance to Nature], Droit & Société 61: 5-28
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2006) Le Jugement en action. Ethnométhodologie du droit, de la morale et de la justice en Egypte. [Adjudication in action: ethnomethodology of law, morality and justice in Egypt], Geneva, Librairie Droz
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2011) Practices of Truth: An ethnomethodological inquiry into Arab contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  • Dupret, Baudouin (2011). Adjudication in action: An ethnomethodology of Law. Aldershot, England: Ashgate
  • Dupret, Baudouin, Jean-Noël Ferrié (2007) ‘The audience they assign themselves: three arab channels and their “self-presentation” (al-Jazeera, al-Manar, al-Hurra)’, Ethnographic Studies, No 9: 63 - 80
  • Dupret, Baudouin, Jean-Noël Ferrié (2008) ‘News headlines: stating in brief what is relevant in today’s world (al-Arabiya, al-Jazeera, al-Manar, BBC World)’, Ethnographic Studies, No 10: 49-68
  • Dupret, Baudouin, Jean-Noël Ferrié (2008) ‘Legislating at the shopfloor level: Background knowledge and relevant context of parliamentary debates’, Journal of Pragmatics 40: 960-78
  • Dupret, Baudouin, Enrique Klaus, Jean-Noël Ferrié (2009) ‘Scandal and dialogical network: what does morality do to politics. About the Islamic headscarf within the Egyptian parliament’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 161-84
  • Dupret, Baudouin, Jiri Nekvapil, Ivan Leudar, eds. (2007) “Media, wars and identities: Broadcasting Islam, Muslims and the Middle East”. Ethnographic Studies, No 9 [6]
  • Dupret, Baudouin, Jiri Nekvapil, Ivan Leudar, eds.(2008) Media, Wars and Identities - Part Two. Ethnographic Studies, No 10 [7]
  • Duranti, Alessandro (2007) ‘Transcripts, like Shadows on a Wall’, Mind, Culture, and Activity 13(4): 301-10.
  • Duranti, Alessandro, Charles Goodwin, eds. (1992) Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Eberle, Thomas S. (2012) ‘Phenomenological life-world analysis and ethnomethodology’s program’, Human Studies 35/2: 279-304
  • Edwards, Derek (1995) ‘Sacks and psychology’, Theory & Psychology, 5/4: 579-596 .
  • Edwards, Derek; Alessandra Fasulo (2006) ‘“To Be Honest”: Sequential uses of honesty phrases in talk-in-interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39 (4): pages 343-76
  • Edwards, Derek, Elizabeth H. Stokoe (2007) ‘Self-help in calls for help with problem neighbours’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 40/1: 9-32
  • Edwards, Derek; Elizabeth Stokoe (2011) ‘“You Don’t Have to Answer”: Lawyers’ Contributions in Police Interrogations of Suspects’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/1: 21-43
  • Eerdmans, Susan L., Micaela Di Candia (2007) ‘Watching paint dry: the sequentiality of idiomatic expressions in NS-NS and NS-NNS talk-in-interaction’, Discourse Studies 9: 579-595
  • Egbert, Maria M. (1991) ‘Scientists’ orientation to an experimental apparatus in their interaction in a chemistry lab’, ial Issues in Applied Linguistics 2: 269-300
  • Egbert, Maria (1996) ‘Context sensitivity in conversation analysis: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator “bitte.”’, Language in Society, 25: 587-612
  • Egbert, Maria M. (1997) ‘Schisming: the collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 30: 1-51
  • Egbert, Maria M. (1997) ‘Some interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi- person conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 27: 611-34
  • Egbert, Maria M. (1998) ‘Miscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-year German students: A comparison with natural conversation’ . In R. Young, A. W. He, eds.,
  • Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 147-169
  • Egbert, Maria (2004) ‘Other-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization: Some conversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorization’, Journal of Pragmatics 36/8: 1467-98.
  • Egbert, Maria (2011) ‘Conversation analysis applied to user centered design: a study of who “the user” is’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 207-221
  • Egbert, Maria (2012) ‘Interaktion in der Audiometrie : Zur Paradoxie der Relevanzmarkierung von Störungen’. In: Ruth Ayaß ; Christian Meyer, eds. Sozialität in Slow Motion : Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven. Wiesbaden : Springer: 463-479
  • Egbert, Maria (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and dyads, triads, and more’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 972- 976
  • Egbert, Maria; Jörg. Bergmann,(2005) ‘Angst - Von der Phänomenologie zur Interaktion :
  • Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaften’,. Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung. 4/6: 227-242
  • Egbert, Maria; Arnulf Deppermann (2012) ‘Introduction to Conversation Analysis with examples from audiology’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 40-7
  • Egbert, Maria; Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung. http://www.verlag-gespraechsforschung.de/2012/egbert.html
  • Egbert, Maria, Andrea Golato, Jeffrey D. Robinson (2009) ‘Repairing reference’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 104-32
  • Egbert, Maria; Ben Mathews (2012) ‘User Centered Design: From understanding hearing loss and hearing technologies towards understanding interaction’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 48-55
  • Egbert, Maria, Monika Vöge (2008) ‘Wh-interrogative formats used for questioning and beyond: German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English why’, Discourse Studies 10: 17-36.
  • Eglin, Peter.(1979) ‘Resolving reality disjunctures on Telegraph Avenue: A Study of Practical Reasoning.’ Canadian Journal of Sociology 4: 359-77.
  • Eglin, Peter (1980) Talk and Taxonomy: A Methodological Comparison of Ethnosemantics and Ethnomethodology with Reference to Terms for Canadian Doctors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  • Eglin, Peter (1980) ‘Culture as method: location as an interactional device’, Journal of Pragmatics 4: 121-35
  • Eglin, Peter (2000) ‘Interruptions’, Ethnographic Studies 5: 56-67
  • Eglin, Peter (2002) ‘Members’ gendering work: ‘women’, ‘feminists’ and membership categorization analysis’, Discourse & Society 13: 819-25
  • Eglin, Peter (2009) ‘What do we do Wednesday? On beginning the class as university-specific work: A preliminary study’, Canadian Review of Sociology 46/ 1: 39-57.
  • Eglin, Peter (2013) ‘Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis.’ in David L. Brunsma, Keri Lyall Smith, Brian Gran, eds., Handbook of Sociology and Human Rights. Boulder and London: Paradigm, 355-364
  • Eglin, Peter, Stephen Hester (1992) ‘Category, Predicate and Task: The Pragmatics of Practical Action’, Semiotica 88: 243-68
  • Eglin, Peter, Stephen Hester (1999) Moral order and the Montreal massacre: a story of membership categorization analysis.’ In: Paul L. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 195-230
  • Eglin, Peter, Stephen Hester (1999) “You’re all a bunch of feminists:” Categorization and the politics of terror in the Montreal Massacre’, Human Studies 22: 253-72
  • Eglin, Peter, Stephen Hester (2003) The Montreal Massacre A Story of Membership Categorization Analysis. Waterloo, ONT, Ca: Wilfrid Laurier University Press
  • Eglin, Peter, Stephen Hester (2010) ‘Présentation’. In Lena Jayyusi, Catégorisation et Ordre Moral. Tr. Michel Barthélémy. Collection Études Sociologiques. Paris: Economica: 17-42.
  • Eglin, Peter; D. Wideman (1986) ‘Inequality in professional service encounters: Verbal strategies of control versus task performance in calls to the police’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 15: 341-62.
  • Ehrlich, Susan (2002) ‘Legal institutions, nonspeaking recipiency and participants’ orientations’, Discourse & Society 13/6: 731-747
  • Ehrlich, Susan; Jack Sidnell (2006) ‘“I think that’s not an assumption you ought to make”: Challenging presuppositions in inquiry testimony’, Language in Society, 35/5: 655-676
  • Ekberg, Katie; Amanda LeCouteur (2012) Negotiating behavioural change: Therapists’ proposal turns in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Communication & Medicine, 9/3: 229-239
  • Ekberg, Stuart (2012) ‘Addressing a source of trouble outside of the repair space’, Journal of Pragmatics 44/4 : 374-386
  • Ekberg, Stuart; Amanda LeCouteur(2014) ‘Making arrangements in talk-in-interaction’, Text and Talk 32/4: 377–400
  • Ekström, Mats (2009) ‘Announced refusal to answer: a study of norms and accountability in broadcast political interviews’, Discourse Studies 11: 681-702.
  • Ekström, Mats; Åsa Kroon Lundell (2011) ‘The joint construction of a journalistic expert identity in studio interactions between journalists on TV news’, Text & Talk 31/6: 661-681
  • Emerson, Robert M.; James A. Holstein (2012) ‘Melvin Pollner and Ethnomethodology’, The American Sociologist 43:1-6
  • Emirbayer, Mustafa; Douglas W. Maynard (2011) ‘Pragmatism and Ethnomethodology’,
  • Qualitative Sociology 34: 221-261
  • Emmertsen, Sofie (2007) ‘Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics 39/3: 570-591
  • Emmertsen, Sofie ;Trine Heinemann (2010 ) “Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction”, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43/2: 109-132
  • Emmison, Mike (1987) ‘Victors and vanquished: the social organization of ceremonial congratulations and commiserations’, Language and Communication 7: 95-110
  • Emmison, Mike (1988) ‘On the interactional management of defeat’, Sociology 22: 233-51
  • Emmison, Michael; Carly W. Butler; Susan Danby (2011) ‘Script proposals: A device for empowering clients in counselling’, Discourse Studies 13/1: 3-26,
  • Emmison, Michael, Susan Danby (2007) ‘Troubles announcements and reasons for calling: initial actions in opening sequences in calls to a national children’s helpline’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40, (1): 63-87
  • Emmison, Michael, Susan Danby (2007) ‘Who’s the friend in the background?: Interactional strategies in determining authenticity in calls to a national children’s helpline’. In Johanna Rendle-Short & Maurice Nevile, eds. Language as action: Australian studies in conversation analysis. Special thematic issue, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3): Available via http://publications.epress.monash.edu/loi/aral
  • Emmison, Michael; Alan Firth (2012) ‘Requesting and receiving advice on the telephone: A comparative analysis of some Australian-based helplines’. In: Limberg, Holger; Miriam A. Locher, eds., Advice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 213-232
  • Encrevé, P., Michel.. de Fornel (1983) ‘Le sens en pratique: construction de la référence et structure sociale de l’interaction dans le couple Question-Reponse’, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 43: 3-30
  • Ende, J., Anita Pomerantz, F. Erickson (1995). ´Preceptors’ strategies for correcting residents in an ambulatory medicine setting: A qualitative analysis´, Academic Medicine, 70-3: 224-229
  • Endress, Martin; George Psathas (2012)‘Introduction’, Special issue ‘In memoriam of Harold Garfinkel’, Human Studies 35/2: 153-155
  • Enfield, N.J. (2012) ‘Reference in conversation’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 433-54
  • Enfield, N. J.; Mark Dingemanse, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Penelope Brown, Tyko Dirksmeyer, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Sonja Gipper, Rósa Gísladóttir, Gertie Hoymann, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Lilla Magyari, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira. (2013) ‘Huh? What? - A first survey in 21 languages’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 343-380
  • Enfield, N.J.; Tanya Stivers; Stephen C. Levinson (2010) ‘Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages: An introduction’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/10: 2615-2619
  • Engelke, Christopher R.; D. Jeffery Higginbotham (2013) ‘Looking to speak: On the temporality of misalignment in interaction involving an augmented communicator using eye-gaze technology’, Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4/1: 95-122
  • Englert, Christina (2010) ‘Questions and responses in Dutch conversations’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/10: 2666-2684
  • Eriksson, Mats (2009) ‘Referring as interaction: On the interplay between linguistic and bodily practices’, Journal of Pragmatics 41 240-262
  • Evaldsson, Ann-Carita (2007) ‘Accounting for friendship: moral ordering and category membership in preadolescent girls’ relational talk’ Research on Language & Social Interaction 40/ 4: 377-404
  • Fabiani, Jean-Louis (2001) ‘L’expérimentation improbable’. In: Michel de Fornel, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 277-95
  • Fasulo, Alessandra (1994). ‘Hablando el habla de otros. El discurso referido en psicoterapia’.
  • Substratum, 2, 5, 69-90.
  • Fasulo, Alessandra (1997). ‘Other voices, other minds. The use of reported speech in group therapy talk’. In L. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, Tools and
  • Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition. NATO Series, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 203-223.
  • Fasulo, Alessandra. (1999). ‘L’acquisizione della competenza conversazionale’. In R. Galatolo e G. Pallotti eds., La conversazione.. Milano: Cortina, 287-317.
  • Fasulo Alessandra (1999). ‘Aspetti poetici e strategie discorsive nella costruzione familiare della differenza di genere’. In M. Del Sapio Garbero, eds., Trame parentali, trame letterarie. Napoli: Liguori, 167-183.
  • Fasulo, Alessandra (2007). ‘Theories of self in psychotherapeutic narratives’. In M. Bamberg, A. De Fina & D. Schiffrin, eds, Selves and Identities in Narrative and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
  • Fasulo, Alessandra (2007) ‘Cosa ha veramente detto X. Due casi di agency contesa’. In: Donzelli A., Fasulo A. (Eds.), Agency e linguaggio Roma: Meltemi, 215-236
  • Fasulo, Alessandra , Teresa Antonelli (1996). ‘Buon senso o non senso? Aspetti normativi e ludici nel discorso familiare sul cibo’. Eta’ Evolutiva, 55, 91-102.
  • Fasulo, Alessandra, Francesca Fiore (2007). A valid person: non-competence as a conversational outcome. In A. Hepburn & S. Wiggins eds.. Discursive Research in Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 224-46
  • Fasulo, Alessandra, Hilda Girardet (2002). ‘Il dialogo nella situazione scolastica’. In C. Bazzanella, ed., Sul dialogo. Milano: Guerini, 59-72.
  • Fasulo, Alessandra, Vivian Liberati, Clotilde Pontecorvo (2002). ‘Language games in the strict sense of the term. Children’s poetics and conversation’. In S. Blum-Kulka & C. Snow (Eds).
  • Talking to Adults. Hillsdale NJ.: LEA, 209-237.
  • Fasulo, Alessandra, Heather Loyd, Vincenzo Padiglione (2007). ‘Children’s socialization into cleaning practices: a cross-cultural perspective’. Discourse & Society, 18, 11-33
  • Fasulo, Alessandra ; Chiara Monzoni (2009) ‘Assessing mutable objects: a multimodal analysis’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/4: 362-376
  • Fasulo, Alessandra, Clotilde Pontecorvo (1999). Come si dice? Linguaggio e apprendimento in famiglia e a scuola. Roma: Carocci.
  • Fasulo, Alessandra, Cristina Zucchermaglio (2002). My selves and I: identity markers in work meeting talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1119-1144
  • Fasulo, Alessandra, Cristina Zucchermaglio (2008). ‘Narratives in the workplace: facts, fiction and canonicity’. Text and Talk, 28, 3, 351-376
  • Fatigante, Marilena. (2004) ‘L’analisi conversazionale e lo studio dell’interazione verbale in Italia: una rassegna delle pubblicazioni’ [Conversation Analysis and the study of verbal interaction in Italy: a review]. In Rassegna Italiana di Psicolinguistica Applicata, Special issue (A. Fasulo & R. Galatolo, eds), 4/ 2-3: 205-38
  • Fatigante, Marilena. (2006) ‘Teoria e pratica della trascrizione in analisi conversazionale L’irriducibilitaÌ interpretativa del sistema notazionale [Theory and practice of transcription in Conversation Analysis. The interpretive nature of the notational system]. In I. Bürki, E. De Stefani, eds., Trascrivere la lingua. Dalla filologia all’analisi conversazionale. Bern: Peter Lang: 219-255
  • Fatigante Marilena, Alessandra Fasulo, Clotilde Pontecorvo (1998). ‘Life with the alien: role casting and face-saving techniques in family conversation with young children’. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 9, 2, 97-121.
  • Fatigante, Marilena; Vivian Liberatia, Clotilde Pontecorvo (2010) ‘Transitions in and out of games: How Parents and children bracket game episodes at home’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 43/4: 346-371
  • Fatigante, Marilena; Franca Orletti (2013) ‘Laughter and smiling in a three-party medical encounter: negotiating participants’ alignment in delicate moments’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 161- 184
  • Fauré, Laurent (2002) ‘Transcrire les données vocales : en quoi les corrélas prosodiques des interjections sont-ils notables?’ cahiers de praxématique 39: 101-133
  • Fehr, B.J., J. Stetson, Y. Mizukawa (1990) ‘A bibliography for ethnomethodology’. In: J. Coulter, ed., Ethnomethodological sociology. Edward Elgar: 475-559
  • Fele Giolo. (1990) ‘L’analisi della conversazione: vocazione strutturale’, Sociologia e ricerca sociale 2: 48-81
  • Fele, Giolo (1991) L’insorgere del conflitto: Uno studio sull’organizzazione del disaccordo nella conversazione. Milano, Angeli
  • Fele, Giolo (1992) ‘La comprensione nell’interazione’, Rassegna italiana di sociologia 33: 425-38
  • Fele, Giolo (1997) ‘Sociology of Action: Ethnomethodological Interpretations of Soccer’. In: A. Marcarino (a cura di), Analisi della conversazione e prospettive di ricerca inetnometodologia, Urbino: QuattroVenti: 43-58
  • Fele, Giolo (1997) ‘Sociology of action: Some ethnomethodological remarks on football’. In P. De Nardis, A. Mussino, N. Porro, eds., Sport: Social problems, social movements (pp. ). Roma: SEAM: 224–231
  • Fele, Giole (1998) Le piccole cerimonie dei media: I quiz telefonici della neo-visione [Media micro events: the television quiz-show as a cermony]. Roma: RAI Radiotelevisone Italiana [RAI-ERI VQPT 158]
  • Fele , Giolo (1999) ‘L’analisi della conversazione come una sociologia particolare’, in R. Galatolo, G. Pallotti (a cura di), La conversazione. Un’introduzione allo studio dell’interazione verba le. Milano: Cortina: 23-42
  • Fele, Giolo (2002) Etnometodologia: Introduzione allo studio delle attività ordinarie Roma: Carocci
  • Fele, Giolo (2006) ‘La communication dans l’urgence: Les appels au secours téléphoniques’,
  • Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 11/2: 33-52
  • Fele, Giolo (2007). L’analisi della conversazione. Bologna: Il Mulino
  • Fele, Giolo (2008) ‘The phenomenal field: ethnomethodological perspectives on collective phenomena’, Human Studies 31/3: 299-322
  • Fele, Giolo (2008). The collaborative production of responses and dispatching on the radio: video analysis in a medical emergency call centre’ Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung /
  • Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9/3: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1175
  • Fele,Giolo (2012) ‘The use of video to document tacit participation in an emergency operations centre’, Qualitative Research 12: 280-303
  • Fele, Giolo (2012) ‘Harold Garfinkel, 29 October 1917-21 April 2011’, Human Studies 35/2: 153-155
  • Fenstermaker, Sarah, Candace West (2002) Doing gender, doing difference: Inequality, power, and institutional change. New York, London: Routledge
  • Ferenæik, Milan (2007) ‘Exercising politeness: membership categorisation in a radio phone-in program’, Pragmatics 17: 351-70
  • Filipi, Anna (2007) ‘A toddler’s treatment of mm and mm hm in talk with a parent’. In Johanna Rendle-Short & Maurice Nevile, eds. Language as action: Australian studies in conversationanalysis. Special thematic issue, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3): Available via http://publications.epress.monash.edu/loi/aral
  • Filipi, Anna (2009) Toddler and parent interaction: The organisation of gaze, pointing and vocalisation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 192]
  • Filipi, Anna (2014) ‘Speakers’ orientations to directional terms in a map task’, Discourse Studies 16/3: 365-384
  • Filipi, Anna, Roger Wales (2010) ‘The organization of assessments produced by children and adults in task based talk’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/11: 3114-3129
  • Finlay, W M L, Charles Antaki, Chris Walton (2007) ‘On not being noticed: learning disabilities and the non-vocal register’, Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45: 227-245
  • Finlay, W.; Charles Antaki, Chris Walton (2008) ‘Saying no to staff: an analysis of refusals in a home for people with severe communication difficulties’, Sociology of Health & Illness 30/1: 55-75
  • Finlay, M., Antaki, Charles, Chris Walton, C. (2008). ‘A manifesto for the use of video in service improvement and staff development in residential services for people with learning disabilities’, British Journal of Learning Disabilities 36: 227-231
  • Finlay, WML, Charles Antaki, Chris Walton, Penny Stribling (2008) ‘The dilemma for staff in “playing a game” with people with a profound intellectual disability’. Sociology of Health and Illness,, 30: 531-549.
  • Finlay, W. M. L.; Chris Walton, Charles Antaki (2008) ‘Promoting choice and control in residential services for people with learning disabilities’, Disability and Society, 23: 349-360
  • Finlay, WML; ChrisWalton, Charles Antaki (2009) ‘Identity at home: Offering everyday choices to people with intellectual impairments’. In M Wetherell, ed, Identities and Social Action - Book Two: Identity Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave: 139-153
  • Finlay, W.M.L.; Chris Walton, Charles Antaki (2011) ‘Giving feedback to care staff about offering choices to people with intellectual disabilities’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 161-183
  • Firth, Alan (1994) ‘”Accounts” in negotiation discourse: a single case analysis’, Journal of Pragmatics 23
  • Firth, Alan, ed. (1995) The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon
  • Firth, Alan (1995) ‘Introduction and overview’. In: A. Firth, ed. The Discourse of Negotiation: Studies of Language in the Workplace. Pergamon Press, Oxford: 3-39.
  • Firth, Alan (1995) ‘Talking for a change: commodity negotiating by telephone’. In: Alan Firth, ed. The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon: 183-222
  • Firth, Alan (1995) ‘“Accounts” in negotiation discourse: A single-case analysis. Journal of Pragmatics. 23/2: 199-226.
  • Firth, Alan (1995) ‘Negotiating in the ’Virtual Marketplace’: making sense of telenegotiating’. In: K. Ehlich, J. Wagner, eds. The Discourse of Business Negotiation. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin: 127-149
  • Firth, Alan (1995) ‘Multiple Mode, Single Activity: Telenegotiating as a Social Accomplishment’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds., Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 151-72
  • Firth, Alan (1995) ‘Ethnomethodology’. In Jef Vershueren, Jan-Ola Östman and Jan Blommaert, eds. Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 269-78
  • Firth, Alan (1996) ‘The discursive accomplishment of normality: On “lingua franca” English and conversation analysis’, Journal of pragmatics 26: 237-59
  • Firth, Alan (2003) ‘Argument as spectacle and collusion: The mediatization of politics on CNN’s Crossfire. In A. Firth, ed. Language Travels: A Festschrift for Torben Vestergaard.
  • Aalborg University Press: Aalborg, Denmark. 131-142
  • Firth, Alan (2009). ‘Doing not being a foreign language learner: English as a lingua franca in the workplace and (some) implications for SLA’, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47: 127-156.
  • Firth, Alan (2009). ‘Ethnomethodology’. In Sigurd D’hondt, ed., The Pragmatics of Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 66-78
  • Firth, Alan (2009). The Lingua Franca Factor’, Intercultural Pragmatics. 6-2: 147-170.
  • Firth, Alan (2010). ‘Telephone Helplines’. In: Klaus P. Schneider, A. Barron, eds.. Pragmatics of discourse. Mouton de Gruyter: The Hague.
  • Firth, Alan (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and lingua franca’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1043-1047
  • Firth, Alan, Michael Emmison (2009). Diagnosis as dialogue: Diagnostic work in calls to a technical support helpline. In M. Büscher,, D. Goodwin, J. Mesman, eds. Ethnographies of diagnostic work: Dimensions of transformative practice. Oxford: Palgrave:
  • Firth, Alan, Michael Emmison, Carolyn Baker Calling for help: An introduction’. In: Carolyn Baker, Michael Emmison, Alan Firth eds. Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1-35.
  • Firth, Alan, Johannes Wagner (1997) ‘On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in second language acquisition research’, The Modern Language Journal 81, 3: 285-300 [followed by six ‘response’ articles]
  • Firth, Alan, Johannes Wagner (1998) ‘SLA property: no trespassing! A response’,The Modern Language Journal 82
  • Firth, Alan, Johannes Wagner (2003) ‘SLA property: No Tresspassing!’. In B. Seidlhofer, ed.
  • Controversies in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK:. 232-236.
  • Firth, Alan, Johannes Wagner (2007). ‘Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA’. Modern Language Journal, 91, 800-818.
  • Fisher, Sue, Alexandra Dundas Todd, eds. (1983) The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics
  • Fisher, Sue., Alexandra Dundas Todd, eds. (1986) Discourse and institutional authority. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex
  • Fitch, K. L., R. E. Sanders (2005) Handbook of language and social interaction . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Fitzgerald, Pamela, Ivan Leudar (2010) ‘On active listening in person-centred, solution- focused psychotherapy’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/12: 3188-3198
  • Fitzgerald, Pamela Elizabeth; Ivan Leudar (2012) ‘On the use of formulations in person-centred, solution-focused short-term psychotherapy’, Communication & Medicine, 9/1 13-22
  • Fitzgerald, Richard (2012) ‘Membership categorization analysis: Wild and promiscuous or simply the joy of Sacks?’, Discourse Studies 14: 305-311
  • Fitzgerald, Richard, Helena Austin (2008) ‘Accusation, mitigation and resisting guilt in talk’,
  • The Open Communication Journal. 2: 93-99 http://www.bentham.org/open/tocommj/openaccess2.htm
  • Fitzgerald, Richard, William Housley (2002) ‘Identity, categorisation and sequential organisation: the sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in’, Discourse and Society. 13: 579-602
  • Fitzgerald, Richard ;William Housley, eds. (2009) Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate:
  • Fitzgerald, Richard; William Housley (2009) ‘Media, Policy and Interaction: introduction’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 1-12
  • Fitzgerald, Richard ; William Housley, Carly W. Butler (2009) ‘Omnirelevance and interactional context’, Australian Journal of Communication, 36/3: 45-64 [ http://aiemca.net/?page_id=229]
  • Flor, Grace de la; Marina Jirotka, Paul Luff, John Pybus, Ruth Kirkham (2010) ‘Transforming scholarly practice: embedding technological interventions to support the collaborative analysis of ancient texts’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 19/3-4: 309-334
  • Flynn, P.J. (1991) The ethnomethodological movement: sociosemiotic interpretations. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (1993) Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (1994) ‘Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: because on the interactional- edited continuum’, TEXT 14: 531-54
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (1999) ‘Collaborative Construction of Task Activity: Coordinating Multiple Resources in a High School Physics Lab’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 32:
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (2000) ‘At the intersection of turn and sequence: Negation and what comes next’. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting, eds., Studies in Interactional Linguistics, Amsterdam: Benjamins: 51-79
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (2002) ‘Denial and the construction of conversational turns’. In: J. Bybee and M. Noonan, eds., Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 61- 78
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (2004) ‘Contingency and units in interaction’, Discourse Studies 6: 27-52
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (2008) Women speaking up: getting and using turns in workplace meetings. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (2010) ‘Questioning in meetings: Participation and positioning’ . In A. F. Freed, S. Ehrlich, eds., ‘Why do you ask?’: The function of questions in institutional discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 211-234
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (2012) ‘Clarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysis’,
  • Discourse Studies14: 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al, 2012]
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and turn taking’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1121-1127
  • Ford, Cecilia E.; Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) ‘Conversation and phonetics: Essential connections’. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, C. E. Ford, eds., Sound patterns in interaction: Cross- linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 3-25
  • Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox (1996) ‘Interactional motivations for reference formulation: He had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two O:lds’. In Studies in Anaphora, B. Fox (Ed.). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 145-68.
  • Ford, Cecilia E.; Barbara A. Fox (2011) ‘Multiple practices for constructing laughables’. In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds., Prosody in Interaction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 339-68[see: Birkner, Karin (2010) ‘Multimodal laughing: Comments on Cecilia Ford and Barbara Fox “Multiple practices for constructing laughables”’. In: Dagmar Barth- Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 369-372 ]
  • Ford, Cecilia E.; Barbara A. Fox, John Hellerman (2004) ‘“Getting past no” Sequence, action and sound production in the projection of no-initiated turns’. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, C. E. Ford, eds., Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam:
  • John Benjamins: 233-269
  • Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson (1996) ‘Practices in the construction of turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited’, Pragmatics 6:427-54.
  • Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson, eds. ( 2002) The Language of Turn and Sequence. New York: Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A. Schegloff; Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]
  • Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson (2002) ‘Constituency and the grammar of turn increments’. In: Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson, Eds., The Language of Turn and Sequence. New York. Oxford University Press: 14-38
  • Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson (2003) ‘Social interaction and grammar’. In: Michael Tomasello, ed. The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol 2. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum: 119-43
  • Ford, Cecilia E., Junko Mori (1994) ‘Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross linguistic study of interactional grammar’, Pragmatics 4:31-61.
  • Ford, Cecilia E.; Trini Stickle (2012) ‘Securing recipiency in workplace meetings: Multimodal practices’, Discourse Studies 14/1: 11-30,
  • Ford, Cecilia E., Sandra A. Thompson (1996) ‘Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns’. In: Ochs, E., Emanuel A. Schegloff, S.A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 134-84
  • Fornel, Michel de (1987) ‘Remarques sur l’organisation thématique et les séquences d’actions dans la conversation’, Lexique, 5: 15-36
  • Fornel, Michel de (1992) ‘Alors tu me vois ? Objet technique et cadre interactionnel dans la pratique visiophonique’, Culture technique, 24: 113-120
  • Fornel, Michel de (1992) ‘Le visiophone, un artefact interactionnel’. in P. Chambat (sous la dir.), Communication et lien social. Usages des machines à communiquer, Paris: Editions Descartes: 221-237
  • Fornel, Michel de (1993) ‘Violence, sport et discourse médiatique: l’exemple de la tragédie du Heysel’ [Violence, sport and media discourse: the example of the Heysel tragedy], in Réseaux
  • No 57: 29-47
  • Fornel, Michel de (1994) ‘Sémantique et pragmatique du geste métaphorique’ [Semantics and pragmatics of the metaphorical gesture], Cahiers de Linguisitque Française 14: 247-253
  • Fornel, Michel de (1994) ‘Le cadre interactionnel de l’échange visiophonique’. Réseaux, 64, 107-132.
  • Fornel, Michel de (1995) Articles ‘analyse de conversation’ et ‘sociolinguisitque’, in Ducrot O. et Schaeffer J.M., Nouveau dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage, Paris: Le Seuil
  • Fornel, Michel de (1996) ‘The interactional framework of videophone interactions’,Réseaux 5: 68-99
  • Fornel, Michel de, Jacqueline Léon (1997) ‘Des questions-échos aux réponses-échos. Une approche séquentielle et prosodique des répétitions dans la conversation’ [Echo-questions to echo-responses: sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation],Cahiers de Praxématique 28: 101-126
  • Fornel, Michel de , Jacqueline Léon (2000). ‘L’analyse de conversation, de l’ethnométhodologie à la linguistique interactionnelle’, Histoire Épistémologie Langage 22:131-55.
  • Fornel, Michel de, J.M. Marandin (1997) ‘L’analyse grammaticale des auto-réparations’ [Gramatical analysis of self-repairs], Le gré des langues, 10: 8-68
  • Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) (2001) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]
  • Forrester, Michael A. (1999) ‘Conversation Analysis: A Reflexive Methodology for Critical Psychology’, Annual Review of Critical Psychology 1: 34-49
  • Forrester, Michael. (2001). The embedding of the self in early interaction. Infant & Child Development, 10, 189-202
  • Forrester, Michael. (2002). Appropriating cultural conceptions of childhood: participation in conversation. Childhood, 9, 255-276.
  • Forrester, Michael A. (2008) ‘The emergence of self-repair: a case study of one child during the early preschool years’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41/1: 99-128
  • Forrester, Michael (2010) Ethnomethodology and adult-child conversation: Whose development?’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell: 42-58
  • Forrester, Michael A. (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and child language acquisition’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 949- 954
  • Forrester, Michael A., S.M. Cherington (2009) ‘The development of other-related conversational skills: A case study of conversational repair during the early years’, First Language, 29/2: 166-191.
  • Forrester, Michael, Chris Pike (1998). Investigating estimation in the mathematics classroom: a conversation analytic approach. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 334-56.
  • Forrester, Michael, David Reason (2006) ‘Conversation analysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy research: questions, issues, problems and challenges’, Psychoanalytic psychotherapy 20: 40-64
  • Forrester, Michael A.; David Reason (2006) ‘Competency and participation in acquiring a mastery of language: a reconsideration of the idea of membership’, The Sociological Review 54/3: 446-66
  • Fox, Barbara A. (2007) ‘Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration’, Discourse Studies 9: 299-318
  • Fox, Barbara A. (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and self-repair’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1105-1110
  • Fox, Barbara A.; Trevor Benjamin, Harrie Mazeland (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and repair organization: Overview’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1094-1097
  • Fox, Barbara; A., Makoto Hayashi, Robert Jasperson (1996) ‘Resources and repair: a cross-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repair’. In: Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 185-237
  • Fox, Barbara A.; Sandra A. Thompson, Cecilia E. Ford, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012) ‘Conversation analysis and linguistics’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 726-40
  • Fox, Barbara, Fay Wouk, Makoto Hayashi, Steven Fincke, Liang Tao, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Minna Laakso, Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) ‘A cross-linguistic investigation of the site of initiation in same-turn self-repair’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed. Conversation Analysis:
  • Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 60-103
  • Fox, Stephen (2006) ‘“Inquiries of every imaginable kind”: ethnomethodology, practical action and the new socially situated learning theory’, The Sociological Review 54/3: 426-45
  • Fradin, Bernard, Louis Quéré, Jean Widmer, eds. (1994) L’enquête sur les categories. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]
  • Francis, David (1995) ‘Negotiation, decision making and formalism: the problem of form and substance in negotiation analysis’, in J. Wagner & K. Ehlich, eds., The Discourse of Business Negotiation, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
  • Francis, David, Christopher Hart (1997) ‘Narrative intelligibility and membership categorization in a television commercial’. In: Stephen Hester, Peter Eglin, eds., Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 123-52
  • Francis, David, Stephen Hester (1997) ‘Reality analysis in a classroom storytelling’ British Journal of Sociology, 48: 95-112
  • Francis, David, Stephen Hester, ‘Le genre selon l’ethnométhodologie et l’analyse de conversation’. In: Louis Quéré et Zbigniew Smoreda (dir.) Le sexe du téléphone. Paris:Editions Hermes Science, [numéro 103 de la revue “Réseaux”] 215-51
  • Francis, David, Stephen Hester (2004) An Invitation to Ethnomethodology: Language, Society and Interaction. London etc. Sage Publications
  • Franck, Dorothea. (1979) Gramatik und Konversation. dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam (also: Königstein: Scriptor, 1980)
  • Frank, Arthur W. (1982) ‘Improper closings: The art of conversational repudiation’, Human Studies 5/4: 357-370
  • Frankel, Richard (1982) ‘Autism for all practical purposes: A micro-interactional view’,
  • Topics in Language Disorders, 3/1: 33-42
  • Frankel, Richard M. (1983) ‘The laying on of hands: Aspects of the organization of gaze, touch, and talk in a medical encounter’. In: S. Fisher, A. Dundas Todd, eds. (1983) The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.: 19-54
  • Frankel, Richard M. (1984) ‘From sentence to sequence: Understanding the medical encounter through micro-interactional analysis’, Discourse Processes 7: 135-70
  • Frankel, Richard M. (1989) ‘”I wz wonderinguhm could Raid uhm effect the Brain permanently d’y know?”: Some observations on the intersection of speaking and writing in calls to a poison control center’, Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 195-226
  • Frankel, Richard M. (1989) ‘Microanalysis and the medical encounter’. In: David T. Helm, W. Timothy. Anderson, Albert.Jay Meehan, Anne Warfield Rawls, eds., The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order. New York: Irvington: 21-49
  • Frankel, Richard (1990) ‘Talking in interviews: a dispreference for patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters’. In: George Psathas, ed. Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America: 231-62
  • Frankel, Richard (1995) ‘Some answers about questions in clinical interviews’. In: G.H. Morris, R.J. Chenail, eds. The talk of the clinic: explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum: 49-70
  • Frankel. Richard M. (2001) ‘Clinical Care and Conversational Contingencies: the Role of Patients’ Self-diagnosis in Medical Encounters’, Text 21: 83-111
  • Frankel, Richard M., H.B. Beckman (1982) ‘Impact: an interaction-based method for preserving and analyzing clinical transactions’. In: L. Pettigrew, ed. Explorations in provider and patient interactions. Louisville, KY: Humana Press: 71-85
  • Frankel, Richard M., H.B. Beckman (1989) ‘Conversation and compliance with treatment recommendations: an application of microinteractional analysis in medicine’. In: B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. O’Keefe, E. Wartella, eds. Rethinking communication, Vol. 2: Paradigm exemplars. Beverly Hills: Sage: 60-75
  • Fraser, Mike, Jon Hindmarsh, Katie Best, Christian Heath, Greg Biegel, Chris Greenhalgh and Stuart Reeves (2006) ‘Remote collaboration over video data: towards real-time e-social science’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 15/4: 257-279
  • Freebody, Peter (1995) ‘Identity and pre-competence in early childhood: The case of school-literacy learning’, Australian Journal of Early Childhood. 20: 17-22
  • Freebody, Peter, Carolyn D. Baker (1996) ‘Categories and sense-making in the talk and texts of schooling’. In: G. Bull & M. Anstey, eds., Lexicons of Literacy. Sydney: Prentice Hall: 145-59
  • Freese, Jeremy, Douglas W. Maynard (1998) ‘Prosodic features of bad news and good news in conversation’, Language in Society 27: 195-220
  • Freiberg, J., Peter Freebody, (1995) ‘Analysing literacy events in classrooms and homes: Conversation-Analytic approaches’. In: Peter Freebody, C. Ludwig, S. Gunn, Everyday literacy practices in and out of schools in low socio-economic urban communities. Report to the Commonwealth Department of Employment, Education and Training. Curriculum Corporation Vol. 1: 185-372
  • French, P., John Local (1983) ‘Turn competitive incomings’, Journal of Pragmatics 7: 17-38
  • Frers, Lars (2009) ’Space, materiality and the contingency of action: a sequential analysis ofthe patient’s file in doctor—patient interactions’, Discourse Studies 11: 285-303
  • Friedland, D., N. Miller (1998) ‘Conversation Analysis of communication breakdown after closed head injury’, Brain Injury 12: 1-14
  • Fukuda, Chie (2006) ‘Resistance against being formulated as cultural other: the case of a Chinese student in Japan’, Pragmatics 16: 429-56
  • Fukuda, Chie (2014) ‘Identities and linguistic varieties in Japanese: An analysis of language ideologies as participants’ accomplishments’, Pragmatics 24:1. 35-62
  • Gafaranga, Joseph (2011). Transition space medium repair: Language shift talked into being.
  • Journal of Pragmatics 43, 118-135
  • Gafaranga, Joseph; Nicky Britten (2003). ‘Fire away’: the opening sequence in general practice consultations. Family Practice, 20: 242-247
  • Gafaranga, Joseph; Nicky Britten (2004) ‘Formulation in general practice consultations’, Text, 24/2: 147-170
  • Gafaranga, Joseph; Nicky Britten (2005). Talking an institution into being: The opening sequence in general practice consultations. In K. Richards and P. Seedhouse (eds), Applying conversation analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 75-90.
  • Gajo, Laurent, Lorenza Mondada () Interactions et acquisitions en contexte: Mode d’appropriation de compétences discursives plurilingues par de jeunes immigrés. Fribourg Suisse: University Press Fribourg
  • Galatolo Renata (2002) ‘La comunicazione in tribunale’, in Carla Bazzanella (a cura di) Sul dialogo. Contesti e forme di interazione verbale, Milano: Guerini e Associati: 137-152.
  • Galatolo, Renata (2003) ‘Les stratégies de changement de footing dans le témoignage commun au tribunale: une resource pour la construction de crédibilité’.. In Bondi, M. e Sorin Stati, eds.
  • Dialogue Analysis 2000 , Niemeyer, Tubingen: 209-218.
  • Galatolo, Renata (2003) ‘Le malentendu en milieu conflictuel. Une révision du cas standard’, in Laforest M., dir. Dire, mésentendre, mésinterpreter, Editions Nota Bene, Québec: 65-93.
  • Galatolo, Renata (2007) ‘Le dévoilement de soi chez le témoin au tribunal’, in C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, V. Traverso, eds., Confidence/Confiding, Tubingen, Niemeyer: 343-358.
  • Galatolo, Renata (2007) ‘Active voicing in court’. In: Elizabeth, Holt, Rebecca Clift, eds.
  • Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 195-220
  • Galatolo, Renata (2014) ‘Identities in Court: participation framework and the judge’s role’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 137-156
  • Galatolo, Renata, Paul Drew (2006) ‘Narrative expansions as defensive practices in courtroom testimony’, Text & Talk 26/6: 661-98
  • Galatolo, Renata, Luca Greco (2002) ‘Interazione sociale e cognizione’ [Social interaction and cognition]. In A. Borghi, T. Iachini (a cura di) Le Scienze della mente [Sciences of Mind], Bologna: Il Mulino: 265-83
  • Galatolo Renata, Marina. Mizzau (1998) ‘Conflit conversationnel et malentendu: quelques relations possibles’. In La Linguistique , 34/1: 151-164.
  • Galatolo, Renata, Marina Mizzau (2005) ‘Quoting dialogues and the construction of the narrative point of view in legal testimony. The role of prosody and gestures’, Studies of Communication Sciences, Special Issue "Argumentation in Dialogic Intreraction": 217-231.
  • Galatolo, Renata, Véronique Traverso (2007 ) ‘Analyse multimodale d’une activité professionnelle: l’utilisation des bons de commande dans un restaurant’, Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée N° 85: 33-58
  • Galatolo, Renata, Véronique. Traverso (2007) ‘Two cooks at work: indipendent and coordinated lines of action’, in: L. Mondada, V. Markaki, eds. Interacting Bodies. Proceedings og the 2d ISGS conference. http://gesture-lyon2005.ens-lsh.fr/article.php3’id_article=259
  • Gale, J. (1991). Conversation analysis of therapeutic discourse: The pursuit of a therapeutic agenda. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Galeano, Giorgia, Alessandra Fasulo (2009) ‘Sequenze direttive tra genitori e figli’. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 2, May-August, 261-278
  • Garcia, Angela (1991) ‘Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argument’, American Sociological Review, 56: 818-35
  • Garcia, Angela (1995) ‘The problematics of representation in community mediation hearings: implications for mediation practice’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 22(4): 23-46
  • Garcia, Angela (1997) ‘Interactional constraints on proposal generation in negotiation hearings: a preliminary investigation’, Discourse & Society 8: 219-47
  • Garcia, Angela (2000) ‘Negotiating negotiations: the collaborative production of resolution in small clams mediation hearings’ Discourse & Society 11: 315-43
  • Garcia, Angela Cora, Gary David, Donald Chand. "The work of medical transcriptionists: sense-making and interactional competence in the production of medical records," Health Informatics Journal, 2009.
  • Garcia, Angela Cora; Lisa M. Fisher(2011) ‘Being there for the children: the collaborative construction of gender inequality in divorce mediation’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 272-293
  • Garcia, Angela; Jennifer Baker Jacobs (1998) ‘The interactional organization of computer mediated communication in the college classroom’, Qualitative Sociology, 21/ 3: 299-317
  • Garcia, Angela C., Jennifer. B. Jacobs (1999) ‘The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 337-67
  • Garcia, Angela.Cora, Penelope Ann Parmer (1999): Misplaced mistrust: The collaborative construction of doubt in 911 emergency calls. Symbolic Interaction 22/4: 297-324.
  • Garcia, Angela Cora; Alecea I. Standlee, Jennifer Bechkoff, Yan Cui (2009 ) ‘Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38: 52-84 [Reprinted in W. Paul Vogt, ed., (2010). Data Collection (Benchmarks in Social Research Methods Series) Volume 3, Sage: 401-430]
  • Garcia, Angela Cora et al (2010) ‘Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer- mediated communication’. In: W Paul Vogt, ed. Data Collection (Vol. 3). Sage
  • Gardner, Hilary.(2009) ‘Applying conversation analysis to interactions with atypically developing children’, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23/8: 551-554
  • Gardner, Hilary, Michael Forrester, eds. (2010) Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell
  • Gardner, Rod (1997) ‘The conversation object Mm: a weak and variable acknowledging token’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 30: 131-56
  • Gardner, Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam: Benjamins [Pragmatics & Beyond NS 92]
  • Gardner, Rod (2004). ‘On delaying the answer: Question sequences extended after the question’. In R. Gardner, J. Wagner, eds. Second Language Conversations. London: Continuum.
  • Gardner, Rod (2004). ‘Conversation Analysis’. In Alan Davies and Catherine Elder (eds.). The Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 262-284.
  • Gardner, Rod (2007) ‘The right connections: Acknowledging epistemic progression in talk’,
  • Language in Society 36/3: 319-341
  • Gardner, Rod (2007) ‘“Broken” starts: Bricolage in turn starts in second language talk’. In Z. Hua, P. Seedhouse, L. Wei,V. Cook, eds., Language learning and teaching as social interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 58-71
  • Gardner Rod (2012) ‘Enriching CA through MCA? Stokoe’s MCA keys’, Discourse Studies 14: 313-319
  • Gardner, Rod (2012) ‘Conversation analysis in the classroom’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 593-611
  • Gardner, Rod (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and recipient behavior’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed.
  • The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1086-1094
  • Gardner, Rod , Richard Fitzgerald, Ilana Mushin (2009) ‘The underlying orderliness in turn- taking: Examples from Australian talk’, Australian Journal of Communication, 36/3: 65-90 [ http://aiemca.net/?page_id=229]
  • Gardner, Rod, Mike Levy (2010) ‘The coordination of talk and action in the collaborative construction of a multimodal text’, Journal of Pragmatics 42, 8: 2189-2203
  • Gardner, Rod, Ilana Mushin (2007) ‘Post-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in a Garrwa community’. In Johanna Rendle-Short & Maurice Nevile, eds. Language as action: Australian studies in conversation analysis. Special thematic issue, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3): Available via http://publications.epress.monash.edu/loi/aral
  • Gardner, Rod, Johannes Wagner, eds. (2004) Second Language Conversations: Studies of Communication in Everyday Settings. London: Continuum
  • Garfinkel, Harold (1963) ‘A conception of, and experiments with, “trust” as a condition of stable concerted actions’. In: O.J. Harvey, ed. Motivation and social interaction: cognitive approaches. New York: Ronald Press: 187-238
  • Garfinkel, Harold (1964) ‘Studies in the routine grounds of everyday activities’, Social Problems 11: 225-50 (reprinted in: In: David Sudnow, ed. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 1972)
  • Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
  • Garfinkel, Harold (1967) ‘Practical sociological reasoning: some features in the work of the Los Angeles Suicide Prevention Center’. In: E.S. Shneidman, ed. Essays in selfdestruction. New York: Science House: 171-187 [reprinted in: Travers, M. & John F. Manzo, eds. (1997)
  • Law in Action: Ethnomethodological & Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Co.: 25-41]
  • Garfinkel, Harold, ed. (1986) Ethnomethodological studies of work. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  • Garfinkel, Harold (1988) ‘Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential quiddity of immortal ordinary society (I of IV): an announcement of studies’, Sociological Theory 6/1: 10-39
  • Garfinkel, Harold (1990) ‘The curious seriousness of professional sociology’. In: Bernard Conein, M. de Fornel, L. Quéré, Les formes de la conversation. Vol 1. CNET: 69-78
  • Garfinkel, Harold (1991) ‘Respecification: evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order*, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I) an announcement of studies’. In: Button, ed. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 10- 19
  • Garfinkel, Harold (1996) ‘Ethnomethodology’s Program’, Social Psychology Quarterly 59: 5-21
  • Garfinkel, Harold (2001) ‘Le Programme de l ethnométhodologie’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 31-56 [A translation of Garfinkel, 1996]
  • Garfinkel, Harold (2001) ‘Postface: l’ethnométhodologie et les legs oublié de Durkheim’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 439- 444
  • Garfinkel, Harold (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Edited and Introduced by Anne Rawls. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  • Garfinkel, Harold (2006) Seeing sociologically: the routine grounds of social action. Edited and introduced by Anne Warfield Rawls. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. [1948]
  • Garfinkel, Harold (2007) ‘Lebenswelt origins of the sciences: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism, Book Two: Workplace and documentary diversity of ethnomethodological studies of work and sciences by ethnomethodology’s authors: What did we do? What did we learn?’,
  • Human Studies 30: 9-56
  • Garfinkel, Harold (2007) ‘Four relations between literatures of the social scientific movement and their specific ethnomethodological alternates’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds.
  • Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 13-29
  • Garfinkel, Harold (2007) Recherches en ethnométhodologie, collection Quadrige, Paris: PUF, Septembre.
  • Garfinkel, Harold (2008) Toward a sociological theory of information. Edited and introduced by Anne Warfield Rawls. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.[1952]
  • Garfinkel, Harold (2012). ‘The ’Red’ as an ideal object’. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa [Ethnography and Qualitative Research] 4/1: 19-31. http://www.mulino.it/edizioni/riviste/scheda_fascicolo.php?isbn=23576&ilmulino=
  • Garfinkel, Harold, Kenneth Liberman (2007) ‘Introduction: The Lebenswelt origins of the sciences’, Human Studies 30: 3-7
  • Garfinkel, Harold, Eric Livingston (2003) ‘Phenomenal field properties of order in formatted queues and their neglected standing in the current situation of inquiry’. In: Mike Ball (ed.)
  • Image Work, a Special Issue of Visual Studies 18/1 ( April 2003): 21-28
  • Garfinkel, Harold, Michael Lynch, Eric Livingston, (1981) ‘The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 11: 131-58
  • Garfinkel, Harold; Anne Rawls (ed.) (2005) Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Paradigm Publishers
  • Garfinkel, Harold, Harvey Sacks, (1970) ‘On formal structures of practical action’. In: John C. McKinney & E.A. Tiryakian, eds. Theoretical sociology: perspectives and developments. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts: 338-66
  • German translation: ‘Über formale Strkturen praktischer Handlungen’. In: Elmar Weingarten, Fritz Sack, Jim Schenkein, hrsg. (1975) Ethnomethodologie: Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagslebens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp: 130-76
  • Garfinkel, Harold, D. Lawrence Wieder (1992) ‘Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis’. In: Graham Watson, R.M. Seiler, eds. Text in context: studies in ethnomethodology. Newbury Park, etc. Sage: 175-206
  • Garot, Bob; Tim J. Berard (2010) ‘Ethnomethodology and Membership Categorization Analysis’. in: Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone, Paul Kerswill, eds. Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics, Los Angeles: Sage: 125-138
  • Gathman, E. Cabell Hankinson; Douglas W Maynard; Nora Cate Schaeffer (2008) ‘The respondents are all above average: compliment sequences in a survey interview’ Research on Language & Social Interaction 41/ 3:271-301
  • Gavioli, Laura (1995) ‘Turn-initial versus turn-final laughter: two techniques initiating remedy in English/Italian bookshop encounters’, Discourse Processes 19: 369-384.
  • Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2010) ‘Closing in on Story Openings and Closings: Evidence from Conversational Stories in Greek’, Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10/2: 345-361
  • Georgalidou, Marianthi; Kaili, Hasan; Celtek, Aytac (2010) ‘Code Alternation Patterns in Bilingual Family Conversation: A Conversation Analysis Approach’, Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10/2 317-344
  • George, Rachel (2013) ‘“What’s a vendetta?” Political socialization in the everyday interactions of Los Angeles families’, Discourse & Society 24/1: 46-65
  • Gerhardt, Cornelia (2009) ‘Intertextual and multimodal humour in the media reception situation: The case of watching football on TV’. In: Neal R Norrick, Delia Chiaro, eds. Humor in interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 79-98.
  • Gibson, David R. (2012) Talk at the Brink: Deliberation and Decision during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Princeton: Princeton University Press
  • Gibson, Will (2009). Intercultural communication online: conversation analysis and the investigation of asynchronous written discourse [39 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1), Art. 49, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs090149
  • Gibson, Will J. (2014) ‘Sequential order in multimodal discourse: Talk and text in online educational interaction’, Discourse & Communication 8/1: 63 –83
  • Gibson, Will; Helena Webb, Dirk vom Lehn (2011) ‘Re-constituting social praxis: an ethnomethodological analysis of video data in optometry consultations’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology , 14/3: 207-218
  • Gill, Virginia T. (1998) ‘Doing attributions in medical interaction: patients’ explanations for illness and doctors’ responses’, Social Psychology Quarterly 61: 322-360
  • Gill, Virginia Teas (2005) ‘Patient “demand” for medical Interventions: Exerting pressure for an offer in a primary care clinic visit’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 38: 451-79
  • Gill, Virginia Teas, Timothy Halkowski and Felicia Roberts (2001) ‘Accomplishing A Request Without Making One: A Single Case Analysis of A Primary Care Visit’ Text 21: 55- 81
  • Gill, Virginia T., Douglas W. Maynard (1995) ‘On “labelling” in actual interaction: delivering and receiving diagnoses of developmental disabilities’, Social Problems 42: 11-37
  • Gill, Virginia, Douglas W. Maynard (2006) ‘Explaining illness: patients’ proposals and physicians’ responses. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 115-50
  • Gill, Virginia Teas, Anita Pomerantz, Paul Denvir (2010). ‘Preemptive Resistance: Patients’ participation in diagnostic sense-making activities’, Sociology of Health and Illness 32 (1): 1-20
  • Gill, Virginia Teas; Felicia Roberts (2012) ‘Conversation analysis in medicine’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 575-92
  • Ginev, Dimitri (2013) ‘Ethnomethodological and hermeneutic-phenomenological perspectives on scientific practices’, Human Studies 36: 277-305
  • Glenn, Phillip (1989) ‘Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations’, Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 127-49
  • Glenn, Phillip J. (1992) ‘Current speaker initiation of two-party shared laughter’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25: 139-162.
  • Glenn, Phillip J. (1995) ‘Laughing at and laughing with: Negotiations of Participant Alignments Through Conversational Laughter’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds.,
  • Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 43-56
  • Glenn, Phillip J. (2003) ‘Sex, Laughter, and Audiotape: On Invoking Features of Context to Explain Laughter in Interaction’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 263-74
  • Glenn, Phillip J. (2003). Laughter in interaction. Cambridge University Press
  • Glenn, Phillip (2003) “On Sexism in Conversational Joking” M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture 6/5 <http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0311/1-glenn-feature-sexism.php>
  • Glenn, Phillip (2010) ‘Interviewer laughs: Shared laughter and asymmetries in employment interviews’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/6: 1485-1498
  • Glenn, Phillip (2013) ‘Interviewees volunteered laughter in employment interviews: A case of ‘nervous’ laughter?’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 255-
  • Glenn, Phillip; Elizabeth Holt, eds. (2013) Studies of Laughter in Interaction. London: Bloomsbury
  • Glenn, Phillip; Elizabeth Holt (2013) ‘Introduction’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds.
  • Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 1-21
  • Glenn, Phillip J., Timothy Koschmann, Mindy Conlee. (1999) ‘Theory presentation and assessment in a problem-based learning group’, Discourse Processes 27: 119-33
  • Glenn, Phillip; Curtis LeBaron (2011) ‘Epistemic authority in employment interviews: Glancing, pointing, touching’, Discourse & Communication 5: 3-22
  • Glenn, Phillip, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. (2003) Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Glenn, Phillip Jenny Mandelbaum (2010) ‘Language and Social Interaction at the University of Texas at Austin’. In W. Leeds-Hurwitz, ed., The Social History of Language and Social Interaction Research: People, Places, Ideas, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
  • Glenn, Phillip, L. Susskind (2010) ‘How talk works: Studying negotiation interaction’,
  • Negotiation Journal, 26/2: 117-123
  • Golato, Andrea (2000) ‘Und ich so / und er so [and I’m like / and he’s like]: An innovative German quotative for reporting on embodied actions.’ Journal of Pragmatics 32: 29-54
  • Golato, Andrea (2002) ‘German compliment responses.’ Journal of Pragmatics 34/5: 547-71
  • Golato, Andrea (2002) ‘Self-quotation in German: reporting on past decisions.’ In: Güldemann, Tom, Manfred von Roncador, eds., Reported Discourse: A Meeting Ground for Different Linguistic Domains. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 49-70
  • Golato, Andrea (2002) ‘Grammar and interaction: reported discourse and subjunctive in German,’ Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 22: 24-55
  • Golato, Andrea (2003) ‘Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs, and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk,’ Applied Linguistics 24: 90-121
  • Golato, Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses: Grammatical structure and sequential organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]
  • Golato, Andrea (2010) ‘Marking understanding versus receipting information in talk: Achso. and ach in German interaction’, Discourse Studies, 12/2: 147-176
  • Golato, Andrea (2012) ‘German oh: marking an emotional change of state’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45/3: 245-268
  • Golato, Andrea (2012) ‘Impersonal quotation and hypothetical discourse’. In: Isabelle Buchstaller, , Ingrid van Alphen, eds., Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 3-36
  • Golato, Andrea, Emma Betz (2008) ’German ach and achso in repair uptake: Resources to sustain or remove epistemic asymmetry’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27: 7-37
  • Golato, Andrea, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) “The negotiation of face in chats.”
  • Multilingual 25: 293-322.
  • Golato, Andrea, Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) ‘Comparing single and double sayings of the German response token ja and the role of prosody: A conversation analytic perspective’,
  • Research on Language & Social Interaction 41/3: 241-270
  • Goldberg, Jo Ann (1975) ‘A system for transfer of instructions in natural settings’, Semiotica 14: 269-96
  • Goldberg, Jo Ann (1978) ‘Amplitude shift: a mechanism for the affiliation of utterances in conversational interaction’. In: J.N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 199-218
  • Goldberg, Jo Ann (2004) ‘The amplitude shift mechanism in conversational closing sequences In: Gene H. Lerner, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 257-97
  • Goll, Michaela, Christoph. Meier (1997) ‘Interactional dynamics of electronically mediated collaborative work: local solidarity in videoconferencing’. In: P. Jackson, J. van der Wielen, eds. Building actions on ideas, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Telework, Amsterdam, September 2-5, 1997, Tilburg: Work and Organization Research Centre: 279-90
  • González-Martínez, Esther (2000) ‘La “déclaration” dans le cadre d’une procédure pénale ou la constutution d’un “je” multiple et rassembleur’ [The “statement” in the context of criminal proceedings or the constitution of a multiple and unifying “I”], Revue Suisse de Sociologie 26: 591-614
  • González-Martínez, Esther (2001) ‘Comment agir en confiance avec un partenaire don’t on se méfie?’ [How can one trust a partner of whom one is suspicious?], Réseaux Vol. 19, N1 108: 89-123
  • González-Martínez, Esther (2005) ‘Organisation et accountability de l’audition de comparution immédiate’, Réseaux 19 (1029-130): 209-41
  • González-Martínez, Esther (2006) ‘The interweaving of talk and text in French criminal pretrial hearing’, Research on language and social interaction 39/3: 229-61
  • González Martínez, Esther (2007) Flagrantes auditions: Echanges langagiers lors d’interactions judiciaires. [Flagrant Hearings. Talk during judicial interactions] Bern, etc.: Peter Lang
  • González-Martínez, Esther (2011) ‘Just telling what is going to happen: the initial phase of a judicial social investigation interview’, Nottingham French Studies, 50/2
  • González Martínez, Esther (2014) ‘Etre par l’action. Production d’une enquête sociale et de ses participants’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 157-180
  • Good, Jeffrey S.; Wayne A. Beach (2005) ‘Opening up gift-openings: Birthday parties as situated activity systems’, Text, 25/5: 565-593
  • Goode, David (1979) ‘The world of the congenitally deafblind: toward the grounds for achieving human understanding’. In: H. Schwartz & J. Jacobs, Qualitative sociology: a method to the madness. New York: Free Press: 381-96
  • Goode, David A. (1986) ‘Kids, culture and innocents’, Human Studies 9/1: 83-106
  • Goode, David A. (1990) ‘On understanding without words: communication between a deafblind child and her parents’. Human Studies 13: 1-38
  • Goode, David (1994) A world without words: the social construction of children born deaf and blind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press [Note: a ‘Review Symposium’ on this book can be found in Human Studies 20 (3), 357-89, edited by F.C. Waksler, with contributions by M. Connolly, G. Kielhofner & T. Mallinson, Michael Lynch, and M. Pollner, with a reply by David Goode]
  • Goode, David (2003) ‘Ethnomethodology and Disability Studies: A Reflection on Robillard’ [Book review] Human Studies 26: 493-503
  • Goode, David (2007) Playing with my dog, Katie: an ethnomethodological study of canine-human Interaction. Ashland, Ohio: Purdue University Press
  • Goode, David A.’Some memories of Harold Garfinkel’, Human Studies 35/2: 169-173
  • Goodman S, Speer, Susan A.,(2007). ‘Category Use in the Construction of Asylum Seekers’,
  • Critical Discourse Studies, 4/2: 165-185.
  • Goodwin, Charles (1979) ‘The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation’. In: George Psathas, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 97-121
  • Goodwin, Charles (1980) ‘Restarts, pauses and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze atturn beginning’, Sociological Inquiry 50: 272-302
  • Goodwin, Charles (1981) Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press
  • Goodwin, Charles (1984) ‘Notes on story structure and the organization of participation’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 225-46
  • Goodwin, Charles (1986) ‘Gesture as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation’,
  • Semiotica 62: 29-49
  • Goodwin, Charles (1986) ‘Audience diversity, participation and interpretation’, Text 6/3: 283- 316
  • Goodwin, Charles (1986) ‘Between and within: alternative and sequential treatments of continuers and assessments’, Human Studies 9: 205-18
  • Goodwin, Charles (1987) ‘Forgetfulness as an interactive resource’, Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 115-31
  • Goodwin, Charles (1987) ‘Unilateral departure’. In: Button, Graham, J.R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 206-18
  • Goodwin, Charles (1994) ‘Recording human interaction in natural settings’, Pragmatics 3: 181-209
  • Goodwin, Charles (1994) ‘Professional vision’. American Anthropologist 96: 606-33
  • Goodwin, Charles (1995) ‘Seeing in depth’, Social Studies of Science 25: 237-74
  • Goodwin, Charles (1995) ‘The negotiation of coherence within conversation’. In: M.A. Gernsbacher, T. Givon, eds., Coherence in spontaneous text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  • Goodwin, Charles (1995) ‘Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man.’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28: 233-60
  • Goodwin, Charles (1996) ‘Transparent vision’. In: Ochs, E., Emanuel A. Schegloff, S.A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 370-404
  • Goodwin, Charles (1997) ‘The blackness of black: Color categories as situated practice’. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, B. Burge, eds., Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag: 111-140
  • Goodwin, Charles (1999) ‘Practices of color classification’. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7: 62- 82.
  • Goodwin, Charles (2000) ‘Action and embodiment within situated human interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522
  • Goodwin, Charles (2000). ‘Gesture, aphasia and interaction’. In D. McNeill (Ed.). Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Goodwin, Charles (2000): ‘Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis - An Ethnomethodological Approach’, in T. v. Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, eds.,: Handbook of Visual Analysis. London, Sage, pp. 157-82
  • Goodwin, Charles (2002) ‘Time in action’, Current Anthopology 43: 19-35
  • Goodwin, Charles (2003) ‘Pointing as situated practice’. In S. Kita, Ed., Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 217-42
  • Goodwin, Charles (2003) ‘Recognizing Assessable Names’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 151-61
  • Goodwin, Charles, ed. (2003) Conversation and Brain Damage Oxford University Press.
  • Goodwin, Charles (2003) ‘Introduction’. In: Charles Goodwin, ed. Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press: 3-20
  • Goodwin, Charles (2003) ‘Conversational Frameworks for the Accomplishment of Meaning in Aphasia’ In: Charles Goodwin, ed. Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press: 90-116
  • Goodwin, Charles (2003) ‘Embedded Context’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 36 323-50
  • Goodwin, Charles (2003) ‘The body in action’. In: J. Coupland, P. Gwyn, eds., Discourse, the Body and Identity. Palgrave/Macmillan, New York: 19-42.
  • Goodwin, Charles (2004) ‘A competent speaker who can’t speak: the social life of aphasia’,
  • Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14
  • Goodwin, Charles (2006) ‘Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves’, Text & Talk 26/4: 443-62
  • Goodwin, Charles (2006) ‘Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia’. In Nick Enfield, Stephen C. Levinson, eds. Roots of Human Sociality London: Berg Press: 96-125
  • Goodwin, Charles (2007) ‘Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities’,
  • Discourse & Society 18/1: 53-73
  • Goodwin, Charles (2007) ‘Environmentally Coupled Gestures’. In: Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell, Elena T. Levy, eds., Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language: Essays in honor of David McNeill. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 195-212
  • Goodwin, Charles (2007) ‘Interactive footing’. In: Elizabeth, Holt, Rebecca Clift, eds.
  • Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 16- 46
  • Goodwin, Charles (2010) ‘Constructing meaning through prosody in aphasia’. In: Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar; Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds., Prosody in interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 373-394 [Kotthoff, Helga (2010) ‘Further perspectives on cooperative semiosis: Comments on Charles Goodwin “Constructing meaning through prosody in aphasia”’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 395-400 ]
  • Goodwin, Charles (2010) ‘Things and their embodied environments’. In L. Malafouris, C. Renfrew, eds., The cognitive life of things: Recasting the boundaries of the mind. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: 103 -120
  • Goodwin, Charles (2011) ‘Contextures of action’. In: Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, Curtis LeBaron, eds. Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 182-93
  • Goodwin, Charles (2013) ‘The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge’, Journal of Pragmatics 46/1: 8-23
  • Goodwin, Charles, Marjorie Harness Goodwin (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: notes on the interactive organization of assessments’, IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1: 1-54
  • Goodwin, Charles, Marjorie Harness Goodwin (1990) ‘Interstitial argument’. In: A.D. Grimshaw, ed. Conflict talk: sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 85-117
  • Goodwin, Charles, Marjorie Harness Goodwin (1992) ‘Assessments and the construction of context’. In: Duranti, A., Charles Goodwin, eds., Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 147-90
  • Goodwin, Charles, Marjorie Harness Goodwin (1992) ‘Context, activity and participation’. In: P.Auer, A. di Luzio, eds. The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 79-99
  • Goodwin, Charles, Marjorie Harness Goodwin (1996) ‘Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes’. In: Y. Engeström, D. Middleton, eds. Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 61-95
  • Goodwin, Charles; Marjorie H. Goodwin, (1997). ‘Contested vision: The discursive constitution of Rodney King’. In: Britt-Louise Gunarsson, Per Linell & Bengt Nordberg, eds.,
  • The construction of professional discourse. New York: Longman: 292-316
  • Goodwin, Charles; Marjorie Harness Goodwin (2004) ‘Participation’. In A. Duranti, ed., A companion to linguistic anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell: 222-244
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Charles Goodwin (2012) ‘Car talk: Integrating texts, bodies, and changing landscapes’, Semiotica 191:257-286
  • Goodwin, Charles, Marjorie H. Goodwin, David Olsher (2002) ‘Producing sense with nonsense syllables: turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia’. In: Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 2002) The Language of Turn and
  • Sequence. New York: Oxford University Press: 56-80
  • Goodwin, Charles, John Heritage (1990) ‘Conversation analysis’, Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 283-307
  • Goodwin, Marjorie (1980) ‘He said/she said: formal cultural procedures for the construction of a gossip dispute activity’, American Ethnologist 7: 674-94
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1980) ‘Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences’, Sociological Inquiry 50: 303-17
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1980) ‘Directive/response speech sequences in girls’ and boys’ task activities’. In: S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, N. Furman, eds. Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger: 157-73
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1982) ‘Processes of dispute management among urban black children’, American Ethnologist 9: 76-96
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1982) ‘”Instigating”: Story telling as social process’, American Ethnologist 9: 799-819
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1983) ‘Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversations’ Journal of Pragmatics 7:657-77
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1985) ‘The serious side of Jump Rope: conversational practices and social organization in the frame of play’, Journal of American Folklore 98:315-30
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1988) ‘Cooperation and competition across girls’ play activities’. In: Sue Fisher, A. Todd, eds., Gender and discourse: The power of talk. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex: 55-94
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1990) He-said-she-said: talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1990/1991) ‘Retellings, pretellings, and hypothetical stories’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 263-76
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1993) ‘Tactical uses of stories: participation frameworks within boys’ and girls’ disputes’. In: D. Tannen, ed., Gender and conversational interaction. New York: Oxford University Press: 110-43
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1995) ‘Assembling a response: setting and collaboratively constructed work talk’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds., Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 173-86
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1995) ‘Co-construction in girls’ hopscotch’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28/3: 261-282
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1996) ‘Informings and announcements in their environment: prosody within a multi-activity work setting’. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen, M. Selting, eds. Prosody in conversation: interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 436-61
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1997) ‘Byplay: negotiating evaluation in storytelling’. In: Guy, G.R., Feagin, C., Schiffrin, D. and Baugh, J., eds., Toward a Social Science of Language: Papers in Honor of William Labov Volume 2. Amsterdam, John Benjamins: 77-102
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1997) ‘Toward families of stories in context’, Journal of Narrative and Life History 7: 107-12
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1998) ‘Games of stance: Conflict and footing in Hopscotch’. In: S.M. Hoyle, C. Templer Adger, eds., Kids’ talk: Strategic language use in later childhood. New York: Oxford University Press: 23-46
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2001) ‘Organizing Participation in Cross-Sex Jump Rope: Situating Gender Differences Within Longitudinal Studies of Activities’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 :75-106
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2002) ‘Building power asymmetries in girls’ interaction’,
  • Discourse & Society 13/3: 715-30
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2002) ‘Exclusion in girls’ peer groups’, Human Development 45: 392-415.
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2006) ‘Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/ response sequences’, Text & Talk 26/4: 515-44
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2006) The hidden life of girls: games of stance, status, and exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell [Series: Blackwell Studies in Discourse and Culture]
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2007) ‘Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction’,
  • Discourse & Society 18/1: 93-110
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2007) ‘Participation and embodied action in preadolescent girls’ assessment activity’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 40/4: 353-375
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2011) ‘Engendering children’s play: person reference in children’s conflictual interaction’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 250-271
  • Goodwin,Marjorie Harness (2014) Constructing the identity of a “Tagalong” Girl”’.In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 29-44
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness; Asta Cekaite (2013) ‘Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 46: 122-138
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness; Asta Cekaite, Charles Goodwin, Eve Tulbert (2012) ‘Emotion as stance’. In A. Peräkylä, M.-L. Sorjonen, eds., Emotion in interaction. New York: Oxford University Press: 16-41
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Charles Goodwin, (1986) ‘Gesture and coparticipation in theactivity of searching for a word’, Semiotica 62: 51-75
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Charles Goodwin, (1987) ‘Children’s arguing’. In: S. Philips, S. Steele, C. Tanz, eds. Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 200-48
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Charles Goodwin (2000) ‘Emotion within situated activity’. In: N. Budwig, I.C. Uzgiris, J.V. Wertsch, eds., Communication: an arena of development.
  • Stemford, CT: Ablex: 33-54
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness; Charles Goodwin (2000) ‘Emotion within situated activity’. In A. Duranti, ed., Linguistic anthropology: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell: 239-257
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Charles Goodwin, Malgah Yaeger-Dror (2002) ‘Multi-modality in girls’ game disputes’, Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11), 1621-1649.
  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Amy Kyratzis (2007) ‘Children Socializing children: practices for negotiating the social order among peers’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 40/4: 279-289
  • Gotsbachner, Emo (2009) ‘Asserting interpretive frames of political events: panel discussions on television news’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 49-72
  • Grancea, Liana (2010) ‘Ethnic solidarity as interactional accomplishment: An analysis of interethnic complaints in Romanianand Hungarian focus groups’, Discourse & Society, 21/2: 161-188
  • Greatbatch, David (1986) Some standard uses of supplementary questions in news interviews’,
  • Language and Linguistics 8: 86-123
  • Greatbatch, David (1986) ‘Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: the use of agenda shifting procedures by interviewees’, Media, Culture and Society 8: 441-55
  • Greatbatch, David (1988) ‘A turn-taking system for British news interviews’, Language in Society 17: 401-30
  • Greatbatch, David (1992) ‘On the management of disagreement between news interviewers’. In: Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 268-301
  • Greatbatch, David (1998) ‘Conversation analysis: neutralism in British news interviews’. In: A. Bell, P. Garrett, eds. Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell: 163-85
  • Greatbatch, David (2006) ‘Prescriptions and prescribing: co-ordinating talk and text-based activities’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 313-39
  • Greatbatch, David et al (2005) ‘Telephone triage: expert systems and clinical expertise’,
  • Sociology of Health & Illness 27/6: 802-30
  • Greatbatch, David, Timothy Clark (2010) ‘The situated production of stories’, In: Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 96- 118
  • Greatbatch, David, Robert Dingwall (1989)`Selective facilitation: some preliminary observations on a strategy used by divorce mediators’, Law and Society Review 23:: 613-41. Reprinted in abridged and edited form in Family and Conciliation Courts Review (1990) 28: 53-64. Reprinted in C. Menkel-Meadow, ed., Mediation: Theory, Policy and Practice, Aldershot, Ashgate, (2001).
  • Greatbatch, David, Robert Dingwall (1997) ‘Argumentative talk in divorce mediation sessions’, American Sociological Review 62: 151-70
  • Greatbatch, David, Robert Dingwall (1998) ‘Talk and identity in divorce mediation’. In Antaki, Charles and Widdicombe, S., eds. Identities in Talk. London, Sage: 121-32
  • Greatbatch, David, Robert Dingwall (1994) `The interactive construction of interventions by mediators’. In Folger, J and Jones, T, eds., New Directions in Mediation: Communication Research and Perspectives, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage: 84-109
  • Greatbatch, David, Robert Dingwall (1999) ‘Professional neutralism in family mediation’. In Sarangi, S, and Roberts, C., eds. Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 271-92
  • Greatbatch, David, Robert Dingwall (1999) ‘The marginalization of domestic violence in divorce mediation’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 13: 174-90
  • Greatbatch, David, Robert Dingwall (1994) `Divorce mediation - the virtues offormality?’. In Eekelaar, J.M. and Maclean, M., eds., Oxford Readings in Socio-Legal Studies: Family Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 391-99
  • Greatbatch, David, Timothy Clark (2003) ‘Displaying group cohesion: humour and laughter in the public lectures of management guru’, Human Relations 56: 1515-44
  • Greatbatch, David, Christian Heath, Paul Luff, Peter Campion (1995) ‘Conversation analysis: human-computer interaction and the general practice consultation’. In: A. Monk, N. Gilbert, eds. Perspectives on HCI: Diverse approaches. New York: Academic Press: 199-222
  • Greatbatch, David, Christian Heath, Peter Campion, Paul Luff (1995) ‘How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction?’, Family Practice, 12/1: 32-36.
  • Greatbatch, David; Paul Luff, Christian Heath, Peter Campion (1993) ‘Interpersonal communication and human- computer interaction: An examination of the use of computers in medical consultations’, Interacting with Computers, 5/2: 193-216
  • Greatbatch, David, Elisabeth Murphy, Robert Dingwall (2001) ‘Qualitative research on medical information systems: ethnomethodological and interactionist perspectives’. Health Services Management Research 14: 1-12.
  • Greco, Luca (2014) ‘« Quel est ton personnage ? » : l’accomplissement situé des identités dansun atelier bruxellois de Drag King’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds.,
  • Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 45-66
  • Greco, Luca; Lorenza Mondada (2014) ‘Les identités-en-interaction : vers une approche multidimensionnelle’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 7-28
  • Greco, Luca; Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., (2014) Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas
  • Greer, Tim (2013) ‘Word search sequences in bilingual interaction: Codeswitching and embodied orientation toward shifting participant constellations’, Journal of Pragmatics 57 100-117
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian (2008). ‘Unpacking tasks: the fusion of new technology with instructional work’. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 17/1: 35-62.
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian (2008). ‘Video analysis of mathematical practice? Different attempts to “open up” mathematics for sociological investigation’ [73 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 32 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803323.
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian (2009) ‘News interviews: Clayman and Heritage’s ’The News Interview’. In Fiona Devine and Sue Heath, ed. Doing Social Science: Evidence and Methods in Empirical Research, ed.,. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 167-192
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian; Wes Sharrock (2005). Gestures in the blackboard work of mathematics instruction. Proceedings of 2nd Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies, http://gesture-lyon2005.ens-lyon.fr/article.php3?id_article=234
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian, Wes Sharrock (2006). ‘Logical relativism: logic, grammar, and arithmetic in cultural comparison’, Configurations 14/3: 275-301
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian, Wes Sharrock (2006). ‘Mathematical relativism: logic, grammar, and arithmetic in cultural comparison’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36/2: 97-117
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian, Wes Sharrock (2007). ‘Linguistic relativism: logic, grammar, and arithmetic in cultural comparison’, Language & Communication 27/1: 81-107
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian, Wes Sharrock (2008). ‘Where do the limits of experience lie? Abandoning the dualism of objectivity and subjectivity’, History of the Human Sciences 21/3: 70-93
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian, Wes Sharrock (2008). ‘School mathematics and its everyday other? Revisiting Lave’s “Cognition in Practice”’. Educational Studies in Mathematics 69/1: 1-21.
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian, Wes Sharrock (2009). ‘Mathematical equations as Durkheimian social facts?’. In: G. Cooper, A. King, R. Rettie , eds., Sociological Objects: Reconfigurations of Social Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate: 119-135.
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian; Wes Sharrock. (2009) ‘Two concepts of attachment to rules’,
  • Journal of Classical Sociology 9/4: 405-427
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian; Wendy Sherman (2008). ‘Kuhn and conceptual change: On the analogy between conceptual changes in science and children’. Science & Education, 17(1), 1- 26.
  • Greiffenhagen, Christian, Rod Watson. (2009). ’Visual repairables: analysing the work of repair in human-computer interaction’. Visual Communication 8 (1), 65-90.
  • Groeber, Simone; Simona Pekarek Doehler (2012) ‘Hearing impaired adolescents in a regular classroom: On the embodied accomplishment of participation and understanding’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 76-89
  • Groeber, Simone; Evelyne Pochon-Berger (2014) ‘Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds ’ Journal of Pragmatics 65: 121-136
  • Grøver Aukrust, Vibeke, Veslemøy Rydland (2009) ‘“Does it matter?” Talking about ethnic diversity in preschool and first grade classrooms’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/8: 1538-1556
  • Guillot, Marie-Noëlle (2005) ‘Revisiting the methodological debate on interruptions: from measurement to classification in the annotation of data for cross-cultural research’, Pragmatics15: 25-47
  • Guillot, Marie-Noëlle (2008) ‘Freedoms and constraints in semi-institutional television discussions: The case of mixed format panel discussions’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/ 2: 179-204
  • Guimaraes, Estefania (2007) ‘Feminist research practice: using conversation analysis to explore the researcher’s interaction with participants’, Feminism & Psychology 17: 149-161.
  • Gülich, Elisabeth (1990) ‘Pour une ethnométhodologie linguistique. Description de séquences conversationnelles explicatives’ [Towards a linguistic ethnomethodology: describing explicative conversational sequences]. In Charolles, M., Fisher, S., Javez, J.,, eds., Le Discours. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy
  • Gülich, Elisabeth (2012) ‘Conversation Analysis as a new approach to the differential diagnosis of epileptic and non-epileptic seizure disorders’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 146-58
  • Gülich, Elizabeth, Lorenza Mondada (2008) Konversationsanalyse: Eine Einführung am Beispiel des Französischen [Conversation Analysis. An introduction on the basis of French data]. Tübingen : Niemeyer
  • Guthrie, Anna M. (1997). ‘On the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academic advising sessions’, Pragmatics 7: 397-415
  • Haakana, Markku (2001) ‘Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects ofmedical interaction’ Text 21: 187-219
  • Haakana, Markku (2002) ‘Laughter in medical interaction: From quantification to analysis, and back’, Journal of sociolinguistics, 6/2: 207-35
  • Haakana, Markku (2007) ‘Reported thought in complaint stories’. In: Elizabeth, Holt, Rebecca Clift, eds. Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 150-78
  • Haakana, Markku (2010) ‘Laughter and smiling: Notes on co-occurrences’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/6: 1499-1512
  • Haakana, M. (2012) ‘Laughter in conversation: The case of “fake” laughter’. In A. Peräkylä, M. L. Sorjonen, eds., Emotion in interaction. Oxford : Oxford University Press: 174-194
  • Haakana, Markku, Salla Kurhila (2009) ‘Other-correction in everyday conversation: some comparative aspects’. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 152-179
  • Haakana, Markku, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. (2009) Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS).
  • Haakana, Markku, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström (2009) ‘Introduction: Comparative dimension of talk in interaction’. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds.
  • Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 15-47
  • Haakana, Markku, Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) ‘Invoking another context: Playfulness in buying lottery tickets at convenience stores’, Journal of Pragmatics: 43/5 1288-1302
  • Hacohen, Gonen, Emanuel A. Schegloff(2006) ‘On the preference for minimization in referring to persons: Evidence from Hebrew conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 38 :1305-12
  • Hadden, Stuart C., Marilyn Lester (1978) ‘Talking identity: The production of “self” in interaction’, Human Studies 1: 331-356
  • Haddington, Pentti (2004) ‘Stance taking in news interviews’, SKY Journal of Linguistics, 17, 101-142
  • Haddington, Pentti (2006) ‘The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance taking’, Text & Talk, 26/3: 281-328
  • Haddington, Pentti (2010) ‘Turn-taking for turntaking: Mobility, time, and action in the sequential organization of junction negotiations in cars’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 43/4: 372-400
  • Haddington, Pentti (2012) ‘Movement in action: Initiating social navigation in cars’, Semiotica191:137-167
  • Haddington, Pentti (2013) ‘Projecting mobility: Passengers directing drivers at junctions’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility:
  • Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 179-209.
  • Haddington, Pentti; Tiina Keisanen (2009) ‘Location, mobility and the body as resources in selecting a route’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 1938-1961
  • Haddington, Pentti; Tiina Keisanen, Maurice Nevile, eds. (2012) ‘Meaning in motion: Interaction in cars’, special issue for Semiotica , 191: 101-333
  • Haddington, Pentti, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds. (2013) Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Haddington, Pentti, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile (2013) ‘Being mobile: Interaction on the move’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 3-61.
  • Haddington, Pentti, Maurice Nevile, Tiina Keisanen (2012) ‘Meaning in motion: Sharing the car, sharing the drive’, Semiotica 191:101-116
  • Haddington, Pentti; Mirka Rauniomaa (2014). Interaction between road users: Offering space in traffic. Space and Culture, 17/2: 176-190
  • Hak, Tony (1995) ‘Ethnomethodology and the institutional context’, Human Studies, 18, 109-137
  • Hakulinen, Auli, Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) ‘Designing utterances for action: Verb repeat responses to assessments’. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 124-151
  • Hakulinen, Auli; Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) ‘Ways of agreeing with negative stance taking’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 235-56
  • Halkowski, Tim (1990) ‘”Role” as an interactional device’, Social Problems 37: 564-77
  • Halkowski, Tim (2006) ‘Realizing the illness: patients’ narratives of symptom discovery’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 86- 114
  • Halkowski, Timothy, Virginia Teas Gill (2010) ‘Conversation analysis and ethnomethodology: the centrality of interaction’. In: Ivy Bourgeault , Robert Dingwall , Ray de Vries, eds.,The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. Sage: 212-228
  • Hall, Joan Kelly;Tetyana Smotrova (2013) ‘Teacher self-talk: Interactional resource for managing instruction and eliciting empathy’, Journal of Pragmatics 47: 75-92
  • Halldorsdottir, Iris (2006) ‘Orientations to law, guidelines, and codes in lawyer-client interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(3), 263-301
  • Halonen, Mia (2006) ‘Life stories used as evidence for the diagnosis of addiction in group therapy’ Discourse & Society 17: 283-98
  • Halonen, Mia (2008) Person reference as a device for constructing experiences as typical in group therapy; In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds.
  • Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 139-51
  • Halonen, Mia, Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2008) ‘Using niin-interrogative to treat the prior speaker’s action as an exaggeration’, Discourse Studies 10: 37-53.
  • Halonen, Mia; Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2012) ‘Multi-functionality of interrogatives: asking reasons for and wondering about an action as overdone’. In J. P. De Ruiter, ed., Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Hama, Hideo (1999) ‘Ethnomethodology and the Rashomon Problem’, Human Studies 22:183-92
  • Hammersley Martyn (2003) ‘Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: Methods or Paradigms?’, Discourse & Society, 14: 751-81 [debate with Jonathan Potter on pages 783-804]
  • Hammersley, Martyn (2003) ‘”Analytics” are No Substitute for Methodology: A Response to Speer and Hutchby’, Sociology 39: 339-51 [comment on: Speer & Hutchby, 2003 a; see also: rejoinder: Speer & Hutchby, 2003 b]
  • Hansen, Alan D. (2005) ‘A practical task: ethnicity as a resource in social interaction’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(1), 63-104
  • Harper, Richard H. R. (1994) ‘Radicalism, beliefs and hidden agendas’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3/1: 43-46
  • Harper, H.R. (1995/1996) ‘Why People Do and Don’t Wear Active Badges: A Case Study’,
  • Computer Supported Cooperative Work 4: 297-318
  • Harper, Richard H. R. ‘The Organisation in Ethnography B A Discussion of Ethnographic Fieldwork Programs in CSCW’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 9:239-64
  • Harper, Richard (1998) Inside the IMF: An ethnography of documents, technology and organisational knowledge. London Academic Press
  • Harper, Richard H. R. (2000) ‘Analysing work practice and the potential role of new technology at the International Monetary Fund: some remarks on the role of ethnomethodology’. In Luff, Paul, J. Hindmarsh, Christian Heath, eds., Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Systems Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 169-86
  • Harper, Richard H.R., John A. Hughes, 1992 ‘”What a f-ing system: send ‘em all to the same place and then expect us to stop ‘em hitting”: Making technology work in air traffic control’. In: Graham Button ed., Technology in working order: studies of work, interaction and technology. London: Routledge: 127-44
  • Harper, Richard; William Odom (2014) ‘Trusting oneself: an anthropology of digital things and personal competence’. In: Richard H. R. Harper, ed. Trust, Computing, and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 272-298
  • Harper, Richard, Dave Randall and Mark Rouncefield (2000) Organisational Change and Retail Finance: An Ethnographic Perspective, London: Routledge [Routledge International Studies in Money and Banking]
  • Harren, Inga, Mia Raitaniemi (2008) ‘The sequential structure of closings in private German phone calls’, Gespächsforschung: Online-Zeischrift zur verbalen Interaktion 9: 198-223 [8]
  • Harris, Jessica; Susan Danby, Carly W Butler, Michael Emmison (2012) ‘Extending client- centered support: counselors’ proposals to shift from e-mail to telephone counseling’, Text & Talk 32/1: 21-37
  • Harris, Scott R. (2000) ‘The social construction of equality in everyday life.’ Human Studies23: 371-93
  • Harris, Scott R. (2000) ‘Meanings and measurements of equality in marriage: A study of the social construction of equality.’ In James A. Holstein and Gale Miller, eds. Perspectives on Social Problems. Stamford, CT: JAI Press: 111-45
  • Harris, Scott R. (2001) ‘What Can Interactionism Contribute to the Study of Inequality? The Case of Marriage and Beyond.’ Symbolic Interaction 24: 455-480
  • Harris, Scott R. (2003) ‘Studying Equality/Inequality: Naturalist and Constructionist Approaches to Equality in Marriage’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32:200-32
  • Harris, Scott R. (2004) ‘Challenging the Conventional Wisdom: Recent Proposals for the Interpretive Study of Inequality’, Human Studies 27:113-36
  • Harris, Scott R. (2006) The Meanings of Marital Equality. SUNY Press,
  • Harris, Scott R. (2009) ‘Four ethnomethodological paradoxes: Reflections on the work of Kenneth Liberman’. In: N.K. Denzin, Studies in Symbolic Interaction: A Research Annual, 33, 443-57
  • Harris, Scott R., Kerry O. Ferris. (2009) ‘How Does It Feel to Be a Star? Identifying Emotion on the Red Carpet’, Human Studies 32(2):133-152.
  • Hartswood, Mark, Rob Procter, Mark Rouncefield, Roger Slack (2003) ‘Making a case in medical work: implications for the electronic medical record’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing 12: 241-66
  • Hartswood, Mark; Mark Rouncefield, Roger Slack, Andrew P. Carlin (2011) ‘Documents’. In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 151-72
  • Hatch, D.J., D.R. Watson, (1974) ‘Hearing the blues: an essay in the sociology of music’, Acta Sociologica 17: 162-78
  • Hauser, Eric (2009) ‘Turn-taking and primary speakership during a student discussion’. In H. thi Nguyen, G. Kasper, eds., Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center: 215-244
  • Hauser, Eric (2011) ‘Generalization: A practice of situated categorization in talk’, Human Studies, 34/2:183-198
  • Have, Paul ten (1977) ‘Etnomethodologie’. In: L. Rademaker, H. Bergman, red. Sociologische stromingen. Utrecht: Het Spectrum: 145-68
  • Have, Paul ten (1980) ‘Openingssequenties’. In: A. Foolen, e.a. red., Conversatieanalyse. Groningen: Xenos: 63-84
  • Have, Paul ten (1981) ‘Lokale en globale samenhangen in raadgevende gesprekken’,
  • Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 1: 24-45
  • Have, Paul ten, (1982) ‘Sociologische gespreksanalyse’, Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2: 90-104
  • Have, Paul ten (1983) ‘Leren in hulpverlenende gesprekken’, Bulletin Leren van Volwassenen nr. 12: 107-23
  • Have, Paul ten, (1985) ‘Contrastive analyses of interview talk’. In: T. Hak, J. Haafkens, G. Nijhof, eds. Working papers on discourse and conversational analysis. Rotterdam: Instituut Preventieve Sociale Psychiatrie EUR: 151-63 (nr. 6 in series Konteksten)
  • Have, Paul ten, (1985) ‘Een methode voor de etnomethodologie?’, Sociologisch Tijdschrift 12: 368-80
  • Have, Paul ten, (1986) ‘De formulering van klachten in huisartsspreekuurgesprekken’. In: J. Creten, G. Geerts, K. Jaspaert, eds. Werkinuitvoering: momentopname van de sociolinguïstiek in België en Nederland. LeuvenAmersfoort: Acco: 125-34
  • Have, Paul ten (1986) ‘Conversatieanalyse tussen uniciteit en universaliteit’. In: Scholtens & Springorum, red. 33-47
  • Have, Paul ten, (1987) Sequenties en formuleringen; aspecten van de interactionele organisatie van huisartsspreekuurgesprekken [Sequences and formulations: aspects of the interactional organization of general practice consultations]. Dordrecht: Foris
  • Have, Paul ten (1988) ‘De dokter zwijgt’. In: F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, red.
  • Taalbeheersing in ontwikkeling. Dordrecht: Foris Publications: 393-99
  • Have, Paul ten, (1989) ‘The consultation as a genre’. In: B. Torode, ed. Text and Talk as Social Practice. Dordrecht/Providence, R.I.: Foris Publications: 115-35
  • Have, Paul ten (1990) ‘Und der Artz schweigt. SpechstundenEpisoden, in denen Ärtze auf Patienteninformationen sprachlich nicht reagieren’. In: K. Ehlich, A. Koerfer, A. Redder, R. Weingarten, Hrsg. Medizinische und therapeutische Kommunikation. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag: 103-21
  • Have, Paul ten (1990) ‘Feiten en fouten: de ‘Bolderkaraffaire’ als interprofessionele methodenstrijd’, Kennis en Methode 14:104-28
  • Have, Paul ten (1990) ‘Methodological issues in conversation analysis’, Bulletin de
  • Méthodologie Sociologique, Nr. 27 (June): 23-51 [also:http://www.pscw.uva.nl/emca/mica.htm]
  • Have, Paul ten (1990) ‘”Dus met deze medicijnen los ik dat probleem niet op”: medicatie en de organisatie van medische interactie’, Medische Antropologie 2 (1990): 5-16
  • Have, Paul ten (1991) ‘The doctor is silent: observations on episodes without vocal receipt during medical consultations’. In: Bernard Conein, M. de Fornel, L. Quéré, Les formes de la conversation, vol 2. Issy les Moulineaux: CNET, 1991: 55-76
  • Have, P, ten (1991) ‘Vorm en inhoud van spreekuurgesprekken’, Huisarts en Wetenschap 34: 330-5
  • Have, Paul ten (1991) ‘Talk and institution: a reconsideration of the ‘asymmetry’ of doctor- patient interaction’. In: Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, eds. Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press: 138-63 [reprinted in T.A. van Dijk, ed. (2007) Discourse Studies: Sage Benchmarks in discourse studies. Vol. V: 99-120]
  • Have, Paul ten (1991) ‘User routines for computer assisted conversation analysis’. The Discourse Analysis Research Group Newsletter, 7/3 (Fall): 39
  • Have, Paul ten (1991) ‘Medische ondervraging: tussentijdse overwegingen bij lopend onderzoek’. In: R. van Hout & E. Huls, red. Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguïstische Conferentie. Delft: Uitgeverij Eburon: 207-23
  • Have, Paul ten (1993) ‘Fragen von Ärzten. Erste Bemerkungen’. In: P. Löning, J. Rehbein, (Hg.), ArtzPatientenKommunikation: Analysen zu interdisziplinären Problemen des medizinischen Diskurses. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter: 373-83
  • Have, Paul ten (1994) ‘De concrete sociale orde: lichaam, machine en informatietechnologie’ [The concrete social order: body, machine, and information technology], Kennis en Methode18: 114-38
  • Have, Paul ten (1995) ‘Disposal negotiations in general practice consultations’. In: A. Firth, ed. The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon: 319-44
  • Have, Paul ten (1995) ‘Formatting the consultation: communication formats and constituted identities’. In: E. Huls & J. KlatterFolmer, eds. Artikelen van de Tweede Sociolinguïstische Conferentie. Delft: Eburon: 245-68
  • Have, Paul ten (1995) ‘Medical ethnomethodology: An Overview’, Human Studies 18: 245-61
  • Have, Paul ten (1997) ‘A doctor’s body work: an exploratory exercise’. In: A. Marcarino, ed.,
  • Analisi della conversatione e prospettive di recerca in etnometodologia. Urbino: Editioni QuattroVenti: 207-18
  • Have, Paul ten (1997) ‘Een basisprocedure voor conversatie-analytisch onderzoek’ [A basic procedure for conversation-analytic research]. In: L. Meeuwesen & HannekeHoutkoop-Steenstra (red.), Sociale Interactie in Nederland. Utrecht: ISOR: 15-42
  • Have, Paul ten (1999) Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide.. London, etc.: Sage Publications
  • Have, Paul ten (1999) ‘Structuring Writing for Reading: Hypertext and the Reading Body’,
  • Human Studies 22: 273-98
  • Have, Paul ten (2000) ‘Computer-Mediated Chat: Ways of Finding Chat Partners’, M/C - A Journal of Media and Culture 4(3) http://www.media-culture.org.au/archive.html#chat
  • Have, Paul ten (2001) ‘Lay Diagnosis in Interaction’ Text 21: 251B260
  • Have, Paul ten (2001) ‘Applied conversation analysis’. In: Alec McHoul and Mark Rapley, eds. How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum: 3-11
  • Have, Paul ten (2002, September) ‘The Notion of Member is the Heart of the Matter: On the Role of Membership Knowledge in Ethnomethodological Inquiry’ [53 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 3(3). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
  • Have, Paul ten (2002) ‘Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer’s “natural” and “contrived” data: a sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies 4: 527-30
  • Have, Paul ten (2002) ‘Comparing telephone call openings: Theoretical and methodological reflections’. In: Kang Kwong Luke, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, eds., Telephone Calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 233-48
  • Have, Paul ten (2002) ‘Reflections on transcription’ cahiers de praxématique 39: 21-43
  • Have, Paul ten (2003) ‘Teaching students observational methods: visual studies and visual analysis’. In: Mike Ball (ed.) Image Work, a Special Issue of Visual Studies 18/1 ( April 2003): 29-35
  • Have, Paul ten (2003) ‘Predstava èlena je jadrom veci: O úlohe èlenského vedenia v etnometodologickom výskkume’, Biograf è. 32: 3-29 [Translation, by Tomáš Gális, ‘The Notion of Member is the Heart of the Matter: On the Role of Membership Knowledge in Ethnomethodological Inquiry’ [53 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 3(3). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm]
  • Have, Paul ten (2004) ‘Ethnomethodology’. In: Seale, Clive, David Silverman, Jay Gubrium, Giampietro Gobo, eds. Qualitative research practice. London, etc.: Sage Publications: 151-64 [reprinted in Paperback in 2007 at pages 139-152]
  • Have, Paul ten (2004) Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. London etc. Sage Publications
  • Have, Paul ten (2005) ‘The Notion of Member is the Heart of the Matter: On the Role of Membership Knowledge in Ethnomethodological Inquiry’, Historical Social Research / Historische Soziakforschung 30: 28-53 [reprint from: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung /
  • Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal] (2002), 3(3). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
  • Have, Paul ten (2005, November). Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to Discourse. Review Essay: Robin Wooffitt (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction [32 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal]. 7(2), Art. 3. Available at http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-06/06-2-3-e.htm
  • Have, Paul ten (2006) ‘On the interactive constitution of medical encounters’, Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 11/2: 85-98
  • Have, Paul ten (2007) Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide – Second Edition. London etc. Sage
  • Have, Paul ten (2009) ‘Conversation analysis: analysing everyday conversational activities’. In: Michael Hviid Jacobsen, ed. Encountering the everyday: an introduction to the sociologies of the unnoticed. Houndmills Basingstoke, Hampshire, U.K. & New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 257-78
  • Have, Paul ten (2010) ‘Conversational turn-taking’, ‘Conversation analysis’, ‘Ethnomethodology’, ‘Sequence organization’, ‘Transcription’. In: Louise Cummings, ed. The pragmatics encyclopedia. London & New York: Routledge
  • Have, Paul ten (2011) ‘Etnomethodologie’. In: Fijgje de Boer, Adri Smaling, red.
  • Benaderingen in kwalitatief onderzoek. Den Haag: Boom Lemma: 129-35
  • Have, Paul ten (2011) ‘Conversatieanalyse: orde in de details’. In: Fijgje de Boer, Adri Smaling, red. Benaderingen in kwalitatief onderzoek. Den Haag: Boom Lemma: 137-44
  • Have, Paul ten (2012) ‘Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis’. In: H. Cooper, ed.
  • APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2. Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. American Psychological Association: 95-109
  • Have, Paul ten (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and ethnomethodology’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 991-996
  • Have, Paul ten (2013) ‘Identifying birds by their song’. In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds. Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 75-87 [Series: Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis]
  • Have, Paul ten, George Psathas, eds. (1995) Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America
  • Hayano, Kaoru (2011) ‘Giving support to the claim of epistemic primacy: yo-marked assessments in Japanese’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 58-81
  • Hayano, Kaoru (2012) ‘Question design in conversation’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds.
  • The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 395-414
  • Hayashi, Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japanese conversation. In N. Akatsuka, ed., Japanese/Korean linguistics IV . Stanford : CSLI.:77-93
  • Hayashi, Makoto (1999) ‘Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation’, Human Studies 22: 475-99
  • Hayashi, Makoto (2001) ‘Postposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation: An interactional account of a grammatical practice’. In: Margret Selting, Elizabeth Couper- Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.317-43
  • Hayashi, Makoto (2003) ‘Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation’. Research on Language and Social Interaction36:109-41
  • Hayashi, Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Hayashi, Makoto (2004) ‘Discourse within a sentence: An exploration of postpositions in Japanese as an interactional resource’, Language in Society 33, 343-376
  • Hayashi, Makoto (2004) ‘Projection and grammar: Notes on the “action-projecting” use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese’, Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1337-1374
  • Hayashi, Makoto (2005) ‘Joint turn construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities.’ Semiotica 1/4 (156): 21-53
  • Hayashi, Makoto (2005) ‘Referential problems and turn construction: An exploration of an intersection between grammar and interaction’, Text 25/4: 437-68
  • Hayashi, Makoto (2009) ‘Marking a “noticing of departure” in talk: Eh-prefaced turns in Japanese conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 2100-2129
  • Hayashi, Makoto (2010) ‘An overview of the question-response system in Japanese ’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/10: 2685-2702
  • Hayashi, Makoto (2012) ‘Turn allocation and turn sharing’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 167-90
  • Hayashi, Makoto; Kaoru Hayano (2013) ‘Proffering insertable elements: a study of other-initiated repair in Japanese’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds.
  • Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Hayashi, Makoto; Shuya Kushida (2013) ‘Responding with resistance to wh-questions in Japanese talk-in-interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 46/3: 231-255
  • Hayashi, Makoto; Junko Mori (1998) ‘Co-construction in Japanese revisited: We do “fi nish each other ’ s sentences”, Japanese/ Korean Linguistics, 7, 77-93
  • Hayashi, Makoto, Junko Mori, Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) ‘Contingent achievement of co-tellership in a Japanese conversation: an analysis of talk, gaze and gesture’. In: Cecilia E.
  • Ford, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 2002) The Language of Turn and Sequence. New York: Oxford University Press: 81-122
  • Hayashi, Makoto; Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell (2013) ‘Conversational repair and human understanding: an introduction’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds.
  • Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1-68
  • Hayashi, Makoto; Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds. (2013) Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Hayashi, Makoto; Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) ‘A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction, with particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble’. Studies in Language, 30/3: 485-540.
  • Hayashi, Makoto, Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) ‘Negotiating boundaries in talk’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 250-78
  • Hayduk, Leslie A. (1976) ‘Formulations in police work: some observations and related technical concerns’, Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 1/4: 463-479
  • Hazel, Spencer; Kristian Mortensen (2014) ‘Embodying the institution—Object manipulation in developing interaction in study counselling meetings ’ Journal of Pragmatics 65: 10-29
  • Hazel, Spencer; Kristian Mortensen, Gitte Rasmussen 92014) ‘Introduction: A body of resources – CA studies of social conduct’, Journal of Pragmatics 65, 1-9
  • Heap, James L. (1980) ‘Description in ethnomethodology’, Human Studies 3/1: 87-106
  • Heap, James L. (1981) ‘Free-phantasy, language, and sociology: A criticism of the Methodist theory of essence’, Human Studies 4/4: 299-311
  • Heap, James L. (1982) ‘Practical reasoning in depression: a practice’, Human Studies 5/4: 345- 356
  • Heap, James (1982). Understanding classroom events: A critique of Durkin, with an alternative. Journal of Reading Behavior 14:391- 411.
  • Heap, James L. (1985). ‘Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: Reading Lessons’,. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(3), 245-279.
  • Heap, James L. (1987). ‘Sociologies in and of education: A reply to Hammersley’. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(2), 239-242.
  • Heap, James L. (1990) ‘Applied ethnomethodology: looking for the local rationality of reading activities’. Human Studies 13: 39-72
  • Heap, James L. (1991) ‘A situated perspective on what counts as reading’. In: C.D. Baker, A. Luke, eds. Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John
  • Benjamins: 103-39
  • Heap, James L. (1992) ‘Normative order in collaborative computer editing’. In: Graham Watson, R.M. Seiler, eds. Text in Context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage: 123-37
  • Heap, James (1997) Conversation analysis methods in researching language and education. In N. H. Hornberger & D. Corson, eds., Research methods in language and education (Vol. 8, pp. 217-226) Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic.
  • Heath, Christian (1981) ‘The opening sequence in doctor-patient interaction’. In: Paul Atkinson & Christian Heath, eds. Medical Work: Realities and Routines. Farnborough: Gower: 71-90
  • Heath, Christian C. (1982) ‘Preserving the consultation: Medical record cards and professional conduct’, Journal of the Sociology of Health and Illness 4: 56-74
  • Heath, Christian (1982) ‘The display of recipiency: An instance of sequential relationship in speech and body movement’, Semiotica, 42/2-4): 147-161
  • Heath, Christian (1984) ‘Talk and recipiency: sequential organization in speech and body movement’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 247-65
  • Heath, Christian (1984) ‘Participation in the medical consultation: the co-ordination of verbal and nonverbal behaviour between the doctor and patient’, Sociology of Health & Illness 6/3: 311-388
  • Heath, Christian (1985) The consultations end - the coordination of speech and body movement. International Journal of the Sociology of Language(51), 27-42.
  • Heath, Christian (1986) Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Heath, Christian (1988) ‘Embarrassment and interactional organization’. In: Paul Drew, Anthony Wootton, eds., Erving Goffman: exploring the interaction order. Cambridge: Polity Press: 136-60
  • Heath, Christian (1989) ‘Institutional form and interactional detail: the delivery of diagnosis in a medical consultation’. In: Langage et travail, 1989: 280-89
  • Heath, Christian (1989) ‘Pain talk: the expression of suffering in the medical consultation’,
  • Social Psychology Quarterly 52: 113-25
  • Heath, Christian (1991) ‘The expression of pain and suffering in the medical consultation: aspects of an interactional organisation’. In: Bernard Conein, M. de Fornel, L. Quéré, Les formes de la conversation, vol 2. Issy les Moulineaux: CNET, 1991: 93-117
  • Heath, Christian (1992) ‘The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general practice consultation’. In: Paul Drew & John Heritage, eds. Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 235-67
  • Heath, Christian (1992) ‘Gesture’s discreet tasks: Multiple relevancies in visual conduct and in the contextualisation of language’. In P. Auer, A. di Luzio, eds., The contextualisation of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 101-128
  • Heath, Christian (1997) ‘The analysis of activities in face to face interaction using video’. In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage: 183-200
  • Heath, Christian (2002) ‘Demonstrative suffering: the gestural (re)embodiment of symptoms’.
  • Journal of Communication 52: 597-617
  • Heath, Christian (2004) ‘Analysing face to face interaction: video, the visual and material’. In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. Second edition
  • London: Sage: 266-82
  • Heath, Christian (2006) ‘Body work: the collaborative production of the clinical object’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 185-213
  • Heath, Christian (2013) The dynamics of auction: social interaction and the sale of fine art and antiques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [Series: Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives]
  • Heath, Christian Jon Hindmarsh (2000) ‘Configuring Action in Objects: From mutual spaces to media spaces. Mind, Culture and Activity 7: 81-104
  • Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh (2002) ‘Analyzing Interaction: Video, ethnography and situated conduct’. In: May, T. (ed.) Qualitative Research in Action. London: Sage. pp. 99-121
  • Heath, Christian C., Jon Hindmarsh, Paul Luff (1999) Interaction in Isolation: the train driver on London Underground’, Sociology 33: 555-75
  • Heath, Christian; Jon Hindmarsh, Paul Luff (2010) Video in Qualitative Research. London : Sage
  • Heath, Christian, Hubert Knoblauch, Luff, Paul (2000) ‘Technology and Social Interaction: The emergence of ‘workplace studies’. British Journal of Sociology 51: 299-320
  • Heath, Christian, Marina Jirotka, Paul Luff, Jon Hindmarsh (1994/1995) ‘Unpacking collaboration: the interactional organisation of trading in a city dealing room’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 3: 147-65
  • Heath, Christian, Dirk vom Lehn (2003) ‘Misconstruing Interactivity’. In: M. Hinton (ed),
  • Interactive Learning in Museums of Art and Design. London: Victoria and Albert Museum
  • Heath, Christian, Dirk vom Lehn (2004) Configuring reception - (dis-)regarding the ‘spectator’ in museums and galleries. Theory Culture & Society, 21(6), 43-+.
  • Heath, Christian, Dirk vom Lehn, J. Osborne (2005) Interaction and interactives: Collaboration and participation with computer-based exhibits. Public Understanding Of Science, 14(1), 91-101.
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff (1991) ‘Collaborative activity and technological design: task coordination in London Underground control rooms’. In: L. Bannon, M. Robinson, K. Schmidt, eds. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 65-80
  • Heath, Christian C., Paul Luff (1992) ‘Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms’, Journal of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1: 69-94
  • Heath, Christian C., Paul Luff (1992) ‘Media space and communicative asymmetries: preliminary observations of video mediated interaction’, Human-Computer Interaction 7: 315- 46
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff (1993) ‘Explicating face-to-face interaction’. In: Gilbert, N., ed.
  • Researching social life. London: Sage: 306-26
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff (1996) ‘Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground’. In: Y. Engeström, D. Middleton, eds. Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 96-129
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff (2000) Technology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University
  • Press
  • Heath, Christian; Paul Luff (2006) ‘Video analysis and organizational practice’. In H. Knoblauch, B.Schnettler, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, eds., Video analysis: Methodology and methods. Frankfurt-am-Main : Peter Lang: 35-50
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff (2007) ‘Gesture and institutional interaction: Figuring bids in auctions of fine art and antiques’, Gesture 7/2: 215-240
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff (2007) ‘Ordering competition: the interactional accomplishment of the sale of art and antiques at auction’, British Journal of Sociology 58: 63-85
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff (2008) ‘Video and the analysis of work and interaction’. In: Pertti Alasuutari, Leonard Bickman, Julia Brannen eds. The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods. London, etc. Sage: 493-505
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff (2010) ‘Orders of bidding: organising participation in auctions of fine art and antiques’. In: Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 119-39
  • Heath, Christian; Paul Luff (2011) ‘Gesture and institutional interaction’. In: Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, Curtis LeBaron, eds. Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 276-88
  • Heath, Christian; Paul Luff (2012) ‘Embodied action and organizational activity’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 283- 307
  • Heath, Christian; Paul Luff (2013) ‘Embodied action and organisational interaction: Establishing contract on the strike of a hammer’, Journal of Pragmatics 46/1: 24-38
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, Dirk vom Lehn, Jon Hindmarsh, Jason Cleverly (2002) ‘Crafting Participation: Designing ecologies, configuring experience’, Visual Communication, 1: 9-34
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, Gillian Nicholls, Dirk vom Lehn, (2000/1) ‘Textuality and interaction: The collaborative production of news stories’, Intellectica: revue de l’Association pour la Recherche Cognitive, 30: 151-175
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, Marcus Sanchez Svensson (2002) ‘Overseeing organisations’,
  • British Journal of Sociology, 53: 181-203
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, Marcus Sanchez-Svensson (2005) ‘Espaces configurants : le déploiement de l’ organisation’, intellectica nE 41-42 “Espace, inter/action & cognition”: 117- 37
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, Marcus Sanchez Svensson (2005) ‘Technology and medical practice’, Sociology of Health & Illness 25/3: 75-96
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, Marcus Sanchez Svensson (2007) ‘Video and qualitative research: analysing medical practice and interaction’, Medical Education, 41, 109-116.
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, Abi Sellen; (1995) ‘Reconsidering the virtual workplace: flexible support for collaborative activity’. In: H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad, K. Schmidt, eds.
  • Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 83-99
  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, Abi Sellen; (1997) ‘Reconsidering the virtual workplace’. In: K.E. Flin, A.J. Sellen, S.B. Wilbur, eds. Video-mediated communication. Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Heath, Christian, Marcus Sanchez Svensson, Jon Hindmarsh, Paul Luff, Dirk vom Lehn (2002) ‘Configuring Awareness’, Computer-Supported Co-operative Work 11/3-4: 317-47
  • Heath, Christian, Marcus Sanchez Svensson, Paul Luff, (2003) ‘Technology and Medical Practice’, Sociology of Health and Illness 25 [Silver Anniversary Issue]: 75-97
  • Heath, Christian C., D.Rod Watson (1989) ‘Some preobservations on a case of human- computer interaction’. In: Langage et travail, 1989: 290-98
  • Heeschen, Claus, Emanuel A. Schegloff (1999) ‘Agrammatism, Adaptation Theory, Conversation Analysis: On the Role of so-called Telegraphic Style in Talk-in-Interaction’,
  • Aphasiology 13: 365-405.
  • Heeschen, Claus, Emanuel A. Schegloff (2003) ‘Aphasic Agrammatism as Interactional Artifact and Achievement’ In: Charles Goodwin, ed. Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press: 231-82
  • Heinemann, Trine (2005) ‘Where grammar and interaction meet: The preference for matched polarity in responsive turns in Danish’. In Auli Hakulinen, Margret Selting, eds. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction.
  • Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 375-402
  • Heinemann, Trine (2006). ‘“Will you or can’t you?” Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests’, Journal of Pragmatics, 38: 1081-1104
  • Heinemann, Trine (2008) ‘Questions of accountability: yes—no interrogatives that are unanswerable’, Discourse Studies 10: 55-71.
  • Heinemann, Trine (2009) ‘Two answers to inapposite inquiries’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed.
  • Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 159-86
  • Heinemann, Trine (2009) ‘Participation and exclusion in third party complaints’, Journal of Pragmatics, 41/12: 2435-2451
  • Heinemann, Trine (2010) ‘The question-response system of Danish ’, Journal of Pragmatics42/10: 2703-2725
  • Heinemann, Trine; Anna Lindström, Jakob Steensig (2011) ‘Addressing epistemic incongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 107-30
  • Heinemann, Trine; Ben Matthews, Pirkko Raudaskoski (2012) ‘Hearing aid adjustment: Translating symptom descriptions into treatment and dealing with expectations’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 113-24
  • Heinemann, Trine, Véronique Traverso, eds. (2009) Complaining in Interaction. Special issue,
  • Journal of Pragmatics, 41/12: 2381-2578
  • Heinemann, Trine, Véronique Traverso (2009) ‘Complaining in interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics, 41/12: 2381-2384
  • Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, Minna Laakso, Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2003) ‘Searching for words: Syntactic and sequential construction of word search in conversation of Finnish speakers with aphasia’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 37: 1-37
  • Hellermann, John (2005) ‘Syntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talk’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38/1: 105-130
  • Hellermann, John (2009) ‘Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: a case study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of English’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53/ 2: 113-132
  • Hellermann, John (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and language acquisition’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1027- 1032
  • Hellermann, John; Yo-An Lee (2014) ‘Members and their competencies: Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second language acquisition’, System, 44: 54–65
  • Helm, David T., W. Timothy. Anderson, Albert.Jay Meehan, Anne Warfield Rawls, eds. (1989) The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order. New York: Irvington
  • Hemmings, Terry, Dave Randall, Liz Marr, David Francis (2000) ‘Task, talk and closure: situated learning and the use of an ‘interactive’ museum artefact’. In S. Hester, D. Francis, eds., Local Educational Order. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 223-44.
  • Hepburn, Alexa (2004) ‘Crying: Notes on Description, Transcription, and Interaction’,
  • Research on Language & Social Interaction 37:251-90
  • Hepburn, Alexa; Galina B. Bolden (2012) ‘The conversation analytic approach to transcription’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 57-76
  • Hepburn, Alexa, Jonathan Potter (2007) ‘Crying receipts: time, empathy, and institutional practice’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40 (1): pages 89-116
  • Hepburn, Alexa; Jonathan Potter (2011) ‘Recipients designed: tag questions and gender’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 135-152
  • Hepburn, Alexa; Jonathan Potter (2011) ‘Designing the recipient: Managing advice resistance in institutional settings’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 74/2: 216-241
  • Hepburn, Alexa; Jonathan Potter (2011) ‘Threats: Power, family mealtimes, and social influence’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 50/1: 99-120
  • Hepburn, Alexa; Scott Varney (2013) ‘Beyond ((laughter)): Some notes on transcription’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 25-38
  • Hepburn, Alexa; Sue Wilkinson, Rebecca Shaw (2012) ‘Repairing self- and recipient reference’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45/2: 175-190
  • Heritage, John (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press [Finnish Translation: Harold Garfinkel ja Etnometodologia. Helsinki: Gaudeamus, 1996]
  • Heritage, John (1984) ‘A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 299-345
  • Heritage, John C. (1985) ‘Recent developments in conversation analysis’, Sociolinguistics 15: 118
  • Heritage, John (1985) ‘Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience’. In: T.A. van Dijk,ed. Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press. Vol. 3: 95-117
  • Heritage, John C. (1987) ‘Ethnomethodology’. In: A. Giddens, J.H. Turner, eds. Social theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press: 224-72
  • Heritage, John (1988) ‘Explanations as accounts: a conversation analytic perspective’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Analyzing everyday explanation: a casebook of methods. London: Sage: 127-44
  • Heritage, John (1989) ‘Current developments in conversation analysis’. In: Roger, D., Peter Bull, eds., Conversation: an interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 21- 47
  • Heritage, John (1990/1) ‘Intention, meaning and strategy: observations on constraints on interaction analysis’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 311-32
  • Heritage, John (1995) ‘Conversation analysis: methodological aspects’. In: U.M. Quasthoff, ed., Aspects of oral communication. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter: 391-418
  • Heritage, John (1997) ‘Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data’. In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice.London: Sage: 161-82
  • Heritage, John (1998) ‘Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry’, Language in Society 27: 291-334
  • Heritage, John (1999) ‘CA at century’s end: practices of talk-in-interaction, their distributions and their outcomes’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 69-76
  • Heritage, John (2001) ‘Goffman, Garfinkel and conversation analysis’. In: M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, S. Yates, eds. Discourse theory and practice. London: Sage 47-56
  • Heritage, John (2002) ‘Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement’. In C.E.Ford, B.A. Fox & S.A.Thompson, eds., The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford. 196-224
  • Heritage, John (2002) ‘Ad hoc inquiries: two preferences in the design of routine questions in an open context’. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 313-335
  • Heritage, John (2002) ‘The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content’, Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11): 1427-1446
  • Heritage, John (2002) ‘Ethno-sciences and their significance for conversation linguistics’. In G.Antos, K. Brinker, W. Heinemann & S. Sager, eds., Linguistics of text and conversation: An international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin: De Gruyter: 908-919.
  • Heritage, John (2003) ‘Presenting Emanuel Schegloff’. In C. Prevignano, P. J. Thibault, eds.,
  • Discussing conversation analysis: The work of Emanuel A. Schegloff . Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1-10
  • Heritage, John C. (2003) ‘Designing Questions and Setting Agendas in the News Interview’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 57-90
  • Heritage, John (2004) ‘Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data’.. In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. Second edition London: Sage: 222-45
  • Heritage, John (2005) ‘Cognition in discourse’. In: Hedwig te Molder, Jonathan Potter, eds.
  • Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 184-202
  • Heritage, John (2005) ‘Conversation analysis and institutional talk’. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders, eds., Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 103-47
  • Heritage, John. (2005) ‘Revisiting authority in physician-patient interaction’. In Judith F. Duchan, Dana Kovarsky, eds., Diagnosis as cultural practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 83- 102.
  • Heritage, John (2007) ‘Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference’. In: Tanya Stivers and N.J.Enfield, eds., Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 255-80
  • Heritage, John (2008) ‘Conversation analysis as social theory.’ In Bryan Turner, ed. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell:300-320.
  • Heritage, John (2008) ‘Constructing and navigating epistemic landscapes’, The Journal of Studies in Contemporary Sociological Theory, 2: 14-25.
  • Heritage, John (2009) ’Negotiating the legitimacy of medical problems: A multi-phase concern for patients and physicians.’ In Dale Brashers, Deana Goldsmith, eds. Communicating to Manage Health and Illness. New York: Routledge: 47-164.
  • Heritage, John (2010) ‘Questioning in medicine’. In A. F. Freed, S. Ehrlich, eds., “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press:42-68
  • Heritage, John (2010) ‘Conversation Analysis: Practices and Methods.’ In: David Silverman (ed.). Qualitative Sociology (3rd Edition). London: Sage: 208-230
  • Heritage, John (2011) ‘A Galilean moment in social theory? Language, culture and their emergent properties’, Qualitative Sociology 34: 263-270
  • Heritage, John (2011) ‘Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: empathic moments in interaction’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 159-183.
  • Heritage, John (2011) ‘The interaction order and clinical practice: some observations on dysfunctions and action steps’, Patient Education and Counseling. 84:338-343
  • Heritage, John (2012)‘Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge’,
  • Research on Language & Social Interaction 45/1: 1-29
  • Heritage, John (2012) ‘The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 45/1: 30-52
  • Heritage, John (2012) ‘Beyond and behind the words: Some reactions to my commentators’,
  • Research on Language & Social Interaction 45/1: 76-81
  • Heritage, John (2012) ‘Epistemics in conversation’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 370-94
  • Heritage, John (2013) ‘Asymmetries of knowledge in patient-provider encounters: Three studies adopting conversation analysis’ (Editorial), Patient Education and Counseling 92:1-2
  • Heritage, John (2013) ‘Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds’,
  • Discourse Studies 15/5: 551-578
  • Heritage, John(2013) ‘Turn-initial position and some of its occupants’, Journal of Pragmatics57: 331-337
  • Heritage, John, J. Maxwell Atkinson, (1984) ‘Introduction’. In: J. Maxwell Atkinson, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1-15
  • Heritage, John, Elisabeth Boyd, Lawrence Kleinman (2001) ‘Subverting criteria: the role of precedent in decisions to finance surgery’, Sociology of Health and Illness 23: 701-28
  • Heritage, John; Steven E. Clayman (2010) Talk in action: Interactions, identities and institutions. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Heritage, John; Steven Clayman (2012) ‘Melvin Pollner: A view from the suburbs’, The American Sociologist 43:99-108
  • Heritage, John, S. Clayman, Don H. Zimmerman, (1988) ‘Discourse and message analysis: the micro structure of mass media messages’. In: R. Hawkins, J.M. Wieman, S. Pingree, eds.
  • Advancing communication science: merging mass and interpersonal processes. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research, vol. 16. London: Sage: 77-109
  • Heritage, John, David Greatbatch, (1986) ‘Generating applause: a study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences’, American Journal of Sociology 92: 110-57
  • Heritage, John, David Greatbatch, (1991) ‘On the institutional character of institutional talk: the case of news interviews’. In: Deirdre Boden, Don H. Zimmerman, eds. Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press: 93-137
  • Heritage, John, Anna Lindström (1996) ‘Motherhood, medicine and morality: scenes from a series of medical encounters’. In: J. Bergman, P. Linell, eds. Morality in discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf
  • Heritage, John, Anna Lindström (1998) ‘Motherhood, medicine and morality: scenes from a medical encounter’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 397-438
  • Heritage, John C.; Anna Lindström (2012) ‘Advice giving-terminable and interminable: The case of British health visitors’. In: Limberg, Holger; Miriam A. Locher, eds., Advice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 169-194
  • Heritage, John; Anna Lindström (2012) ‘Knowledge, empathy and emotion in a medical encounter’. In Anssi Peräkylä, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, eds) Emotion and Affect in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 256-273
  • Heritage, John, Douglas W. Maynard (2006) ‘Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patien interaction’, Annual Review of Sociology 32:351-74
  • Heritage, John, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. (2006) Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients. [Series: Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, No. 20] Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Heritage, John, Douglas W. Maynard (2006) ‘Introduction: analyzing interaction between doctors and patients in primary care encounters’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds.
  • Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1-21
  • Heritage, John, Geoffrey Raymond (2005) ‘The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences’, Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15-38
  • Heritage, John; Geoffrey Raymond (2012) ‘Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiesence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions’. In J. P. De Ruiter, ed., Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 179-192
  • Heritage, John, Jeffrey Robinson (2006) ‘Accounting for the visit: giving reasons for seeking medical care’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 48-85
  • Heritage, John; Jeffrey D. Robinson (2006) ‘The structure of patients’ presenting concerns 1: Physicians’ opening questions’, Health Communication, 19: 89-102
  • Heritage, John; Jeffrey D. Robinson (2011) ‘“Some” vs “any” medical worries: encouraging patients to reveal their unmet concerns’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 15-31
  • Heritage, John, Jeffrey D. Robinson, Marc N. Elliott, Megan Beckett, Michael Wilkes (2007) ‘Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make’,
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine 22(10): 1429-33
  • Heritage, John, Andrew Roth (1995) ‘Grammar and institution: questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 1-60
  • Heritage, John, Sue Sefi (1992) ‘Dilemmas of advice: aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between Health Visitors and firsttime mothers’. In: Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 359417
  • Heritage, John, Marja-leena Sorjonen (1994) ‘Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of questioning design’, Language in Society 23: 1-29
  • Heritage, John, Tanya Stivers (1999) ‘Online Commentary in Acute Medical Visits: A Method of Shaping Patient Expectations’, Social Science and Medicine 49(11): 1501-17
  • Heritage, John; Tanya Stivers (2012) ‘Conversation analysis and sociology’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 659-73
  • Heritage, John C., D. Rod Watson, (1979) ‘Formulations as conversational objects’. In: George Psathas, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 123-62
  • Heritage, John C., D. Rod Watson, (1980) ‘Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: Some instances analysed’, Semiotica 30: 245-62
  • Hester, Sally, Stephen Hester (2010) ‘Conversational actions and category relations: An analysis of a children’s argument’, Discourse Studies 12: 33-48.
  • Hester, Sally; Stephen Hester (2012) ‘Categorial occasionality and transformation: analyzing culture in action’, Human Studies 35/4: 563-581
  • Hester, Stephen (1992) ‘Recognizing references to deviance in referral talk’. In: Graham Watson, R.M. Seiler, eds. Text in Context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage: 156-74
  • Hester, Stephen (1994) ‘Les catégories en contexte’. In: B. Fradin, L. Quéré, J. Widmer, eds. (1994) L’enquête sur les catégories. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]: 219-42
  • Hester, Stephen (1996) ‘Laughter in its place’. In: Paton, George E.C., Powell, Chris, Wagg, Stephen, eds., The Social Faces of Humour. Practices and Issues. Hants: Athenaeum Press: 243-269.
  • Hester, Stephen (1998) ‘Describing “deviance” in school: recognizably educational psychological problems’. In: Charles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe, eds. Identities in Talk. London, Sage: 133-50
  • Hester, Stephen (2002) ‘Bringing it all back home: selecting topic, category and location in TV News Programmes’, in S. Hester and W. Housley, eds. Language, interaction and national identity: studies in the social organisation of national identity in talk-in-interaction, Aldershot: Ashgate, 16-37
  • Hester, Stephen (2009) ‘Ethnomethodology: respecifying the problem of social order’. In: Michael Hviid Jacobsen, ed. Encountering the everyday: an introduction to the sociologies of the unnoticed. Houndmills Basingstoke, Hampshire, U.K. & New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 234-56
  • Hester, Stephen, Peter Eglin, eds. (1997) Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America
  • Hester, Stephen, Peter Eglin (1997) ‘Membership categorization analysis: an introduction. In: Stephen Hester, Peter Eglin, eds., Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 1-24
  • Hester, Stephen, Peter Eglin (1997) ‘The reflexive constitution of category, predicate and context in two settings’. In: Stephen Hester, Peter Eglin, eds., Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 25-48
  • Hester, Stephen, Richard Fitzgerald (1999) ‘Category, predicate and contrast: some organizational features in a radio talk show’. In: Paul L. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 171-94
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis (1994) ‘Doing Data: the local organization of a sociological interview’, British Journal of Sociology, 45: 675-95.
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis (1997) ‘Reality analysis in a classroom storytelling’, British Journal of Sociology 48: 95-112
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis, eds. (2000) Local Educational Order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins [Pragmatics & Beyond NS 73]
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis (2000) ‘Category play in a school staff-room’, Ethnographic Studies 5: 42-55
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis (2000) ‘Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and “Institutional Talk”’, Text, 20/3: 373-90
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis (2000) ‘Analysing “Institutional Talk”: a Reply to Watson’,
  • Text, 20: 391-413
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis (2000). ‘Ethnomethodology and local educational order’. In S. Hester & D. Francis, eds., Local educational order: ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1-17.
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis (2001) ‘Is institutional talk a phenomenon? Reflections on ethnomethodology and applied conversation analysis’. In: Alec McHoul and Mark Rapley, eds.
  • How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum: 206-17
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis (2002) ‘Category Play in a School Staff-room’, Ethnographic Studies, 5: 42-55
  • Hester. Stephen, David Francis (2003) ‘Analysing visually available mundane order: a walk to the supermarket’. In: Mike Ball (ed.) Image Work, a Special Issue of Visual Studies 18/1 ( April 2003): 36-46
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis, eds. (2007) Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate [Series: Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Series editors D. Francis and S. Hester]
  • Hester, Stephen, David Francis (2007) ‘Analysing orders of ordinary action’ In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 3-12
  • Hester, Stephen, William Housley, eds. (2002) Language, Interaction and National Identity: Studies in the social organisation of national identity in talk-in-interaction. Aldershot: Ashgate
  • Hester, Stephen, William Housley (2002) ‘Introduction: ethnomethodology and national identity’, in S. Hester, W. Housley, eds. Language, interaction and national identity: studies in the social organisation of national identity in talk-in-interaction, Aldershot: Ashgate, 1-15.
  • Heyman, Richard D. (1986) ‘Formulating topic in the classroom’, Discourse Processes 9: 3755
  • Heyman, Richard D. (1990) ‘The problem of locating ethnicity in talk’, Sociolinguistics 19: 37-52
  • Heyman, Richard D. (1994) Why didn’t you say that in the first place? How to be understood at work. San Francisco: JosseyBass
  • Hicks, D., Glenn, P. J. (1996) ‘The pragmatics of sexual harassment’. In: S. Ragan, C. Beck, L. L. Kaid, D. Bystrom, eds., She said/he said: Communication consequences of the Hill- Thomas hearings. Champaign: University of Illinois Press: 215-38.
  • Hilbert, Richard (1984) ‘The acultural dimensions of chronic pain: flawed reality construction and the problem of meaning’, Social Problems 31: 365-78
  • Hilbert, Richard (1990) ‘Ethnomethodology and the Micro-Macro Order’, American Sociological Review 55: 794-808
  • Hilbert, Richard (1991) ‘Norman and Sigmund: Comment on Denzin’s “Harold and Agnes”’,
  • Sociological Theory 9: 264-68
  • Hilbert, RichardA. (1992) The classical roots of Ethnomethodology: Durkheim, Weber, and Garfinkel. Foreword by Randall Collins. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
  • Hilbert, Richard (1992) ‘Ethnomethodological Recovery of Durkheim’, Sociological Perspectives 34: 337-57
  • Hilbert, Richard (1995) ‘Garfinkel’s Recovery of Themes in Classical Sociology’,Human Studies 18: 157-75
  • Hilbert, Richard A. “Ethnomethodology.” Encyclopedia of Social Theory. 2004. SAGE Publications. 9 Mar. 2009. <http://sage-ereference.com/socialtheory/Article_n96.html>.
  • Hilbert, Richard A.(2012) ‘Melvin Pollner and the passing of an American sociologist’, The American Sociologist 43:55-66
  • Hill, Richard.J., Kathleen S. Crittenden, eds. (1968) Proceedings of the Purdue Symposium on ethnomethodology. Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue Research Foundation
  • Hindmarsh, Jon (2009). Work and the Moving Image: Past, present and future. Sociology, 43/5: 990-996
  • Hindmarsh, Jon (2010) ‘Peripherality, participation and communities of practice: examining the patient in dental training’. In: Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 218-40
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, Mike Fraser, Christian Heath, Steve Benford (2001) ‘Virtually Missing the Point: Configuring CVEs for object-focused interaction’. In: Churchill, E., Snowdon, D., A. Munro, eds., Collaborative Virtual Environments. Springer Verlag: 115-39
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, Mike Fraser, Christian Heath, Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh (2000) ‘Object-Focused Interaction in Collaborative Virtual Environments’. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (ToCHI),7: 477-509
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, Christian Heath (2000) ‘Sharing the Tools of the Trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 29: 517-56
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, Christian Heath (2000) ‘Embodied Reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics, 32: 1855-78
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, Christian Heath. (2003) ‘Transcending the Object in Embodied Interaction’. In: Coupland, J., Gwyn, R., eds., Discourse, the Body and Identity. London: Palgrave:. 43-69
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, Christian Heath, Dirk vom Lehn, Jason Cleverly (2002) ‘Creating assemblies: aboard the Ghost Ship’. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’02). ACM Press: 156-65
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, Christian Heath, Dirk Vom Lehn, Jason Cleverly (2005) ‘Creating assemblies in public environments: social interaction, interactive exhibits and CSCW’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 14/1: 1-41
  • Hindmarsh, Jon; Lewis Hyland, Avijit Banerjee (2014) ‘Work to make simulation work: ‘Realism’, instructional correction and the body in training’ Discourse Studies 16/2: 16: 247-269
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, K. Neil Jenkings, Tim Rapley (2007) ‘Introduction to “Healthcare Technologies in Practice”’, Health Informatics Journal 13: 5-8.
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, Nick Llewellyn (2010) ‘Finding organisation in detail: methodological orientations’. In: Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 24-46
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, Alison Pilnick. (2002) ‘The tacit order of teamwork: Collaboration and embodied conduct in anaesthesia’, The Sociological Quarterly 43: 139-64
  • Hindmarsh, Jon, Alison Pilnick (2007) ‘Knowing bodies at work: embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia’, Organization Studies. 28: 1395 - 1416.
  • Hindmarsh, Jon; Patricia Reynolds, Stephen Dunne (2011) ‘Exhibiting understanding: The body in apprenticeship’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/2: 489-503
  • Hockey, John; Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson (2006) ‘Seeing the way: visual sociology and the distance runner’s perspective’, Visual Studies 21/1: 70-81
  • Hockey, John; Jacqui Allen-Collinson (2009) The sensorium at work: the sensory phenomenology of the working body. The Sociological Review. Vol. 57. No 2. P217-239.
  • Hockey, John; Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson (2013) ‘Distance running as play/work: Training-together as a joint accomplishment’. In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds.
  • Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 211-224
  • Hoey, Elliott M. (2014) ‘Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 47/2: 175–200
  • Hollander, Matthew M.; Jason Turowetz (2013) ‘“So, why did you decide to do this?” Soliciting and formulating motives for speed dating’, Discourse & Society 24: 701-724
  • Holstein, James A. (1983)‘Grading practices: The construction and use of background knowledge in evaluative decision-making’, Human Studies 6/4: 377-392
  • Holt, Elizabeth (1993) ‘The structure of death announcements: Looking on the bright side of death’, Text 13:189-212
  • Holt, Elizabeth (1996) ‘Reporting on talk: the use of direct reported speech in conversation’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 29/3: 219-45
  • Holt, Elisabeth (1999) ‘Just gassing: an analysis of direct reported speech in a conversation between employees of a gas supply company’, Text 19/4: 505-37
  • Holt. Elizabeth (2000) ‘Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 33/4: 425-54
  • Holt, Elizabeth (2007) ‘“I’m eyeing your chop up mind”: reporting and enacting’. In: Elizabeth, Holt, Rebecca Clift, eds. Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 47-80
  • Holt, Elizabeth (2009) ‘Reported speech’. In: Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Ola Östman, Jef Verschueren, eds. The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam: Benjamins: 190-205
  • Holt, Elizabeth (2010) ‘The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/6: 1513-1525
  • Holt, Elisabeth (2011) ‘On the nature of “laughables”: Laughter as a response to overdone figurative phrases’, Pragmatics 21:3 393-410
  • Holt, Liz (2012) ‘Using laugh responses to defuse complaints’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45/4 430-448
  • Holt, Elizabeth (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and laughter’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1033-1038
  • Holt, Elizabeth (2013) ‘“There’s many a true word said in jest”: Seriousness andnon-seriousness in interaction’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 69-90
  • Holt, Elizabeth, Rebecca Clift, eds. (2007) Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Holt, Elizabeth; Paul Drew (2005) ‘Figurative Pivots: the Use of Figurative Expressions in Pivotal Topic Transitions’. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 38: 35
  • Honan, Eileen; Michele Knobel, Carolyn Baker, Bronwyn Davies (2000) ‘Producing possible Hannahs: Theory and the subject of research’, Qualitative Inquiry, 6/1: 9-32
  • Hopper, Robert (1989) ‘Conversation analysis and social psychology as descriptions of interpersonal communication’. In: Roger, D., Peter Bull, eds., Conversation: an interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 48-65
  • Hopper, Robert (1989) ‘Speech in telephone openings: Emergent interaction v. routines’,
  • Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 240-252.
  • Hopper, Robert (1990) ‘Sequential ambiguity in telephone openings: “What are you doin’”’,
  • Communication monographs 56: 24052
  • Hopper, Robert ed. (1990/1) ‘Ethnography and conversation analysis after Talking Culture’.
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 161-387
  • Hopper, Robert (1991) ‘Hold the phone’. In: Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, eds. Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press: 217-31
  • Hopper, Robert (1992) Telephone conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
  • Hopper, Robert (1993) ‘Performance and conversation’ [Special issue]. Text & Performance Quarterly,13/2
  • Hopper, Robert (1995) ‘Episode Trajectory in Conversational Play’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds., Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 57-72
  • Hopper, Robert W. (1995) ‘Studying conversational interactions in institutions’. In: Burleson, B.R., ed. Communication yearbook 18. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications: 371-80 [comment on Nofsinger, 1995]
  • Hopper, Robert (1999) ‘Going public about social interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 32:
  • Hopper, Robert (2005) ‘A cognitive agnostic in conversation analysis: when do strategies affect spoken interaction?’ In: Hedwig te Molder, Jonathan Potter, eds. Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 134-58
  • Hopper, Robert, Chia-Hui Chen (1996) ‘Languages, cultures, relationships: Telephone openings in Taiwan’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 29: 291-314
  • Hopper, Robert, N. Doany, M. Johnson, K. Drummond (1990/1991) ‘Universals and particulars in telephone openings’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 369-88
  • Hopper, Robert, Glenn, P. J. (1994) ‘Repetition and play in conversation’. In: B. Johnstone, ed., Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Vol. II. Norwood, NJ: Ablex: 29-40
  • Hopper, Robert, S. Koch, Jenny Mandelbaum (1986) ‘Conversation analysis methods’. In: D.G. Ellis, W.A. Donahue, eds. Contemporary issues in language and discourse processes. Beverly Hills: Sage: 77-109
  • Hopper, Robert, Curt LeBaron (1998) ‘How gender creeps into talk’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 59-74
  • Horton-Salway, Mary, Jane Montague, Sally Wiggins, Sarah Seymour-Smith (2008) ‘Mapping the components of the telephone conference: an analysis of tutorial talk at a distance learning institution’, Discourse Studies 10: 737-758.
  • Hössjer, Amelie, Kerstin Severinson Eklundh (2009) ‘Making space for a new medium: on the use of electronic mail in a newspaper newsroom’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 18/1: 1-46
  • Hougaard, Gitte Rasmussen (2008) Membership categorization in international business phonecalls. The importance of ‘being international’. Journal of Pragmatics 40/2: 307-332.
  • Hougaard Rasmussen , Gitte (2009). ‘Legitimate Peripheral Participation as a Framework for Conversation Analytic Work in Second Language Learning’ [29 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2), Art. 4, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs090247
  • Hougaard, Gitte Rasmussen; C. E. Brouwer, J. Wagner (2004) ‘Embedded corrections in second language talk’. In: Gardner, Rod, Johannes Wagner, eds. (2004) Second Language Conversations: Studies of Communication in Everyday Settings. London: Continuum:
  • Housley,William (1999) ‘Role as an Interactional Device and Resource in Multidisciplinary Team Meetings’, Sociological Research Online 4:3 see: [9]
  • Housley, William (2000) ‘Category work and knowledgeability within multidisciplinary team meetings’, TEXT, 20: 83-107
  • Housley, William (2000) ‘Story, Narrative and Teamwork’, The Sociological Review 48: 425-43
  • Housley, William, Richard. Fitzgerald (2000) ‘Conversation analysis, practitioner based research, reflexivity and reflective practice: some exploratory remarks’, Ethnographic Studies, 5: 27-44
  • Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2001) ‘Categorisation, Narrative and Devolution in Wales’ Sociological Research Online, vol. 6, no. 2, [10]
  • Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2002) ‘The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis’, Qualitative Research. 2: 59-83
  • Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2003) ‘Moral Discrepancy and Political Discourse: Accountability and the Allocation of Blame in a Political News Interview’
  • Sociological Research Online, vol. 8, no. 2, <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/2/housley.html>
  • Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2008) ‘Motives and social organisation: sociological amnesia, psychological description and the analysis of accounts’, Qualitative Research. 8(2): 237-256.
  • Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2009) ‘Membership categorization, culture and norms in action’, Discourse & Society 20: 345-362.
  • Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2009) ‘Membership category work in policy debate’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 13-26
  • Housley, William; Robin James Smith (2011) ‘Telling the CAQDAS code: Membership categorization and the accomplishment of ‘coding rules’ in research team talk’, Discourse Studies 13: 417-434
  • Houtkoop, Hanneke (1986) ‘Summarizing in doctor-patient interaction’. In: T. Ensink et al., eds. Discourse and Public Life. Dordrecht/Providence, R.I.: Foris Publications: 201-21
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1985) ‘Kan een verzoek met “ja” worden geaccepteerd?’,
  • Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5: 23-40
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1986) ‘Eigenschappen van aangrenzende paren’, Gramma: Nijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10: 41-62
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1986) ‘Claimen en demonstreren in gesprekken’, Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 8: 222-34
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement: an analysis of proposal- acceptance sequences. Dordrecht/Providence, R.I.: Foris Publications
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1991) ‘Opening sequences in Dutch Telephone Conversations’. In: Boden, Deirdre & Don H. Zimmerman, eds., Talk and social structure. Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press: 232-50
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1994) ‘De interactionele functie van zacht spreken in interviews’[The interactional function of speaking softly in interviews], Gramma/TTT, Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 3: 183-202
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1995) ‘Meeting Both Ends: Standardization and Recipient Design in Telephone Survey Interviews’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds., Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 91-106
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1996) ‘Probing behavior of interviewers in the standardized semi-open research interview’, Quality & Quantity 30: 20530
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1997) ‘Being friendly in survey interviews’, Journal of Pramatics 28: 591-623
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1997) ‘Interactie in gestandaardiseerde interviews’ [Interaction in standardized interviews]. In: L. Meeuwesen & HannekeHoutkoop-Steenstra (red.), Sociale Interactie in Nederland. Utrecht: ISOR: 43-62
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1997) ‘Portrait of the person oriented survey interviewer’. In: A. Marcarino, ed., Analisi della conversatione e prospettive di recerca in etnometodologia. Urbino: Editioni QuattroVenti: 97-122
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1997) ‘Tussen tekst en interactie in het gestandaardiseerde interview’ [Between text and interaction in the standardized interview],Gramma/TTT, Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 6: 107-28
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (2000) Interaction and the standardized interview. The living questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (2002) ‘Questioning turn format and turn-taking problems in standardized interviews’. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 243-61
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (2003) ‘Gender Differences in Telephone Conversations’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 275-87
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke, Charles, Anataki, (1997) ‘Creating Happy People by Asking Yes-No Questions’, Research On Language and Social Interaction 30, 4, 285-315
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke; Huub van den Bergh ( 2000) ‘Effects of introductions in large-scale telephone survey interviews’, Sociological Methods & Research 28/ 3: 281-300,
  • Houtkoop, Hanneke, Frank Jansen, Anja Walstock (2005) ‘Collaborative problem description in help desk calls’. In: Carolyn Baker, Michael Emmison, Alan Firth eds. Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 63-89
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke, Harrie Mazeland (1982) ‘Beurten en grotere gesprekseenheden’, Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2: 105-35
  • Houtkoop, Hanneke, Harrie Mazeland (1985) ‘Turns and discourse units in everyday conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 9: 595-619
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, J.P. (1987) ‘Making arrangements: Five-part proposal-acceptance sequences in Dutch telephone conversations’. In Jef Verschueren, Marcella Bertuccelli Papi, eds., The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 357-366
  • Houwen, Fleur van der (2009) ‘Formulating disputes’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 2072-2085
  • Houwen, Fleur van der (2013) ‘Reported writing in court: putting evidence “on record”’, Text &Talk 33/6: 747-769
  • Huang, Chia-Hui; Yanying Lu (2013) ‘Interactions of cultural identity and turn-taking organisation: A case study of a senior Chinese immigrant in Australia’, Chinese Language and Discourse, 4/2: 229-252
  • Hudak, Pamela; Shannon Clark, Geoffrey Raymond (2013) ‘Some interactional consequences of medical specialization: The omni-relevance of surgery in treatment recommendations by orthopaedic surgeons’, Health Communication. 28/6: 533-545
  • Hudak, Pamela L.; Virginia Teas Gill, Jeffrey P. Aguinaldo, Shannon Clark, Richard Frankel (2010) ‘“I’ ve heard wonderful things about you”: How patients complement surgeons’,
  • Sociology of Health & Illness, 32/5: 777-797
  • Hudak, Pamela L.; Shannon J. Clark, and Geoffrey Raymond (2011) ‘How surgeons design treatment recommendations in orthopaedic surgery’, Social Science & Medicine 73/7: 1028-1036
  • Hughes, John (2001) ‘Of ethnography, ethnomethodology and workplace studies’,
  • Ethnographic Studies 6: 7-16
  • Hughes, John A. (2011) ‘On calculation’. In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds.
  • Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 57-72
  • Hughes, John; Dave Randall, Mark Rouncefield, Peter Tolmie (2011) ‘Meetings and the accomplishment of organization’. In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds.
  • Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 131-50
  • Huisman, Marjan (2001) Besluitvorming in vergaderingen. Organisaties, interactie en taalgebruik. Diss. Vrije Universteit Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT. [Decision making in meetings. Organizations, interaction and language use.]
  • Huisman, Marjan (2001) ‘Decision-making in meetings as talk-in-interaction’, International Studies of Management & Organization 31/3: 69-90
  • Hutchby, Ian (1991) ‘The organisation of talk on talk radio’. In P. Scannell (ed.), Broadcast Talk. London: Sage, 1991 119-37
  • Hutchby, Ian (1992) ‘Confrontation talk: Aspects of interruption in argument sequences on talk radio. Text 12: 343-71
  • Hutchby, Ian (1992) ‘The pursuit of controversy: routine scepticism in talk on talk radio’,
  • Sociology 26: 673-94
  • Hutchby, Ian (1995) ‘Aspects of recipient design in expert advice-giving on Call-in Radio’,
  • Discourse Processes 19: 219-38
  • Hutchby, Ian (1996) ‘Power in discourse: the case of arguments on a British talk radio show’,
  • Discourse & Society 7: 481-97
  • Hutchby, Ian (1996) Confrontation talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and power on talk radio. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Hutchby, Ian (1997) ‘Building alignments in public debate: A case study from British TV.’
  • Text 17: 161-179
  • Hutchby, Ian (1999) ‘Rhetorical Strategies in Audience Participation Debates on Radio and TV’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 243-67
  • Hutchby, Ian (1999) ‘Beyond Agnosticism?: Conversation Analysis and the Sociological Agenda’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 85-93
  • Hutchby, Ian (1999) ‘Frame attunement and footing in the organisation of talk radio openings’,
  • Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 41-64
  • Hutchby, Ian (2001) Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press
  • Hutchby, Ian (2001) ‘”Oh”, irony and sequential ambiguity in arguments’, Discourse & Society12: 123-41
  • Hutchby, Ian (2001) ‘”Witnessing”: the use of first-hand knowledge in legitimating lay opinions on talk radio’, Discourse Studies 3: 481-97
  • Hutchby, Ian (2001) ‘The moral status of technology: being recorded, being heard, and the construction of children’s concern about family relationships’. In: Ian Hutchby & J. Moran- Ellis, eds. Children, technology and culture. London: Routledge Falmer: 104-22
  • Hutchby, Ian (2001) ‘Technologies, texts and affordances’, Sociology 35: 441-56
  • Hutchby, Ian (2002) ‘Resisting the incitement to talk in child counselling: aspects of the utterance “I don’t know”’, Discourse Studies 4: 147-68
  • Hutchby, Ian (2005) ‘”Active listening”: formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counselling’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 38 303-29
  • Hutchby, Ian (2005) ‘”Incommensurable” studies of mobile phone conversation: a reply to Ilkka Arminen’, Discourse Studies 7: 663-70
  • Hutchby, Ian (2005) Media talk: conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting Open University Press
  • Hutchby, Ian (2007) The Discourse of Child Counselling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John
  • Benjamins
  • Hutchby, Ian (2010) ‘Feelings-talk and the paradoxes of child counselling’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell: 146-162
  • Hutchby, Ian (2011) ‘Non-neutrality and argument in the hybrid political interview’, Discourse Studies 13: 349-365
  • Hutchby, Ian, Simone Barnett (2005) ‘Aspects of the sequential organisation of mobile phone conversation’, Discourse Studies 7: 147-71
  • Hutchby, Ian, Michelle O’Reilly (2010) ‘Children’s participation and the familial moral order in family therapy’, Discourse Studies 12: 49-64.
  • Hutchby, Ian; Michelle O’Reilly, Nicola Parker (2012) ‘Ethics in praxis: Negotiating the presence and functions of a video camera in family therapy’, Discourse Studies 14: 675-690
  • Hutchby, Ian., Vanita Tanna (2008) ‘Aspects of sequential organisation in text message exchange.’ Discourse and Communication, 2: 143-164.
  • Hutchby, Ian, Robin Wooffitt (1998) Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press (UK and Europe), Blackwell Publishers Inc (USA)
  • Hutchby, Ian, Robin Wooffitt (2008) Conversation analysis (2nd Edition). Polity Press
  • Ijäs-Kallio, Taru; Johanna Ruusuvuori, Anssi Peräkylä (2010) ‘Patient Involvement in problem presentation and diagnosis delivery in primary care’, Communication & Medicine, 7/2: 131-141
  • Ijäs-Kallio,Taru; Johanna Ruusuvuori, Anssi Peräkylä (2011) ‘“Unilateral” decision making and patient participation in primary care’, Communication & Medicine, 8/2: 145-155
  • Ikeda, Keiko; Don Bysouth (2013) ‘Laughter and Turn-taking: Warranting next speakership in multiparty interactions’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 39-64
  • Ikeya, Nozomi, Mitsuhiro Okada (2007) ‘Doctors’ practical management of knowledge in the daily case conference’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 69-89
  • Ingrama, Jenni; Victoria Elliott (2014) ‘Turn taking and ‘wait time’ in classroom interactions’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics 62: 1-12
  • Ingrids, Henrik; Karin Aronsson (2014) ‘Reported speech and reported affect in child custody disputes, Research on Language and Social Interaction , 47/1: 69-88
  • Iversen, Clara (2012) ‘Recordability: Resistance and collusion in psychometric interviews with children’, Discourse Studies 14: 691-709
  • Iwasaki, Shimako (2009) ‘Initiating interactive turn spaces in Japanese conversation: Local projection and collaborative action’, Discourse Processes, 46/2: 226-246.
  • Iwasaki, Shimako (2011) ‘The multimodal mechanics of collaborative unit construction in Japanese conversation’. In: Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, Curtis LeBaron, eds. Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 106-20
  • Jacknick, Christine M. (2011). “But this is writing”: post-expansion in student-initiated sequences. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language). 5(1) 39-54. Retrieved from http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_5_1/jacknick.pdf
  • Jacknick, Christine (2013) ‘“Cause the textbook says…”: Laughter and student challenges in the ESL classroom’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 185-200
  • Jackson, Clare (2011) ‘The gendered “I”’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds.
  • Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 31-47
  • Jacoby, Sally, Patrick Gonzales (1991) ‘The constitution of expert/novice in scientific discourse’, ial Issues in Applied Linguistics 2/2: 149-82
  • Jacoby, Sally, Patrick Gonzales (2002) ‘Saying What Wasn’t Said: Negative observation as a linguistic resource for the interactional achievement of performance feedback’. In: Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson, eds., The Language of Turn and Sequence. New York: Oxford University Press: 123-64
  • Jacoby, Sally, Tim McNamara (1999) ‘Locating competence’. English for Specific Purposes18 (3), 213-241.
  • Jalbert, Paul L. (1989) ‘Categorization and beliefs: news accounts of Haitian and Cuban Refugees’. In: David T. Helm, W. Timothy. Anderson, Albert.Jay Meehan, Anne Warfield Rawls, eds., The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order. New York: Irvington: 231-48
  • Jalbert, Paul L. (1992) ‘Charting the logical geography of the concept of “cease-fire”’, Human Studies 15/2-3: 265-290
  • Jalbert, Paul L. (1994) ‘Structures of the “unsaid”’, Theory, Culture & Society 11: 127-60
  • Jalbert, Paul L. (Ed.) (1999) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America and the International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. [Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis No. 5]
  • Jalbert, Paul L. (1999) ‘Critique and analysis in media studies: media criticism as practical action’. In: Paul L. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 31-52
  • Jasperson, Robert (2002) ‘Some linguistic aspects of closure cut-off’. In: Cecilia Ford et al., eds., The language of turn and sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 257-86
  • Jayyusi, Lena (1984) Categorization and the moral order. Boston, etc. Routledge & Kegan Paul
  • Jayyusi, Lena (1988) ‘Towards a Socio-logic of the Film Text’, Semiotica 68: 271-96.
  • Jayyusi, Lena (1991) ‘The Equivocal Text and the Objective World’, Continuum: The Australian Journal of Media and Culture 5: 166-90.
  • Jayyusi, Lena (1991) ‘Values and moral judgement: communicative praxis as moral order’. In: Graham Button, ed. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 227-51
  • Jayyusi, Lena (1993) ‘Premeditation and happenstance: the social construction of intention, action and knowledge’, Human Studies 16: 43555
  • Jayyusi, Lena (1993) ‘The reflexive nexus: Photo-practice and natural history’. Continuum6(2), 25-52. [11]
  • Jayyusi, Lena (2007) ‘Between Saying and showing: making and contesting truth claims in the media’, Ethnographic Studies, No 9: 19 - 43
  • Lena Jayyusi, Catégorisation et Ordre Moral. Tr. Michel Barthélémy. Collection Études Sociologiques. Paris: Economica (Translation of Jayyusi, 1984)
  • Jefferson, Gail (1972) ‘Side sequences’. In: David Sudnow, ed. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 294-338
  • Jefferson, Gail (1973) ‘A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped tag- positioned address terms in closing sequences’, Semiotica 9: 47-96
  • Jefferson, Gail (1974) ‘Error correction as an international resource’, Language in Society 2: 181-99
  • Jefferson, Gail (1978) ‘Sequential aspects of story telling in conversation’. In: J.N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 213-48
  • Jefferson, Gail (1978) ‘What’s in a “Nyam”?’, Sociology 12: 135-9
  • Jefferson, Gail (1979) ‘A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination’. In: George Psathas, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 79-96
  • Jefferson, Gail (1980) ‘On “trouble-premonitory” response to inquiry’, Sociological Inquiry50: 153-85
  • Jefferson, Gail (1981) ‘Caveat speaker’. Final report SSRC (mimeo)
  • Jefferson, Gail (1983) ‘On exposed and embedded correction in conversation’. Studium Linguistik, 14: 58-68
  • Jefferson, Gail (1984) ‘On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 191-222
  • Jefferson, Gail (1984) ‘On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 346-69
  • Jefferson, Gail (1984) ‘Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “Yeah” and “Mm hm”’, Papers in Linguistics 17: 197-206
  • Jefferson, Gail (1984) ‘Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset’. In V.D’Urso, P. Leonardi, eds., Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric. Padua: Cleup Editore:11-38
  • Jefferson, Gail (1985) ‘On the interactional unpacking of a “gloss”’, Language in Society 14: 435-66
  • Jefferson, Gail (1985) ‘An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter’. In: T.A. van Dijk,ed. Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press. Vol. 3: 25-34
  • Jefferson, Gail (1986) ‘Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset’, Human Studies 9: 153-84
  • Jefferson, Gail (1987) ‘On exposed and embedded correction in conversation’. In: Graham Button, J.R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 86-100
  • Jefferson, Gail (1988) ‘On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation’. Social Problems 35: 418-41
  • Jefferson, Gail (1989) ‘Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation’. In: Roger, D., Peter Bull, eds., Conversation: an interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 166-96
  • Jefferson, Gail (1989) ‘Letter to the Editor Re: Anita Pomerantz’ Epilogue to the Special Issue on Sequential Organization of Conversational Activities, Spring 1989’. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53: 427-429.
  • Jefferson, Gail (1990) ‘List-construction as a task and a resource’. In: George Psathas, eds.
  • Interaction Competence. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 63-92
  • Jefferson, Gail (1993) ‘Caveat speaker: Preliminary notes on recipient topic-shift implicature’,
  • Research on language and social interaction 26: 1-30
  • Jefferson, Gail (1996) ‘A case of transcriptional stereotyping’, Journal of Pragmatics 26: 159- 70
  • Jefferson, Gail (1996) ‘On the Poetics of Ordinary Talk’, Text and Performance Quarterly 16: 11-61.
  • Jefferson, Gail (2002) ‘Is ‘’no’‘ an acknowledgment token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(-) tokens’, Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1345-1383
  • Jefferson, Gail (2003) ‘A Note on Resolving Ambiguity’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 221-40
  • Jefferson, Gail (2004) ‘Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction’. In: Gene H. Lerner, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 13-31
  • Jefferson, Gail (2004) A sketch of some orderly aspects of overlap in natural conversation’. In: Gene H. Lerner, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 43-59
  • Jefferson, Gail (2004)’”At first I thought”: A normalizing device for extraordinary events’. In: Gene H. Lerner, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 131-67
  • Jefferson, Gail (2004) ‘A note on laughter in ‘male-female’ interaction’, Discourse Studies 6: 117-33
  • Jefferson, Gail (2007) ‘Preliminary notes on abdicated other-correction’, Journal of Pragmatics 39/3: 445-461
  • Jefferson, Gail (2010) ‘Sometimes a frog in your throat is just a frog in your throat: Gutturals as (sometimes) laughter-implicative’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/6: 1476-1484
  • Jefferson, Gail, John R.E. Lee, (1981) ‘The rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a “TroublesTelling” and a “Service Encounter”’, Journal of Pragmatics 5: 399-422
  • Jefferson, Gail; John R.E. Lee (1992) ‘The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a “troubles-telling” and a “service encounter”’. In P. Drew, J. Heritage, eds.
  • Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: pp.521-548
  • Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A. Schegloff (1987) ‘Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy’. In: Button, Graham, J.R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 152-205
  • Jefferson, Gail, Jim Schenkein (1977) ‘Some sequential negotiations in conversation: unexpanded and expanded versions of projected action sequences’, Sociology 11: 87103 (also in: J.N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press (1978): 155-72)
  • Jenkings, K.Neil (2006) ‘Garfinkel and his Ethnomethodological “Bastards”’, Sociology 40(5): 957-63.
  • Jenkings, K. Neil (2007) ‘Implementation, change management and benefit realization: investigating the utility of ethnographically enriched process maps’, Health Informatics Journal 2007 13: 57-69.
  • Jenkings, K. Neil (2009) Studies in and as Ethnomethodology: Garfinkel and his Ethnomethodological `Bastards’ Part Two: Review Essay, Sociology 43: 775-781.
  • Jenkings, K. Neil (2013) ‘Playing dangerously: an ethnomethodological view upon rock-climbing’. In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds. Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 191-210
  • Jenks, Christopher (2009) ‘Getting acquainted in Skypecasts: aspects of social organization in online chat rooms’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19/1: 26-46
  • Jenks, Christopher Joseph (2011) Transcribing talk and interaction: Issues in the representation of communication data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  • Jenks, Christopher Joseph (2013) ‘Working with transcripts: an abridged review of issues in transcription’, Language and Linguistics Compass 7/4: 251-261
  • Jenks, Christopher Joseph; Adam Brandt (2013) ‘Managing mutual orientation in the absence of physical copresence: multiparty voice-based chat room interaction’, Discourse Processes50/4: 227-248
  • Jenks, , Christopher; Alan Firth, Liz Trinder (2012) ‘When disputants dispute: interactional aspects of arguments in family mediation sessions’, Text & Talk 32/3: 307-327
  • Jimerson, Jason, Matthew Oware (2006) ‘Telling the code of the street: an ethno- methodological ethnography’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35/1: 24-50
  • Jingree, Treena.; M Finlay, Charles Antaki (2006) ‘Empowering words, disempowering actions: an analysis of interactions between staff members and people with learning disabilities in residents’ meetings’, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 212-226
  • Jirotka, Marina, Nigel Gilbert, Paul Luff (1992) ‘On the social organisation of organisations’,
  • Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1, 1-2, 95-118
  • Jirotka, Marina, Rob Procter, Mark Hartswood, Roger Slack and Andrew Simpson, et al. (2005) ‘Collaboration and trust in healthcare innovation: The eDiaMoND case study’,
  • Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 14/4: 369-398
  • Joaquin, Anna Dina L. (2010) ‘Frontotemporal dementia, sociality, and identity: Comparing adult-child and caregiver-frontotemporal dementia interactions’, Discourse Studies 2010 12: 443-464
  • Jones, Aled (2009) ’Creating history: documents and patient participation in nurse-patient interviews’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31/6: 907-923 [reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010) Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell: 117-32
  • Joosten, Alard; Harrie Mazeland; Betty Meiboom-de Jong (1999) ‘Psycho-social explanations of complaints in Dutch general practice’, Family Practice, 16/3: 245-249.
  • Irvine, Annie; Paul Drew, Roy Sainsbury (2013) ‘“Am I not answering your questions properly?” Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews’, Qualitative Research 13/1: 87-106
  • Jackson, Clare; Danielle Jones (2013) ‘Well they had a couple of bats to be truthful: Well-prefaced, self-initiated repairs in managing relevant accuracy in interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 47: 28-40
  • Jensen, Thomas Wiben (2012) ‘Evaluating by feeling: The rhetorical design of emotions in the practice of mirroring’. In: Gitte, Rasmussen, C.E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds., Evaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 145 - 168
  • Jones, Charlotte M. (2001) ‘Missing assessments: lay and professional orientations in medical interviews’, Text 21: 113-50
  • Jones, Charlotte M. (2003) ‘Utterance restarts in telephone conversation: marking topic initiation and reluctance’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds.
  • Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 137-49
  • Jones, Charlotte M., Wayne A. Beach (1995) ‘Therapists’ techniques for responding to unsollicited contributions by family members’. In: G.H. Morris, R.J. Chenail, eds. The talk of the clinic: explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum: 49-70
  • Jones, Charlotte M. ;Wayne A. Beach, (2005) ‘“I just wanna know why”: Patient’s attempts and doctors’ responses to premature solicitation of diagnostic information’. In Judith F. Duchan, D. Kovarsky, eds., Diagnosis as cultural practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.103-136
  • Jones Sarah E., Don H. Zimmerman (2003) ‘A child’s point and the achievement of intentionality’, Gesture 3/2: 155-185
  • Joosten, Alard (1997) Psychosociale verklaringen voor klachten in huisarts- spreekuurgesprekken: een gespreksanalytische studie. [Psychosocial explanation of complaints in general practice consultations: a conversation analytic study - in Dutch only] Groningen: Vakgroep Taal en Communicatie, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen {Groningen Series on Language Use and Communication]
  • Jordan, Brigitte (1987) ‘The Hut and the Hospital: Information, Power and Symbolism in the Artifacts of Birth’, Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care and Education 14:1:36-40.
  • Jordan, Brigitte (1989) ‘Cosmopolitical Obstetrics: Some Insights from the Training of Traditional Midwives’. Social Science and Medicine 28:9:925-44.
  • Jordan, Brigitte (1996) ‘Transforming Ethnography – Reinventing Research’. In: Groupware - Software für die Teamarbeit der Zukunft: Grundlegende Konzepte und Fallstudien. J. Schiestl and H. Schelle, eds. Marburg, Germany: Tectum Verlag: 200-12
  • Jordan, Brigitte (1996) ‘Ethnographic Workplace Studies and Computer Supported Cooperative Work’. In: Dan Shapiro, Michael Tauber and Roland Traunmüller, eds., The Design of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware Systems. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland/Elsevier Science: 17-42
  • Jordan, Brigitte (1997) ‘Authoritative Knowledge and Its Construction’. In: Robbie Davis- Floyd and Carolyn Sargent, eds. Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 55-79
  • Jordan, Brigitte, Austin Henderson, (1995) ‘Interaction analysis: foundations and practice’,
  • The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4: 39-101
  • Jordan, Brigitte, Nancy Fuller (1975) ‘On the Non-Fatal Nature of Trouble: Sense-Making and Trouble-Managing in Lingua Franca Talk’, Semiotica 13:11-31
  • Jordan, Kathleen, Michael Lynch (1993) ‘The Mainstreaming of a Molecular Biological Tool: A Case Study of a New Technique’, in G. Button (ed.) Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction and Technology, London: Routledge
  • Jordan, Kathleen, Michael Lynch (1992) ‘The sociology of a genetic engineering technique: ritual and rationality in the performance of the plasmid prep’. in: A. Clarke, J. Fujimura (eds)
  • The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in 20th Century Life Sciences, Princeton: Princeton University Press
  • Jordan, Kathleen, Michael Lynch (1998) ‘The dissemination, standardization and routinization of a molecular biological technique’, Social Studies of Science 28(5/6): 773-800
  • Juhila, Kirsi; Sirpa Saario, Kirsi Günther, Suvi Raitakari (2014) ‘Reported client–practitioner conversations as assessment in mental health practitioners’ talk’, Text &Talk 34/1: 69-88
  • Jules-Rosette, B. (1985) ‘Harold Garfinkel: la contribution de l’ethnomethodologie à la recherche sociologique’, Sociétés: Revue des sciences humaines et sociales. no. 5, septembre 1985: 358 (interview with Garfinkel)
  • Kääntä, Leila (2014) ‘From noticing to initiating correction: Students’ epistemic displays in instructional interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics, 66: 86–105
  • Kääntä, Leila; Arja Piirainen-Marsh (2013) ‘Manual guiding in peer group interaction: a resource for organizing a practical classroom task’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 46/4: 322-343
  • Kaimaki, Marianna (2010) ‘Tunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitch alignment: evidence from interactional organisation’, Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10/2: 213- 250
  • Kaimaki, Marianna (2011) ‘Transition relevance and the phonetic design of English call openings’, Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2130-2147
  • Kaimaki, Marianna (2012) ‘Sequential and prosodic design of English and Greek non-valenced news receipts’, Language and Speech 55/1: 99-117
  • Kang, M. Agnes; Olga A. Zayts (2013) ‘Interactional difficulties as a resource for patient participation in prenatal screening consultations in Hong Kong’, Patient Education and Counseling 92 38-44
  • Kangasharju, Helena (1996) ‘Aligning as a team in multiparty conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 26: 291 - 319
  • Kangasharju, Helena (2009) ‘Preference for disagreement? A comparison of three disputes’. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 231-253
  • Kangasharju, Helena, Tuija Nikko (2009) ‘Emotions in organizations: joint laughter in workplace meetings’, Journal of Business Communication 46/1: , 100-119.
  • Kapellidi, Charikleia (2013) ‘The organization of talk in school interaction’, Discourse Studies15/2: 185 -204
  • Kärkkäinen, Elise; Tiina Keisanen (2012) ‘Linguistic and embodied formats for making (concrete) offers’, Discourse Studies 14: 587-611
  • Karl, Ute (2011). ‘Vergeschlechtlichte Kategorisierungen im Umgang mit institutionellen Handlungsherausforderungen am Beispiel von Gesprächen in Jobcentern’ [143 Absätze].
  • Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13/1, Art. 29, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201294.
  • Kasper, Gabriele (2009). Categories, context and comparison in conversation analysis. In H. T. Nguyen, Gabriele Kasper, eds., Talk in interaction: Multilingual perspectives. Honolulu: Foreign Language Resource Centre, University of Hawai at Mãnoa, 1-28.
  • Kasper, Gabriele (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and interview studies’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1022-1027
  • Kasper, Gabriele, Johannes Wagner (2011) ‘Conversation analysis as an approach to second language acquisition’. In Dwight Atkinson, ed., Alternative approaches to seconds language acquisition. New York: Routledge: 117-142
  • Kaufmann, Laurence; Louis Quéré (2001) ‘Comment analyser les collectifs et les institutions ?’ In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 361-90
  • Kaukomaa, Timo; Anssi Peräkylä, Johanna Ruusuvuori (2013) ‘Turn-opening smiles: Facial expression constructing emotional transition in conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 55: 21-42
  • Kawatoko, Yasuko (1999) ‘Space, Time and Documents in a Refrigerated Warehouse’,
  • Human Studies 22: 315-37
  • Kawatoko, Yasuko, Naoki Ueno (2003) ‘Talking about skill: making objects, technologies and communities visible’. In: Mike Ball (ed.) Image Work, a Special Issue of Visual Studies 18/1 ( April 2003): 47-57
  • Keating, Elizabeth; Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa (2011) ‘Interspatial subjectivities: engineering in virtual environments’, Social Semiotics 21/2 219-237
  • Keating, Elizabeth, Gene Mirus (2012) ‘The eyes have it: Technologies of automobility in sign language’, Semiotica 191:287-308
  • Keel, Sara (2011) ‘The parents’ questioning repeats in response to young children’s evaluative turns’, Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12: 52-94 (www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de)
  • Keevallik, Leelo (2008) ‘Clause combining and sequenced actions: The Estonian complementizer and pragmatic particle et’. In R.Laury (Ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions. Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins:125-152
  • Keevallik, Leelo (2010) ‘Marking boundaries between activities: The particle nii in Estonian’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43/2:157-182
  • Keevallik, Leelo (2010) ‘Minimal answers to yes/no questions in the service of sequence organization’, Discourse Studies 12/3: 283-309
  • Keevallik, Leelo (2010) ‘Bodily quoting in dance correction’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 43/4: 401-426
  • Keevallik, Leelo (2011) ‘Grammar for adjusting assumptions: The Estonian enclitic -gi/-ki in interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/12: 2879-2896
  • Keevallik, Leelo (2011) ‘The terms of not knowing and social affiliation’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 184-206
  • Keevallik, Leelo (2013) ‘The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax’,
  • Research on Language & Social Interaction 46/1:1-21
  • Keevallik, Leelo (2013) ‘Here in time and space: Decomposing movement in dance instruction’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 345-370.
  • Keevallik, Leelo (2013) ‘Accomplishing continuity across sequences and encounters: No(h)-prefaced initiations in Estonian’, Journal of Pragmatics 57: 274-289
  • Keevallik, Leelo(2014) ‘Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations ’ Journal of Pragmatics 65: 103-120
  • Keisanen, Tiina (2012) ’"Uh-oh, we were going there": Environmentally occasioned noticings of trouble in in-car interaction’, Semiotica 191:197-222
  • Keisanen, Tiina; Mirka Rauniomaa (2012) ‘The organization of participation and contingency in prebeginnings of request sequences’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45/4: 323-351
  • Kelly, Ann (2001) ‘Reparting a service request’. In: A. McHoul and M. Rapley (eds), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum: 72-85
  • Kelly, John, John K. Local (1989) ‘On the use of general phonetic techniques in handling conversational material’. In: Roger, D., Peter Bull, eds., Conversation: an interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 197-212
  • Kelly, Russell (1998) ‘Nurses Talking : a radical policy, ethnomethodology, for researching critical care nursing’, Nursing in Critical Care 3: 41-6
  • Kelly, Russell (1999) ‘Goings on in a CCU: an ethnomethodological account of things that go on in a routine hand-over’, Nursing in Critical Care 4: 85-91
  • Kelly, Russell (1999) ‘One step forward and two steps back: Woolgar, reflexivity, qualitative research and a line dancing class’, Ethnographic Studies 4: 1-13
  • Kelly, Russell (2013) ‘“Vine Right, Shimmy, Shimmy!” Accomplishing order in a line dancing class’.In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds. Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 257-285
  • Kent, Alexandra (2012) ‘Compliance, resistance and incipient compliance when responding to directives’, Discourse Studies 14: 711-730
  • Kerby, J., John Rae (1998) ‘Moral identity in action: young offenders’ reports of encounters with the police’, British Journal of Social Psychology 37: 439-56
  • Kern, Friederike; Margret Selting (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and interactional linguistics’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1012-1016
  • Kessler, Suzanne J., Wendy McKenna, (1978) Gender: an ethnomethodological approach. New York: Wiley
  • Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi; Jeffrey D. Robinson (2012) ‘Exploring essentially three-turn courses of action: An institutional case study with implications for ordinary talk´, Discourse Studies14: 217-241
  • Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi; Jeffrey D. Robinson, Jenny Mandelbaum (2011) ‘Extending the notion of pragmatic completion: The case of the responsive compound action unit’, Journal of Pragmatics, 43: 3844-3859.
  • Kew, Francis (1986) ‘Playing the game: an ethnomethodological perspective’, International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 21/4: 305-321
  • Kidwell, Mardi (1997) ‘Demonstrating recipiency: Knowledge displays as a resource for the unaddressed participant’, Issues in Applied Linguistics 8: 85-96
  • Kidwell, Mardi (2000) ‘Common ground in cross-cultural communication: Sequential and institutional contexts in front desk service encounters’. Issues in Applied Linguistics,11 (1): 17-37
  • Kidwell, Mardi (2005) ‘Gaze as social control: how very young children differentiate ‘The Look’ from a ‘Mere Look’ by their adult caregivers’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(4): 417-449
  • Kidwell, Mardi (2006) ‘”Calm down!”: the role of gaze in the interactional management of hysteria by the police’, Discourse Studies 8: 745-70
  • Kidwell, Mardi (2009) ‘Gaze shift as an interactional resource for very young children’,
  • Discourse Processes, 46/2&3: 145-160
  • Kidwell, Mardi (2009) ‘What happened?: an epistemics of before and after in “at-the-scene” police questioning preview’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/1: 20-41
  • Kidwell, Mardi (2011) ‘Epistemics and embodiment in the interactions of very young children’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:257-84
  • Kidwell, Mardi (2012) ‘Interaction among children’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 511-32
  • Kidwell, Mardi (2013) ‘Availability as a trouble source in directive-response sequences’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Kidwell, Mardi, Esther González Martínez (2010) ‘“Let me tell you about myself’ : A method for suppressing subject talk in a ‘soft accusation’ interrogation’, Discourse Studies 12: 65-89.
  • Kidwell, Mardi, Don Zimmerman (2006). ‘Observability’ in the interactions of very young children. Communication Monographs, 73, 1, 1-28.
  • Kidwell, Mardi, Don H. Zimmerman, (2007) ‘Joint attention as action’, Journal of Pragmatics39/3: 592-611
  • Kilby, Laura; Ava D. Horowitz (2013) ‘Opening up terrorism talk: The sequential and categorical production of discursive power within the call openings of a talk radio broadcast’,
  • Discourse & Society 24: 725-742
  • Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) ‘A high boundary tone as a resource for a social action: The Korean sentence-ender -ta’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/11: 3055-3077
  • Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) ‘Retroactive indexing of relevance: the use of well in third position’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46/2: 125-143
  • Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) ‘Reshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning to respond to questions in Korean conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 57: 303-317
  • Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie; Satomi Kuroshima, eds. (2013) ‘Turn beginnings in interaction’, part special issue: Journal of Pragmatics 57: 267-337
  • Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie; Satomi Kuroshima (2013) ‘Turn beginnings in interaction: An introduction’, Journal of Pragmatics 57: 267-273
  • Kim, Kwang-ki; Tim Berard. 2009) ‘Typification in society and social science: The continuing relevance of Schutz’s social phenomenology’, Human Studies 32/33: 263-89
  • Kim,K.-H. (1993) ‘Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation as interactional resources’. In S.Choi, ed., Japanese/Korean Linguistics Vol.3. Center for the Study of Language and Information: Leland Stanford Junior University: 3-18.
  • Kim, K.-H. (1995) ‘Wh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation: Cases of topicalization’,In P. Downing, M. Noonan, eds. Word order in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 247-296
  • Kim, Kyu-hyun (1999) ‘Phrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences in Korean Conversation’, Human Studies 22: 425-46
  • Kim, Kyu-hyun (1999) ‘Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation’. Discourse and Cognition 6: 141-68
  • Kim, Kyu-hyun (2001) ‘Confirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaboration: organization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation’. In: Margret Selting, Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen, eds., Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins
  • Kim, Kyung-Man (1999) ‘The Management of Temporality: Ethnomethodology as Historical Reconstruction of Practical Action’, Sociological Quarterly 40: 505-23.
  • Kim, Mary Shin (2011) ‘Negotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversation: An examination of the Korean evidential marker -tamye’, Discourse Studies 13/4: 435-459
  • Kim, Mary Shin. (2014) ‘Reported thought as a stance-taking device in Korean conversation’,
  • Discourse Processes, 51/3: 230-263
  • Kim, Younhee (2012) ‘Practices for initial recognitional reference and learning opportunities in conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 44/6-7: 709-729
  • Kinnell, Anne Marie, Douglas W. Maynard (1996) ‘The Delivery and Receipt of Safer Sex Advice in Pre-test Counseling Sessions for HIV and AIDS’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35:405-437
  • Kitazawa, Yutaka (1992) ‘Local interactional production of the rational practice of consumption’, Human Studies 15/1: 145-160
  • Kitazawa, Yutaka (1999) ‘The accountability of hand-drawn maps and rendering practices’,
  • Human Studies 22: 299-314
  • Kitzinger, Celia (1998) ‘Inaccuracies in Quoting from Data Transcripts: Or Inaccuracy in Quotations from Data Transcripts’, Discourse & Society 9: 136-43.
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2000) ‘Doing feminist conversation analysis’, Feminism and Psychology, 10:163-93
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2000) ‘How to resist an idiom’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33: 121-54
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2004) ‘Feminist approaches’. In: Seale, Clive, David Silverman, Jay Gubrium, Giampietro Gobo, eds. Qualitative research practice. London, etc.: Sage Publications: 125-40
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2005) ‘”Speaking as a heterosexual”: (how) does sexuality matter for talk-in- interaction?’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 38/3: 221-65
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2005) Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing normative heterosexuality in ‘after hours’ calls to the doctor, Social Problems, 52(4). Special Section: Language Interaction and Social Problems, 477-98
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2006) Talking sex and gender, in Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods edited by Paul Drew, Geoff Raymond and Darin Weinberg, 155-170. London: Sage.
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2006) After post-cognitivism, Discourse Studies, 8(1):67-84.
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2007) ‘Is “Woman” always relevantly gendered?’, Gender and Language1(1): 39-49.
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2007) ‘Feminist Conversation Analysis: Research by students at the University of York, UK’, Feminism & Psychology 17: 133-148.
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2008) ‘Developing Feminist Conversation Analysis: A Response to Wowk’
  • Human Studies 31/2: 179-208
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2011) ‘Working with childbirth helplines: the contributions and limitations of conversation analysis’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 98-118
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2012) ‘Repair’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 229- 56
  • Kitzinger, Celia (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and gender and sexuality’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 996- 1000
  • Kitzinger, Celia, Hannah Frith (1999) ‘”Just say no?” The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal’, Discourse & Society 10: 293-316
  • Kitzinger, Celia, Danielle Jones (2007) ‘When May calls home: The opening moments of family telephone conversations with an Alzheimer’s patient’, Feminism & Psychology 17/2: 184-202
  • Kitzinger, Celia, Sheila Kitzinger (2007) ‘Birth trauma: Talking with women and the value of conversation analysis’, British Journal of Midwifery 15/5: 256-64.
  • Kitzinger, Celia; Gene H. Lerner, Jörg Zinken, Sue Wilkinson, Heidi Kevoe-Feldman, Sonja Ellis (2013) ‘Reformulating place’, Journal of Pragmatics 55: 43-50
  • Kitzinger, Celia, Jenny Mandelbaum (2013) ‘Word Selection and Social Identities in Talk’,
  • Communication Monographs 80/2: 176-98
  • Kitzinger, Celia, Rose Rickford (2007) ‘Becoming a “Bloke”: The construction of gender in interaction’, Feminism & Psychology 17(2): 214-23
  • Kitzinger, Celia; Rebecca Shaw, MerranToerien (2012) ‘Referring to persons without using a full-form reference: Locally initial indexicals in action’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45/2: 116-136
  • Klein, Gabriella, Isabella Paoletti, eds. (2002) In & Out. Procedure conversazionali e strategie comunicative di inclusione e di esclusione [In & Out. Conversational procedure and comunicative strategies of inclusion and exclusion]. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  • Klippi, Anu (2003) ‘Collaborating in Aphasic Group Conversation: Striving for Mutual Understanding’ In: Charles Goodwin, ed. Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press: 117-43
  • Knoblauch, Hubert; Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab, Hans-Georg Soeffner, eds. (2006) Video analysis: Methodology and methods. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
  • Knoblauch,Hubert; Bernt Schnettler (2012) ‘Videography: analysing video data as a ‘focused’ ethnographic and hermeneutical exercise’, Qualitative Research 12: 334-356,
  • Koenig, Christopher J. (2011) ‘Patient resistance as agency in treatment decisions’, Social Science & Medicine. 72/7:1105-1114
  • Koivisto, Aino (2012) ‘Discourse patterns for turn-final conjunctions’, Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272
  • Koivisto, Aino (2013) ‘On the preference for remembering: acknowledging an answer with finnish ai nii(n) (“oh that’s right”)’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 46/3: 277-297
  • Komter, Martha (1986) ‘Token up-dates: The reiteration of mutual knowledge in the opening stages of job interviews’, Human Studies 9/2-3: 247-259
  • Komter, Martha L. (1990) ‘The discourse structure of job interviews’. In: H. Pinkster & I. Genee, eds., Unity in Diversity. Dordrecht: Foris: 165-181
  • Komter, Martha L. (1991) Conflict and cooperation in job interviews; a study of talk, tasks and ideas. Amsterdam: Benjamins
  • Komter, Martha L. (1994) ‘Accusations and defences in courtroom interaction’, Discourse & Society 5: 165-87
  • Komter, Martha L (1995) ‘The Distribution of Knowledge in Courtroom Interaction’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds., Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 107-28
  • Komter, Martha L. (1997) ‘Berouw in de rechtszaal’ [Remourse in the courtroom]. In: L. Meeuwesen & HannekeHoutkoop-Steenstra (red.), Sociale Interactie in Nederland. Utrecht: ISOR: 101-122
  • Komter, Martha L. (1998) Dilemmas in the court room. A study of Trials of Violent Crime in the Netherlands. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum [Everyday Communication Series]
  • Komter, Martha L. (2000) ‘The power of legal language: the significance of small activities for large problems’, Semiotica, 131/3-4: 415-428
  • Komter, Martha L. (2001) ‘La construction de la preuve dans un interrogatoire de police’. In: Dupret, Baudouin (ed.) ‘Le droit en action et en contexte. Ethnométhodologie et analyse de conversation dans la recherche juridique’ [Law in action and in context: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis in research in the field of law] Droit et Société, No 48: 367-93
  • Komter, Martha L. (2002) ‘The suspect’s own words: The treatment of written statements in Dutch courtrooms’, Forensic Linguistics:. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 9/2: 168-192.
  • Komter, Martha L. (2002/3) ‘The construction of records in Dutch police interrogations’,
  • Information Design Journal & Document Design 11/2-3: 201-213.
  • Komter, Martha (2003) ‘The interactional dynamics of eliciting a confession in a Dutch police interrogation’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 36 433-70
  • Komter, Martha L. (2005) ‘Understanding problems in an interpreter-mediated police interrogation’. In: S. Burns (ed.), Ethnographies of Law and Social Control. Sociology of Crime, Law & Deviance, vol. 6. Amsterdam etc.: Elsevier: 203-24
  • Komter, Martha L. (2006) ‘From talk to text: the interactional construction of a police record’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(3), 201-228
  • Komter, Martha L. (2011) ‘From talk to text: The interactional construction of a police record’. In: L. Prior, ed., Sage Benchmarks in Social Research Methods: Using Documents and Record in Social Research. London: Sage
  • Komter, Martha (2012) ‘Conversation analysis in the courtroom’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 612-29
  • Komter, Martha (2012) ‘The career of a suspect’s statement: Talk, text, context’, Discourse Studies 14: 731-752
  • Kondratyuk, Nataliya; Anssi Peräkylä (2011) ‘Therapeutic work with the present moment: A comparative conversation analysis of existential and cognitive therapies’, Psychotherapy Research, 21/3: 316-330
  • Konopásek, Zdenek, Kusá, Zuzana (2000, December). Re-use of life stories in an ethnomethodological research [42 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Online Journal], 1(3). Available at: http://qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
  • Konopásek, Zdenìk, Zuzana Kusá (2006) ‘Political screenings as trials of strength: Making the communist power/lessness real’, Human Studies 29: 341-362
  • Koole, Tom (2003) ‘The interactive construction of heterogeneity in the classroom’,
  • Linguistics and Education 14/1: 3-26
  • Koole, Tom (2010) ‘Displays of epistemic access. Student responses to teacher explanation’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 43/2: 183-209
  • Koole, Tom (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and education’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 977-982
  • Koole, Tom (2012) ‘Teacher evaluations: Assessing “knowing”, “understanding”, and “doing”’. In: Gitte, Rasmussen, C.E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds., Evaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 43 - 66
  • Korobov, Neill (2011) ‘Gendering desire in speed-dating interactions’, Discourse Studies 13/4: 461-485
  • Korobov, Neill (2011) ‘Mate-preference talk in speed-dating conversations’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/2: 186-209
  • Koschmann, Timothy. (2010). ‘On the universality of recursion’. Lingua, 120/12, 2691-2694.
  • Koschmann, Timothy, ed. (2011) ‘Understanding Understanding in Action’, Special Issue Section Journal of Pragmatics 43/2
  • Koschmann, Timothy (2011) ‘Understanding understanding in action’, Journal of Pragmatics43/2: 435-7
  • Koschmann, Timothy (2012) ‘Early glimmers of the now familiar ethnomethodological themes in Garfinkel’s “The Perception of the Other”’, Human Studies 35/4: 479-504
  • Koschmann, Timothy (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and learning in interaction’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1038- 1043
  • Koschmann, Timothy, Phillip Glenn, Mindy Conlee (1997) ‘Analyzing the emergence of a learning issue in a problem-based learning meeting’, Medical Education Online [serial online], 2(1). Available from: http://www.academicmedicine.org/cgi/content/full/75/7/769
  • Koschmann, Timothy, Phillip Glenn, Mindy Conlee (2000) ‘When is a problem-based tutorial not tutorial? Analyzing the tutor’s role in the emergence of a learning issue’. In: D. H. Evensen, C. E. Hmelo, Eds., PBL: A research perspective on learning interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum: 53-74
  • Koschmann, Timothy, Curtis LeBaron (2002) ‘Learner articulation as interactional achievement: Studying the conversation of gesture’. Cognition And Instruction, 20(2), 249- 282.
  • Koschmann, Timothy; Curtis LeBaron, Charles Goodwin, Alan Zemel, Gary Dunnington (2007) ‘Formulating the Triangle of Doom’, Gesture 7/1: 97-118
  • Koschmann, Timothy, Curtis LeBaron, Charles Goodwin, Paul Feltovich (2006, November). ‘The mystery of the missing referent: Objects, procedures, and the problem of the instruction follower’. In S. Greenberg, G. Mark, eds., Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York, ACM: 373-382. [also avail. in the ACM Digital Library]
  • Koschmann, Timothy; Curtis LeBaron, Charles Goodwin, Paul Feltovich (2011) ‘“Can you see the cystic artery yet?” A simple matter of trust’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/2: 521-41
  • Koschmann, Timothy, Alan Zemel (2009). ‘Optical pulsars and black arrows: Discoveries as occasioned productions’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 200-246.
  • Koschmann, Timothy; Alain Zemel (2011) ‘“So that’s the ureter.” The informal logic of discovering work’, Ethnographic Studies 12: 31-46
  • Koschmann, Timothy, Alan Zemel, Mindy Conlee-Stevens, N. Young, J., Robbs, A. Barnhart (2005) ‘How do people learn? Member methods and communicative mediation’. In R. Bromme, F. Hesse & H. Spada, eds., Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledgecommunication and how they may be overcome (pp. 265-287) Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Koschmann, Timothy, Alan Zemel, Gerry Stahl (2007). The video analyst’s manifesto (or The implications of Garfinkel’s policies for studying practice within design-based research). In R. Goldman, B. Barron, S. Derry, R. Pea, eds., Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 133-143
  • Koshik, Irene (2002) ‘A conversation-analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions’, Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1851-77
  • Koshik, Irene (2002) ‘Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35: 277-309
  • Koshik, Irene (2003) ‘Wh-questions used as challenges’, Discourse Studies 5: 51-77
  • Koshik, Irene (2005) ‘Alternative questions in conversational repair’, Discourse Studies 7: 192-211
  • Koshik, Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Koshik, Irene, Mi-Suk Seo (2012) ‘Word (and other) search sequences initiated by language learners’, Text & Talk 32/2: 167-189
  • Koskela, Inka; Ilkka Arminen (2012) ‘The embedded evaluations in air traffic control training’. In: Gitte, Rasmussen, C.E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds., Evaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins:15-42
  • Koskela, Inka, Ilkka Arminen, Hannele Palukka (2013) ‘Centres of coordination as a nexus of aviation’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 245-276.
  • Koskinen, Ilpo; Esko Kurvinen (2002) ‘Messages visuels mobiles Nouvelle technologie et interaction’, Réseaux, n° 112-113: 108-138
  • Kozart, Michael (2002) ‘Understanding efficacy in psychotherapy: an ethnomethodological perspective on the therapeutic alliance’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 27: 217-31
  • Krey, Björn (2011) Textuale Praktiken und Artefakte: Soziologie schreiben bei Garfinkel, Bourdieu und Luhmann. Berlin: Springer VS
  • Kupetz, Maxi (2011) Multimodal resources in students’ explanations in CLIL interaction.
  • Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5/1: 121-141. Retrieved from http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_5_1/ kupetz.pdf
  • Kupetz, Maxi (2014) ‘Empathy displays as interactional achievements – Multimodal and sequential aspects’, Journal of Pragmatics 61: 4-34
  • Kurhila, Salla. (1999). ‘Does nativeness legitimize correcting?’. In: Jef Verschueren, ed..
  • Pragmatics in 1998. Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference.
  • Volume 2. International Pragmatics Association, Antwerp. 321-330.
  • Kurhila, Salla (2001) ‘Correction in talk between native and non-native speaker’, Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1083-1110
  • Kurhila, Salla (2006) Second language interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Kuroshima, Satomi (2010) ‘Another look at the service encounter: Progressivity, intersubjectivity, and trust in a Japanese sushi restaurant’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/3 856-869
  • Kushida,Shuya (2011) ‘Confirming understanding and acknowledging assistance: Managing trouble responsibility in response to understanding check in Japanese talk-in-interaction’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2716-2739
  • Laakso, Minna (2003) ‘Collaborating Construction of Repair in Aphasic Conversation: An Interactive View on the Extended Speaking Turns of Persons with Wernicke’s Aphasia’ In: Charles Goodwin, ed. Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press: 163-88
  • Laakso, Minna (2010) ‘Children’s emerging and developing self-repair practices’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell: 74-100
  • Laakso, Minna (2012) ‘Aphasia as an example of how a communication disorder affects interaction’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 138- 45
  • Laakso, Minna, A. Klippi (1999) ‘A closer look at the “hint and guess” sequences in aphasic conversation’, Aphasology 13: 345-64
  • Laakso, Minna, Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2010) ‘Cut-off or particle—Devices for initiating self- repair in conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/4: 1151-1172
  • Laakso, Minna,Tuula Tykkyläinen (2009) ‘Gendered practices of negotiation?: Comparing girls and boys’ practices of making proposals in same-sex peer play’. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 279-298
  • Laforest, Marty (2009) ‘Complaining in front of a witness: Aspects of blaming others for their behaviour in multi-party family interactions’, Journal of Pragmatics, 41/12: 2452-2464
  • Lamerichs, Joyce; Hedwig te Molder (2011) ‘Reflecting on your own talk: the discursive action method at work’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 184-206
  • Lan Hing Ting, Karine, Dimitri Voilmy, Monika Büscher, Drew Hemment (2013) ‘The sociality of stillness’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds.,
  • Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 371-405.
  • Land, Victoria, Celia Kitzinger (2005) ‘Speaking as a Lesbian: Correcting the Heterosexist Presumption’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 38/4: 371-416
  • Land, Victoria, Celia Kitzinger (2007) ‘Some uses of third-person reference forms in speaker self-reference’, Discourse Studies 2007 9: 493-525.
  • Land, Victoria, Celia Kitzinger (2007) ‘Contesting Same-Sex Marriage in Talk-in-Interaction’,
  • Feminism & Psychology 17: 173-183.
  • Land, Victoria; Celia Kitzinger (2011) ‘Categories in talk-in-interaction: gendering speaker and recipient’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 48-63
  • Landqvist, Håkan (2005) ‘Constructing and negotiating advice in calls to a poison information center’. In: Carolyn Baker, Michael Emmison, Alan Firth, eds., Calling for Help: Language and social interaction in telephone helplines. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 143) John Benjamins. Pp. 207-34
  • Lankshear, Gloria, David Mason (2001) ‘Technology and ethical dilemmas in a medical setting: privacy, professional autonomy, life and death’, Ethics and Information Technology, 3: 225-35
  • Lankshear, Gloria, Peter Cook, David Mason, Sally Coates, Graham Button (2001) ‘Call centre employees’ responses to electronic monitoring: some research findings’, Work Employment and Society 15: 595-605
  • Larsen, Tine (2013) ‘Dispatching emergency assistance: callers’ claims of entitlement and call takers’ decisions’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 46/3: 205-230
  • Launspach, Sonja. (2013) ‘“That really was a good method for beginners”: How narratives are used to situate objects and techniques in a quilting guild’, Narrative Inquiry, 23/2: 262-282
  • Laurier, Eric (2004) ‘Doing Office Work on the Motorway’, Theory Culture & Society, 21: 261-77
  • Laurier, Eric (2004) ‘The spectacular showing: Houdini and the wonder of ethno- methodology’, Human Studies 27: 377-99
  • Laurier, Eric (2005) Searching for a parking space’, intellectica nE 41-42 “Espace, inter/action & cognition”: 101-15
  • Laurier, Eric (2008) ‘Drinking up endings: conversational resources of the cafe’ Language & Communication 28, 2: 165-81
  • Laurier, Eric (2008) ‘How breakfast happens in the cafe’, Time & Society 17,1: 119-43
  • Laurier, Eric (2013) ‘Encounters at the counter: The relationship between regulars and staff’. In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds. Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 287-308
  • Laurier, Eric (2013) ‘Before, in and after: Cars making their way through roundabouts’. In:
  • Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 210-242.
  • Laurier, Eric (2013) ‘Becoming a Barista’. In: Aksel Tjora, Graham Scambler, eds. Café Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 127–146
  • Laurier, Eric. (2014) The Graphic Transcript: Poaching comic book grammar for inscribing the visual, spatial and temporal aspects of action. Geography Compass, 8/4: 235-248
  • Laurier, Eric, Barry Brown, (2008) ‘Rotating maps and readers: praxiological aspects of alignment and orientation’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33: 201-21
  • Laurier, Eric; Barry Brown (2011) ‘The reservations of the editor: the routine work of showing and knowing the film in the edit suite’, Social Semiotics 21/2 239-257
  • Laurier, Eric; Barry Brown (2014) ‘Intersubjective work of imagination in film editing: proposals, suggestions, re-iterations, directions, and other ways of producing possible sequences’. In: Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, eds. Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge: 208-233
  • Laurier, Eric, Barry Brown, Hayden Lorimer (2012) ‘What it means to change lanes: Actions, emotions and wayfinding in the family car’, Semiotica 191:117-135
  • Laurier, Eric, Chris Philo (2004) ‘Ethnoarchaeology and undefined investigations’,
  • Environment and Planning A, 36: 421-436
  • Laurier, Eric, Chris Philo (2006) ‘Natural problems of naturalistic video data’. in H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, B. Schnettler, eds., Video-Analysis Methodology and Methods, Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology. Oxford: Peter Lang: 183-192
  • Laurier, Eric, Chris Philo (2006) ‘Possible geographies: a passing encounter in a cafe’, AREA38, 4: 353-63
  • Laurier, Eric, Chris Philo (2006) ‘Cold shoulders and napkins handed: gestures of responsibility’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31, 2: 193- 208
  • Laurier, Eric, Chris Philo (2007) ‘”A Parcel of Muddling Muckworms”: revisiting Habermas and the English Coffee House, Social and Cultural Geography 8, 2: 259-81
  • Laurier, Eric; Stuart Reeves (2014) ‘Cameras in video games: comparing play in counter- strike and the doctor who adventures’. In: Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, eds.
  • Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge: 181-207
  • Laurier, Eric, Ignaz Strebel, Barry Brown (2008) ‘Video analysis: lessons from professional video editing practice’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Researchhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803378
  • Laurier, Eric, Angus Whyte (2001) ‘”I Saw You”: Searching for Lost Love via Practices of Reading, Writing and Responding’, Sociological Research Online, 6/1 <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/1/laurier.html>
  • Laurier, Eric, Angus Whyte, Kathy Buckner (2001) ‘An ethnography of a neighbourhood café: informality, table arrangements and background noise’, Journal of Mundane Behavior 2.2 http://www.mundanebehavior.org/
  • Laurier, Eric, Angus Whyte, Kathy Buckner (2002) ‘”I Saw You” or, Love’s labour lost: the spatial work of finding someone to love via practices of reading and writing’. In: A. Dumont,
  • Constructions sociales de l’espace, Les Territoires de l’anthropologie de la communication, ed., Les Editions de l’Université de Liège, 114-32
  • Laurier, Eric, Angus Whyte, Kathy Buckner, (2002) ‘Neighbouring as an occasioned activity : “Finding a lost cat”’, space & culture, 5: 346-67
  • Laursen, Ditte (2012) ‘Sequential organization of text messages and mobile phone calls in interconnected communication sequences’, Discourse & Communication, 6/1: 83-99
  • Lavin, Danielle; Douglas W. Maynard (2001) ‘Standardization vs. Rapport: Respondent laughter and interviewer reaction during telephone surveys’, American Sociological Review, . 66/3: 453-479
  • Lavin, Danielle, Douglas W. Maynard (2002) ‘Standardization vs. rapport: How interviewers handle the laughter of respondents during telephone surveys’. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 335-65
  • Law, John, Michael Lynch (1988) ‘Lists, field guides, and the descriptive organization of seeing: Birdwatching as an exemplary observational activity’, Human Studies 11:271-304
  • Lawrence, Samuel G. (1996). ‘Normalizing stigmatized practices: Achieving co-membership by ‘‘doing being ordinary’’ . Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29/3: 181-218.
  • Lawrence, Samuel G. (2003) ‘Rejecting Illegitimate Understandings’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 195-205
  • Lazaraton, Anne(2014) ‘Aaaaack! The active voice was used! Language play, technology, and repair in the Daily Kos weblog’, Journal of Pragmatics 64: 102-116
  • LeBaron, Curtis, Phillip Glenn, M. Thompson (2009). ‘Identity work during boundary moments: Managing positive identities through talk and embodied interaction’. In J. Dutton, L. Roberts, eds., Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation. New York: Routledge:187-211
  • LeBaron, Curtis, S. Jones (2002) ‘Closing up closings: Showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of an interaction’. Journal of Communication, 53/3: 542- 65
  • LeBaron, Curtis D., Timothy Koschmann (2002) ‘Gesture and the transparency of understanding’. In: Phillip Glenn, LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 119-32
  • Lee, John R. E.(1984) ’Innocent victims and evil-doers.’ Women’s Studies International Forum7: 69-83.
  • Lee, John R.E. (1987) ‘Prologue: talking organisation’. In: Button, Graham, J.R.E. Lee, eds.,
  • Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 19-53
  • Lee, John R.; R. Watson(1993) ‘Regards et habitudes des passants: les arrangements de la visibilité de la locomotion’, Les Annales de la recherche urbaine, 57-58: 101-10
  • Lee, Ee Lin ; Bradford ‘J’ Hall (2009) ‘Thou Soo and Aih Auan: Communicating dissatisfaction in a Chinese Malaysian Community’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/2: 116-134
  • Lee, Seung-Hee (2005) ‘The scales of justice: balancing neutrality and efficiency in plea- bargaining encounters’, Discourse & Society 16: 33-54
  • Lee, Seung-hee (2006) ‘Second summonings in Korean telephone conversation openings’,
  • Language in Society 35: 261-83
  • Lee, Seung-Hee (2009) ‘Extended requesting: Interaction and collaboration in the production and specification of requests’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/6: 1248-1271
  • Lee, Seung-Hee (2011) ‘Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/3: 904-917
  • Lee, Seung-Hee (2011) ‘Managing nongranting of customers’ requests in commercial service encounters’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/2: 109-134
  • Lee, Seung-Hee (2012) ‘Response design in conversation’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 415-32
  • Lee, Yo-An (2004) ‘The work of examples in classroom instruction’, Linguistics and Education 15: 99-120
  • Lee, Yo-An (2006) ‘Respecifying display questions: Interactional resources for language teaching’, TESOL Quarterly 40: 691-713
  • Lee, Yo-An (2006) ‘Towards respecification of communicative competence: Condition of L2 instruction or its objective?’, Applied Linguistics 27: 349-76
  • Lee, Yo-An (2007) ‘Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206
  • Lee, Yo-An (2008) ‘Yes-no question in third turn position: Pedagogical discourse processes’,
  • Discourse Processes, 45(3), 237-262.
  • Lee, Yo-An (2010). ‘Learning in the contingency of talk-in-interaction’, Text & Talk, 30/4: 403-422.
  • Lee, Yo-An (2012) ‘Building connected discourse in non-native speech: Re-specifying non-native proficiency’, Pragmatics 22/4: 519-614
  • Lee, Yo-An. (2013) ‘Descriptions of L2 interaction: Toward descriptive adequacy’, Modern Language Journal, 97/4, 853-868
  • Lee, Yo-An, Akihiko Takahashi (2011) ‘Lesson plans and the contingency of classroom interactions’, Human Studies, 34/2: 209-227
  • Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy, ed., (2010) The Social History of Language and Social Interaction Research: People, Places, Ideas, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
  • Lehn, Dirk vom (2003). Das Museum als Lern- und Erlebnisraum. Entstaatlichung und soziale Sicherheit. Verhandlungen des 31. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Leipzig. J. Allmendinger. Koeln, Leske und Budrich
  • Lehn, Dirk vom (2014) Harold Garfinkel: The creation and development of ethnomethodology. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.
  • Lehn, Dirk vom, Christian Heath, Jon Hindmarsh (2001) Exhibiting Interaction: Conduct and Collaboration in Museums and Galleries. Symbolic Interaction: 189-216
  • Lehn, Dirk vom, Christian Heath, Jon Hindmarsh (2003) ‘La decouverte interactive des objects de musée’, Alliage: culture, science, technique 50-51: 165-78
  • Lehn, Dirk vom, Christian Heath, Hubert Knoblauch (2001) ‘Configuring Exhibits: The interactional production of experience in museums and galleries’. In: Hubert Knoblauch, Helga Kotthoff,, eds., Verbal Art Across Cultures: The aesthetics and proto-aesthetics of communication. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag: 281-97
  • Lehtinen, Esa (2005) ‘Achieved similarity: Describing experience in Seventh-Day Adventist Bible study’, Text 25: 341-371
  • Lehtinen, Esa (2005) ‘Information, understanding and the benign order of everyday life in genetic counselling’, Sociology of Health & Illness 27/5: 575-601
  • Lehtinen, Esa (2007) ‘Merging doctor and client knowledge: On doctors’ ways of dealing with clients’ potentially discrepant information in genetic counseling’, Journal of Pragmatics 39: 389-427
  • Lehtinen, Esa (2013) ‘Hedging, knowledge and interaction: Doctors’ and clients’ talk about medical information and client experiences in genetic counseling’, Patient Education and Counseling 92: 31-37
  • Lehtinen, Esa, Helena Kääriäinen. (2005) ‘Doctor’s Expertise and managing discrepant information from other sources in genetic counseling: a conversation analytic perspective’,
  • Journal of Genetic Counseling 14 (6): 435
  • Leppanen, Vesa (1998) ‘The straightforwardness of advice: Advice-giving in interactions between Swedish district nurses and patients’, Research on Language & Social Interaction,31/2: 209-239
  • Leppänen, Vesa (1998) ’The straightforwardness of advice: advice-giving in interactions between Swedish district nurses and patients” Research on Language and Social Interaction31(2), s. 209-239
  • Leppänen, Vesa (2005) ‘Callers´ presentations of problems in telephone calls to Swedish primary care’. In: C.D. Baker,, M. Emmison, A. Firth, eds. Calling for Help: Language and social interaction in telephone helplines,, Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 175-205
  • Leppänen, Vesa (2010) ‘Power in Telephone Advice Nursing’, Nursing Inquiry 17/1: 1-12
  • Leppänen, Vesa (2010) ‘Emotional neutrality as an interactional achievement: A conversation analysis of primary care telenursing’. In: Å. Wettergren. B. Sieben. eds. Emotionalizing organizations and organizing emotions. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 251-271
  • Lepper, Georgia (2000) Categories in text and talk: a practical introduction to categorization analysis. London: Sage
  • Lerner, Gene H. (1989) ‘Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion’, Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 167-77
  • Lerner, Gene (1991) ‘On the syntax of sentences-in-progress’, Language in Society 20: 441-58
  • Lerner, Gene (1992) ‘Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter’,
  • Qualitative Sociology 15: 247-71
  • Lerner, Gene (1993) ‘Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation’, Text 13: 213-45 [Reprinted in Asa Kasher, ed. (1999)
  • Pragmatics - Critical Assessments. London: Routledge]
  • Lerner, Gene (1994) ‘Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13: 20- 33
  • Lerner, Gene (1995) ‘Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities’, Discourse Processes 19: 111-31
  • Lerner, Gene H. (1996) ‘On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker’. In: Ochs, E., Emanuel A. Schegloff, S.A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 238-76
  • Lerner, Gene H. (1996) ‘On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in interaction: “Second person” reference in multi-party conversation’, Pragmatics 6: 281-294
  • Lerner, Gene H. (1996) ‘“Finding face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction’,
  • Social Psychology Quarterly 59: 303-21
  • Lerner, Gene H. (2002) ‘Turn-sharing: the choral co-production of talk-in-interaction’. In: Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 2002) The Language of Turn and Sequence. New York: Oxford University Press: 225-56
  • Lerner, Gene H. (2003) ‘Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context- free organization’, Language in Society 32/2:177-201
  • Lerner, Gene H. (2004) ‘On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in- interaction: grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 37/2: 151-85
  • Lerner Gene H. (2004) ‘Introductory remarks’. In: Gene H. Lerner, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 1-11
  • Lerner, Gene H. (2004) Collaborative turn sequences’. In: Gene H. Lerner, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 225-56
  • Lerner, Gene H., ed. (2004) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation.
  • Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 125]
  • Lerner, Gene H. (2013) ‘On the place of hesitating in delicate formulations: a turn constructional infrastructure for collaborative indiscretion’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 95-134
  • Lerner, Gene H.; Galina B. Bolden, Alexa Hepburn, Jenny Mandelbaum (2012) ‘Reference recalibration repairs: Adjusting the precision of formulations for the task at hand’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45/2, 191-212
  • Lerner, Gene H., Celia Kitzinger, eds. (2007) Special Issue on Referring to Self and Others in Conversation, Discourse Studies 9/4.
  • Lerner, Gene H., Celia Kitzinger (2007) ‘Introduction: person-reference in conversation analytic research’, Discourse Studies 9: 427-432.
  • Lerner, Gene H., Celia Kitzinger (2007) ‘Extraction and aggregation in the repair of individual and collective self-reference’, Discourse Studies 2007 9: 526-557.
  • Lerner, Gene H.; Celia Kitzinger (2012) ‘Research at the intersection of reference and repair: introduction to the special issue’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 45/2: 111-115
  • Lerner, Gene, Tomoyo Takagi, 1999. ‘On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: A Co-Investigation of English and Japanese Grammatical Practices’, Journal of Pragmatics 31: 49-75
  • Lerner, Gene H., Don H. Zimmerman (2003) ‘Action and the appearance of action in the conduct of very young children’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 441-57
  • Lerner, Gene H.; Don H. Zimmerman, Mardi Kidwell (2011) ‘Formal structures of practical tasks: a resource for action in the social life of very young children’. In: Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, Curtis LeBaron, eds. Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 44-58
  • Lesser R., Lisa Perkins (1999). Cognitive Neuropsychology and Conversation Analysis in Aphasia: an Introductory Casebook. London: Whurr.
  • Lester, Marilyn (1980) ‘Generating newsworthiness: The interpretive construction of public events’, American Sociological Review, 45/6: 984-994
  • Leudar, Ivan, Charles Antaki, Rebecca Barnes (2006) ‘When psychotherapists disclose personal information about themselves to clients’, Communication and Medicine 3: 27-41
  • Leudar, Ivan, Jacqueline Hayes, Jirí Nekvapil, and Johanna Turner Baker (2008) ‘Hostility themes in media, community and refugee narratives’, Discourse & Society 19: 187-221.
  • Leudar, Ivan, Rosemarie McCabe, Charles Antaki (2004) ‘Do people with schizophrenia display theory of mind deficits in clinic al interactions?’, Psychological Medicine, 34: 401-412
  • Leudar, Ivan, Jiri Nekvapil (1998) ‘On the emergence of political identity in the Czech Mass media: the case of the Democratic Party of Sudentenland’,Czech Sociological Review 6: 43-58
  • Leudar, Ivan, Jiri Nekvapil (2000) ‘Presentations of Romanies in the Czech media: On category work in television debates’, Discourse and Society, 11, 488-513
  • Leudar, Ivan, Jirí Nekvapil (2007) ‘The War on Terror and Muslim Britons’ safety: A week in the life of a dialogical network’, Ethnographic Studies, No 9: 44 - 62
  • Leudar, Ivan; Jiørí Nekvapil (2011) ‘Practical historians and adversaries: 9/11 revisited’,
  • Discourse & Society 22/1: 66-85
  • Leudar, Ivan, Wes Sharrock, Jacqueline Hayes, Shirley Truckle (2008) ‘Psychotherapy as a “structured immediacy”’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/5: 863-85.
  • Leudar, Ivan, Wes Sharrock, Shirley Truckle, Thomas Colombino, Jacqueline Hayes, Kevin Booth (2008) ‘Conversation of emotions: on turning play into psychoanalytic psychotherapy’. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 152-72
  • Levinson, Stephen C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Levinson, Stephen C. (2005) ‘Living with Manny’s dangerous idea’, Discourse Studies 7: 431- 53
  • Levinson, Stephen C. (2012) ‘Action formation and ascription’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 103-30
  • Levy, Mike; Rod Gardner (2012) ‘Liminality in multitasking: Where talk and task collide in computer collaborations’, Language in Society 41/5, 557-587.
  • Leydon, Geraldine Marie; Katie Ekberg, Paul Drew (2013) ‘‘‘How can I help?’’ Nurse call openings on a cancer helpline and implications for call progressivity’, Patient Education and Counseling 92: 23-30
  • Li, Xiaoting (2013) ‘Language and the body in the construction of units in Mandarin face-to-face interaction’. In: Szczepek Reed, B.; , G. Raymond, eds., Units of Talk–Units of Action. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 343-375
  • Li, Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation.
  • Journal of Pragmatics, 67/1: 34–60
  • Liberman, Ken (1980) ‘Ambiguity and gratuitous concurrence in inter-cultural communication’, Human Studies 3/1: 65-85
  • Liberman, Kenneth (1985) Understanding interaction in Central Australia: an ethno- methodological study of Australian aboriginal people. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  • Liberman, Kenneth (1990) ‘The collective character of disputes in Aboriginal communities’,
  • Sociolinguistics 19: 89-98
  • Liberman, Kenneth (1996) ‘”Universal Reason” as a local organizational method: Announcement of a study’, Human Studies 19: 289-301
  • Liberman, Kenneth (1999) ‘Walkabout to Meditation: Craft and Ethics in Field Inquiry’,Qualitative Inquiry 5: 47-63
  • Liberman, Kenneth (1999). ‘The social praxis of communicating meanings’, Text, 19/1: 57-72
  • Liberman, Kenneth (2004) Dialectical practice in Tibetan philosophical culture : an ethnomethodological inquiry into formal reasoning. Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield
  • Liberman, Kenneth (2006) ‘Book Symposium: Response’, Human Studies 29:393-398
  • Liberman, Kenneth (2007) ‘Thinking as a public activity: the local order of a Tibetan philosophical debate’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 159-73
  • Liberman, Kenneth B. (2007) Husserl’s Criticism of Reason: With Ethnomethodological Specifications. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books
  • Liberman, Kenneth (2008) ‘Larry Wieder’s Radical Ethno-Inquiries’, Human Studies 31/3: 251-257
  • Liberman, Kenneth (2008) ‘The reflexivity of the authenticity of Hatha Yoga’. in Jean Byrne, Mark Singleton, eds.) Yoga: Contemporary Perspectives. London: Routledge: 102-117
  • Liberman, Kenneth (2008) ‘The virtues of sophistry: sophistry in and as its course’,
  • Argumentation: an International Journal on Reasoning 22: 59-70
  • Liberman, Kenneth (2011). ‘The reflexive intelligibility of affairs: Ethnomethodological perspectives’, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure: Revue suisse de linguistique générale, 64: 73- 99
  • Liberman, Kenneth (2012) ‘Semantic Drift in Conversations’, Human Studies 35/2: 263-277
  • Liberman, Kenneth (2013 More Studies in Ethnomethodology. Foreword by Harold Garfinkel. New York: State University of New York Press [SUNY series in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences]
  • Licoppe, Christian (2002) ‘Sociabilité et technologies de communication: Deux modalités d’entretien des liens interpersonnels dans le contexte du déploiement des dispositifs de communication mobiles’, Réseaux, n° 112-113: 172-210
  • Licoppe, Christian (2009) ‘Recognizing mutual ‘proximity’ at a distance: Weaving together mobility, sociality and technology’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 1924-1937
  • Licoppe, Christian; Laurence Dumoulin (2007) ‘L’ouverture des procès à distance par visioconférence: Activité,performativité, technologie’, Réseaux, n° 144: 103-140
  • Licoppe, Christian; Laurence Dumoulin, (2010) ‘The “curious case” of an unspoken opening speech act: A video-ethnography of the use of video communication in courtroom activities’,
  • Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43/3: 211 - 231
  • Licoppe, Christian; Julien Morel (2011). “La référence aux lieux et à la proximité mutuelle et l’émergence de projets de rencontres dans les conversations mobiles”. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances 5/2: 364-389.
  • Licoppe, Christian; Julien Morel (2012) ‘Video-in-interaction: “Talking Heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and skype video calls’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45/4 399-429
  • Licoppe, Christian, Julien Morel (2013) ‘Interactionally generated encounters and the accomplishment of mutual proximity in mobile phone conversations’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 277-299.
  • Licoppe, Christian; Julien Morel (2014) ‘Mundane video directors in interaction. Showing one’s environment in skype and mobile video calls’. In: Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, eds. Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge: 135-160
  • Licoppe, Christian, Marc Relieu (2005) ‘Entre système et conversation. Une approche située de la compétence des téléopérateurs dans les services d’assistance technique’. In Emmanuel Kessous, Jean-Luc Metzger, eds., Le travail avec les technologies de l’information. Paris:
  • Hermès: 177-99
  • Liddicoat, Antony J (2004) ‘The projectability of turn constructional units and the role of prediction in listening’, Discourse Studies 6/4: 449-470
  • Liddicoat, Anthony (2011) An Introduction to Conversation Analysis, 2nd edn, London: Continuum
  • Liebscher, Grit; Jennifer Dailey-O’Cain (2013) ‘Constructing identities through laughter’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 237-254
  • Limberg, Holger (2010) The Interactional Organization of Academic Talk. Amsterdam: John
  • Benjamins
  • Lindfors, Pirjo, Liisa Raevaara (2005) ‘Discussing patients’ drinking and eating habits inmedical and homeopathic consultations’, Communication & Medicine 2; [Special issue ‘Professional theories and institutional interaction’]: 137-50
  • Lindsay, Jayne, Ray Wilkinson (1999) ‘Repair sequences in aphasic talk: a comparison of aphasic-speech and language therapist and aphasic-spouse conversations’, Aphasiology 13: 305-25
  • Lindström, Anna (1996) ‘Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings’, Language in Society 23: 231-52
  • Lindström, Anna (2005) ‘Language as social action: A study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service’. in: Auli Hakulinen, Margret Selting, eds. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 209-230
  • Lindström, Anna (2009) ‘Projecting nonalignment in conversation’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed.
  • Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 135-58
  • Lindström, Anna; Trine Heinemann (2009) Good enough: low-grade assessments in caregiving situations’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/4: 309-328
  • Lindström, Anna; Lorenza Mondada (2009) ‘Assessments in social interaction’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/4: 299-308
  • Lindström, Anna; Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2012) ‘Affiliation in conversation’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 350-69
  • Lindström, Jan (2006) ‘Grammar in the service of interaction: Exploring turn organization in Swedish’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 39/1: 81-117
  • Lindström, Jan, Camilla Lindholm (2009) ‘“May I ask”: Question frames in institutional interaction’. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 180-205
  • Lindström, Jan K.; Anne-Marie Londen (2013) ‘Concession and reassertion: on a dialogic discourse pattern in conversation’, Text&Talk; 33/3: 331-352
  • Lindwall, Oskar, ed. (2014) Special Issue on ‘The body in medical work and medical training’,
  • Discourse Studies 16/2
  • Lindwall, Oskar (2014) ‘The body in medical work and medical training: An introduction’,
  • Discourse Studies 16/2: 125-129
  • Lindwall, Oskar; Anna Ekström (2012) ‘Instruction-in-interaction: the teaching and learning of a manual skill’, Human Studies 35:27-49
  • Lindwall, Oskar; Elin Johansson, Jonas Ivarsson, Hans Rystedt, Claes Reit (2014) ‘The use of video in dental education: Clinical reality addressed as practical matters of production, interpretation, and instruction’, In: Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, eds.
  • Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge: 161-180
  • Lindwall, Oskar, Gustav Lymer (2008) ‘The dark matter of lab work: Illuminating the negotiation of disciplined perception in mechanics’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17 2: 180-224.
  • Lindwall, Oskar; Gustav Lymer (2011) ‘Uses of “understand” in science education’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/2: 452-74
  • Lindwall, Oskar; Gustav Lymer (2014) ‘Inquiries of the body: Novice questions and the instructable observability of endodontic scenes’, Discourse Studies 16/2: 16: 271-294
  • Linstead, Stephen (2006) ‘Ethnomethodology and sociology: an introduction’, The Sociological Review 54/3: 399-404
  • Livet, Pierre (2001) ‘Dynamiques ethnométhodologiques’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 421-37
  • Livingston, Eric (1986) The ethnomethodological foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  • Livingston, Eric (1987) Making sense of ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  • Livingston, Eric (1995) An Anthropology of Reading. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Livingston, Eric (1995). ‘The idiosyncratic specificity of the methods of physical experimentation. The Australian New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31,1-22
  • Livingston, Eric (1999) ‘Cultures of proving’, Social Studies of Science 29: 867-88
  • Livingston, Eric (2000). ‘The availability of mathematics as an inspectable domain of practice through the use of origami’. In S. Hester & D. Francis, eds., Local educational order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 245-270
  • Livingston, Eric (2003) ‘Reading Ethnomethodology’s Program’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 36 481-6
  • Livingston, Eric (2005) ‘Natural reasoning in mathematical theorem proving’, Communication & Cognition 38: 319-44
  • Livingston, Eric (2006) ‘The context of proving’, Social Studies of Science 36: 39-68
  • Livingston, Eric (2006) ‘Ethnomethodological studies of mediated interaction and mundane expertise’, The Sociological Review 54/3: 405-425.
  • Livingston, Eric (2007) ‘Circumstances of reasoning in the natural sciences’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 121-33
  • Livingston, Eric (2008) Ethnographies of Reason. Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate [Series : Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis]
  • Livingston, Eric (2008) ‘Context and detail in studies of the witnessable social order: Puzzles, maps, checkers, and geometry’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/5: 840-62.
  • Livingston, Eric (2011). ‘Etnometodologia sotto le cancellature [Ethnomethodology under erasure]. Trans. from English by Enrico Caniglia and Concetta Simona Condorelli. Quaderni di Teoria Sociale 11, 35-59.
  • Livingston, Eric (2012) ‘Games, pastimes, and leisure pursuits’, The American Sociologist43:109-124
  • Llewellyn, Nick (2005) ‘Audience participation in political discourse: a study of public meetings’, Sociology 39/4: 697-716
  • Llewellyn, Nick (2006) ‘Arguing against absent arguables: organizing audience participation in political discourse’, Discourse Studies 8: 603-26
  • Llewellyn, Nick (2008) ‘Organization in actual episodes of work: Harvey Sacks and organization studies’, Organization Studies 29/5:763-791.
  • Llewellyn, Nick (2010) ‘On the reflexivity between setting and practice: the ‘recruitment interview’. In: Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 74-95
  • Llewellyn, Nick (2011) ‘The delicacy of the gift: Passing donations and leaving change’,
  • Discourse & Society March 2011 22: 155-174,
  • Llewellyn, Nick; Carly W. Butler (2011) ‘Walking out on air’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/1: 44-64
  • Llewellyn, Nick, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. (2010 ) Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Llewellyn, Nick, Jon Hindmarsh (2010) ‘Work and organisation in real time: an introduction’. In: Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 3-23
  • Lloyd, Mike (1996) ‘Condemned to be meaningful: non-response in studies of men and infertility’ Sociology of Health and Illness 18: 433-454.
  • Lloyd, Mike (1997) ‘The language of reproduction: is it doctored?’ Qualitative Health Research 7: 184-201
  • Lloyd, Mike (2006) ‘Show and tell: Making humour with a naked man’ Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 20: 363-81
  • Lloyd, Mike (2007) ‘Rear gunners and troubled privates: Wordplay in a dick joke competition’
  • Journal of Sociolinguistics 11: 5-23
  • Lloyd, Mike (2011) ‘Miss Grimshaw and the White Elephant: Categorisation in a risqué humour competition’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24/1: 63-86
  • Local, John (1996) ‘Conversational phonetics: some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk’. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen, M. Selting, eds. Prosody in conversation: interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 177-230
  • Local, John (2004 ) ‘Getting back to prior talk: and-uh (m) as a back-connecting device in British and American English’. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, C. E. Ford, eds., Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 377 - 400
  • Local, John; Peter Auer, Paul Drew (2010) ‘Retrieving, redoing and resuscitating turns in conversation’. In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al. eds., Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 131-160
  • Local, John; John Kelly (1986) ‘Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure’, Human Studies 9/2-3:185-204
  • Local, John; John Kelly, Bill Wells, (1986) ‘Towards a phonology of conversation: turn-taking in Tyneside English’, Journal of Linguistics 22: 411-37
  • Local, John Gareth Walker (2008) ‘Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources’, Text & Talk 28-6: 723-747
  • Local, John, Tony Wootton (1995) ‘Interactional and phonetic aspects of immediate echolalia in autism: a case study’, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 9: 155-84
  • Lock, S., Wilkinson, R. and Bryan, K. (2001). SPPARC (Supporting Partners of People with Aphasia in Relationships and Conversation): A Resource Pack. Bicester: Speechmark.
  • Locker, David (1981) Symptoms and illness: the cognitive organization of disorder. London: Tavistock
  • Logan Klein, Noa (2011) ‘Doing gender categorization: non-recognitional person reference and the omnirelevance of gender’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 64-82
  • Loloma Froholdt, Lisa (2011) ‘Getting closer to context: a case study of communication between ship and shore in an emergency situation’, Text & Talk 30/4: 385-402
  • Lomax, H., N. Casey (1998) ‘ Recording Social Life: Reflexivity and Video Methodology’
  • Sociological Research Online, vol. 3, no. 2 [12]
  • Luff, Paul, G.N. Gilbert, D.M. Frohlich, eds. (1990) Computers and conversation. London: Academic Press
  • Luff, Paul K., Christian C. Heath (1993) ‘System use and social organisation: observations on human-computer interaction in an architectural practice’. In: Graham Button, ed. (1992)
  • Technology in working order: studies of work, interaction and technology. London: Routledge: 184-210
  • Luff, Paul K., Christian C. Heath (2000) ‘The collaborative production of computer commandsin command and control’ International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52: 669-99 [Available online at http://www.idealibrary.com]
  • Luff, Paul, Christian Heath (2002) ‘Broadcast Talk: Technologically Mediated Action in a Complex Setting’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3)
  • Luff, Paul; Christian Heath (2012) ‘Some ‘technical challenges’ of video analysis: social actions, objects, material realities and the problems of perspective’, Qualitative Research 12: 255-279
  • Luff, Paul K., Christian Heath, M. Jirtoka (2000) ‘Surveying the Scene: Technologies for Everyday Awareness and Monitoring in Control Rooms’, Interacting With Computers, 13/2: 193-228
  • Luff, Paul, Christian Heath, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Jon Hindmarsh, Keiichi Yamazaki, Shinya Oyama (2003) ‘Fractured ecologies: creating environments for collaboration’, Human Computer Interaction 18: 51-84
  • Luff, Paul, Jon Hindmarsh, Christian Heath, eds. (2000) Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Systems Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Luke, Allan, Peter Freebody (1997). ‘Shaping the social practices of reading’. In S. Musprat et al., eds., Constructing critical literacies. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton:185-225
  • Luke, Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam:
  • Benjamins
  • Luke, Kang Kwong (2002) ‘The initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kong telephone calls’. In: Kang Kwong Luke, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, eds., Telephone Calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 171-200
  • Luke, Kang Kwong, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, eds., (2002) Telephone Calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 101]
  • Lutfey, Karen (2004) ‘Assessment, objectivity, and interaction: The case of patient compliance with medical treatment regimens’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 67/4: 343-368
  • Lutfey, Karin, Douglas W. Maynard (1998) ‘Bad news in oncology: how phyisician and patient talk about death and dying without using those words’, Social Psychology Quarterly61: 321-41
  • Lymer, Gustav, Jonas Ivarsson, Hans Rystedt, Åse A Johnsson, Sara Asplund, Magnus Båth (2014) ‘Situated abstraction: From the particular to the general in second-order diagnostic work’, Discourse Studies 16/2: 16: 185-215
  • Lymer, Gustav; Oskar Lindwall, Jonas Ivarsson (2011) ‘Space and discourse interleaved: intertextuality and interpretation in the education of architects’, Social Semiotics 21/2 197-217
  • Lynch, Michael (1982) ‘Technical work and critical enquiry: investigation in a scientificlaboratory’, Social Studies of Science 12: 499-533
  • Lynch, Michael (1982) ‘Closure and disclosure in pre-trial argument’, Human Studies 5: 15-33
  • Lynch, Michael (1983) ‘Accommodation practices: vernacular treatments of madness’, Social Problems 31: 152-64
  • Lynch, Michael (1984) ‘Turning up signs in neurobehavioral diagnosis’, Symbolic interaction7: 67-86
  • Lynch, Michael (1985) Art and artifact in laboratory science: a study of shop work and shop talk. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  • Lynch, Michael (1985) ‘Discipline and the material form of images: an analysis of scientific visibility’, Social Studies of Science 15: 37-66
  • Lynch, Michael (1988) ‘The externalized retina: selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences’, Human Studies 11: 201-34
  • Lynch, Michael. (1988) ‘Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences’, Social Studies of Science18: 265-89
  • Lynch, Michael (1988) ‘Alfred Schutz and the sociology of science’. In: L. Embree, ed.
  • Worldly phenomenology: the influence of Alfred Schutz on human science. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 71-100
  • Lynch, Michael (1991) ‘Method: measurement ordinary and scientific measurement as ethnomethodological phenomena’. In: Graham Button, ed. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 77-108
  • Lynch, Michael (1991) ‘Pictures of nothing? Visual construals in social theory’, Sociological Theory 9: 1-21
  • Lynch, Michael (1991) ‘Laboratory space and the technological complex: an investigation of topical contextures’, Science in Context 4: 51-78 [reprinted in: S.L. Starr, ed. Ecologies of knowledge: work and politics in science and technology. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1995: 226-56]
  • Lynch, Michael (1991) ‘Science in the age of mechanical reproduction: contextual uses of diagrams in contemporary biology’, Biology and Philosophy 6: 155-76
  • Lynch, Michael (1992) ‘Extending Wittgenstein: the pivotal move from epistemology to the sociology of science’. In: A. Pickering, ed. Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 215-65
  • Lynch, Michael (1992) ‘From the “Will to Theory” to the discursive collage: A reply to Bloor’s “Left and right Wittgensteinians”’. In: A. Pickering, ed. Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 283-300
  • Lynch, Michael (1993) Scientific practice and ordinary action: ethnomethodology and socialstudies of science. New York: Cambridge University Press
  • Lynch, Michael (1994) ‘Representation is overrated: Some critical remarks about the use of the concept of representation in science studies’, Configurations 2: 137-49
  • Lynch, Michael (1995) ‘Springs of action or vocabularies of motive?’ In P. Gouk (ed.),
  • Wellsprings of Achievement: Cultural and Economic Dynamics in Early Modern England and Japan. Aldershot: Valarium: 94-110
  • Lynch, Michael (1995) ‘On Making Explicit’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 3: 65-68
  • Lynch, Michael (1996) ‘Detoxifying the “poison pen effect”’ In A. Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 238-58
  • Lynch, Michael (1996) ‘DeKanting agency: Comments on Bruno Latour’s “On interobjectivity”’, Mind, Culture, and Activity 3: 246-51
  • Lynch, Michael (1997) ‘A so called fraud: moral modulations in a literary scandal’, History of the Human Sciences 10: 11-23
  • Lynch, Michael (1997) ‘A sociology of knowledge machine’, Ethnographic Studies, No. 2: 16-38.
  • Lynch, Michael (1997) ‘Preliminary notes on judges’ work: The judge as a constituent of courtroom hearings’. In M. Travers & John Manzo (eds), Law in Action: Ethnomethodological & Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Co.: 99-130
  • Lynch, Michael (1997). ‘Ethnomethodology without indifference’, Human Studies, 20/3: 371- 376
  • Lynch, Michael (1997). ‘Theorizing practice’, Human Studies, 20/3: 335-44
  • Lynch, Michael (1998) ‘Towards a constructivist genealogy of social constructivism’. In I. Velody, R. Williams, eds., The Politics of Constructionism. London: Sage: 13-32
  • Lynch, Michael (1998) ‘The production of scientific images: Vision and re-vision in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science,’ Communication & Cognition 31: 213-28
  • Lynch, Michael (1998) The discursive production of uncertainty: The O.J. Simpson “dream team” and the sociology of knowledge machine,’ Social Studies of Science 28: 829-68
  • Lynch, Michael (1999) ‘Archives in formation: Privileged spaces, popular archives, and paper trails,’ History of the Human Sciences, 22: 65-87
  • Lynch, Michael (1999) ‘Silence in context: Ethnomethodology and social theory’, Human Studies 12: 211-33
  • Lynch, Michael (2000) ‘Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge’, Theory, Culture, and Society 17/3: 27-53
  • Lynch, Michael (2000) ‘The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis’, Text,24: 517-32
  • Lynch, Michael (2000) ‘Response to Wes Sharrock’, Text, 24: 541-4
  • Lynch, Michael (2001) ‘Les fondements ethnométhodologique de l’analyse de conversation’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 259- 74
  • Lynch, Michael (2001) ‘Après Wittgenstein: le tournant de l’épistémologie a la sociologie des sciences’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 123-60
  • Lynch, Michael (2001) ‘Ethnomethodology and the logic of practice’. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina & E. v. Savigny, eds., The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge:131-48
  • Lynch, Michael (2002) ‘The living text: Written instructions and situated actions in telephone surveys. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 125-151
  • Lynch, Michael (2002) ‘From naturally occurring data to naturally organized ordinary activities: comment on Speer’, Discourse Studies 4: 531-37
  • Lynch, Michael (2002) ‘Protocols, practices, and the reproduction of technique in molecular biology’, British Journal of Sociology 53: 203-20
  • Lynch, Michael (2004) ‘Misreading Schutz: A Response to Dennis on “Lynch on Schutz on Science”’, Theory & Science [ISSN: 1527-5558] http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol5.1/lynch.html
  • Lynch, Michael (2006) ‘Cognitive activities without cognition? ethnomethodological investigations of selected “cognitive” topics’, Discourse Studies 8: 95-104.
  • Lynch Michael (2007) ‘Law courts as perspicuous sites for ethnomethodological investigations’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 107-19
  • Lynch, Michael (2007) The origins of ethnomethodology’. in S. P. Turner, M. W. Risjord, eds.. Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology. Amsterdam, Oxford: Elsevier: 485-515.
  • Lynch, Michael (2011) ‘Commentary: On understanding understanding’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/2: 553-55
  • Lynch, Michael (2011) ‘Credibility, evidence, and discovery: The case of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker’ Ethnographic Studies 12: 78-105
  • Lynch, Michael (2011) ‘Harold Garfinkel (29 October 1917 - 21 April 2011): A remembranceand reminder’ (Obituary), Social Studies of Science 41/6: 927 -942
  • Lynch Michael (2011) ‘Ad hoc special section on ethnomethodological studies of science, mathematics, and technical activity: Introduction’, Social Studies of Science 41/6: 835-837
  • Lynch, Michael (2012) ‘Garfinkel Stories’, Human Studies 35/2: 163-168
  • Lynch, Michael (2012) ‘Revisiting the Cultural Dope’, Human Studies 35/2: 223-233
  • Lynch, Michael (2012) ‘Philosophy on the ground: An appreciation of a “Spirit Master”’, The American Sociologist (2012) 43:67-75
  • Lynch, Michael (2013) ‘Seeing fish’. In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds.
  • Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 89-104
  • Lynch, Michael, David Bogen (1990) ‘Social critique and the logic of description: a response to McHoul’, Journal of Pragmatics 14: 50521
  • Lynch, Michael, David Bogen (1991) ‘In defense of data-driven analysis’, Sociological Theory9: 269-76
  • Lynch, Michael, David Bogen, (1994) ‘Harvey Sacks’ primitive natural science’, Theory, Culture & Society 11: 65-104
  • Lynch, Michael, David Bogen (1996) The spectacle of history: speech, text, and memory at the Iran-Contra hearings. Duke University Press
  • Lynch, Michael, David Bogen (1996) ‘Methodological appendix: Postanalytic ethnomethodology’. In their: The spectacle of history: speech, text, and memory at the Iran-Contra hearings. Duke University Press: 262-87
  • Lynch, Michael, David Bogen (1997) ‘Lies, recollections and categorical judgements in testimony’. In: Hester, S., Peter Eglin, eds., Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 99-122
  • Lynch, Michael, David Bogen (1997) ‘Sociology’s asociological “Core”: an examination of textbook sociology in light of the sociology of scientific knowledge’, American Sociological Review 62: 481-93
  • Lynch, Michael, David Bogen (1997) ‘Reinventing cognitive sociology’. In A. Marcarino (ed.), Analisi della Conversazione e Prospettive di Ricerca in Etnometodologia. Urbino, Italy: Quattro Venti: 11-24
  • Lynch, Michael, David Bogen (1999) ‘The struggle between testimony and evidence at the Iran-Contra Hearings’. In: Paul L. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 53-76
  • Lynch, Michael, David Bogen (2005) ‘”My memory has been shredded”: a non-cognitivist investigation of “mental” phenomena’. In: Hedwig te Molder, Jonathan Potter, eds.
  • Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 226-40
  • Lynch, Michael, Simon Cole (2005) ‘Science and technology studies on trial: dilemmas of expertise’, Social Studies of Science 35: 269-311
  • Lynch, Michael, Simon A. Cole, Ruth McNally, Kathleen Jordan (2008) Truth Machine. The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting. Chicago, London, University of Chicago
  • Press
  • Lynch, Michael, S.Y. Edgerton (1988) ‘Aesthetics and digital image processing: representational craft m contemporary astronomy’. In: G. Fyfe and John Law, eds., Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations. London Routledge and Kegan Paul:184-22O
  • Lynch, Michael, Kathleen Jordan (1995) ‘Instructed action in, of and as molecular biology’,
  • Human Studies 18: 227-44
  • Lynch, Michael, John Law (1999) ‘Pictures, texts, and objects: The literary language game of birdwatching.’ In M. Biagioli (ed.), Routledge Science Studies Reader. London: Routledge: 317-41
  • Lynch, Michael, Eric Livingston, Harold Garfinkel, (1983) ‘Temporal order in laboratory life’. In: K.D. KnorrCetina & M. Mulkay, eds. Science observed: perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage: 205-38
  • Lynch, Michael, Douglas Macbeth (1998) ‘Demonstrating physics lessons’. In J. Greeno and S. Goldman, eds., Thinking Practices in Mathematics and Science Learning. Marwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 269-97
  • Lynch, Michael, Ruth McNally (1999) ‘Science, common sense, and common law: Courtroom inquiries, and the public understanding of science,’ Social Epistemology 13: 183-96
  • Lynch, Michael, Ruth McNally (2003) ‘”Science,” “common sense,” and DNA evidence: a legal controversy about the public understanding of science’, Public Understanding of Science12: 83-103
  • Lynch, Michael, Ruth McNally (2005) ‘” Science”, “sens commun” et preuve ADN : une controverse judiciaire à propos de la compréhension publique de la science’ [“Science”, “Common Sense”, and DNA Evidence : A Legal Controversy about the Public Understanding of Science], Droit et Société #61: 655-82
  • Lynch, Michael, Mark Peyrot (1992) ‘Introduction: A reader’s guide to ethnomethodology’, In: Mark Peyrot, Michael Lynch, eds., ‘Ethnomethodology: Contemporary Variations’, special issues of Qualitative Sociology, 15/2: 113-22
  • Lynch, Michael, Wes Sharrock, eds. (2003) Harold Garfinkel [Four-Volume Set: SAGE Masters in Modern Social Thought series] London: Sage Publications
  • Lynch, Michael, Wes Sharrock (2003). ‘Editor’s introduction’. In M. Lynch, W. Sharrock, eds., Harold Garfinkel Vol. 1. London: Sage: VII-XLVI
  • Lynch, Michael, Steve Woolgar, eds. (1990) Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press
  • Lyytinen, Kalle, Ojelanki Ngwenyama (1999) ‘Sharrock and Button … and much ado about nothing’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8/3: 285-293
  • MacAndrew, Craig, Rovert B. Edgerton (1969) Drunken comportment: a social explanation. Chicago: Aldine
  • Macbeth, Douglas (1990) Classroom order as practical action: The making and un-making of a quiet reproach’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11, 189-214.
  • Macbeth, Douglas (1991) ‘Teacher authority as practical action’, Linguistics and Education 3: 281-313
  • Macbeth, Douglas (1992) ‘Classroom “Floors”: Material organizations as a course of affairs’. In: Mark Peyrot, Michael Lynch, eds., ‘Ethnomethodology: Contemporary Variations’, special issues of Qualitative Sociology 15 (2):123-50
  • Macbeth, Douglas (1994) ‘Classroom encounters with the unspeakable: “Do you see, Danelle?”’, Discourse Processes 17: 311-35
  • Macbeth, Douglas (1996) ‘The discovery of situated worlds: analytic commitments, or moral orders?’, Human Studies 19: 267-87
  • Macbeth, Douglas (1998). ‘Qualitative methods and the “analytic gaze”: An affirmation of scientism’. Interchange, 29(2), 137-168.
  • Macbeth, Douglas (1999) ‘Glances, trances, and their relevance for a visual sociology’. In: Paul L. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 135-70
  • Macbeth, Douglas (2000). ‘Classrooms as installations’. In S. Hester & D. Francis, eds., Local educational order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 21-69
  • Macbeth, Douglas (2000) On an actual apparatus for conceptual change. Science Education, 84, 228-64
  • Macbeth, Douglas (2001) ‘On “reflexivity” in qualitative research: two readings, and a third’,
  • Qualitative Inquiry 7: 35-68
  • Macbeth, Douglas (2002). ‘A commentary on instructional design’. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2&3), 373-386.
  • Macbeth, Douglas (2003) ‘Learning Lessons reconsidered: On the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse’, American Educational Research Journal. 40: 239-80
  • Macbeth, Douglas (2004) ‘The relevance of repair for classroom correction’, Language in Society: 33: 703-36
  • Macbeth, Douglas (2007) ‘Book review: N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers (eds), Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives’, Discourse Studies 9:567-574.
  • Macbeth, Douglas (2011) ‘Understanding understanding as an instructional matter’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/2: 438-51
  • Macbeth, Douglas (2012) ‘Some notes on the play of basketball in its circumstantial detail, and an introduction to their occasion’, Human Studies 35/2: 193-208
  • Macbeth, Douglas (2014) ‘Studies of work, instructed action, and the promise of granularity: A commentary’, Discourse Studies 16/2: 16: 295-308
  • MacMartin, Clare (2008) ‘Resisting optimistic questions in narrative and solution-focused therapies’. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds.
  • Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 80-99
  • MacMartin, Clare; Jason B Coe, Cindy L Adams (2014) ‘Treating distressed animals as participants: I know responses in veterinarians’ pet-directed talk’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 47/2: 151–174
  • MacMartin, Clare; LeBaron, Curtis D (2006) ‘Multiple Involvements within group interaction: a video-based study of sex offender therapy’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 39: 41-80
  • MacWhinney, Brian; Johannes Wagner (2010) ‘Transcribing, searching and data sharing: The CLAN software and the TalkBank data repository’, Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 11: 154-173 (www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de)
  • McCleary, Leland Emerson; Tarcísio de Arantes Leite (2013) ‘Turn-taking in Brazilian Sign Language: Evidence from overlap’, Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4/1: 123-154
  • Madill, A, Sue Widdicombe, M. Barkham (2001) ‘The potential of Conversation Analysis for psychotherapy research’, The Counselling Psychologist, 29: 413-34
  • Maheux-Pelletier, Geneviève, Andrea Golato (2008) ‘Repair in membership categorization in French’, Language in Society 37/5: 689-712
  • Maheux-Pelletier, Geneviève (2011) ‘Repair as a conversational resource for (dis)affiliation in the negotiation of linguistic identity’, Nottingham French Studies, 50/2
  • Mahon, Merle. (2009) ‘Interactions between a deaf child for whom English is an additional language and his specialist teacher in the first year at school: Combining words and gestures’,
  • Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23/8: 611-629,
  • Majlesi, Ali Reza (2014) ‘Finger dialogue: The embodied accomplishment of learnables in instructing grammar on a worksheet’, Journal of Pragmatics 64: 35-51
  • Mäkitalo, Åsa, Roger Säljö (2002) ‘Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: Categories as situated practices’, Text 22: 57-82
  • Malone, M.J. (1997) Worlds of Talk: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Conversation.
  • Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
  • Mandelbaum, Jenny (1987) ‘Couples sharing stories’. Communication Quarterly 35: 144-70
  • Mandelbaum, Jenny (1989) ‘Interpersonal activities in conversational storytelling’, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53/2:114-126.
  • Mandelbaum, Jenny (1990/1991) ‘Beyond mundane reasoning: conversation analysis and context’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 333-50
  • Mandelbaum, Jenny (1991) ‘Conversational non-co-operation: An exploration of disattended complaints’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 25: 97-138
  • Mandelbaum, Jenny (1993) ‘Assigning responsibility in conversational storytelling: the interactional construction of reality’, Text 13: 247-66
  • Mandelbaum, Jenny (2003) ‘Interactive Methods for Constructing Relationships’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 207-19
  • Mandelbaum, Jenny (2010) ‘Concurrent and intervening actions during storytelling in family “ceremonial”dinners’. In D. Schiffrin, A. DeFina, A.Nylund, eds. Telling stories: Language, narrative, and social life. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press: 161-172.
  • Mandelbaum, Jenny (2012) ‘Storytelling in conversation’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds.
  • The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 492-508
  • Mandelbaum, Jenny, Anita Pomerantz, (1991). What drives social action? In K. Tracy (Ed.).
  • Understanding face-to-face interaction: Issues linking goals and discourse Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum: 151-67
  • Mangrum, Faye Gothard, Michael S. Fairley, D.Lawrence Wieder (2001) ‘Informal problem solving in the technology-mediated work place’, Journal of Business Communication 38: 315-336.
  • Månsson, Ann-Christin (2012) ‘Interactive evaluation of cognitive functioning’. In: Gitte, Rasmussen, C.E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds., Evaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 169 - 188
  • Manzo, John (1993) ‘Jurors’ narratives of personal experience in deliberation talk’, Text 13: 267-90
  • Manzo, John (1994) ‘You wouldn’t take a seven-year-old and ask him all these questions: jurors’ use of practical reasoning in supporting their arguments’, Law and Social Inquiry 19: 601-26
  • Manzo, John (1996) ‘Taking turns and taking sides: opening scenes from two jury deliberations’, Social Psychology Quarterly 59: 107-25
  • Manzo, John F. (1997) ‘Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis, and the Sociology of Law’. In: Travers, M. & John F. Manzo, eds. (1997) Law in Action: Ethnomethodological &
  • Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Co.: 1-15
  • Manzo, John (2002) ‘Community organizing: “Community” as a discursive resource in a youth social services agency’, Journal of Mundane Behavior 3/2 [www.mundanebehavior.org]
  • Manzo, John F. (2004) ‘On the sociology and social organization of stigma: some ethnomethodological insights’, Human Studies 27: 401-16
  • Manzo, John (2010) ‘Coffee, connoisseurship, and an ethnomethodologically-informed sociology of taste’, Human Studies 33/2-3:141-155
  • Manzo, John; Robin L. Heath, Lee Xenakis Blonder (1998) ‘The interpersonal management of crying among survivors of stroke’, Sociological Spectrum 18: 161-184
  • Manzo, John; Lee Xenakis Blonder, Allan F. Burns (1995) ‘The social-interactional organization of narrative and narrating among stroke patients and their spouses’, Sociology of Health and Illness 17: 307-327
  • Marandin, J.M. (1986) ‘Des mots et des actions: compliment, complimenter et l’action de complimenter’. In: Bernard Conein et al. (1986) Lexique et faits sociaux. (Lexique 5). Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille:65-99
  • Marcarino, Aurelia, ed. (1997) Analisi della conversatione e prospettive di recerca in etnometodologia. Urbino: Editioni QuattroVenti
  • Margutti, Piera (2007) Two uses of third-person references in family gatherings displaying family ties: teasing and clarifications’, Discourse Studies 9: 623-651
  • Marguttia, Piera; Paul Drew (2014) ‘Positive evaluation of student answers in classroom instruction’, Language and Education, 28/1 1-23
  • Markaki, Vassiliki; Sara Merlino, Lorenza Mondada, Florence Oloff (2010) ‘Laughter in professional meetings: The organization of an emergent ethnic joke’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/6: 1526-1542
  • Markaki, Vassiliki; Lorenza Mondada (2012) ‘Embodied orientations towards co-participants in multinational meetings’, Discourse Studies 14/1: 31-52
  • Markman, Kris M. (2009) ’“So what shall we talk about”: Openings and closings in chat-based virtual meetings’, Journal of Business Communication 46/1: , 150-170.
  • Marlaire, Courtney L., Douglas W. Maynard (1990) ‘Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon’, Sociology of Education 63: 83-101
  • Marlaire, Courtney L., Douglas W. Maynard (1993) ‘Social problems and the organization of talk in interaction’. In: J.A. Holstein, G. Miller, eds. Reconsidering social problems: debates in social problems theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter: 173-98
  • Marr, Liz, Dave Francis, Dave Randall (1999) ‘”The Soccer Game” as journalistic work: managing the production of stories about a football club’. In: Paul L. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 111-34
  • Martin, Cathrin (2009) ‘Relevance of situational context in studying learning as changing participation’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53/ 2: 133-149
  • Martin, Cathrin, Fritjof Sahlström (2010) ‘Learning as longitudinal interactional change: from other-repair to self-repair in physiotherapy treatment’, Discourse Processes 47: 668-697
  • Martin, David, Mark Hartswood, Roger Slack and Alex Voss (2006) ‘Achieving dependability in the configuration, integration and testing of healthcare technologies’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 15/5-6: 467-499
  • Martin, David, John Mariani, and Mark Rouncefield (2007) ‘Managing integration work in an NHS electronic patient record (EPR) project’, Health Informatics Journal 2007 13: 47-56.
  • Martin, David; Jacki O’Neill (2011) ‘Talk: talking the organisation into being’, In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 109-30
  • Martin, David, Jacki O’Neill, Dave Randall, Mark Rouncefield (2007) ‘How Can I Help You? Call centres, classification work and coordination’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16/3: 231-264
  • Marton, Ference (2009) ‘Beyond learning as changing participation’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53/ 2: 211-215
  • Maschler, Yael; Gonen Dori-Hacohen (2012) ‘From sequential to affective discourse marker: Hebrew nu on Israeli political phone-in radio programs’, Discourse Studies14: 419-455
  • Mashford-Scott, Angela. Amalia Church (2011) Promoting children’s agency in early childhood education. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5/1: 15-38. Retrieved from http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_5_1/mashford-scott_church.pdf
  • Maso, Ilja (1978) ‘Harold Garfinkel’. In: L. Rademaker, red. Hoofdfiguren uit de sociologie 3. Utrecht: Het Spectrum: 45-62
  • Maso, Ilja (1984) Verklaren in het dagelijks leven: een inleiding in etnomethodologisch onderzoek [Explaining in everyday life: an introduction to ethnomethodological research]. Groningen: WoltersNoordhoff
  • Mason, David, Graham Button, Gloria Lankshear, Sally Coates and Wes Sharrock, (2002) ‘On the Poverty of A Priorism: Technology, Surveillance in the Workplace and Employee Responses’, Information, Communication and Society, 5: 555-72
  • Mason, David, Graham Button, Gloria Lankshear and Sally Coates (2002) ‘Getting real about surveillance and privacy in the workplace’, in Steve Woolgar (ed.) Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137-52
  • Matoesian, Gregory M. (1993) Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Matoesian, Gregory M. (2001) Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford University Press
  • Matoesian, Gregory (2005) ‘Nailing down an answer: participations of power in trial talk’,
  • Discourse Studies 7: 733-59
  • Matoesian, Gregory (2005) ‘L’ambivalence sociologique du témoignage expert : conflit discursif dans la constitution de l’identité juridique’ [Sociological Ambivalence in Expert Testimony : Discursive Conflict in the Constitution of Legal Identity], Droit et Société #61: 719-38
  • Matoesian, Gregory M., James R. Coldren (2001) ‘Evaluer la police de proximité. Style indirect, ambiguïté et paroles rapportées dans un contexte juridique bureaucratique’. In: Dupret, Baudouin (ed.) ‘Le droit en action et en contexte. Ethnométhodologie et analyse de conversation dans la recherche juridique’ [Law in action and in context: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis in research in the field of law] Droit et Société, No 48: 395-415
  • Matthews, Ben (2009) ‘Discerning the relations between conversation and cognition’, Human Studies 32:487-502 [Book Review Essay: Hedwig te Molder, Jonathan Potter, eds.,
  • Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005]
  • Maxim,Jane, Suzanne Beeke, Ray Wilkinson, K. Bryan (2006). ‘Conversations with older people: order and disorder’. in Jones,R.L., J. Percival ed., Language in Later Life: Issues, Methods and Representations. London: Centre for Policy on Ageing/Open University, 25-42
  • May, Judith; Caroline Ellis-Hill, Sheila Payne (2001) ‘Gatekeeping and legitimization: how informal carers’ relationship with health care workers is revealed in their everyday interactions’, Journal of Advanced Nursing 36/3: 364-375
  • May, Marian (2007) ‘Troubled conception: Negotiating the likelihood of having children’. In Johanna Rendle-Short & Maurice Nevile, eds. Language as action: Australian studies in conversation analysis. Special thematic issue, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3): Available via http://publications.epress.monash.edu/loi/aral
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1980) ‘Placement of topic changes in conversation’, Semiotica 30: 26390
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1982) ‘Person description in plea bargaining’, Semiotica 42: 195-213
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1982) ‘Aspects of Sequential Organization in Plea Bargaining Discourse’, Human Studies 5:319-344
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1983) ‘Social order and plea bargaining in the court’, Sociological Quarterly 24: 233-51
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1984) Inside plea bargaining: the language of negotiation. New York: Plenum
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1985) ‘The problem of justice in the courts approached by the analysis of plea bargaining discourse’. In: T.A. van Dijk,ed. Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press. Vol. III: 153-79
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1985) ‘How children start arguments’, Language in Society :1-29
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1985) ‘On the functions of social conflict among children’, American
  • Sociological Review 50: 207-23
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1986) ‘The development of argumentative skills among children’. In: A. Adler, P. Adler, eds. Sociological studies of child development, vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 233-58
  • Maynard, D. (1986) ‘Offering and soliciting collaboration in multi-party disputes among children (and other humans)’, Human Studies 9: 261-86
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1988) ‘Language, interaction, and social problems’, Social Problems35: 311-34
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1988) ‘On Narratives and Narrative Structure in Plea Bargaining’, Law and Society Review 22:101-133
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1989) ‘Perspective-display sequences in conversation’. Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 91-113
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1989) ‘On the ethnography and the analysis of talk in institutional settings’. In: J. Holstein, G. Miller, eds. New perspectives on social problems. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 127-64
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1989) ‘Notes on the delivery and reception of diagnostic news regarding mental disabilities’. In: David T. Helm, W. Timothy. Anderson, Albert.Jay Meehan, Anne Warfield Rawls, eds., The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order. New York: Irvington: 54-67
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1991) ‘Bearing bad news in clinical settings’. In: B. Dervin, ed.
  • Progress in communication sciences. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex: 143-72
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1991) ‘On the interactional and institutional bases of asymmetry in clinical discourse’, American Journal of Sociology 97: 448-95
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1991) ‘The perspective-display series and the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news’. In: Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, eds. Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press: 162-92
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1991) ‘Goffman, Garfinkel and Games’, Sociological Theory 9: 277-79
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1992) ‘On clinicians coimplicating recipients’ perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news’. In: Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 331-58
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1992) ‘Narratives and narrative structure in plea bargaining’. In: J. Levi, A. Walker, eds. Language in the Judicial Process. New York: Plenum Press
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1996) ‘On “realization” in everyday life: the forecasting of bad news as a social relation’, American Sociological Review 61: 109-31
  • Maynard. Douglas W. (1996) ‘From paradigm to prototype and back again: interactive aspects of “cognitive processing” in standardized survey interviews’. In: N. Schwarz, S. Sudman, eds.
  • Answering questions: methodology for determining cognitive and communicating processesinv research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1996) ‘Introduction of Harold Garfinkel for the Cooley-Mead Award’,
  • Social Psychology Quarterly 59:1-4
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1997) ‘How to tell patients bad news: the strategy of “forecasting”’.
  • Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 64, 4, 181-182.
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1997) ‘The news delivery sequence: bad news and good news in conversational interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 30: 93-130
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1997) ‘Structural aspects of bad news and good news in conversational interaction’. In: A. Marcarino, ed., Analisi della conversatione e prospettive di recerca in etnometodologia. Urbino: Editioni QuattroVenti: 59-76
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (1998) ‘Praising Versus Blaming the Messenger: Moral Issues in Deliveries of Good and Bad News’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 31
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (2000) ‘Review of David Silverman, Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis’, Language in Society, 29/4: 590-594.
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (2003) Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (2004) ‘On Predicating a Diagnosis as an Attribute of a Person’,
  • Discourse Studies 6:53-76
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (2005) ‘Social actions, gestalt coherence, and designations of disability: lessons from and about autism’, Social Problems, 52/4: 499-524
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (2006) ‘Cognition on the ground ‘, Discourse Studies 8: 105-115
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (2006). ‘‘Does it mean I’m gonna die?’’ On meaning assessment in the delivery of diagnostic news. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 1902-1916.
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (2010) ‘Demur, defer and deter: Concrete actual practices for negotiation in interaction’, Negotiation Journal, 26:125-143.
  • Maynard, Douglas W.(2011) ‘On ‘‘interactional semantics’’ and problems of meaning’,
  • Human Studies, 34/2: 199-207
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (2012) ‘An intellectual remembrance of Harold Garfinkel: Imagining the unimaginable, and the concept of the “Surveyable Society”’, Human Studies 35/2: 209-221
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (2012) ‘Everyone and no one to turn to: Intellectual roots and contexts for conversation analysis’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 11-31
  • Maynard, Douglas W. (2013) ‘Defensive mechanisms: I-mean prefaced utterances in complaint and other conversational sequences’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Steven E. Clayman, (1991) ‘The diversity of ethnomethodology’,
  • Annual Review of Sociology 17: 385-418
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Steven E. Clayman (2003) ‘Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis’. In L. Reynolds, N. Herman-Kinney, eds., Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press:173-202
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Steven E. Clayman, Timothy Halkowski, Mardi Kidwell (2010) ‘Toward an interdisciplinary field: Language and social interaction research at the University of Calfornia, Santa Barbara’. In Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz, ed. The Social History of Language and Social Interaction Research. Cresskill: Hampton Press: 313-333
  • Maynard, Douglas W., R.M. Frankel (2003) ‘Indeterminancy and Uncertainty in the Delivery of Diagnostic News in Internal Medicine: A Single Case Analysis’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 393-410
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Richard M. Frankel (2006) ‘On diagnostic rationality: bad news, good news, and the symptom residue’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds.
  • Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 248-78
  • Maynard, Douglas W.; Jeremy Freese, Nora Cate Schaeffer (2010) ‘Calling for participation: Requests, blocking moves, and rational (iInter)action in survey introductions’, American Sociological Review, 75/5: 791-814
  • Maynard, Douglas W.;Jeremy Freese, Nora Cate Schaeffer (2011) ‘Improving response rates in telephone interviews’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 54-74
  • Maynard, Douglas W., John Heritage (2005) ‘Conversation analysis, doctor-patient interaction and medical communication’, Medical Education 39:428-435
  • Maynard, Douglas W.; Matthew M. Hollander (2014) ‘Asking to speak to another: a skill for soliciting survey participation’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47/1: 28-48
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds., 2002. Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley
  • Maynard, Douglas W. Pamela L. Hudak (2008) ‘Small talk, high stakes: Interactional disattentiveness in the context of prosocial doctor-patient interaction’, Language in Society , 37/5 661-688
  • Maynard, Douglas W., John F. Manzo (1993) ‘On the sociology of justice: Theoretical notes from an actual jury deliberation’, Sociological Theory 11: 171-93 [reprinted in: Travers, M. & John F. Manzo, eds. (1997) Law in Action: Ethnomethodological & Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Co.: 209-37]
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Courtney L. Marlaire (1992) ‘Good reasons for bad testing performance: the interactional substrate of educational exams’, Qualitative Sociology 15: 177- 202
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Anssi Peräkylä (2003) ‘Language and Social Interaction’. In: John DeLamater, ed. Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum: 233- 258
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Nora Cate Schaeffer (1997) ‘Keeping the gate: declinations of the request to participate in a telephone survey interview’, Sociological Methods & Research 26: 34-79
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Nora Cate Schaeffer (2000) ‘Toward a Sociology of Social Scientifie Knowledge: Survey Research and Ethnomethodology’s Asymmetric Alternates’, Social Studies of Science 30: 323-70
  • Maynard, Douglas W.; Nora Cate Schaeffer (2001) ‘La pratique des sondages vue par l’ethnométhodologie’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.)
  • L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 175-206
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Nora Cate Schaeffer (2002) ‘Standardization and its discontents’. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 3-47
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Nora Cate Schaeffer (2002) ‘Refusal conversion and tailoring’. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 219-243
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Nora Cate Schaeffer (2002) ‘Opening and closing the gate: The work of optimism in recruiting survey respondents’. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 179-205
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Nora Cate Schaeffer (2006) ‘Standardization-in-interaction: the survey interview’. In Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, Darin Weinberg, eds. Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London, etc. Sage: 9-27
  • Maynard ,Douglas W.; Nora Cate Schaeffer (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and interaction in standardized survey interviews’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1016-1022
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Thomas P. Wilson (1980) ‘On the reification of social structure’. In: S.G. McNall, G.N. Howe, eds. Current perspectives in social theory: a research annual. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 287-322
  • Maynard, Douglas W., Don H. Zimmerman (1984) ‘Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships’, Social Psychology Quarterly 47: 30-116
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1983) ‘Specherwechsel in der Schule’. In: K. Ehlich, J. Rehbein, Hrsg.
  • Kommunikation in Schule und Hochschule: linguistische und ethnomethodologische Analysen. Tübingen: Narr: 77-101
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1983) ‘Openingssequenties van lesbeginnen’. In: Harrie Mazeland & J. Sturm, red. Onderwijs als interactieprobleem. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen Nr. 16b: 95-121
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1985) ‘”Morgen, nehmt Platz.” Von der Pause zum Grüssen: die diskursspezifische Ausprägung des Grussmusters in Anfängen von Unterrichtsstunden’. In: W. Herrlitz & H. Bolte, Hgs. Kommunikation im Sprachunterricht. Utrecht: Pressa Trafectina: 71- 130
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1986) ‘Repair-organisatie in onderwijsinteracties’. In: Scholtens & Springorum, red.: 233-46
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1990) ‘Die Kontextualität minimaler Redeannahmen im ArtzPatientDiskurs’. In: K. Ehlich, A. Koerfer, A. Redder, R. Weingarten, Hrsg. Medizinische und therapeutische Kommunikation. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag: 82-102
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1990) ‘”Yes”, “no” and “mhm”: variations in acknowledgment choices’. In: Bernard Conein, M. de Fornel, L. Quéré, Les formes de la conversation, vol 1. Issy les Moulineaux: CNET: 251-82
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1991) ‘Pragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden in vraagwoordvragen’, Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10: 122 (ook in: R. van Hout & E. Huls, red. Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguïstische Conferentie. Delft: Uitgeverij Eburon: 309-28)
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1991) ‘De constructie van vraagwoordvragen en de interactionele organisatie van achtergrondkennis’. In: M.M.H. Bax & W. Vuijk, red. Thema’s in de taalbeheersing. Dordrecht: Foris Publications: 96-106
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1992) Vraag/antwoord sequenties [Question/Answer sequences]. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1994). ‘Argumentatie in gesprekken. Een conversatie- analytische aanzet’, Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 16/4: 273-295.
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1994) ‘Descriptieve praktijken. Pragmatische analyse van categoriseringen’. In F. Maes et al., eds., Perspectieven in taalbeheersingsonderzoek. Dordrecht: ICG Publications: 267-279
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1995) ‘De gespreksorganisatorische status van verduidelijken en andere vormen van uitleggen’. In E. Huls & J. Klatter-Folmer, eds., Artikelen van de tweede sociolinguïstische conferentie. Delft: Eburon: 419-34
  • Mazeland, Harrie (1996) ‘Pragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questions’. In: W. de Mulder, L. Tasmowski, eds. Coherence & anaphora. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10: 185-206
  • Mazeland, Harrie (2003) Inleiding in de conversatieanalyse [Introduction to converdation analysis]. Bussum: Uitgeverij Coutinho
  • Mazeland, Harrie (2003) ‘A politician’s sociology. US Vice President Gore’s categorization of the participants in the Warsaw Uprising’. in: T. Ensink & C. Sauer (eds) The art ofcommemoration. Fifty years after the Warsaw Uprising. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 95-115 (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture series)
  • Mazeland, Harrie (2004) ‘Responding to the double implication of telemarketers’ opinion queries’, Discourse Studies 6: 95-115
  • Mazeland, Harrie (2006) ‘“VAN” as a quotative in Dutch: Marking quotations as a typification’. In: Tom Koole et al., eds. Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguïstische conferentie.
  • Delft: Eburon: 354-65
  • Mazeland, Harrie (2006) ‘Conversation Analysis’. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd Edition, Vol.3.0 Oxford, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science: 153-162
  • Mazeland, Harrie (2007) ‘Parenthetical sequences’ Journal of Pragmatics 39/10: 1816-1869
  • Mazeland, Harrie (2009). ‘Positionsexpansionen: Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungen’. In S. Günthner, J. Bücker, Hgs.,
  • Grammatik im Gespräch. Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung . Berlin/New York: De Gruyter: 185-214
  • Mazeland, Harrie (2010) ‘HOOR als TAG: Een beroep op sequentie-overstijgende relevanties’. In W. Spooren, M. Onrust & J. Sanders, eds. Studies in Taalbeheersing 3. Assen: Van Gorcum: 271-284).
  • Mazeland, Harrie (2012) ‘NOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleuters’. In: Kees de Glopper, Myrte Gosen, Jacqueline van Kruiningen, red. Gesprekken in het onderwijs: Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst. Delft: Eburon: 39-71
  • Mazeland, Harrie (2012) ‘Grammar in conversation’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 475-91
  • Mazeland, Harrie, Jan Berenst (2008) ‘Sorting pupils in a report-card meeting: Categorization in a situated activity system’, Text & Talk 28|1: 55-78
  • Mazeland, Harrie, Titus Ensink (2001) ‘Categorizing in discourse: The case of Dutch ander.’ In: M.Bax & J-W.Zwart, eds., Reflections on language and language learning. (In honour of Arthur van Essen.) Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins: 141-53
  • Mazeland, Harrie, Paul ten Have (1996) ‘Essential tensions in (semi)open research interviews’. In: Ilja Maso, F. Wester, eds. The deliberate dialogue: qualitative perspectives on the interview. Brussels: VUB University Press: 87-113
  • Mazeland, Harrie; Marc Huiskes (2001) ‘Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction. Its use as a resumption marker.’ In: M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar, Vol. 10): 141-69
  • Mazeland, Harrie, Marjan Huisman, Marca Schasfoort (1995) ‘Negotiating categories in travel agency calls’. In: A. Firth, ed. The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon: 271-97
  • Mazeland, Harrie; Leendert Plug (2010) ‘Doing confirmation with ja/nee hoor: Sequential andprosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particle’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 161-188
  • Mazeland, Harrie; Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) ‘The logic of clarification: Some observations about word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactions’, InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures, No. 26, August 2001, URL: <http://inlist.uni-konstanz.de/issues/26/index.htm’
  • Mazeland, Harrie; Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2004) ‘The logic of clarification. Some observations about word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactions. In: R. Gardner & J. Wagner, eds., Second Language Conversations. London, New York: Continuum: 132-156.
  • McCabe, Rosemarie; Christian Heath, Tom Burns, and Stefan Priebe (2002) ‘Engagement of patients with psychosis in the consultation: conversation analytic study’, BMJ - British Medical Journal 325: 1148-1151
  • McHoul, Alec (1978) ‘The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom’, Language in Society 7: 183-213
  • McHoul, AlecW. (1982) Telling how texts talk: essays on reading and ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  • McHoul, Alec W. (1983) ‘Announcing: A contribution to the critique of information systems models of human communication’, Human Studies 6/3:279-294
  • McHoul, Alec (1986) ‘The getting of sexuality: Foucault, Garfinkel and the analysis of sexual discourse’, Theory, Culture and Society 3: 65-79
  • McHoul, Alec (1987) ‘Why there are no guarantees for interrogators’, Journal of Pragmatics11: 455-71
  • McHoul, Alec (1988) ‘Language and the sociology of mind: a critical introduction to the work of Jeff Coulter’, Journal of Pragmatics 12: 229-86
  • McHoul, Alec (1990) ‘Critique and description: an analysis of Bogen and Lynch’, Journal of Pragmatics 14: 523-32
  • McHoul, Alec (1990) ‘The organization of repair in classroom talk’ Language in Society 19: 349-77
  • McHoul, Alec (1994) ‘Towards a critical ethnomethodology’, Theory, Culture & Society 11: 105-26
  • McHoul, Alec (1998) ‘How can Ethnomethodology be Heideggerian?’, Human Studies 21: 13- 26
  • McHoul, Alex (2005) ‘Aspects of Aspects: On Harvey Sacks’s “missing” book, Aspects of the sequential organization of conversation (1970)’, Human Studies 28:113-28
  • McHoul, Alec (2008) ‘Questions of context in studies of talk and interaction - Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/5: 823-26.
  • McHoul, Alec, ed. (2008) ‘Questions of Context in Studies of Talk and Interaction–Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/5 Special Issue: 823-996
  • McHoul, Alec (2009) ‘What are we doing when we analyse conversation?’, Australian Journal of Communication, 36/3: 14-22 [ http://aiemca.net/?page_id=229]
  • McHoul, Alec, Mark Rapley, Charles Antaki (2008) ‘You gotta light?: On the luxury of context for understanding talk in interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/5: 827-39.
  • McHoul, Alec, D. Rodney. Watson (1984) ‘Two axes for the analysis of “commonsense” and “formal” geographical knowledge in classroom talk’, British Journal of the sociology of education 5: 281-302
  • McIllvenny, Paul (1995) ‘Seeing conversations: analyzing sign language talk’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds., Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 129-50
  • McIllvenny, Paul (1996) ‘Popular public discourse at Speakers’ Corner: negotiating cultural identities in interaction’, Discourse & Society 7: 7-37
  • McIllvenny, Paul (1996) ‘Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal audience participation in popular public discourse’, Language in Society 25: 27-60
  • McIlvenny, Paul (2008) ‘A home away from home: mediating parentcraft and domestic space in a reality tv parenting programme’, Home Cultures: The Journal of Architecture, Design & Domestic Space 5/2: 141-166.
  • McIlvenny, Paul (2009) ‘Communicating a “time-out” in parent-child conflict: Embodied interaction, domestic space and discipline in a reality TV parenting programme’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 2017-2032
  • McIlvenny, Paul (2011) ‘Video interventions in “everyday life”: semiotic and spatial practices of embedded video as a therapeutic tool in reality TV parenting programmes’, Social Semiotics21/2: 259-288
  • McIlvenny, Paul (2013) ‘Interacting outside the box: Between social interaction and mobilities’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 409-417.
  • McIlvenny, Paul (2014). Velomobile formations-in-action: Biking and talking together. Space and Culture, 17/2: 137-156
  • McIlvenny, Paul; Mathias Broth, Pentti Haddington, eds. (2009) Special issue on ‘Communicating place, space and mobility’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 1879-2136
  • McIlvenny, Paul; Mathias Broth, Pentti Haddington (2009) ‘Communicating place, space and mobility’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 1879-1886
  • McIlvenny, Paul; Mathias Broth, Pentti Haddington, eds. (2014) Special Issue: Moving Together: Mobile Formations in Interaction’, Space and Culture 17/2: 104-190
  • McIlvenny, Paul; Mathias Broth, Pentti Haddington (2014). ‘Moving together: Mobile formations in interaction’, Space and Culture, 17/2: 104-106
  • McKinlay, Andy, Chris McVittie (2006) ‘Using topic control to avoid the gainsaying of troublesome evaluations’, Discourse Studies 8: 797-815
  • Meehan, Albert J. (1981) ‘Some conversational features of the use of medical terms by doctors and patients’. In: Atkinson, Paul, C. Heath, eds. Medical work: realities and routines. Farnborough: Gower: 107-27
  • Meehan, Albert J. (1986) ‘Record-keeping practices in the policing of juveniles’, Urban Life15/1: 70-102
  • Meehan, Albert J. (1989) ‘Assessing the “Policeworthiness” of citizen’s complaints to the police: accountability and the negotiation of “Facts”’. In: David T. Helm, W. Timothy. Anderson, Albert.Jay Meehan, Anne Warfield Rawls, eds., The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order. New York: Irvington: 116-40
  • Meehan, Albert J. (1997) ‘Record-keeping practices in the policing of juveniles’. In: Travers, M. & John F. Manzo, eds. Law in Action: Ethnomethodological & Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Co.: 183-208 (1988)
  • Meehan, Albert J. (2006) ‘Using Talk to study the policing of gangs and its recordwork’. In Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, Darin Weinberg, eds. Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London, etc. Sage: 190-210
  • Mehan, Hugh (1978). Structuring school structure. Harvard Educational Review 48:32- 64.
  • Mehan, Hugh (1979) Learning lessons: social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
  • Mehan, Hugh (1979). ‘What time is it, Denise?’Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18: 285-294.
  • Mehan, Hugh (1983) The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision making’, Language in Society 12: 187211
  • Mehan, Hugh (1985) ‘The structure of classroom discourse’. In: T.A. van Dijk,ed. Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press. Vol. III:12031
  • Mehan, Hugh (1991) ‘The school’s work of sorting students’. In: Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, eds. Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press:71-90
  • Mehan, Hugh, A. Hertweck, J.C. Meihls (1986) Handicapping the handicapped: decision making in students’ educational careers. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press
  • Mehan, Hugh, Houston Wood (1975) The reality of ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley
  • Meier, Christoph (1997) Arbeitsbesprechungen: Interaktionstruktur, Interaktionadynamiek und Konsequenzen einer sozialen Form. [Workmeetings: Interactional structure, interaction dynamics, and consequences of a social form] Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag
  • Meier, Chistoph (1998) ‘Zur Untersuchung von Arbeits- und Interaktionsprozessen anhand von Videoaufzeichnungen’ [Towards studies of work and interaction processes based on video recordings], Arbeit, 7: 257-75
  • Melander, Helen (2012) ‘Knowing how to play the game of jump rope: Participation and stancetaking in a material environment’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1434–1456
  • Melander, Helen, Fritjof Sahlström (2009) ‘In tow of the blue whale: Learning as interactional changes in topical orientation’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/8: 1519-1537
  • Melander, Helen;Fritjof Sahlström (2009) ‘Learning to fly—the progressive development of situation awareness’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53/ 2:151-166
  • Mellinger, Wayne M. (1992) ‘Accomplishing Fact in Police “Dispatch Packages”: An Analysis for the Situated Construction of an Organizational Record’. In G. Miller and J. A. Holstein, eds., Perspectives on Social Problems. Vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 47-72
  • Mellinger, Wayne M. (1992) ‘Talk-as-Work: The Case of Paramedic Calls for Emergency Field Orders.’ in G. Miller, ed., Current research in Occupations and Profesions. Vol. 7 Special Issue on Human Service Occupations and Professions. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 77-108
  • Mellinger, Wayne M. (1994) ‘Negotiated Orders: The Negotiation of Directives in Paramedic-Nurse Interactions.’ Symbolic Interaction 17: 165-85
  • Mellinger, Wayne M (1995) ‘The Anatomy of an Obituary: ‘Rock Hudson Dies at 59 After Fighting AIDS’, Perspectives on Social Problems Vol 7: 53-84
  • Mellinger, Wayne M. (1995) ‘Talk, Power and Professionals: Partial Repeats as Challenges in the Psychiatric Interview’. in Juerg Siegried, ed., Therapeutic and Everyday Discourse as behavior Change: Toward a Microanalysis in Psychotherapy Process Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex: 391-418
  • Meredith, Joanne; Elisabeth Stokoe (2014) ‘Repair: Comparing Facebook ’chat’ with spoken interaction’, Discourse and Communication, 8/2: 181-207
  • Merlino, Sara; Lorenza Mondada (2014) ‘Identités fluides dans le travail interactionnel du traducteur improvisé’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 87-114
  • Merritt, Marilyn (1975). ‘On questions following questions in service encounters’, Language in Society 5:315-57.
  • Metzger, Terri R. Wayne A. Beach (1996). ‘Preserving alternative versions: Interactional techniques for organizing courtroom cross-examination’, Communication Research, 23, 749- 765.
  • Mieroop, Dorien van de; Harrie Mazeland (2009) ‘Modificaties van vraag-antwoordsequenties in getolkte arts-patiëntgesprekken’, Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 31: 124-141.
  • Mikesell, Lisa (2009) ‘Conversational Practices of a frontotemporal dementia patient and his interlocutors’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/2: 135-162
  • Mikesell, Lisa (2010) ‘Repetitional responses in frontotemporal dementia discourse: Asserting agency or demonstrating confusion?’, Discourse Studies 2010 12: 465-500
  • Misgeld, Dieter (1980) ‘Ultimate self-responsibility, practical reasoning, and practical action: Habermas, Husserl, and ethnomethodology on discourse and action’, Human Studies 3/3: 255- 278
  • Mi-Suk, Seo; Irene Koshik (2010). ‘A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/8: 2219-2239
  • Modaff, D.P. (2003) ‘Body Movement in the Transition From Opening to Task in Doctor- Patient Interviews’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 411-22
  • Moerman, Michael (1977) ‘The preference for self-correction in a Thai conversational corpus’,
  • Language,53/4:872-882.
  • Moerman, Michael (1968) ‘Being Lue: uses and abuses of ethnic identification’. In: J. Helm, ed. Essays on the problem of tribe. University of Washington Press, reprinted as ‘Accomplishing ethnicity’ in: Turner, R., ed., Ethnomethodology: selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin 1974: 54-68
  • Moerman, Michael (1972) ‘Analysis of Lue conversation: providing accounts, finding breaches, and taking sides’. In: David Sudnow, ed. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 170-228
  • Moerman, Michael (1988) Talking culture: ethnography and conversational analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
  • Moerman, Michael (1990/1991) ‘Exploring talk and interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 173-87
  • Moerman, Michael (1992) ‘Life after CA: an ethnographer’s autobiography’. In: Graham Watson, R.M. Seiler, eds. Text in Context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage: 30-34
  • Moerman, Michael (1993) ‘Ariadnes’ thread and Indra’s net: Reflections on ethnography, ethnicity, identity, culture, and interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26/1: 85-98.
  • Moerman, Michael (1996) ‘The field of analyzing foreign language conversations’, Journal of Pragmatics 26/2: 147-58.
  • Moerman, Michael, Harvey Sacks, (1971 [1988]). ‘On “understanding” in the analysis of natural conversation’. In M. Moerman, Talking culture, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press: 180-86
  • Molder, Hedwig te, Jonathan Potter, eds. (2005) Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [review: Matthews, Ben, 2009]
  • Molotch, Harvey L., Deirdre Boden (1985) ‘Talking social structure: discourse, dominationand the Watergate hearings’, American Sociological Review 50: 273-88
  • Mondada, Lorenza (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles [Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics], Cahiers de l’ILSL 7, University of Lausanne
  • Mondada, Lorenza (1995) ‘Analyser les interactions en classe: quelques enjeux théoriques et repères méthodologiques’ [Analyzing class interactions: theoretical and methodological remarks], Actes du 3ème Colloque d’Orthophonie/Logopédie ‘Interventions en groupe et interactions’, Université de Neuchâtel, 29-30 sept. (1994. Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique (TRANEL), 22, 55-89
  • Mondada, Lorenza (1995) ‘Introduction: pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans les dynamiques interactionnelles’ [Introduction: towards a linguistic approach of interactional dynamics], in Lorenza Mondada, eds., Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles, Actes du colloque de Lausanne, Cahiers de l’ILSL no 7: 1-18
  • Mondada, Lorenza (1995) ‘La construction interactionnelle du topic’ [Interactional construction of topic], in Lorenza Mondada, eds., Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles, Actes du colloque de Lausanne, Cahiers de l’ILSL no 7: 111-135)
  • Mondada, Lorenza (1995) ‘Planification des énoncés et séquences interactionnelles’ [Utterance planning and interactional sequences], Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-Strasbourg, ‘Problèmes de sémantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxe’, Neuchâtel, 19-21 mai 1994, SCOLIA, 5, 319-342
  • Mondada, Lorenza (1997) ‘La construction discursive de catégories’. In: D. Dubois (éd.)
  • Catégorisation et cognition: de la perception au discours. Paris: Kimé: 291-313
  • Mondada, Lorenza (1998) ‘Pour une linguistique interactionnelle’ [Towards an interactional linguistics], ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa), 8, 113-130
  • Mondada, Lorenza (1998) ‘Technologies et interactions sur le terrain du linguiste. Le travail du chercheur sur le terrain’ [Technologies and interactions in the linguistic field: the work of the fieldresearcher], Actes du Colloque de Lausanne 13-14.12. Cahiers de l’ILSL 10, 39-68
  • Mondada, Lorenza (1998) ‘Therapy interactions: specific genre or “blow up” of ordinary conversational practices?’, Pragmatics 8: 155-66
  • Mondala, Lorenza (1999) ‘L’organisation séquentielle des ressources linguistiques dans l’élaboration collectives des descriptions’ [The sequential organisation of linguistic resourses in the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage & société nE 89: 9-36
  • Mondada, Lorenza (1999) ‘L’accomplissement de l’ “étrangéité” dans et par l’interaction: procédures de catégorisation des locuteurs [The accomplishment of ‘foreign-ness’ in and through interaction: prodedures for the categorization of speakers in interaction]’, Langages34, N. 134: 20-34
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2000) Décrire la ville: la construction des savoirs urbains dans l’interaction et dans le texte. Paris: Anthropos
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2000) ‘Grammaire-pour-l’interaction et analyse conversationnelle’. In: A.- C. Berthoud, Lorenza Mondada,, eds., Modèles du discours en confrontation. Berne: Lang
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2000) ‘La construction du savoir dans les discussions scientifiques: apport de la linguistique interactionnelle et de l’analyse conversationnelle à la sociologie des sciences’ [The construction of knowledge in scientific discussions: the contribution of interactional linguistics to the sociology of science], Revue Suisse de Sociologie 26: 615-36
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2001) ‘La concertation entre experts: diagnostics de chirurgie en videoconférence’ [Concertation among experts: diagnostics in surgery using videoconferencing]. In: S. Pène, A. Borzeix, B. Fraenkel, eds., Le langage dans les organisations. Paris, etc.: L’Harmattan: 221-44
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2001) ‘Intervenir à distance dans une opération chirurgicale: l’organisation interactive d’espaces de participation’, Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, 74: 33-56
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2001) ‘Gestion du topic et organisation de la conversation’. Cadernos des estudios linguisticos 41:7-36
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2002). “La ville n’est pas peuplée d’êtres anonymes : Processus de catégorisation et espace urbain”, Marges Linguistiques, 3, mai. (http://www.marges- linguistiques.com).
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2002) ‘Pratiques de transcriptions et effets de catégorisation’ cahiers de praxématique 39: 45-75
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2002) ‘Processi di categorizzazione e produzione dell’inclusione e dell’esclusione a proposito di una riunione di lavoro tramite videoconferenza’. In: Klein, Gabriella, Isabella Paoletti, eds. (2002) In & Out. Procedure conversazionali e strategie comunicative di inclusione e di esclusione. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane: 117-75.
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2003) ‘Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions’. In: Mike Ball, ed. Image Work, a Special Issue of Visual Studies 18/1 ( April 2003): 58-73
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2004) ‘Temporalité, séquentialité et multimodalité au fondement de l’organisation de l’interaction : Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tour’, Cahiers de Linguistique Française 26: 169-92
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2004) ‘Ways of “Doing Being Plurilingual” in international work meetings’. In Rod Gardner, JohannesWagner, eds. Second Language Conversations. London: Continuum: 27-60
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2005) ‘La constitution de l’ origo déictique comme travail interactionnel des participants: une approche praxéologique de la spatialité’, intellectica nE 41-42 “Espace, inter/action & cognition”: 75-100
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2005) ‘Espace, langage, interaction et cognition: une introduction’, intellectica nE 41-42 “Espace, inter/action & cognition”: 7-23[Online: http://www.intellectica.org/actuels/n41_42/Mondada_intro_42_2005.pdf].
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2005). ‘Becoming collective: the constitution of audience as an interactional process’. In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel, eds., Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press: 876-883.
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2006) ‘Video recording as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis’. In Hubert Knoblauch, Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab, Hans-Georg Soeffner, eds., Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods, Oxford: Peter Lang: 51-68
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2006) ‘Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence’, Discourse Studies 8: 117-129
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2006) ‘Interactions en situations professionnelles et institutionnelles : de l’analyse détaillée aux retombées pratiques’, Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 11/2: 5-16
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2006) ‘L’ordre social comme un accomplissement pratique des membres dans le temps’, Médias et Culture, 2, 85-119
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2006) ‘Multiactivité, multimodalité et séquentialité : l’initiation de cours d’action parallèles en contexte scolaire’. In: Marie-Cecile Guernier, Viviane Durand-Guerrier & Jean-Pierre Sautot, eds., Interactions verbales, didactiques et apprentissage. Besançon:
  • Presses Universitaires de Franche Comté: 45-72.
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2007) ‘L’imbrication de la technologie et de l’ordre interactionnel. L’organisation de vérifications et d’identifications de problèmes pendant la visioconférence’,
  • Réseaux, 144, 141-182.
  • Mondada. Lorenza (2007) ‘Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers’, Discourse Studies 9/2: 194-225 [reprinted in Dijk, T. van (ed.).
  • Discourse Studies, London : Sage, vol. IV, 126-157].
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2007) ‘Operating together through videoconference: members’ procedures for accomplishing a common space of action’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 51-67
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2007) ‘Commentary: transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices’, Discourse Studies 9/6: 809-21
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2007) ‘Bilingualism and the analysis of talk at work : Code-switching as a resource for the organization of action and interaction’. In : M. Heller, ed. Bilingualism : A Social Approach. New York: Palgrave, 297-318.
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2007) ‘Interaktionsraum und Koordinierung’. In R. Schmitt, ed.
  • Koordination. Analysen zur multimodalen Interaktion. Tübingen: Narr, 55-94.
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2007) ‘Turn Taking in multimodalen und multiaktionalen Kontexten’. In H. Hausendorf, ed. Gespräch als Prozess. Tübingen : Narr, 237-276.
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2008). ‘Using Video for a Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Social Interaction: Videotaping Institutional Telephone Calls’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Researchhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803390
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2009) ‘Video recording practices and the reflexive constitution of the interactional order: some systematic uses of the split-screen technique’, Human Studies32/1: 67-99
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2009) “The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations”, Food Quality and Preference 20/8:558-571
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2009) ‘Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 1977-1997
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2009) ‘The embodied and negotiated production of assessments in instructed actions’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/4: 329-361
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2010) ‘Eröffnung und Vor-Eröffnung in technisch vermittelter Interaktion: Videokonferenzen’. In: L., Mondada, R. Schmitt, eds., Situationseröffnung, Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion. Tübingen, Narr: 277-334
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2011) ‘Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/2: 542-52
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2011) ‘The management of knowledge discrepancies and of epistemic changes in institutional interactions’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 27-57
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2011) ‘The situated organisation of directives in French: imperatives and action coordination in video games’, Nottingham French Studies, 50/2
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2011) ‘The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations’. In: Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, Curtis LeBaron, eds. Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 207-26
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2011) ‘The interactional production of multiple spatialities within a participatory democracy meeting’, Social Semiotics 21/2 289-316
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2012) ‘The dynamics of embodied participation and language choice in multilingual meetings’, Language in Society, 41: 213-235
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2012) ‘Video analysis and the temporality of inscriptions within social interaction: the case of architects at work’, Qualitative Research 12: 304-333,
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2012) ‘Talking and driving: Multiactivity in the car’, Semiotica191:223-256
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2012) ‘Coordinating action and talk-in-interaction in and out of video games’. In: Ruth Ayaß, Cornelia Gerhardt, eds., The appropriation of media in everyday life. Amsterdan: Benjamins: 231-270
  • Mondada Lorenza (2012) ‘Garden lessons: Embodied action and joint attention in extended sequences’. In: H Nasu, F.C Waksler, eds. Interaction and Everyday Life: Phenomenological and Ethnomethodological Essays in Honor of George Psathas. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books: 293–311
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2012) ‘The conversation analytic approach to data collection’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 32-56
  • Mondada Lorenza (2012) ‘Deixis: An integrated interactional multimodal analysis’. In: P. Bergmann, J. Brenning, eds. Interaction and usage-based grammar theories. What about prosody and visual signals? Berlin: De Gruyter: 173–206
  • Mondada Lorenza (2012) ‘Organisation multimodale de la parole-en-interaction: Pratiques incarnées d’introduction des référents’, Langue Française 175: 129–147
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and institutional interaction’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1005- 1011
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2013) ‘Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates’,Journal of Pragmatics 46/1: 39-68
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2013) ‘Coordinating mobile action in real time: The timely organisation of directives in video games’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds.,
  • Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 300-341.
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2013) ‘Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided visits’, Discourse Studies 2013 15/5: 597-626
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2014) ‘Instructions in the operating room: How the directs their assistant’s hands’, Discourse Studies 16/2: 16: 131-161
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2014) ‘Shooting video as a research activity: Video making as a form of proto-analysis’. In: Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, eds. Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge: 33-62
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2014) ‘The surgeon as a camera director: Maneuvering video in the operating theatre’. In: Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, eds. Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge: 97-132
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2014) ‘The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction’ Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137-156
  • Mondada, Lorenza, Rosane Alencar, Florence Oloff (2004) ‘Les séquences d’ouvertures comme lieu d’accomplissement du caractère plurilingue des activités scientifiques’,
  • Sociolinguistica 18: 139-162
  • Mondada, Lorenza; Florence Oloff (2011) ‘Gesture in overlap: the situated establishment of speakership’. In: G. Stam, M. Ishino, eds., Integrating Gestures: The Interdisciplinary Nature of Gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 321-338
  • Mondada, Lorenza, Simona Pekarek Doehler, (2004). ‘Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroom’. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501-18.
  • Mondada, Lorenza, Danièle Dubois, (1995) ‘Construction des objets de discours etcatégorisation: Une approche des processus de référenciation’, Tranel 23: 273-302.
  • Mondada, Lorenza; A. Schmitt, eds. (2010) Situationseröffnungen: Zur Multimodalen Herstellung Fokussierter Interaktion [Openings: The multimodal constitution of focused interaction]. Tübingen: Narr.
  • Monzoni, Chiara (2005) ‘The use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-party conversation’.In Auli Hakulinen, Margret Selting, eds. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 129-157
  • Monzoni, Chiara Maria (2008) ‘Introducing direct complaints through questions: the interactional achievement of “pre-sequences”?’, Discourse Studies 10: 73-87.
  • Monzoni, Chiara M. (2009) ‘Direct complaints in (Italian) calls to the ambulance: The use of negatively framed questions’, Journal of Pragmatics, 41/12: 2465-2478
  • Monzoni, Chiara M., Paul Drew (2009) ‘Inter-interactional contexts of story-interventions by non-knowledgeable story recipients in (Italian) multi-person interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/2, 197-218
  • Moore, Robert J. (2008) ‘When names fail: Referential practice in face-to-face service encounters’, Language in Society, 37/3: 385-413
  • Moore, Robert J. (2004). ‘Managing troubles in answering survey questions: respondents’ uses of projective reporting’, Social Psychology Quarterly. 67/1: 50-69.
  • Moore, Robert J., Cabell Gathman, Nicolas Ducheneaut. (2009) ‘From 3d space to third place: the social life of small virtual spaces’, Human Organization, 68/2: 230-240.
  • Moore, Robert J., Nicolas Ducheneaut, Eric Nickell (2007) ‘Doing virtually nothing: Awareness and accountability in massively multiplayer online worlds’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 16/3: 265-305
  • Moore, Robert J., Douglas W. Maynard (2002) ‘Achieving understanding in the standardized survey interview: repair sequences’. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge.
  • Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 281-313
  • Moore, Robert J., Jack Whalen, E. Cabell Hankinson Gathman (2010) ‘The work of the work order: document practice in face-to-face service encounters’. In: Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:172-97
  • Morel Julien (2002) ‘Une ethnographie de la telephonie mobile dans les lieux publics’,
  • Réseaux, n° 112-113: 50-77
  • Morel, Julien; Christian Licoppe (2012) ‘Caméras en interaction : le travail collaboratif des monstrations visiophoniques’, Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 96: 181-206.
  • Mori, Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese: Connectiveexpressions and turn construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 8]
  • Mori, Junko (1999) ‘Well I may be exaggerating but… : Self-qualifying clauses in negotiation of opinions among Japanese speakers’, Human Studies 22: 447-73
  • Mori, Junko (2004) ‘Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom’, The Modern Language Journal,88/4: 536-550
  • Mori, Junko (2006) ‘The workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences: An analysis of sequential context, turn shape, and prosody’, Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205
  • Mori, Junko (2007) ‘Reconstructing the participants’ treatments of “interculturality”: variations in data and methodologies’, Pragmatics 17: 123-41
  • Mori, Junko (2007) ‘Bordercrossings? Exploring the intersection of second language acquisition, conversation analysis, and foreign language pedagogy’, The Modern Language Journal, 91, 849-862
  • Mori, Junko., Makoto Hayashi,. (2006) ‘The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers’,
  • Applied Linguistics, 27/2:195-219.
  • Mori, Junko; Timothy Koschmann (2012) ‘Good reasons for seemingly bad performance: Competences at the blackboard and the accountability of a lesson’. In: Gitte, Rasmussen, C.E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds., Evaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 89 - 118
  • Morita, Emi (2002) ‘Stance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences: Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanese’. In N.Akatsuka, S.Strauss, eds.,Japanese/ Korean Linguistics 10 Stanford:CSLI.: 220-233
  • Morita, Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk: The Japanese interactional particles ne and sa. Amsterdam: Benjamins
  • Morita, Emi (2008) ‘Highlighted moves within an action: segmented talk in Japanese conversation’, Discourse Studies 10: 517-541
  • Morita, Emi (2012) ‘Deriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactional particle ne’, Journal of Pragmatics 44/3: 298-314
  • Morita, Emi (2012) ‘‘‘This talk needs to be registered’’: The metapragmatic meaning of the Japanese interactional particle yo’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1721–1742
  • Morrison, Ken. (1981) ‘Some properties of “Telling Order Designs” in didactic inquiry’,
  • Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 245-62
  • Mortensen, Kristian (2009) ‘Establishing recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom’, Discourse Processes, 46/5: 491-515
  • Mortensen, Kristian (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and multimodality’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1061-1068
  • Mortensen, Kristian, Spencer Hazel (2011) ‘Initiating round robins in the L2 classroom – preliminary observations’, Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5/1: 55-70. Retrieved from http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_5_1/mortensen_hazel.pdf
  • Mortensen, Kristian; Spencer Hazel (2014) ‘Moving into interaction—Social practices for initiating encounters at a help desk’, Journal of Pragmatics 62: 46-67
  • Mortensen, Kristian ; Johannes Wagner (2013) ‘Conversation analysis: overview’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1075- 1082
  • Mossa, Duncan; Rebecca Barnesa (2008) ‘Birdsong and footprints: tangibility and intangibility in a mindfulness research project’, Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives 9/1: 11-22
  • Mulkay, Michael, Colin Clark, Trevor Pinch (1993) ‘Laughter and the profit motive: the use of humor in a photographic shop’, Humor 6/2: 163-193.
  • Muntigl, Peter (2013) ‘Resistance in couples counselling: Sequences of talk that disrupt progressivity and promote disaffiliation’, Journal of Pragmatics 49: 18-37
  • Muntigl, Peter; Kwok Tim Choi (2010) ‘Not remembering as a practical epistemic resource in couples therapy’, Discourse Studies 12/3: 331-356
  • Muntigl, Peter; Adam O. Horvath (2014) ‘“I Can See Some Sadness in Your Eyes”: When experiential therapists notice a client’s affectual display’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 47/2: 89–108
  • Muntigl, Peter; Adam O. Horvath (2014) ‘The therapeutic relationship in action: How therapists and clients co-manage relational disaffiliation’, Psychotherapy Research 24/3: 327-345
  • Muntigl, Peter; Naomi Knight, Ashley Watkins (2012) ‘Working to keep aligned in psychotherapy: using nods as a dialogic resource to display affiliation’, Language and Dialogue 2/1: 9-27
  • Muntigl, Peter; Naomi Knight, Ashley Watkins, Adam O. Horvath, Lynne Angus (2013) ‘Active retreating: Person-centered practices to repair disaffiliation in therapy’, Journal of Pragmatics 53 1-20
  • Muntigl, Peter, Loreley Hadic Zabala (2008) ‘Expandable responses: how clients get prompted to say more during psychotherapy’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41/ 2:187-226
  • Murphy, Joan, Ivana Marková, Sarah Collins, E. Moodie (1996) ‘AAC systems: obstacles to effective use.’ European Journal of Disorders of Communication 31:31-44
  • Murphy , Keith. M. ( 2004 ) ‘Imagination as joint activity: The case of architectural interaction’, Mind, Culture and Activity, 11/4: 267-278
  • Murphy , Keith. M. ( 2005 ) ‘Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice’, Semiotica , 156 ( 1/4 ), 113-145
  • Murphy, Keith M. (2012) ‘Transmodality and temporality in design interactions’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1966-1981
  • Murtaugh, Ged (2001) ‘Ethnography in public space: competence, communication and the research process’, Ethnographic Studies 6: 60-72
  • Mushin, Ilana, Rod Gardner (2009) ‘Silence is talk: Conversational silence in Australian Aboriginal talk-in-interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 2033-2052
  • Negretti, Raffaella (1999) ‘Web-based activities and SLA: a conversation analysis research approach’, Language Learning & Technology 3/1: 75-87
  • Nekvapil, Jiri (1997) ‘Die kommunikatieve Überwindung der tschechisch-deutschen etnischen Polarisation: Deutsche, deutsche Kollegen, Expatriates und andere soziale Kategorien im Automobilwerk Škoda’ [The communicative overcoming of the Tschech/German ethnic polarization: Germans, German colleagues, expatriates and other social categories in the Škoda car factory]. In: S. Höhne, M. Nekula (Hgg.), Sprache, Wirtschaft, Kultur: Deatsche und Tschechen in Interaktion. München: Iudicium: 127-45
  • Nekvapil, Jiri (1997) ‘Some remarks on item orderings in Czech conversation: the issue of pre- requests’. In: B. Palek, ed. Typology: Prototypes, Item Orderings and Universals [Proceedings of LP’96]. Prague: Charles University Press: 444-50
  • Nekvapil, Jiri, Ivan Leudar, (1998) ‘Masmediální utvárení dialogických sítí a politické identity: prípad Demokratické strany Sudety’ [Emergence of dialogic networks and political identity in mass media: the case of Democratic Party of Sudetenland],Slovo a slovenost 59: 30-52 [Note: an English version has also been published; see Leudar & Nekvapil, 1988)
  • Nekvapil, Jiri, Ivan Leudar (2002) On dialogical networks: arguments about the migration law in czech mass media in 1993’’, in S. Hester and W. Housley, eds. Language Interaction and National Identity. Aldershot: Ashgate: 60-101.
  • Nekvapil, Jirí Ivan Leudar (2006) ‘Sequencing in media dialogical networks’, Ethnographic Studies 8: 30-43
  • Nelson, C.K. (1994) ‘Ethnomethodological positions on the use of ethnographic data in conversation analytic research’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 23: 307-329
  • Németh, Zsuzsanna (2012) ‘Recycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turn self-repair strategies in Hungarian’, Journal of Pragmatics 44/14: 2022-2034
  • Nevile, Maurice (2001) ‘Understanding who’s who in the airline cockpit: pilots’ pronominal choices and cockpit roles’. In: Alec McHoul and Mark Rapley, eds. How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum: 57-71
  • Nevile, Maurice (2002) ‘Coordinating talk and non-talk activity in the airline cockpit’,
  • Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 25: 131-46
  • Nevile, Maurice (2004) Beyond the black box: talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate [Series: Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Series editors D.Francis and S.Hester]
  • Chinese translation, check: http://www.bjbb.com/bookdetail.aspx?pid=3692527
  • Nevile, Maurice (2004) ‘Integrity in the Airline Cockpit: Embodying Claims About Progress for the Conduct of an Approach Briefing’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 37: 447-81
  • Nevile, Maurice (2005) ‘You always have to land: accomplishing the sequential organization of actions to land an airliner’. In S.Norris & R.Jones, eds., Discourse in action: introducing mediated discourse analysis. London: Routledge: 32-44
  • Nevile, Maurice (2005) ‘”Checklist complete.” Or is it? Closing a task in the airline cockpit’.
  • Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 28: 60-76
  • Nevile, Maurice (2006) ‘Making sequentiality salient: and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots’. Discourse Studies 8: 279-302
  • Nevile, Maurice (2006) ‘A conversation analysis model for examining aviation communication in context: part I - processes for representing data’. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 6:35-50
  • Nevile, Maurice (2006) ‘A conversation analysis model for examining aviation communication in context: part II - processes for analysing data’. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 6:155-173
  • Nevile, Maurice (2007) ‘Talking without overlap in the airline cockpit: precision timing at work’. Text and Talk 27:225-249
  • Nevile, Maurice (2007) ‘Action in time: ensuring timeliness for collaborative work in the airline cockpit’. Language in Society 36:233-257
  • Nevile, Maurice. (2007) ‘Seeing the point: attention and participation in the airline cockpit’, in: L. Mondada, V. Markaki, eds. Interacting Bodies. Online Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies. Lyon: ENS LSH & ICAR Research Lab: http://gesture-lyon2005.ens-lsh.fr/article.php3?id_article=245
  • Nevile, Maurice (2008) ‘Being out of order: overlapping talk as evidence of trouble in airline pilots’ work’. In Vijay Bhatia, John Flowerdew & Rodney H. Jones, eds. Advances in discourse studies. London and New York, Routledge: 36-50
  • Nevile, Maurice (2009 ) ‘“You are well clear of friendlies”: Diagnostic error and cooperative work in an Iraq war friendly fire incident’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 18/2-3: 147-173
  • Nevile, Maurice (2010) ‘Looking for action: Talk and gaze home position in the airline cockpit’, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33: 1-21.
  • Nevile, Maurice (2011) ‘The real thing: artifacts, action and authenticity in a student-led stakeholder session’. In: Jacob Burr, ed., Participatory Innovation Conference Proceedings, pp.84-90. University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg. Available at http://spirewire.sdu.dk/proceedings/PINC-proceedings-web.pdf
  • Nevile, Maurice (2012) ‘Interaction as distraction in driving: A body of evidence’, Semiotica191:169-196
  • Nevile, Maurice (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and cockpit communication’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 958- 962
  • Nevile, Maurice (2013) ‘Seeing on the move: Mobile collaboration on the battlefield’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 152-176.
  • Nevile, Maurice (2013) ‘Collaboration in crisis: Pursuing perception through multiple descriptions (how friendly vehicles became damn rocket launchers)’. In: Antoon De Rycker, Zuraidah Mohd Don, eds. Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives. Amsterdam, John Benjamins: 159-183
  • Nevile, Maurice; Pentti Haddington (2010) ’In-car distractions and their impact on driving activities’. Canberra: Department of Transport and Infrastructure. Road Safety Grant Report. pp.155. ISBN 978-1-921769-15-3. Available at http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/roads/safety/publications/2010/pdf/rsgr_2010001.pdf
  • Nevile, Maurice, Johanna Rendle-Short (2007) ‘Language as action’. In Johanna Rendle-Short & Maurice Nevile, eds. Language as action: Australian studies in conversation analysis. Special thematic issue, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3): 30.1-30.13. Available via http://publications.epress.monash.edu/loi/aral
  • Nevile, Maurice, Johanna Rendle-Short (2009) ‘A conversation analysis view of communication as jointly accomplished social interaction: an unsuccessful proposal for a social visit’. In M.Haugh & A.Liddicoat (eds.) Conceptualizing communication. Special Issue,
  • Australian Journal of Linguistics 29: 75-89
  • Nevile, Maurice, Johannes Wagner (2008) ‘Managing languages and participation in a multilingual group examination’. In H. Haberland, J. Mortensen, A. Fabricius, B. Preisler, K. Risager, & S. Kjærbeck eds. Higher Education in the global village: cultural and linguistic practices in the international university. Department of Culture and Identity, Roskilde University, Denmark: 149-173.
  • Nevile, Maurice, Michael B. Walker, (2005) ‘A context for error: Using conversation analysis to represent and analyse recorded voice data’. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 5: 109-35 [Note: same text below in downloadable format]
  • Nevile, Maurice, Michael B. Walker (2005) ‘A context for error: Using conversation analysis to represent and analyse recorded voice data’. Aviation Research Report. B2005/0108. Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Department of Transport and Regional Services, Canberra. Available at http://www.atsb.gov.au/aviation/research/context_error.cfm
  • Nguyen, Hanh Thi (2006). ‘Constructing “expertness”: A novice pharmacist’s development of interactional competence in patient consultations’. Communication & Medicine, 3/2: 147-160.
  • Nguyen, Hanh Thi (2007). ‘Rapport building in language instruction: A Microanalysis of the multiple resources in teacher talk’. Language and Education, 21/4: 284-303.
  • Nguyen, Hanh Thi (2008) ‘Sequence organization as local and longitudinal achievement’, Text & Talk 28/4: 501-528
  • Nguyen, Hanh Thi (2009). ‘The recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talk: Negotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledge’. In Hanh Thi Nguyen, Gabriele Kasper, eds., Talk in interaction: Multilingual perspectives Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai‘i Press: 57-87.
  • Nguyen, Hanh thi (2012). Developing interactional competence: A conversation-analytic study of patient consultations in pharmacy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan
  • Nguyen, Hanh Thi, Gabriele Kasper, eds. (2009). Talk in interaction: Multilingual perspectives. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
  • Nicolau, Gilda (1997) Le cabinet Fl 117 20ème Sud: Approche ethnométhodologique des pratiques d’un juge des enfants. [Série “Ethnologie(s) en herbe”] Paris: Publications de l’université Paris 7 - Denis-Diderot
  • Nielsen, Mie Femø (2006) ‘“Doing” interviewer roles in TV interviews’. In M. Ekström, Å . Kroon, M. Nylund, eds., News from the interview society. Göteborg: Nordicom: 95-120
  • Nielsen, Mie Femø (2009) ‘Interpretative management in business meetings: understanding managers’ interactional strategies through conversation analysis, Journal of Business Communication 46/1: 23-56
  • Nielsen, Mie Femø; Søren Beck Nielsen, Gitte Gravengaard, Brian Due (2012) ‘Interactional functions of invoking procedure in institutional settings’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1457-1473
  • Nielsen, Mie Femø, Johannes Wagner, (2007) ‘Diversity and continuity in conversation analysis’, Journal of Pragmatics 39/3: 441-444
  • Nielsen, Søren Beck (2011) ‘Keeping the gate ajar during openings of general practice consultations’, Communication & Medicine, 8/3: 235-45
  • Niemelä, Maarit (2005) ‘Voiced direct reported speech in conversational storytelling: Sequential patterns of stance taking’, SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 197-221
  • Niemi, Jarkko (2014) ‘Two “yeah but” formats in Finnish: The prior action engaging nii mut and the disengaging joo mut utterances’, Journal of Pragmatics, 60: 54-74
  • Niemi, Kreeta (2014) “I will send badass viruses.” Peer threats and the interplay of pretend frames in a classroom dispute. Journal of Pragmatics, 66: 106–121.
  • Nikander, Pirjo (2000) “Old” versus “Little Girl”: A discursive approach to age categorisation and morality. Journal of Aging Studies 14/4: 335-358.
  • Nikander, Pirjo (2002) Age in action: Membership work and stage of life Categories in talk. Helsinki, Finnish Academy of Science and Letters
  • Nikander, Pirjo (2003) ‘The absent client: Case description and decision-making in interprofessional meetings’. In C. Hall. L. Juhila, N. Parton, T. Pösö, eds. Constructing Clienthood in Social Work and Human Services: Identities, interactions and practices. London, Jessica Kingsley
  • Nikander, Pirjo (2005) ‘Managing Scarcity: Joint decision making in interprofessional meetings’. In T. Heinonen, A. Metteri, eds. Social Work in Health and Mental Health: Issues, Developments and Actions. Toronto, Canadian Scholar’s Press: 260-279
  • Nikander, Pirjo (2007) ‘Interprofessional decision making in elderly care: morality, criteria, and help allocation’. In Isabella Paoletti, ed. Family Caregiving. Relational and Institutional Issues. New York, Nova Science. 319-332
  • Nikander, Pirjo (2008). ‘Working with transcripts and translated data’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 225-231.
  • Nikander, Pirjo (2009) ‘Doing change and continuity. Age identity and the micro-macro divide’, Ageing & Society 29: 863-881.
  • Nilsen, Mona, Åsa Mäkitalo (2010) ‘Towards a conversational culture? How participants establish strategies for co-ordinating chat postings in the context of in-service training’,
  • Discourse Studies 12: 90-105
  • Nishizaka, Aug (1992) ‘The use of ‘power’: The discursive organization of powerfulness’,
  • Human Studies 15/1: 129-144
  • Nishizaka, Aug (1999) ‘Doing interpreting within interaction: The interactive accomplishment of a “Henna Gaijin” or “Strange Foreigner”’, Human Studies 22: 235-51
  • Nishizaka, Aug (2000) Seeing what one sees: Perception, emotion, and activity. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 7: 105-23
  • Nishizaka, Aug (2003). ‘Imagination in action’, Theory & Psychology, 13, 177-208.
  • Nishizaka, Aug (2006) ‘What to learn: the embodied structure of the environment’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 39: 119-54
  • Nishizaka, Aug (2007) ‘Hand touching hand: referential practice at a Japanese midwife house’,
  • Human Studies 30/3: 199-217
  • Nishizaka, Aug (2010) ‘Self-initiated problem presentation in prenatal checkups: Its placement and construction’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 43/3: 283-313
  • Nishizaka, Aug (2011) ‘Touch without vision: Referential practice in a non-technological environment’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/2: 504-20
  • Nishizaka, Aug (2011) ‘The embodied organization of a real-time fetus: the visible and the invisible in prenatal ultrasound examinations’, Social Study of Science 41/3: 309-336
  • Nishizaka, Aug (2011) ‘Response expansion as a practice for raising a concern during regular prenatal checkups’, Communication & Medicine 8/3: 247-259
  • Nishizaka, Aug (2013) ‘Distribution of visual orientations in prenatal ultrasound examinations: When the healthcare provider looks at the pregnant woman’s face’, Journal of Pragmatics 51: 68-86
  • Nishizaka, Aug (2014) ‘Instructed perception in prenatal ultrasound examinations’, Discourse
  • Studies 16/2: 16: 217-246
  • Nofsinger, R.E. (1995) ‘Micromanaging expert talk: Hosts’ Contributions to televised computer product demonstrations’. In Burleson, B.R., ed. Communication yearbook 18. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications: 345-70 [cf.comment in Hopper, 1995]
  • Nolen, Jason A.; Douglas W Maynard (2013) ‘Formulating the request for survey participation in relation to the interactional environment’, Discourse Studies, 15/2 205 -227
  • Noordegraaf, Martine,Carolus van Nijnatten, Ed Elbers (2008) ‘Assessing suitability for adoptive parenthood: hypothetical questions as part of ongoing conversation’, Discourse Studies 10: 655-672.
  • Nordberg, Bengt (1999) ‘On closings in alarm calls’, Språk och stil, 8, 65-103
  • Noy, Chaim (2012) ’Inhabiting the family-car: Children-passengers and parents-drivers on the school run’, Semiotica 191:309-333
  • O’Brien-Malone, Anjala; Charles Antaki (2001) ‘Two approaches to the question “what does the interviewer have in mind”?’. In: Alec McHoul, Mark Rapley, eds. How to analyse talk in institutional settings, London: Continuum: 171-182
  • Ochs, Elinor, Sally Jacoby (1997) ‘Down to the wire: The cultural clock of physicists and the discourse of consensus’. Language in Society 26 (4), 479-505.
  • Ochs, Elinor, Patrick Gonzales, Sally Jacoby (1996) ‘”When I come down I’m in the domain state”: grammar and graphic representation in the interpretative activity of physicists’. In: Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, S.A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 328-69
  • Ochs, Elinor, Sally Jacoby, Patrick Gonzales (1994) ‘Interpretive journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space’, CONFIGURATIONS 2: 151-171
  • Ochs, Elinor, Clotilde Pontecorvo, Alessandra Fasulo (1996). ‘Socializing taste’. Ethnos, 61, 1/2, 7-46.
  • Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Sandra A. Thompson, eds. (1996) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Oelschlaeger, Mary L. (1999) ‘Participation of a conversation partner in the word searches of a person with aphasia’, American Journal of Speech-Language pathology 8: 62-71
  • Oelschlaeger, Mary L., Jack S. Damico (2003) ‘Word Searches in Aphasia: A Study of the Collaborative Responses of Communicative Partners’ In: Charles Goodwin, ed. Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press: 211-27
  • O’Grady, Catherine; Maria R Dahm, Peter Roger, Lynda Yates (2014) ‘Trust, talk and the dictaphone: Tracing the discursive accomplishment of trust in a surgical consultation’,
  • Discourse & Society 25: 65-83
  • Ogien, Albert (2001) ‘L’autre sociologie’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La
  • Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 391-419
  • Ogien, Albert (2009) ‘Rules and details: From Wittgenstein and Rawls to the study of practices’, Journal of Classical Sociology 9/4: 450-474
  • Ogien, Ruwen (2001) ‘L’idiot de Garfinkel’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 57-74
  • Oh, Sun-Young (2005) ‘English zero anaphora as an interactional resource’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 38/2: 267-302
  • Oh, Sun-Young (2006) ‘English zero anaphora as an interactional resource II ‘, Discourse Studies 8/6: 817-46
  • Oh, Sun-Young (2007) ‘Overt reference to speaker and recipient in Korean’, Discourse Studies9: 462-492.
  • Oh, Sun-Young (2007) ‘The interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Korean conversation’, in N.J. Enfield and T. Stivers, eds. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 203-25
  • Ohara, Yumiko, Scott Saft (2003) ‘Using conversation analysis to track gender ideologies in social interaction: toward a feminist analysis of a Japanese phone-in consultation TV program’, Discourse & Society 14: 153-72
  • Oloff, Florence (2012) ‘Withdrawal from turns in overlap and participation’. In: Bergmann, P., Brenning, J., Pfeiffer, M., Reber, E., eds., Prosody and Embodiment in Interactional Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter: 207-237
  • Oloff, Florence (2013) ‘Embodied withdrawal after overlap resolution’, Journal of Pragmatics46/1: 139-156
  • Olsher, D. (2004) ‘Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction’. In Rod Gardner, Johannes Wagner, eds. Second Language Conversations.
  • London: Continuum: 221-45
  • Olszewski, Brandon, Deborah Macey, Lauren Lindstrom (2006) ‘The Practical Work of <coding>: An Ethnomethodological Inquiry’, Human Studies 29: 363-380
  • Ong, Kenneth Keng Wee (2011) ‘Disagreement, confusion, disapproval, turn elicitation and floor holding: Actions as accomplished by ellipsis marks-only turns and blank turns in quasisynchronous chats’, Discourse Studies 13: 211-234,
  • Oshima, Sae (2014) ‘Consensus through professionalized head nods: The role of nodding in service encounters in Japan’, Journal of Business Communication 51/1: 31-57
  • Padmos, Henrike; Harrie Mazeland, Hedwig te Molder (2006) ‘On doing being personal: Citizen talk as an identity-suspending device in public debates on GMOs’. In: Heiko Hausendorf and Alfons Bora, eds. Analysing Citizenship Talk: Social positioning in political and legal decision-making processes. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 276-95
  • Paget, Marianne A. (1982) “Your son is cured now; You may take him home”, Culture
  • Medicine and Psychiatry 6/3: 237-259
  • Pain, Jean (2009). Not just talking: Conversational analysis, Harvey Sacks’ gift to therapy.
  • London: Karnac Books.
  • Pajo, Kati (2012) ‘Difficulty to receive a spoken message due to hearing loss: Analysis of a private interaction between two sisters at a coffee table’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies.
  • Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 67-75
  • Pallotti, G.; Johannes Wagner, eds. (2011) L2 learning as social practice: Conversation- analytic perspectives. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center
  • Paoletti, Isabella (1998) ‘Handling “incoherence” according to speaker’s on-sight categorization’. In: Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe (ed.) Identities in Talk. London: Sage: 171-90
  • Paoletti, Isabella (1998) Being an older women: a study in the social production of identity.
  • Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  • Paoletti, Isabella (1999) ‘A half life: women caregivers of older disabled relatives’, Journal of Women and Aging 11: 53-67
  • Paoletti, Isabella (2001) ‘Membership categories and time appraisal in interviews with family caregivers of disabled elderly’, Human Studies 24: 293-325
  • Paoletti, IsabeIla (2002) ‘Caring for older people: a gendered practice’, Discourse & Society13/6: 805-17
  • Paoletti, Isabella (2002) ‘Essere impopolare: la constructione conversationale dell’esclusione’. In: Klein, Gabriella, Isabella Paoletti, eds. (2002) In & Out. Procedure conversazionali e strategie comunicative di inclusione e di esclusione. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane: 27- 55
  • Paoletti, Isabella (2009 ) ‘Communication and diagnostic work in medical emergency calls in Italy’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 18/2-3: 229-250
  • Paoletti, , Isabella (2012) ‘The issue of conversationally constituted context and localization problems in emergency calls’, Text & Talk 32/2: 191-210
  • Paoletti, Isabella (2012) ‘Operators managing callers’ sense of urgency in calls to the medical emergency number’, Pragmatics 22:4
  • Paoletti, Isabella, Greer Cavallaro Johnson (2007) ‘Doing “being ordinary” in an interview narrative with a second generation Italian-Australian woman’. In: Michael Bamberg, Anna De Fina, Deborah Schiffrin, eds. Selves and Identities in Narrative and Discourse,
  • Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
  • Paoletti, Isabella, Giolo Fele (2004) ‘Order and disorder in the classroom’, Pragmatics 14: 69- 85
  • Paperman, Patricia (2001) ‘Indifférence, neutralité, engagement’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 345-60
  • Park, Innhwa (2010) ‘Marking an impasse: The use of anyway as a sequence-closing device’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics 42/12: 3283-3299
  • Park, Innhwa (2012) ‘Asking different types of polar questions: The interplay between turn, sequence, and context in writing conferences’, Discourse Studies 14: 613-633
  • Park, Innhwa (2012) ‘Seeking advice: Epistemic asymmetry and learner autonomy in writing conferences’, Journal of Pragmatics 44/14: 2004-2021
  • Park, Yong-Yae (2002) ‘Recognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephone conversation openings’. In: Kang Kwong Luke, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, eds., Telephone Calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures.
  • Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 25-47
  • Park, Yujong (2009) ‘Interaction between grammar and multimodal resources: quoting different characters in Korean multiparty conversation’, Discourse Studies 11: 79-104
  • Parker, Nicola; Michelle O’Reilly (2012) ‘‘Gossiping’ as a social action in family therapy: The pseudo-absence and pseudo-presence of children’, Discourse Studies14: 457-475
  • Parker, Richard, Anita Pomerantz, B. J. Fehr (1995) ‘Satisfaction Work in an Emergency Situation: The Case of the Philadelphia 911 Call’, Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior 8: 164-76
  • Parry, Ruth Helen (2004) ‘The interactional management of patients’ physical incompetence: a conversation analytic study of physiotherapy interactions’, Sociology of Health and Illness 26: 976-1007
  • Parry, Ruth Helen (2004) ‘Communication during goal setting in physiotherapy treatment sessions’, Clinical Rehabilitation 18: 668-82
  • Parry, Ruth Helen (2005) ‘Official recommendations and actual practice in physiotherapy: Managing troubles of physical performance’, Communication & Medicine 2; [Special issue ‘Professional theories and institutional interaction’]: 151-62
  • Parry, Ruth (2005) ‘A video analysis of how physiotherapists communicate with patients about errors of performance: insights for practice and policy’, Physiotherapy, 91: 204-214
  • Parry, Ruth (2009) ‘Practitioners’ accounts for treatment actions and recommendations in physiotherapy: when do they occur, how are they structured, what do they do?’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31/6: 835-853 [reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010) Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell: 48-65]
  • Parry, Ruth (2010) ‘Video-based conversation analysis’. In: Ivy Bourgeault , Robert Dingwall, Ray de Vries, eds.,The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. London: Sage: 373-396
  • Parry, Ruth (2013) ‘Giving reasons for doing something now or at some other time’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46/2: 105-124
  • Parry, Ruth H.; Victoria Land (2013) ‘Systematically reviewing and synthesizing evidence from conversation analytic and related discursive research to inform healthcare communication practice and policy: an illustrated guide’, BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013, 13:69 online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/13/69
  • Pasquandrea, Sergio (2011). ‘Managing multiple actions through multimodality: Doctors’ involvement in interpreter-mediated interactions’, Language in Society, 40: 455-481
  • Pasquandrea, Sergio (2012) ‘Co-constructing dyadic sequences in healthcare interpreting: A multimodal account’, New Voices in Translation Studies, 8: 132-157 (available at: http://www.iatis.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=488:current-issue8-2012&Ite mid=86)
  • Patrona, Marianna (2012) ‘Journalists on the news: The structured panel discussion as a form of broadcast talk’, Discourse & Society 23: 145-162,
  • Payne, George C. F. (1976). ‘Making a lesson happen: An ethnomethodological analysis’. In Martyn Hammersley & Peter Woods, eds., The process of schooling: A sociological reader. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul: 33-40
  • Pekarek Doehler, Simona (2001) ‘Referential processes as situated cognition: Pronominal expressions and the social co-ordination of talk’. In: Cognition in Language Use: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 1. Edited by Enikö Németh. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association: 302-16
  • Pekarek Doehler, Simona (2006) ‘«CA for SLA» : Analyse conversationnelle et recherche sur l’‘acquisition des langues’, Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 11/2: 123-37
  • Pekarek Doehler, Simona; Elwys De Stefani, Anne-sylvie Horlacher, (2011) ‘The grammar of closings: the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in French talk-in-interaction’,
  • Nottingham French Studies, 50/2
  • Peräkylä , Anssi (1993) ‘Invoking a hostile world: Discussing the patient’s future in AIDS counselling’, Text 13/2:291-316.
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (1995) AIDS Counselling: Institutional Interaction and Clinical Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (1997) ‘Reliability and validity in research based on tapes and transcripts’. In: Silverman, D., ed., Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage: 201-20
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (1997) ‘Conversation analysis: a new model of research in doctor-patient communication. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 90, 205-8
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (1998) ‘Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care’, Social Psychology Quarterly 61/4: 301-20
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2002) ‘Agency and authority: extended responses to diagnostic statements in primary care encounters’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35/2: 219-47
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2004) ‘Conversation analysis’. In: Seale, Clive, David Silverman, Jay Gubrium, Giampietro Gobo, eds. Qualitative research practice. London, etc.: Sage Publications: 165-79 [reprinted in Paperback in 2007 at pages 153-67]
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2004) ‘Reliability and validity in research based on naturally occurring social interaction.’ In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. Second edition London: Sage: 283-304
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2004) ‘Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: a conversation analytic view’, Psychotherapy Research 14/3: 289-307
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2004) ‘Two traditions of interaction research’, British Journal of Social Psychology 43/1:1-20.
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2005) ‘Patients’ responses to interpretations: A dialogue between conversation analysis and psychoanalytic theory’, Communication & Medicine 2/2; [Special issue ‘Professional theories and institutional interaction’]: 163-76
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2005) ‘Analysing talk and text’. In: Norman.Denzin, Yvonna Lincoln, eds.
  • Handbook of Qualitative Research. Third Edition. Newbury Park: Sage: 869-86
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2006) ‘Communicating and responding to diagnosis’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 214-47
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2006) ‘Observation, video and ethnography: case studies in aids counselling and greetings’.In: Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, Darin Weinberg, eds. Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London, etc. Sage: 81-96
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2007) ‘Conversation analysis’. In George.Ritzer, ed. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Volume II. London: Blackwell: 791-94.
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2008) ‘Conversation analysis and psychoanalysis: interpretation, affect and intersubjectivity’. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds.
  • Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 100-19
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2010) ‘Shifting the perspective after the patient’s response to an interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 91/6: 1363-1384.
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2011) ‘After interpretation: third-position utterances in psychoanalysis’,
  • Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/3: 288-316
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2011) ‘A psychoanalyst’s reflection on conversation analysis’s contribution to his own therapeutic talk’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 222-242
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2012) ‘Conversation analysis in psychotherapy’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 551-74
  • Peräkylä, Anssi, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar (2008) ‘Analysing psycho- therapy in practice’. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds.
  • Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 5-25
  • Peräkylä, Anssi, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds. (2008) Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Perakyla, Anssi, Johanna Ruusuvuori (2006) ‘Facial expression in an assessment’. In H. J. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H-G. Soeffner & B. Schnettler, eds. Video-Analysis: ´Methodology and Methods. Qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang: 127-142.
  • Peräkylä, Anssi, Johanna Ruusuvuori, (2007) Components of participation in health care consultations: a conceptual model for research. In S. Collins et al, eds. Patient Participation in Health Care Consultations. Qualitative perspectives. Maidenhead: Open University Press: 167-175.
  • Peräkylä, Anssi; Johanna Ruusuvuori (2012) ‘Facial expression and interactional regulation of emotion’. In A.Peräkylä, M.L.Sorjonen, eds. Emotion in interaction. Oxford:Oxford University Press: 64-91
  • Peräkylä, Anssi, Johanna Ruusuvuori, Pirjo Lindfors (2007) What is patient participation: reflections arising from the study of general practice, homoeopathy and psychoanalysis. In S. Collins et al, eds. Patient Participation in Health Care Consultations. Qualitative perspectives. Maidenhead: Open University Press: 121-142.
  • Peräkylä, Anssi, Johanna Ruusuvuori, Sanna Vehviläinen (2005) ‘Introduction: Professional theories and institutional interaction’, Communication & Medicine 2/2; [Special issue ‘Professional theories and institutional interaction’]: 105 -09
  • Peräkylä, Anssi, David Silverman (1991) ‘Reinterpreting speech-exchange systems: communication formats in aids counselling’, Sociology 25: 627-51
  • Peräkylä, Anssi, David Silverman (1991) ‘Owning experience: describing the experience of other persons’, Text 11: 441-80
  • Peräkylä, Anssi , Marja-leena Sorjonen (2012) Emotion in interaction. NewYork:Oxford University Press
  • Peräkylä Anssi, Sanna Vehviläinen (2003) ‘Conversation Analysis and the Professional Stocks of Interactional Knowledge’, Discourse & Society, 14/6: 727-50
  • Perkins, Lisa (1995) ‘Applying conversational analysis to aphasia: clinical implications and analytic issues’, European Journal of Disorders of Communication 30: 372-83
  • Perkins, Lisa (2003) ‘Negotiating Repair in Aphasic Conversation: Interactional Issues’ In: Charles Goodwin, ed. Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press: 147-62
  • Perkins, Lisa, Jenni Crisp, David Walshaw (1999) ‘Exploring conversation analysis as an assessment tool for aphasia: the issue of reliability’, Aphasiology 13: 259-81
  • Perkins, Lisa, A. Whitworth, L. Lesser (1998) ‘Conversing in dementia: a conversation analytic approach’, Journal of Neurolinguistics 11: 33-53
  • Perry, Mark; Oskar Juhlin, Arvid Engström (2014) ‘Dealing with time, just in time: Sense-making and clip allocation in mult-person, multi-stream, live play tv production’. In:
  • Mathias Broth, Eric Laurier, Lorenza Mondada, eds. Studies of Video Practices: Video at Work. Abingdon, Oxon UK: Routledge: 262
  • Person, Raymond F. (2009) ‘‘‘Oh’’ in Shakespeare: a conversation analytic approach’, Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10, 84-107
  • Persson, Rasmus (2013) ‘Intonation and sequential organization: Formulations in French talk-in-interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38
  • Peskett, R. and Wootton, A.J. (1985). ‘Turn-taking and overlap in the speech of young Down’s Syndrome children’ Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 29, 263-273.
  • Pettersson, Mårten, Dave Randall, Bo Helgeson (2004) ‘Ambiguities, awareness and economy: a study of emergency service work’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 13/2: 125-154
  • Peyrot, Mark (1982) ‘Understanding ethnomethodology’. Human Studies 5:261-83.
  • Peyrot, Mark (1987) ‘Circumspection in psychotherapy: Structures and strategies of counsellor-client interaction’, Semiotica 65/3-4: 249-268
  • Peyrot, Mark (1995) ‘Therapeutic preliminaries: conversational context and process in psychotherapy’, Qualitative Sociology, 18/3: 311-329
  • Peyrot, Mark (1995) ‘Psychological testing and forensic decision-making: the properties-in-use of the MMPI.’ Social Problems, 42/4: 574-586
  • Peyrot, Mark; Stacy Lee Burns (2001) ‘Sociologists on trial: theoretical competition and juror reasoning.’ American Sociologist, 32/4: 42-69
  • Peyrot, Mark, Michael Lynch, eds. (1992) ‘Ethnomethodology: Contemporary Variations’, special issues of Qualitative Sociology, Vol 15 (2) & Vol 15 (3)
  • Pharo, Patrick (2001) ‘L’ ethnométhodologie et la théorie de la signification’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale[Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 331-43
  • Phillabaum, Scott (2005) ‘Calibrating photographic vision through multiple semiotic resources’, Semiotica 156-1/4: 147-175
  • Piirainen-Marsh, Arja (2010) ‘Bilingual practices and the social organisation of video gaming activities’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/11: 3012-3030
  • Piirainen-Marsh, Arja (2012) ‘Organising participation in video gaming activities’. In: Ayaß, Ruth; Cornelia Gerhardt, eds., The Appropriation of Media in Everyday Life . Amsterdam: Benjamins: 195-230
  • Piirainen-Marsh, Arja; Jauni, Heidi (2012) ‘Assessments and the social construction of expertise in political TV interviews’, Text & Talk 32/5: 637-660
  • Piirainen–Marsh, Arja; Liisa Tainio (2009) ‘Collaborative game-play as a site for participation and situated learning of a second language’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research53/ 2: 167-183
  • Pike, Chris (2010) ‘Intersubjectivity and misunderstanding in adult-child learning conversations’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell: 163-182
  • Pilesjö, Maja. S.; Gitte Rasmssen(2011). ‘Exploring interaction between a non-speaking boy using aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication and his everyday communication partners: Features of turn organization and turn design’, Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders. 2(2): 183-213.
  • Pillet-Shore, Danielle (2003) ‘Doing “okay”: On the multiple metrics of an assessment.
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 36: 285-319
  • Pillet-Shore, Danielle (2006) ‘Weighing in primary-care nurse-patient interactions. Social Science & Medicine 62: 407-21
  • Pillet-Shore, Danielle (2010) ‘Making way and making sense: Including newcomers in interaction’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 73/2: 152-175
  • Pillet-Shore, Danielle (2011) ‘Doing introductions: The work involved in meeting someone new’, Communication Monographs, 78/1:73-95.
  • Pillet-Shore, Danielle (2012) ‘Greeting: Displaying stance through prosodic recipient design’,
  • Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45/4 375-398
  • Pillet-Shore, Danielle (2012) ‘The problems with praise in parent-teacher interaction’,
  • Communication Monographs, 79/2: 181-204.
  • Pilnick, Alison (1998) “Why didn’t you just say that?”: Dealing with issues of asymmetry, knowledge and competence in the pharmacist/client encounter. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20/1: 29-51
  • Pilnick, Alison (1999) Patient counselling by pharmacists: Advice, Information or Instruction?
  • The Sociological Quarterly, 40;4: 613-622
  • Pilnick, Alison. (2001) ‘The interactional organization of pharmacist consultations in a hospital setting: A putative structure’, Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 1927-45
  • Pilnick, Alison. (2002) ‘“There are no rights and wrongs in these situations”: identifying interactional difficulties in genetic counselling’, Sociology of Health and Illness 24: 66-88
  • Pilnick, Alison. (2002) What ‘most people’ do: Exploring the ethical implications of genetic counselling, New Genetics and Society 21: 339-50
  • Pilnick, Alison. (2003) ‘“Patient counselling” by pharmacists: four approaches to the delivery of counselling sequences and their interactional reception’, Social Science and Medicine 56: 835-49
  • Pilnick, Alison. (2004). ‘“It’s just one of the best tests that we’ve got at the moment”: informed choice in nuchal translucency screening for fetal abnormality’. Discourse and Society451-65
  • Pilnick, Alison (2008). ‘”It’s something for you both to think about”: choice and decision making in nuchal translucency screening for Downs Syndrome’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 30/4: 511–530.
  • Pilnick, Alison (2013) ‘Sociology without frontiers? On the pleasures and perils of interdisciplinary research’, Sociological Research Online 18/3 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/18/3/9.html
  • Pilnick, Alison, Tim Coleman. (2003) ‘“I’ll give up smoking when you get me better.” Patients’ resistance to attempts to topicalise smoking in GP consultations’. Social Science and Medicine 57: 135-45
  • Pilnick, Alison, Tom Coleman (2006) ‘Death, depression and “defensive expansion”: closing down smoking as an issue for discussion in GP consultations’, Social Science and Medicine62: 2500-12
  • Pilnick, Alison; Robert Dingwall (2011) ‘On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor-patient interaction: a critical review’, Social Science and Medicine, 72/8: 1374–1382.
  • Pilnick, Alison, Diane Fraser, David James (2004) ‘Presenting and discussing nuchal translucency screening for fetal abnormality in the UK’, Midwifery 20: 82-93
  • Pilnick, Alison, Jon Hindmarsh (1999) ‘”When you wake up, it’ll all be over”: Communication in the anaesthetic room’, Symbolic Interaction 22: 345-60
  • Pilnick, Alison, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill (2009) ‘Beyond “doctor and patient”: developments in the study of healthcare interactions’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31/6: 787-802 [reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010)
  • Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell: 1-16]
  • Pilnick, Alison; O. Zayts (2012) ‘Let’s have it tested first: directiveness, culture and decision-making following positive antenatal screening in Hong Kong’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 34/2: 266–282. [Also published in N. Armstrong, H. Eborall, eds. (2012) The Sociology of Screening and Testing. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell]
  • Pinch, Trevor, Colin Clark (1986) ‘The Hard Sell: “Patter Merchanting” and the strategic (re)production and local management of economic reasoning in the sales routines of Market Pitchers’, Sociology 20: 169-91
  • Pino, Marco; Luigina Mortari (2013) ‘Beyond neutrality: Professionals’ responses to clients’ indirect complaints in a Terapeutic Community for people with a diagnosis of mental illness’,
  • Communication & Medicine 10/3: 213–224
  • Pino, Marco; Luigina Mortari (2012) ‘Problem formulation in mental health residential treatment: A single case analysis’, Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica – Journal of Theories and Research in Education 7/1, 1-24
  • Plug, Leendert (2010) ‘ Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology, with reference to some Dutch phrases’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/7: 2014-2035
  • Plunkett, Reece (2009) ‘Fashioning the feasible: Categorisation and social change’, Australian
  • Journal of Communication, 36/3: 23-44 [13]
  • Pochon-Berger, Evelyne (2011) ‘A participant’s perspective on tasks: from task instruction, through pre-task planning, to task accomplishment’, Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5/1: 71-90. Retrieved from http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_5_1/pochon-berger.pdf
  • Pollner, Melvin (1974) ‘Sociological and common sense models of the labelling process’. In: Turner, R., ed. Ethnomethodology: selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 27-40
  • Pollner, Melvin (1974) ‘Mundane reasoning’, Philosophy of the social sciences 4: 35-54 German translation: Mundanes Denken’. In: Elmar Weingarten, Fritz Sack, Jim Schenkein, hrsg. (1975) Ethnomethodologie: Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagslebens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp: 295-326
  • Pollner, Melvin (1976) ‘”The very coinage of your brain”: the anatomy of reality disjunctions’,
  • Philosophy of the social sciences 5: 411-30
  • Pollner, Melvin (1978) ‘Constitutive and mundane versions of labelling theory’, Human Studies 3: 285-304
  • Pollner, Melvin (1979) ‘Explicative transaction: making and managing meaning in traffic court’. In: Psathas, George, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington 229-55
  • Pollner, Melvin (1987) Mundane reason: reality in everyday life and sociological discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [Italian Edition, Rome: Il Molino; 1995]
  • Pollner, Melvin (1991) ‘Left of ethnomethodology: the rise and decline of radical reflexivity’,
  • American Sociological Review 56: 370-80
  • Pollner, Melvin (1993) ‘The reflexivity of constructionism and the construction of reflexivity’. In: J.A. Holstein, G. Miller, eds. Reconsidering social constructionism: debates in social problems theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter: 199-212
  • Pollner, Melvin (1997) ‘A World without Words and the World with Words’, Human Studies20/3: 377-81
  • Pollner, Melvin (2002) ‘Inside the bubble: Communion, cognition, and deep play at the intersection of Wall Street and Cyberspace’. In Steve Woolgar, ed. Virtual Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 230-246
  • Pollner, Melvin (2012). The end(s) of ethnomethodology. The American Sociologist, 43/1:7-20
  • Pollner, Melvin (2012) ‘Ethnomethodology from/as/to Business’, The American Sociologist43/1: 21-35
  • Pollner, Melvin (2012) ‘Reflections on Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology’s Program’, The American Sociologist (2012) 43:36-54
  • Pollner, Melvin, Robert Emerson (2001) ‘Ethnomethodology and ethnography’. In Paul Atkinson et al, eds, Handbook of Ethnography, London: Sage: 118-35
  • Pollner, Melvin, David Goode (1990) ‘Ethnomethodology and person-centered practices’,Person Centered Review 5: 203-20
  • Pollner, Melvin; L. McDonald-Wikler (1985) ‘The social construction of unreality: A case study of a family’ s attribution of competence to a severely retarded child’, Family Process, 24/2: 241-254.
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1978) ‘Compliment responses: notes on the cooperation of multiple constraints’. In: J.N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 79-112
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1978) ‘Attributions of responsibility: blamings’, Sociology 12: 115-21
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1980) ‘Telling my side: “limited access” as a fishing device’, Sociological Inquiry 50: 186-98
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1984) ‘Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 57- 101
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1984) ‘Pursuing a response’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds.
  • Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 152-63
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1984) ‘Giving a source or basis: the practice in conversation of telling “how I know”’, Journal of Pragmatics 8: 607-25
  • Pomerantz, Anita M. (1986) ‘Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims’,
  • Human Studies 9: 219-30
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1987) ‘Description in legal settings’. In: Button, Graham, J.R.E. Lee, eds.,
  • Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 226-43
  • Pomerantz, Anita. (1988) ‘Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy’,
  • Communication Monographs, 55: 360-73
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1988/89) ‘Constructing skepticism’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 22: 293-313.
  • Pomerantz, Anita M. (1989) ‘Epilogue’,Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53,242- 246.
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1990) ‘Conversation analytic claims’, Communication Monographs 57: 23- 15
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1990/1991) ‘Mental concepts in the analysis of social action’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 299-310
  • Pomerantz, Anita, ed. (1993) ‘New Directions in Conversation Analysis’, special issue of
  • TEXT, volume 13-2
  • Pomerantz, Anita (1998) ‘Multiple interpretations of context: How are they useful?’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 123-32
  • Pomerantz, Anita (2003) ‘Modeling as a Teaching Strategy in Clinical Training: When Does It Work?’ In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 381-91
  • Pomerantz, Anita (2003) ‘How patients handle their lay diagnoses during medical consultations’. Texas Linguistic Forum, 45: 127-138.
  • Pomerantz, Anita (2004) ‘Investigating reported absences: ‘Neutrally’ catching the truants’. In: Gene H. Lerner, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 109-29
  • Pomerantz, Anita (2005) ‘Using participants’ video-stimulated comments to complement analyses of interactional practices’. In: Hedwig te Molder, Jonathan Potter, eds. Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 93-113
  • Pomerantz, Anita (2012) ‘Do participants’ reports enhance conversation analytic claims? Explanations of one sort or another’, Discourse Studies14: 499-505 [comment on Hansung et al, 2012]
  • Pomerantz, Anita (2012) ‘Fragen mit Antwortangebot, soziales Handeln und moralische Ordnung [Candidate Answer Queries, Actions, and the Moral Order]. In R. Ayass & C. Meyer, eds., Sozialität in Slow Motion: Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven Festschriftfur Jorg Bergmann [Sociality in Slow Motion: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Festschrift for Jorg Bergmann]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.: 333-352
  • Pomerantz, Anita M., J. Maxwell Atkinson, (1984) ‘Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and the study of courtroom interaction’. In: D.J. Muller, D.E. Blackman, A.J. Chapman, eds.
  • Topics in psychology and law. Chichester: Wiley: 283-94
  • Pomerantz, Anita; Paul Denvir (2007) ‘Enacting the institutional role of chairperson in upper management meetings: The interactional realization of provisional authority’. In: F. Cooren, ed. Interacting and organizing: analyses of a management meeting. London: Lawrence Erlbaum: 31-52
  • Pomerantz, Anita, J. Ende (1997) ‘When supervising physicians see patients - strategies used in difficult situations’. Human Communication Research, 23: 589-615
  • Pomerantz, Anita; J. Ende, F. Erickson (1995) ‘Precepting in a general medicine clinic: how preceptors correct’. In G. Morris, R. Cheneil, eds. Talk of the clinic. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum
  • Pomerantz, Anita, B.J. Fehr (1997) ‘Conversation Analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices’. In: T. A van Dijk, ed., Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage: 64-91
  • Pomerantz, Anita, Virginia Teas Gill, Paul Denvir (2007) ‘When patients present serious health conditions as unlikely: managing potentially conflicting issues and constraints’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:127-46
  • Pomerantz, Anita; John Heritage (2012) ‘Preference’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 210-28
  • Pomerantz, Anita, Jenny Mandelbaum (2005) ‘Conversation analytic approaches to the relevance and uses of relationship categories in interaction’. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders, eds., Handbook of language and social interaction Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 149-71
  • Pomerantz, Anita M., B.P. Mastriano, M.M. Halfond (1987) ‘Students clinicians’ difficulties while conducting the summary diagnostic interview’, Text 7: 19-36
  • Pomerantz, Anita, E. Sean Rintel (2004) ‘Practices for reporting and responding to test results during medical consultations: Enacting the roles of paternalism and independent expertise’,
  • Discourse Studies, 6: 9–26
  • Pomerantz, Anita; Robert E. Sanders (2013) ‘Conflict in the jury room: Averting acrimony and engendering it’, Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 1/2: 141-164.
  • Pomerantz, Anita, Alan Zemel (2003) ‘Perspectives in interviewers’ queries’. In H. v. d. Berg, M. Wetherell, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, eds., Analyzing Interviews on Racial Issues.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Alessandra Fasulo, Laura Sterponi (2001) ‘Mutual apprentices. The making of parenthood and childhood in family dinner conversation’‘ , Human Development, 44, 340-361.
  • Pooler, J (2009) ‘Managing the diagnostic space in calls for help’. In Monika Büscher, Dawn Goodwin and Jessica Mesman, eds. Ethnographies of diagnostic work: Dimensions of transformative practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Potter, Jonathan (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and emotion and cognition in interaction’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 985-991
  • Potter, Jonathan; Derek Edwards (2012) ‘Conversation analysis and psychology’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 701-25
  • Potter, Jonathan; Alexa Hepburn (2010) ‘Putting aspiration into words: “Laugh particles”, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/6: 1543-1555
  • Poulios, Apostolos (2010) ‘Aspects of Advice Giving and Advice Receiving in Television Talk Shows’, Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10/2: . 251-294
  • Pratt, Steven, D. Lawrence Wieder (1993) ‘The case of saying a few words and talking for another among the Osage people: ‘Public speaking’ as an object of ethnography’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 26.4: 353-408.
  • Psathas, George, ed. (1979) Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington
  • Psathas, George (1979) ‘Organizational features of direction maps’. In: George Psathas, ed.,
  • Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 203-26
  • Psathas, George (1980). ‘Approaches to the study of the world of everyday life’. Human Studies, 3(1), 3-17.
  • Psathas, George (1986) ‘Some sequential structures in direction-giving’, Human Studies 9/2-3: 231-246
  • Psathas, George (1988) “Ethnomethodology” in Jacob L. Mey, ed. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier: 290-93
  • Psathas, George, ed. (1990) Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America
  • Psathas, George (1990) ‘Introduction: Methodological issues and recent developments in the study of naturally occurring interaction’. In: Psathas, George, ed., Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America: 1-30
  • Psathas, George (1990) ‘The organization of talk, gaze, and activity in a medical interview’. In: George Psathas, ed., Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America: 205-30
  • Psathas, George (1991) ‘The structure of direction-giving in interaction’. In: Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, eds. Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press:195-216
  • Psathas, George (1992) ‘The study of extended sequences: the case of the garden lesson’. In: Graham Watson, R.M. Seiler, eds. Text in Context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage: 99-122
  • Psathas, George (1994) ‘Alfred Schutz’ (p.3685); ‘Ethnomethodology,’ (pp. 1160-1164); ‘Harvey Sacks’ (pp. 3639-3640), in Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press:
  • Psathas, George (1995) Conversation analysis: the study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage [Qualitative Research Methods 35]
  • Psathas, George, ed. (1995) Ethnomethodology: discussions and contributions. Special Issue of Human Studies 18: 107-336
  • Psathas, George (1995) ‘”Talk and Social Structure” and “Studies of Work”’, Human Studies18: 139-55
  • Psathas, George (1999) ‘Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction’, Human Studies 22: 139-62 (Also published in Japanese in Culture and Society: International Journal of the Human Sciences, 2000, Vol. 2, pp. 37-73; and in W.W. Sharrock, M. Lynch, eds. Ethnomethodology, Sage Publications, 2010)
  • Psathas, George (1999) “On the Study of Human Action” in L. Embree (ed.) Schutzian Social Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 47-68
  • Psathas, George, (2003) ‘Types, typifications and membership categorization devices: Alfred Schutz and Harvey Sacks on the notion of types’, Focus Pragensis III, Prague: Center for Phenomenological Research, 28-51
  • Psathas, George (2004) ‘Alfred Schutz’s Influence on American Sociologists and Sociology’,
  • Human Studies 27: 1-35
  • Psathas, George (2004) ‘The Ideal Type in Weber and Schutz,’ in M. Endress, George Psathas, and H. Nasu, eds., Explorations of the Life-World: Continuing Dialogues with Alfred Schutz. Dordrecht: Springer: 143-69
  • Psathas, George (2007) ‘Lebenswelt origins of the sciences’, Human Studies 30: 1-2
  • Psathas, George (2008) Reflections on the history of ethnomethodology: The Boston and Manchester “schools”, The American Sociologist 39:38-67
  • Psathas, George, (2009) ‘The correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Harold Garfinkel: What was the “terra incognita” and the “treasure island?,”’ in H. Nasu, L. Embree, G. Psathas I. Srubar, eds., Alfred Schutz and His Intellectual Partners, Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesselschaft mbH, , 401-434
  • Psathas, George, (2010) ‘Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis at Boston University: A brief history’. In W. Leeds-Hurwitz, ed., The Social History of Language and Social Interaction Research: People, Places, Ideas, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2010, 179-213
  • Psathas, George, (2010) ‘Alfred Schutz’s influence on American sociology during his lifetime’. In Cherry Schreker, ed. Exchange and Influence: Transatlantic Travel and the Development of Sociological Ideas, Ashgate Publishers: 225-238.
  • Psathas, George (2012) ‘Memoir’, Human Studies 35/2: 157-158
  • Psathas, George, Tim Anderson (1990) ‘The ‘practices’ of transcription in conversation analysis’, Semiotica 78: 75-99
  • Psathas, George; Martin Endress, eds. (2012) Special issue ‘In memoriam of Harold Garfinkel’,
  • Human Studies 35/2: 149-345
  • Psathas, George, J.M. Henslin (1967) ‘Dispatched orders and the cab driver: a study of locating activities’, Social Problems 14/4: 424-43
  • Psathas, George, Hisashi Nasu, eds. (1999) Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis: East and West, Human Studies 22/2-4:135-499
  • Psathas, George; L.L. Simmel, W.S. Siegal, P.D. Berger (2002) ‘A conversation analysis of practices and competencies in telefundraising’, The CASE International Journal of Educational Advancement, 25/4: 22-39
  • Pudlinski, Christopher (2002) ‘Accepting and rejecting advice as competent peers: caller dilemmas on a warm line’, Discourse Studies 4: 481-500
  • Pudlinski, Christopher (2005) ‘Doing empathy and sympathy: caring responses to troubles tellings on a peer support line’, Discourse Studies 7: 267-88
  • Pudlinski, C. (2005) ‘The mitigation of advice: Interactional dilemmas of peers on a telephone support service’, in C. Baker, M. Emmison and A. Firth (eds) Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  • Pudlinski, Christopher (2008) ‘Encouraging responses to good news on a peer support line’,
  • Discourse Studies 10: 795-812
  • Pudlinski, Christopher (2009) ‘Empowerment on warm lines: microanalytical explorations of peer encouragement’, Text & Talk 29-4: 439-458
  • Pudlinski,Christopher (2012) ‘The pursuit of advice on US peer telephone helplines: Sequential and functional aspects’. In: Limberg, Holger; Miriam A. Locher, eds., Advice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 233-252
  • Puroila, Anna-Maija (2013) ‘Young children on the stages: Small stories performed in day care centers’, Narrative Inquiry, 23/2: 323-343
  • Quéré, L. (1986) ‘Mise en place d’un ordre et mise en ordre des places: l’invitation comme événement conversationel’. In: Bernard Conein et al. (1986) Lexique et faits sociaux. (Lexique 5). Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille: 101-38
  • Quéré, Louis (2002) ‘La validité de l’argument naturaliste en sciences sociales’. In: l’argumentation: preuve et persuasion. Paris, Éditions de l’EHESS: 93-117
  • Quéré, Louis (2002) ‘Oublier la science pour mieux l’analyser’, Critique 661-662: 453-64 [review of Lynch, 1993]
  • Quéré, Louis, Cédric Terzi (2011). ‘Etnometodologia: Una svolta problematica’,. Quaderni di Teoria Sociale, 20, 61-102.
  • Quéré, Louis (2012) ‘Is there any good reason to say goodbye to “ethnomethodology”?’,
  • Human Studies 35/2: 305-325
  • Quéré, Louis, Zbigniew Smoreda, eds., (2000) Le sexe du téléphone. [The gender of the telephone]. Paris: Editions Hermes Science [le numéro 103 de la revue “Réseaux”; No. 103 of the Review “Réseaux”]
  • Quéré, Louis; Cédric Terzi (2011) ‘Some features of pragmatist thought still remain insufficiently explored in ethnomethodology’, Qualitative Sociology 34: 271-275
  • Radford, Julie. (2009) ‘Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk’, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23/8: 598-610,
  • Radford, Julie, Merle Mahon (2010) ‘Multimodal participation in storybook sharing’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell: 209-226
  • Radford, Julie; Clare Tarplee (2000) ‘The management of conversational topic by a ten year old child with pragmatic difficulties’, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14/5: 387-403.
  • Rae, John (1994) ‘Social Fax: repair-mechanisms and intersubjectivity’, American Behavioral Scientist 37: 824-38
  • Rae, John (2001) ‘Organizing participation in interaction: doing participation framework’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 34: 253-78
  • Rae, John (2008) ‘Lexical substitution as a therapeutic resource’. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 62-79
  • Rae, John, Joanne Kerby (2007) ‘Designing contexts for reporting tactical talk’. In: Elizabeth, Holt, Rebecca Clift, eds. Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 179-94
  • Raevaara, Liisa (2011) ‘Accounts at convenience stores: Doing dispreference and small talk’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics 43/2: 556-571
  • Ramsberger, Gail, Lise Menn (2003) ‘Co-Constructing Lucy: Adding a Social Perspective to the Assessment of Communicative Success in Aphasia’ In: Charles Goodwin, ed.
  • Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press: 283-303
  • Rancew-Sikora, Dorota (2007) Analiza konwersacyjna jako metoda badania rozmów codziennych. [Conversation Analysis as a Method for Studying Everyday Talk] Warsawa: Trio
  • Randall, Dave (1995) ‘“Doing” mother-daughter: Conversation analysis and relational contexts’. In T. J. Socha, G. H.Stamp, eds., Parents, children and communication: Frontiers of theory and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 113–125
  • Randall, Dave; Liz Marr and Mark Rouncefield (2001) ‘Ethnography, Ethnomethodology and Interaction Analysis’, Ethnographic Studies 6: 31-44
  • Randall, Dave; Mark Rouncefield (2011) ‘Plans and planning: conceptual confusions and empirical investigations’. In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 73-90
  • Randall, Dave; Wes Sharrock (2011) ‘The sociologist as movie critic’. In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 1-18
  • Rapley, Mark (2004) The social construction of intellectual disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rapley, Timothy John (2001) ‘The art(fullness) of open-ended interviewing: some considerations on analysing interviews’, Qualitative Research 1: 303-23
  • Rapley, Tim (2004) ‘Analysing conversations’ In Clive Seale, ed., Researching Society and Culture (2nd edition). London: Sage: 383-396
  • Rapley, Tim, (2004) ‘Interviews’ in Clive Seale, Giampietro Gobo, Jay Gubrium and David Silverman, eds., Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage: 15-33 [reprinted in Paperback in 2007 at pages 15-33]
  • Rapley Tim (2012) ‘Order, order: A ‘modest’ response to Stokoe’, Discourse Studies 14: 321- 328
  • Rapley, Tim, Carl May, Ben Heaven, Madeline Murtagh, Ruth Graham, Eileen Kaner, Richard Thomson (2006) ‘Doctor-Patient Interaction in a Randomised Controlled Trial of Decision- support Tools’, Social Science and Medicine 62: 2267-78
  • Rapley, Mark (1998). ‘“Just an ordinary Australian”: Self-categorization and the discursive construction of facticity in “new racist” political rhetoric’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), 325–344
  • Rapley, Mark, Charles Antaki (1996) ‘A conversation analysis of the acquiescence of people with learning disabilities’, Journal of Community and Applied Psychology 6: 371-91
  • Rapley, Mark, P. Kiernan, Charles Antaki,(1998) ‘Invisible to themselves or negotiating identity? The interactional management of “being intellectually disabled”, Disability & Society13/5, 807-27
  • Rasmussen, Gitte (1998). ‘The use of forms of address in intercultural business calls’. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, 3, 57-72.
  • Rasmussen, Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualen interkulturellen Gesprächen. Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischen Franzosen und Dänen und zwischen Deutschen und Dänen [On the meaning of cultural differences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations: a micro analysis of interactions in German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes]. München: Iudicium
  • Rasmussen, Gitte (2010 ) ‘“Going mental”: The risks of assessment activities (in teenage talk)’, Discourse Studies 12/6: 739-761,
  • Rasmussen, Gitte (2012) “Introduction”. In: Gitte Rasmussen, Catherine E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds. (2012). Evaluating cognitive competences in interaction. Amsterdam, Benjamins: 1- 14
  • Rasmussen, Gitte (2013). ‘Triumphing: When mental state evaluations become insults’. In: Gitte Rasmussen, Catherine E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds. (2012). Evaluating cognitive competences in interaction. Amsterdam, Benjamins: 211-234.
  • Rasmussen, Gitte (2014) ‘Inclined to better understanding—The coordination of talk and ‘leaning forward’ in doing repair’ Journal of Pragmatics 65: 30-45
  • Rasmussen, Gitte; Catherine E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds. (2012). Evaluating cognitive competences in interaction. Amsterdam, Benjamins
  • Rasmussen, Gitte; Spencer Hazel, Kristian Mortensen, eds. (2014) Special Issue: ‘A body of resources – CA studies of social conduct’, Journal of Pragmatics 65, 1-156
  • Rasmussen, Gitte, Johannes Wagner (2002) ‘Language choice in international telephone conversations’. In: Kang Kwong Luke, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, eds., Telephone Calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 111-31
  • Rasmussen, Gitte; see also Hougaard Rasmussen, Gitte
  • Raudaskoski, Pirkko (2011) ‘When lives meet live: categorization work in a reality TV show and “experience work” in two home audiences’, Text & Talk 31/5: 619-641
  • Rauniomaa, Mirka; Tiina Keisanen (2012) ‘Two multimodal formats for responding to requests’, Journal of Pragmatics 44/6-7: 829-842
  • Rautajoki, Hanna (2009) ‘Staging public discussion: mobilizing political community in closing discussion programmes’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 73-94
  • Rautajoki, Hanna (2012) ‘Membership categorization as a tool for moral casting in TV discussion: The dramaturgical consequentiality of guest introductions´, Discourse Studies 14: 243-260
  • Rawclaw J (2008) Two patterns for conversational closings in instant message discourse’,
  • ColoradoResearch in Linguistics 21: 1–21
  • Rawls, Ann Warfield (1984) ‘Interaction as a resource for epistemological critique: a comparison of Goffman and Sartre’, Sociological Theory 2: 222-52
  • Rawls, Ann Warfield (1987) ‘The interaction order sui generis: Goffman’s contribution to social theory’, Sociological Theory 5/2: 136-49
  • Rawls, Ann Warfield (1989) ‘Language, self, and social order: a re-evaluation of Goffman and Sacks’, Human Studies 12/1: 147-72
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (1989) ‘An ethnomethodological perspective on social theory’ in David Helm et al, eds. Interactional order: New directions in the study of social order. New York: Irvington Press: 4-20.
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (1990) ‘Emergent sociality: A dialectic of commitment and order’.
  • Symbolic Interaction 13/1:63-82. (French: Mauss Review 2002 No.19.)
  • Rawls, Ann Warfield (1996) ‘Durkheim’s epistemology: the initial critique 1915 to 1924’, The Sociological Quarterly 38: 111-45
  • Rawls, Ann Warfield (1996) ‘Durkheim’s epistemology: the neglected argument’, American Journal of Sociology 102: 430-82
  • Rawls, Ann Warfield (1997) ‘Durkheim and pragmatism: an old twist on a contemporary debate’, Sociological Theory 15/1: 5-29
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (1998) ‘Durkheim’s challenge to philosophy: human reason explained as a product of enacted social practices’, American Journal of Sociology 104: 887-901
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (2000) ‘”Race” as an Interaction Order Phenomenon: W.E.B. Du Bois’s “Double Consciousness” Thesis Revisited’, Sociological Theory 18: 241-74
  • Rawls, Ann (2000) ‘Harold Garfinkel’. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (2001) ‘Durkheim’s Treatment of Practice: Concrete Practice vs Representations as the Foundation of Reason’, Journal of Classical Sociology 1/1: 33-68
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (2002) ‘Editor’s introduction’. In Harold Garfinkel,
  • Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield: 1-64
  • Rawls, Ann Warfield (2003). ‘Harold Garfinkel’. In M. Lynch & W. Sharrock, eds., Harold Garfinkel, Vol. 1. London: Sage: 9-42
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (2003) ‘Conflict as a foundation for consensus: Contradictions of capitalism in book III of Durkheim’s division of labor’. Critical Sociology 29/3:295-335.
  • Rawls,Ann W. (2003) ‘Orders of interaction and intelligibility: Intersections between Goffman and Garfinkel by way of Durkheim’. In A. J. Treviño, ed., Goffman’s legacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield: 216-253
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield ‘2004) ‘Le falace de l’abstraction mal placé’ Mauss Review 24.
  • Rawls,Anne Warfield (2004) Epistemology and practice: Durkheim’s elementary forms of religious life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (2005) ‘Garfinkel’s conception of time’. Time and Society 14/2-3: 163-190.
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (2006) ‘Introduction’. In: Rawls, A.W. (Ed.), Seeing Sociologically. The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers: 1-98.
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (2008) ‘Harold Garfinkel, Ethnomethodology and Workplace Studies’,
  • Organization Studies 29; 701-32
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (2009) ‘Editor’s introduction’ [Special issue: John Rawls’ ‘Two concepts of Rules’] Journal of Classical Sociology 9/4: 357-370
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (2009) ‘Two conceptions of social order: Constitutive orders of action, objects, and identities versus aggregate orders of individual action’, Journal of Classical Sociology, 9/4, 500-520
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield (2011) ‘Garfinkel, ethnomethodology and the defining questions of pragmatism’, Qualitative Sociology 34: 277-282
  • Rawls, Anne W. (2012). ‘Introduction’ to ‘The ’Red’ as an ideal object. An unpublished paper of Garfinkel’s’. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa ‘[Ethnography and Qualitative Research] 4/1: 7-18.
  • Rawls, Anne Warfield, Gary C. David (2005) ‘Accountably other: trust, reciprocity, and exclusion in a context of situated practice’, Human Studies 28: 469-97
  • Raymond, Chase Wesley (2014) `Negotiating entitlement to language: Calling 911 without English`, Language in Society 43/1: 33-59
  • Raymond, Geoffrey (2000) ‘The voice of authority: the local accomplishment of authoritative discourse in live news broadcasts’, Discourse Studies 2: 354-79
  • Raymond, Geoffrey (2003) ‘Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding’, American Sociological Review 68: 939-67
  • Raymond, Geoffrey (2004) ‘Prompting action: the stand alone “so” in ordinary conversation’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 37: 185-218
  • Raymond, Geoffrey (2006) ‘Questions at work: yes//no type interrogatives in institutional contexts’. In Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, Darin Weinberg, eds. Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London, etc. Sage: 115-34
  • Raymond, Geoffrey (2010) ‘Prosodic variation in responses: The case of type-conforming responses to yes/no interrogatives’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 109-130
  • Raymond, Geoffrey (2010) ‘Grammar and social relations: Alternative forms of yes/no-type initiating actions in health visitor interactions’. In A.F. Freed, S. Ehrlich, eds. ‘Why do you ask?’: The function of questions in institutional discourse. New York: Oxford UniversityPress: 87-107
  • Raymond, Geoffrey (2013) ‘At the intersection of turn and sequence organization: On the relevance of “slots” in type-conforming responses to polar interrogatives’. In: Beatrice Szczepek Reed, Geoffrey Raymond, eds. Units of Talk – Units of Action. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 169 – 206
  • Raymond, Geoffrey, John Heritage (2006) ‘The epistemics of social relationships: owning grandchildren’, Language in Society, 35(5):677-705
  • Raymond, Geoffrey; John Heritage (2013) ‘One question after another: same-turn-repair in the formation of yes/no type initiating actions’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 213-272
  • Raymond, Geoffrey, Don H. Zimmerman (2007) ‘Rights and Responsibilities in Calls for Help: The Case of the Mountain Glade Fire’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40, (1): 33-61
  • Rhys, Catrin S. (2013) ‘Choosing not to repair: Sorry as a warrant for interactional progress’,
  • Research on Language & Social Interaction 46/1: 84-103
  • Reed, Darren, Michael Ashmore (2000) ‘The Naturally-Occurring Chat Machine.’ M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture, 3 (4). Available at: http://www.api-network.com/mc/0008/machine.html
  • Reeves, Stuart, Barry Brown, Eric Laurier (2009) ‘Experts at play: Understanding skilled expertise’, Games and Culture, 4/3: 205-227.
  • Reiter, Rosina Márquez (2006) ‘Interactional Closeness in Service Calls to a Montevidean Carer Service Company’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 39: 7-39
  • Relieu, Marc (1993) ‘L’éthnométhodologie, une respécification radicale de la démarche sociologique’ [Ethnomethodology: a radical respecification of sociology], Cahiers de recherches Ethnométhodologiques. Laboratoire de Recherches Ethnométhodologiques, Université de Paris VIII, NE1: 55-71
  • Relieu, Marc (1993) ‘L’intervention policière comme action située’ in La relation de service dans le secteur public, T.3, Les compétences de l’agent, Plan urbain-RATP-DRI:173-93
  • Relieu, Marc (1994) ‘Les catégories dans l’action: l’apprentissage des traversées de rue par des non-voyants’ [Categories in action: learning to cross the street by blind persons]. In: B. Fradin, L. Quéré, J. Widmer, eds. (1994) L’enquête sur les catégories.Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]: 185-218
  • Relieu, Marc (1995) ‘Notes sur Talk and Social Structure’, Cahiers de recherches Ethnométhodologiques. Laboratoire de Recherches Ethnométhodologiques, Université de Paris VIII, NE2: 125-135
  • Relieu, Marc (1997) ‘L’observabilité des situations publiques problématiques: genèse des propositions d’aide a des non-voyants’ [The observability of problematic public situations: genesis of proposals to assist blind persons]. In: A. Marcarino, ed., Analisi della conversatione e prospettive di recerca in etnometodologia. Urbino: Editioni QuattroVenti: 219-34
  • Relieu, Marc (1999) ‘Parler en marchant: Pour une écologie dynamique des échanges de paroles’ [Talking while walking: towards a dynamic ecology of verbal exchanges] langage & société nE 89: 37-67
  • Relieu, Marc (1999) ‘La réalisation et la réception du produit télévisuel comme accomplissements’, In J.P Desgoutte, éd. La mise en scène du discours audiovisuel, Paris, L’Harmattan: 35-65
  • Relieu, Marc (1999) ‘Du tableau statistique à l’image audiovisuelle. Lieux et pratiques de la représentation en sciences sociales’, Réseaux, 17(94), 49-86
  • Relieu, Marc (2002) ‘Ouvrir la boîte noire: identification et localisation dans les conversations mobiles’. Réseaux, 20 (112-113), 19-48
  • Relieu, Marc (2006) ‘Remarques sur l’analyse conversationnelle et les technologies médiatisées’, Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, XI/ 2: 17-33
  • Relieu, Marc (2007) ‘La téléprésence, ou l’autre visiophonie’, Réseaux, 144, 183-223.
  • Relieu, Marc (2005) ‘Les usages des TIC en situation naturelle : une approche ethnométhodologique de l’hybridation des espaces d’activité ‘, intellectica nE 41-42 “Espace, inter/action & cognition”: 139-62
  • Relieu, Marc (2006) ‘Remarques sur l’analyse conversationnelle et les technologies médiatisées’, Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 11/2: 17-32
  • Relieu, Marc (2007). La téléprésence, ou l’autre visiophonie. Réseaux, 144, 183-223
  • Relieu, Marc, Franck Brock (1995) ‘L’infrastructure conversationnelle de la parole publique. Les interviews télédiffusées et les meetings politiques’ [The conversational infrastructure of public speech: television interviews and political meetings], Politix 31, Parler en public, Presses de Sciences Po: 77-112
  • Relieu, Marc; Julien Morel (2011) ‘Locating mobility in orientation sequences’, Nottingham French Studies, 50/2
  • Rendle-Short, Johanna (2000). ‘When “okay” is okay in computer science seminar talk’,
  • Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 22/2: 19-33
  • Rendle-Short,Johanna. (2002/2003) ’Managing Interaction: A conversation analytic Approach to the management of interaction by an 8-year-old girl with Asperger’s Syndrome’, Issues in Applied Linguistics 13/2
  • Rendle-Short, Johanna (2006) The academic presentation: situated talk in action. Aldershot: Ashgate [Series: Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis]
  • Rendle-Short, Johanna (2007) ‘Neutralism and adversarial challenges in the political news interview’, Discourse & Communication 1: 387-406.
  • Rendle-Short, Johanna (2007) ‘“Catherine, you’re wasting your time”: Address terms within the Australian political interview’, Journal of Pragmatics, 39/9:1503-1525.
  • Rendle-Short, Johanna (2009) ‘Doing ’public policy’ in the political news interview’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 95-114
  • Rendle-Short, Johanna (2010) ‘“Mate” as a term of address in ordinary interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/5: 1201-18
  • Reynolds, Edward (2011) ‘Enticing a challengeable in arguments: sequence, epistemics and preference organisation’, Pragmatics, 21, 3, 411–430.
  • Rhodes, Penny, Neil Small, Emma Rowley, Mark Langdon, Steven Ariss, John Wright (2008) ‘Electronic medical records in diabetes consultations: participants’ gaze as an interactional resource’, Qualitative Health Research 18(9): 1247-1263
  • Rindstedt, Camilla (2014) ‘Conversational openings and multiparty disambiguations in doctors’ encounters with young patients (and their parents)’, Text and Talk 32/4: 421-442
  • Rintel, E. Sean, Joan Mulholland, Jeffery Pittam (2001) ‘First things first: Internet Relay Chat openings’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6, (3). <http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue3/>
  • Rintel, E. Sean; Jeffery Pittam (1997) ‘Strangers in a strange land: Interaction management on Internet Relay Chat’, Human Communication Research, 23, 507-534
  • Rintel, E. Sean, Jeffery Pittam, Joan Mulholland. (2003) ‘Time will tell: Ambiguous non- responses on Internet Relay Chat’, The Electronic Journal of Communication / La Revue Electronique de Communication, 13, (1) <http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v13n1.htm>
  • Roberts, Felicia (2000) ‘The interactional construction of asymmetry: the medical agenda as a resource for delaying response to patient questions’, The Sociological Quarterly, 41/1: 151-170
  • Roberts, Felicia (2002) ‘Qualitative differences among cancer clinical trial explanations’,
  • Social Science &Medicine, 55/11:1947-1955.
  • Roberts, Felicia (2004) ‘Speaking to and for animals in a veterinary clinic: a practice for managing interpersonal interaction’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 37/4: 421-47
  • Roberts, Felicia (2008) ‘Transcribing and Transcription’. In W. Donsbach, ed. International
  • Encyclopedia of Communication, XI., Oxford/Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell: 5161-5165
  • Roberts, Felicia, Alexander Francis, Melanie Morgan (2006). ‘The Interaction of Inter-turn Silence with Prosodic Cues in Listener Perception of “Trouble” in Conversation’, Speech Communication 48: 1079-1093
  • Roberts, Felicia; Piera Margutti & Shoji Takano (2011) ‘Judgments concerning the valence of inter-turn silence across speakers of American English, Italian, and Japanese’, Discourse Processes 48/5: 331-354.
  • Roberts, Felicia., J.D. Robinson (2004). ‘Inter-observer agreement on “first stage” conver- sation analytic transcripts’. Human Communication Research, 30, 376-410.
  • Robillard, Albert B. (1994) ‘Communication problems in the Intensive Care Unit’, Qualitative Sociology 17: 383-95
  • Robillard, Albert B. (1996) ‘Anger in-the-social-order’, Body & Society 2: 17-30
  • Robillard, Albert B. (1999) Meaning of a Disability: The Lived Experience of Paralysis.
  • Philadelphia: Temple University Press
  • Note: A Review Symposium, with contributions by Janet E. Price, Arthur W. Frank, John O’Neill, and Gerald Gold, has been published in Body & Society, 6/2, June 2000: 87-108
  • Robillard, Albert B., Geoffry M. White, Thomas W. Maretzki (1983) ‘Informed consent in conversational interaction’. In: S. Fisher, A. Dundas Todd, eds. (1983) The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics: 107-33
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (1998) ‘Getting down to business: talk, gaze and bodily orientation during openings of doctor-patient consultations’, Human Communication Research 25: 97-123
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2001) ‘Asymmetry in action: sequential resources in the negotiation of a prescription request’ Text 21: 19-54
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2001) ‘Closing medical encounters: two physician practices and their implications for the expression of patients’ unstated concerns’, Social Science & Medicine 53: 639-56
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2003). ‘An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients’ participation’. Health Communication, 15(1), 27-57.
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2004) ‘The sequential organization of “explicit” apologies in naturally occurring English’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 37/3: 291-331
  • Robinson, Jeffrey (2006) ‘Soliciting patients’ presenting concerns’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 22-47
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2006). ‘Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair’, Communication Monographs, 73: 137-161
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2006). ‘Nonverbal communication and physician-patient interaction:
  • Review and new directions’. In V. Manusov. M. L. Patterson, eds., The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications: 437-459
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2007). ‘The role of numbers and statistics within conversation analysis’,
  • Communication Methods and Measures 1: 65-75.
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2009). ‘Managing counterinformings: An interactional practice for soliciting information that facilitates reconciliation of speakers’ incompatible positions’,
  • Human Communication Research, 35: 561-587
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2011). ‘Conversation analysis and health communication’. In T. Thompson, A. Dorsey, K. Miller, & R. Parrott, eds., Handbook of Health Communication, 2nd ed.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2012) ‘Overall structural organization’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 257-80
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2013) ‘Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: the case of partial questioning repeats’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds.
  • Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2014) ‘What “What?” ‘tells us about how conversationalists manage intersubjectivity’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 47/2: 109–129
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D.; Galina B. Bolden (2010) ‘Preference organization of sequence-initiating actions: The case of explicit account solicitations’, Discourse Studies 2010 12: 501-533
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D., John Heritage (2005) ‘The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: the completion relevance of current symptoms’, Social Science & Medicine 61: 481-493
  • Robinson, Jeffrey, John Heritage (2006) ‘Physicians’ Opening questions and Patients’ Satisfaction.’ Patient Education and Counselling, 60: 279-85
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D.; Heidi Kevoe-Feldman (2010) ‘Using full repeats to initiate repair on others’ questions’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 43/3: 232-259
  • Robinson, Jeffrey D.; J. F. Nussbaum (2004) ‘Grounding research and medical education about religion in actual physician-patient interaction: Church attendance, social support, and older adults’, Health Communication, 16: 63-85
  • Robinson, Jeffrey, Tanya Stivers (2001) ‘Achieving activity transitions in primary-care encounters: From history taking to physical examination’. Human Communication Research 27: 253-298.
  • Robles, Jessica S. (2012) ‘Troubles with assessments in gifting occasions’, Discourse Studies14: 753-777
  • Robles, Jessica S.; Evelyn Y. Ho, (2014) ‘Interactional formats and institutional context: a practical and exploitable distinction in interviews’, Text and Talk 32/4: 443-465
  • Roca-Cuberes, Carles (2008) ‘Membership categorization and professional insanity ascription’, Discourse Studies 10/4: 543-570
  • Roca-Cuberes, Carles (2011) ‘Making psychotherapy visible: a conversation analytic study of some interactional devices employed in psychiatric interviews’, Text & Talk 31/2: 221-245
  • Roger, D., Peter Bull, eds. (1989) Conversation: an interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
  • Romaniuk, Tanya (2013) ‘Pursuing answers to questions in broadcast journalism’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46/2: 144-164
  • Romaniuk, Tanya (2013) ‘Interviewee laughter and disaffiliation in broadcast news interviews’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 201-220
  • Romaniuk, Tanya; Susan Ehrlich (2013) ‘On the interactional import of self-repair in the courtroom’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Rönkkö, Kari, Yvonne Dittrich, Dave Randall (2005) ‘When plans do not work out: how plans are used in software development projects’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)14/5: 433-468
  • Rønneberg, Kari; Jan Svennevig (2010) ‘Declining to help: Rejections in service requests to the police’, Discourse & Communication 4: 279-305
  • Rooke, John, David Seymour (2005) ‘Studies of work: achieving hybrid disciplines in IT design and management studies’, Human Studies 28: 205-21
  • Rooksby, John (2011) ‘Text at work: mundane practices of reading in workplaces’. In: Mark Rouncefield, Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 173-90
  • Rooksby, John; Mark Rouncefield and Ian Sommerville (2010) ‘Testing in the wild: the social and organisational dimensions of real world practice’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 18/ 5-6: 559-580
  • Rose, E. (2003) ‘A Conversation with Harvey Sacks’, in M. Lynch and W. Sharrock, eds.
  • Harold Garfinkel. London: Sage: 71-84.
  • Rosenthal, Benjamin M. (2008) ‘A resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction: the phrase TTE YUU KA’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41/2 April: 227-40
  • Rossano, Federico (2010) ‘Questioning and responding in Italian’, Journal of Pragmatics42/10: 2756-2771
  • Rossano, Federico (2012) ‘Gaze in conversation’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 308-29
  • Rossano, Federico, Penelope Brown, Stephen C. Levinson (2009) ‘Gaze, questioning, and culture’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 187-245
  • Roth, Andrew (1998) ‘Who makes news: descriptions of television news interviewees’ publicpersonae’, Media, Culture and Society 20: 79-107
  • Roth, Andrew (2002) Social epistemology in broadcast news interviews, Language in Society, 31/3: 355-381.
  • Roth, Andrew. (2005) ‘“Popquizzes’on the campaign trail: Journalists, candidates, and the limits of questioning’, Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics,10/2: 28-46.
  • Roth, Wolff-Michael (2009). Specifying the ethnomethodological “what more?”’, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 1-12
  • Roth, Wolff-Michael (2011) ‘Researching living/lived mathematical work’ [40 paragraphs].
  • Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 31, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101318
  • Roulston, Katryn (2001) ‘Data analysis and “theorizing as ideology”’, Qualitative Research 1: 279-302
  • Roulston, Kathy (2001) ‘Investigating the ‘cast of characters’ in a cultural world’. In: Alec McHoul and Mark Rapley, eds. How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum:100-12
  • Roulston, Kathryn (2006) ‘Close encounters of the “CA” kind: a review of literature analysing talk in research interviews’, Qualitative Research 6: 515-34
  • Roulston Kathryn (2014) ‘Interactional problems in research interviews’, Qualitative Research14: 277-293
  • Roulston, Kathryn J., Carolyn D. Baker, Anna Liljestrom (2001) ‘Analyzing the researcher’s work in generating data: the case of complaints’ Qualitative Inquiry 7: 745-72
  • Rouncefield, Mark, Roger Slack, Mark Hartswood (2011) ‘Technology’. In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 191-210
  • Rouncefield, Mark; Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate
  • Rouncefield, Mark; Peter Tolmie (2013) ‘Overview: Garfinkel’s Bastards at Play’. In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds. Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 1-18
  • Routarinne, Sara (2009) ‘Uptake makes a difference: Comparing evaluation uptake in two learning environments’. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 254-278
  • Ruggerone, Lucia (1997) ‘The three stages of Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology’. In: A. Marcarino, ed., Analisi della conversatione e prospettive di recerca in etnometodologia. Urbino: Editioni QuattroVenti: 287-92
  • Ruggerone Lucia (2013) ‘Science and Life-World: Husserl, Schutz, Garfinkel’, Human Studies36:179-197
  • Ruhleder, Karen and Brigitte Jordan (1999) ‘Meaning-making across remote sites: How delays in transmission affect interaction’. In: Susanne Bodker, Morten Kyng and Kjeld Schmidt, eds.
  • ECSCW ‘99: Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 411-129
  • Ruhleder, Karen and Brigitte Jordan (2001) ‘Co-Constructing Non-Mutual Realities: Delay- Generated Trouble in Distributed Interaction’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 10/1:113-138
  • Ruhleder, Karen and Brigitte Jordan (2001) ‘Managing Complex, Distributed Environments: Remote Meeting Technologies at the “Chaotic Fringe”.’ First Monday (Peer-Reviewed Journal on the Internet) 6:5 (May 7). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_5/ruhleder/ http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/857/766
  • Ruhleder, Karen, Brigitte Jordan and Michael Elmes (1999) ‘Das Vernetzen der “neuen Organisation” durch Integration moderner Kommunikationstechnologien und Teamarbeit’. In: Peter-W. Gester, Christof Schmitz and Barbara Heitger, eds. Managerie: Systemisches Denken und Handeln im Management. 5. Jahrbuch, Heidelberg, Germany: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag: 54-78
  • Rutter, Ben (2013) ‘Reduced breath support in a speaker with dysarthria secondary to multiple sclerosis: Its impact on conversational speech’, Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4/1:27-44
  • Ruusuvuori, Johanna. (2000). Control in the medical consultation: Practices of giving and receiving the reason for the visit in primary healthcare. Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 16. http://acta.uta.fi/pdf/951-44-4755-7.pdf.
  • Ruusuvuori, Johanna. (2001) ‘Looking means listening: coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction’, Social Science & Medicine 52: 1093-1108.
  • Ruusuvuori, Johanna (2005) ‘Comparing homeopathic and general practice consultations: The case of problem presentation’, Communication & Medicine 2; [Special issue ‘Professional theories and institutional interaction’]: 123-36
  • Ruusuvuori, Johanna (2005) ‘“Empathy” and “sympathy” in action: Attending to patients ´ troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations’, Social Psychology Quarterly 68, 204-222
  • Ruusuvuori, Johanna (2007) Managing affect: integration of empathy and problem-solving in health care encounters’, Discourse Studies 9: 597-622.
  • Ruusuvuori, Johanna (2012) ‘Emotion, affect and conversation’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 330-49
  • Ruusuvuori, Johanna, Pirjo Lindfors (2009) ‘Complaining about previous treatment in health care settings’, Journal of Pragmatics, 41/12: 2415-2434
  • Ruusuvuori, Johanna; Anssi Peräkylä (2009) ‘Facial and verbal expressions in assessing stories and topics’,Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/4: 377-394
  • Ruusuvuori, Johanna, Liisa Voutilainen (2009) ‘Comparing affiliating responses totroubles-tellings in different types of health care encounters’. In: Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS): 206-230
  • Ryan, Anne, David Silverman (2000) ‘Marking boundaries: culture as category work’,
  • Qualitative Inquiry 6: 107-28
  • Ryave, A.L. (1978) ‘On the achievement of a series of stories’. In: J.N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 1978: 113-32
  • Ryave, A.Lincoln., James N. Schenkein (1974) ‘Notes on the art of walking’. In R. Turner, ed.
  • Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 265-74
  • Rystedt, Hans; Jonas Ivarsson, Sara Asplund, Åse Allansdotter Johnsson, Magnus Båth (2011) ‘Rediscovering radiology: New technologies and remedial action at the worksite’, Social Studies of Science 41/6: 867-891
  • Sacks, Harvey (1963) ‘On sociological description’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology 8: 1-16
  • Sacks, Harvey (1967) ‘The search for help: no one to turn to’. In: E.S. Shneidman, ed. Essays in selfdestruction. New York: Science House: 203-23
  • Sacks, Harvey (1972) ‘An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology’. In: David Sudnow, ed. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 31-74
  • Sacks, Harvey (1972) ‘On the analyzability of stories by children’. In: J.J. Gumperz, & D. Hymes, ed. Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York: Rinehart & Winston: 325-45
  • Sacks, Harvey (1972) ‘Notes on police assessment of moral character’. In: David Sudnow, ed.
  • Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 280-93
  • Sacks, Harvey (1973) ‘On some puns with some intimations’. In: R.W. Shuy, ed.
  • Sociolinguistics: current trends and prospects (Report of the 32rd annual round table meeting on linguistics and language studies). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press: 135-44
  • Sacks, Harvey (1974) ‘An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation’. In: J. Sherzer, R. Bauman, ed. Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. London: Cambridge University Press: 337-53
  • Sacks, Harvey (1974) ‘Some consideration of a story told in ordinary conversations’,
  • Poetics,15, 127-138.
  • Sacks, Harvey (1975) ‘Everyone has to lie’. In: M. Sanches, B. Blount, eds. Sociocultural dimensions of language use. New York: Academic Press: 57-80
  • Sacks, Harvey (1978) ‘Some technical considerations of a dirty joke’. In: J.N. Schenkein, ed.,
  • Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 249-70
  • Sacks, Harvey (1979) ‘Hotrodder: a revolutionary category’. In: George Psathas, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 7-14
  • Sacks, Harvey (1980) ‘Button button who’s got the button?’. Sociological Inquiry 50: 318-27
  • Sacks, Harvey (1984) ‘Notes on methodology’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds.
  • Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2-27
  • Sacks, Harvey (1984) ‘On doing “being ordinary”’. In. Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 413-29
  • Sacks, Harvey (1985) ‘The inference-making machine’. In: T.A. van Dijk,ed. Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press. Vol. III: 13-23
  • Sacks, Harvey (1986) ‘Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversation’ Ed. Gail Jefferson from unpublished lectures 1 and 2 (Winter 1970), Poetics 15: 127-38
  • Sacks, Harvey (1987) ‘On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation’. In: Button, Graham, J.R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 54-69
  • Sacks, Harvey (1987) ‘”You want to find out if anybody really does care”’. In: Button, Graham, J.R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 219- 25
  • Sacks, Harvey (1988) ‘On members’ measurement systems’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22: 45-60.
  • Sacks, Harvey (1992) Lectures on conversation. 2 vols. Edited by Gail Jefferson with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
  • Sacks, Harvey (1999) ‘Max Weber’s Ancient Judaism’, Theory, Culture and Society 16: 31-99
  • Sacks, Harvey (2004) ‘An initial characterization of the organization of speaker turn-taking in conversation’. In: Gene H. Lerner, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 35-42
  • Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff (1979) ‘Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction’. In: George Psathas, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 15-21; reprinted: in N.J. Enfield and T. Stivers, eds. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 23-8
  • Sacks Harvey,.Emanuel A. Schegloff (2002) [1975] ‘Home position’, Gesture 2/ 2: 133-146
  • Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (1974) ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation’, Language 50: 696-735
  • Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (1978) ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation’. In: J.N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 7-55 (1974)
  • Saft, Scott (1998) ‘Some uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discourse’. In:
  • N. Akatsuka, et al., eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics 7. Stanford: CSLI: 261-37
  • Saft, Scott (2001) ‘Concession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur in Japanese discourse: Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievement’. In:
  • Pragmatics in 2000: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 2. Edited by Enikö Németh. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association: 496-507
  • Saft, Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings: Culture and interaction in Japanese’, Pragmatics 11: 223-62
  • Saft, Scott (2004) ‘Conflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese: Arguments in university faculty meetings’, Language in Society 33: 549-84
  • Saft, Scott L. (2006) The moderator in control: Use of names, the particle ne, and response tokens on a Japanese discussion TV program’‘, Research on Language & Social Interaction39: 155-93
  • Saft, Scott (2007) ‘Exploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction: The case of a political discussion program’, Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7): 1290-1312
  • Sahlström, Fritjof, ed. (2009) Special Issue: Conversation Analysis as a Way of Studying Learning’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53/ 2: 103-215
  • Sahlström, Fritjof (2009 ) ‘Editorial: Conversation analysis as a way of studying learning—an introduction to a special issue of SJER’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53/ 2: 103-111
  • Saigo, Hideki (2011) The Japanese sentence-final particles in talk-in-interaction’.
  • Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins
  • Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir (1998) ‘Conversation analysis’. In: G. Symon,, C. Cassell, eds.,
  • Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research—A Practical Guide. Sage,
  • London
  • Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir (2003) ‘Strategizing as lived experience and strategists everyday efforts to shape strategic direction’, Journal ofManagement Studies 40: 141-174.
  • Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir (2004) ‘Talk-in-interaction’. In: G. Symon,, C. Cassell, eds.,
  • Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research. Sage, London, pp. 214-227.
  • Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir (2004) ‘Managerial elites making rhetorical and linguistic ‘moves’ for a moving (emotional) display’, Human Relations 57: 1103-1143.
  • Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir (2004) ‘Understanding the production of ‘strategy’ and ‘organization’ through talk amongst managerial elites’, Culture and Organization 10: 125-141.
  • Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir (2005) ‘Strategic practice, ‘discourse’ and the everyday interactional constitution of ‘power effects’. Organization 12: 803-841.
  • Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir (2010) ‘The interactional accomplishment of a strategic plan’. In: Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 198-
  • Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir (2010) ‘ Ethnomethodology and the moral accountability of interaction: Navigating the conceptual terrain of “face” and face-work’, Journal of Pragmatics42/8: 2147-2157
  • Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir, Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini (2008) ‘Introduction to the symposium on the foundations of organizing: the contribution from Garfinkel, Goffman and Sacks’, Organization Studies 29: 653-675.
  • Sanchez Svensson, Marcus(2007) ‘Monitoring practice and alarm technology in anaesthesiology’, Health Informatics Journal 2007 13: 9-21.
  • Sanchez Svensson, Marcus, Christian Heath, Paul Luff (2007) ‘Instrumental action:m the timely exchnage of implements during surgical operations’. In L. Bannon, ed. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. London: Springer
  • Sanchez Svensson, Marcus, Paul Luff, Christian Heath (2009) ‘Embedding instruction in practice: contingency and collaboration during surgical training’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31/6: 889-906 [reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010) Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell: 99-116]
  • Sanders, Robert E. (1999) ‘The impossibility of a culturally contexted conversation analysis: On simultaneous, distinct types of pragmatic meaning’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32/1-2:129-140.
  • Sanders, Robert E. (2003) ‘Conversational socializing on marine VHF radio: Adapting laughter and other practices to the technology in use’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 309-26
  • Sandlund, Erica, Pia Sundqvist (2011) ‘Managing task-related trouble in L2 oral proficiency tests: contrasting interaction data and rater assessment’, Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5/1: 91-120. Retrieved from http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_5_1/sandlund_sundqvist.pdf
  • Santamaría-García, Carmen (2011) ‘Bricolage assembling: CL, CA and DA to explore agreement’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16/3: 345–370
  • Scarpetta, Fabiola ; Anna Spagnolli (2009) ‘The interactional context of humor in stand-up comedy’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/3: 210-230
  • Schaeffer, Nora Cate, Douglas W. Maynard (2002) ‘Occasions for intervention: Interactional resources for comprehension in standardized survey interviews’. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 261-281
  • Schaeffer, Nora Cate, Douglas W. Maynard (2005) ‘From paradigm to prototype and back again: interactive aspects of ‘cognitive processing’ in standardized survey interviews’. In: Hedwig te Molder, Jonathan Potter, eds. Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge
  • University Press: 114-33
  • Scheffer, Thomas (1997) ‘Dolmetschen als Darstellungsproblem B Eine ethnographische Studie zur Rolle der Dolmetscher in Asylanhörungen’ [Interpretation as a presentation problem - An ethnographic analysis of the interpreter’s role in asylum-hearings], Zeitschrift für Soziologie 26: 159-80
  • Scheffer, Thomas (1998) ‘Übergänge von Wort und Schrift: Zur Genese und Gestaltung von Anhörungsprotokollen in Asylverfahren’ [Transitions of talk and writing: the origins and design of protocols within asylum procedures], Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 20: 230-65
  • Scheffer, Thomas (1998) ‘Jenseits der Konversation B Zur Konzeptualisierung von Asylanhörungen anhand der ethnographischen Analyse ihrer Eröffnung’ [Beyond Conversation B A Conceptualisation of Asylum-hearings based on the Ethnographic Analysis of their Opening], Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 24
  • Scheffer, Thomas (2001) Asylgewährung B Eine ethnographische Analyse des deutschen Asylverfahrens [Granting Asylum B A Ethnographic Analysis of the German Asylum Seeking Procedure] K.Ammann/J.Bergmann/S.Hirschauer (Hg.) Qualitative Soziologie Bd.1, Stuttgart: Lucius&Lucius
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1963) ‘Toward a reading of psychiatric theory’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology 8: 61-91
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1968) ‘Sequencing in conversational openings’, American Anthropologist, 70: 1075-95 [many reprints]
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1972) ‘Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place’. In: David Sudnow, ed. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 75-119
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1978) On some questions and ambiguities in conversation’. In: W.U. Dressler, ed. Current trends in textlinguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter: 81-102 (reprint: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 28-52)
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1979) ‘Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings’. In George Psathas, ed. Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 23-78
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1979) ‘The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation’. In: T. Givon, ed. Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press: 261- 86
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1980) ‘Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”’,
  • Sociological Inquiry 50: 104-52
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1982) ‘Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences’. In: D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse: text and talk.(Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press: 71-93
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1984) ‘On some questions and ambiguities in conversation’. In J.M.
  • Atkinson, J. Heritage, eds. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 28-52
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1984) ‘On some gestures relation to talk’. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 266-96
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1986) ‘The routine as achievement’, Human Studies 9: 111-51
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1987) ‘Analyzing single episodes of interaction: an exercise in conversation analysis’, Social Psychology Quarterly 50/2: 101-14
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1987) ‘Recycled turn beginnings: a precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organization’. In: Graham Button, J.R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 70-85
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1987) ‘Between macro and micro: contexts and other connections’. In: J. Alexander, et al. eds. The micro-macro link. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press: 207-34
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1987) ‘Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction’,
  • Linguistics 25: 201-18
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1988) ‘Goffman and the analysis of conversation’. In: Paul Drew, A. Wootton, eds., Erving Goffman: exploring the interaction order. Cambridge: Polity Press: 89- 135
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1988) ‘On a virtual servomechanism for guessing bad news: a single- case conjecture’, Social Problems 35: 442-57
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1988) ‘Description in the social sciences I: talk-in-interaction’, IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 2: 1-24
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1988) ‘Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in conversation analysis’. In: D. Tannen, ed. Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1988) ‘Presequences and indirection: applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 12: 55-62
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1988/9) ‘From interview to confrontation: observations on the Bush/Rather encounter’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 22: 215-40
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1989) ‘Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction’. In: M.H. Bornstein, J.S. Bruner, eds. Interaction in human development. Hilsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum: 139-53
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1990) ‘On the organization of sequences as a source of “coherence” in talk-in-interaction’. In: B. Dorval, ed. Conversational organization and its development, Norwood, N.J.: Ablex: 51-77
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1991) ‘Reflections on talk and social structure’. In: Boden, Deirdre,
  • Don H. Zimmerman, eds. Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press: 44-70
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1991) ‘Conversation Analysis and Socially Shared Cognition’. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, S. Teasley, eds., Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association: 150-71
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1992) ‘Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation’, American Journal of Sociology, 97:1295-1345
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1992) ‘To Searle on conversation: A note in return. In: H. Parrett, J. Verschueren, eds. (On) Searle on Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 113-28.
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1992) ‘On talk and its institutional occasions’. In: Drew, Paul, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 101-34
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1992) ‘In another context’. In: A. Duranti, C. Goodwin, eds.,
  • Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 193-227
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1993) ‘Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26: 99-128
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1995) ‘Parties and talking together: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talk-in-interaction’. In: Paul ten Have, George Psathas, eds., Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 31-42
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1995) ‘Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action’, Research in Language and social interaction 28: 185-211
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996) ‘Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: contingency in action, interaction and co-participant context’. In: E.H. Hovy, D. Scott, eds. Computational and conversational discourse: Burning issues-An interdisciplinary account. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag: 3-38
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996) ‘Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction’. In: Ochs, E., Emanuel A. Schegloff, S.A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 52-133
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996) ‘Confirming allusions: towards an empirical account of action’,
  • American Journal of Sociology 104: 161-216
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996) ‘Some practices of referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: a partial sketch of a systematics’. In: B. Fox, ed. Studies in anaphora. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 437-85
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1997) ‘Whose text? Whose context?’, Discourse & Society 8: 165-87
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1997) ‘Practices and actions: boundary cases of other-initiated repair’,
  • Discourse Processes 23: 499-545
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1997) ‘”Narrative Analysis” Thirty Years Later’, Journal of Narrative and Life History 7: 97-106
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1997) ‘Third turn repair’. In: G.R. Guy et al, eds. Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov, Volume 2: Social interaction and discourse structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 31-40
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1998) ‘Reply to Wetherell’, Discourse & Society, 9: 413-16
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1998) ‘Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction’,
  • Language and speech 41: 235-63
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1998) ‘Body torque’, Social Research 65: 535-86
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1999) ‘On Sacks on Weber on Ancient Judaism: Introductory Notes and Interpretive Resources’, Theory, Culture and Society 16:1-29
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1999) ‘What Next?: Language and Social Interaction Study at the Century’s Turn’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 141-8
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1999) ‘Discourse, pragmatics, conversation, analysis’, Discourse Studies 1: 405-35
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1999) ‘”Schegloff’s Texts” as “Billig’s Data”: A critical reply’,
  • Discourse & Society 10: 558-72
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1999) ‘Naivety vs. Sophistication or Discipline vs. Self-Indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig’, Discourse & Society 10: 577-82
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2000) ‘Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation’, Language in Society 29:1-63
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2000) ‘On granularity’, Annual Review of Sociology 26: 715-20
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2000) ‘When “others” initiate repair’, Applied Linguistics 21: 205-43
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2001) ‘Accounts of conduct in interaction: interruption, overlap, and turn-taking’. In: J.H. Turner, ed. Handbook of sociological Theory. New York/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic/Plenum: 287-321
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2001) ‘Getting serious: Joke 6 serious “no”’, Journal of Pragmatics33: 1947-55
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2001) ‘Overwrought utterances: “Complex” sentences in a different sense’. In: J. Bybee, M. Moonan, eds. Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 321-36
  • Schegloff, E.A. (2002) ‘Accounts of conduct in interaction: interruption, overlap and turn-taking’, in J.H. Turner, eds. Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Plenum: 287- 321
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2002) ‘Survey interviews as talk-in-interaction’. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen, eds.,
  • Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 151-61
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2002) ‘Reflections on research on telephone conversation: Issues of cross-cultural scope and scholarly exchange, interactional import and consequences’. In: Kang Kwong Luke, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, eds., Telephone Calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 249-81
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2002) ‘On “opening sequencing”: a framing statement’. In: J.E. Katz, M. Aakhus, eds. Perpetual contact: mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 321-25
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2002) ‘Opening sequencing’. In: J.E. Katz, M. Aakhus, eds. Perpetual contact: mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 326-85
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2003) ‘On ESP Puns’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 531-40
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2003) ‘The Surfacing of the Suppressed’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum:241-62
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2003) ‘Conservation Analysis and Communication Disorders’ In: Charles Goodwin, ed. Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press: 21-55
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2004) ‘Answering the phone’. In: Gene H. Lerner, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 63-107
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2004) ‘On Dispensability’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 37: 95-150
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2004) Putting the interaction back into dialogue’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27/2: 207-208
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2005) ‘Whistling in the dark: Notes from the other side of liminality’,
  • Texas Linguistic Forum, Austin, TX: 48: 17-30
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2005) ‘On complainability’, Social Problems 52/3: 449-476
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2005) ‘On integrity in inquiry… of the investigated, not the investigator’, Discourse Studies 7: 455-80
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2006) ‘On possibles’, Discourse Studies 8: 141-157
  • Schegloff, E.A. (2006) ‘Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language and the arena in which culture is enacted’, in N.J. Enfield, S.C. Levinson, eds. Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. London: Berg:70-96.
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007) ‘A tutorial on membership categorization’, Journal of Pragmatics 39: 462-82
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007) ‘Categories in action: person-reference and membership categorization’, Discourse Studies 9: 433-461.
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007) ‘Conveying who you are: the presentation of self, strictly speaking’. in N.J. Enfield and T. Stivers, eds. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 123-48
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2009) ‘One perspective on Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 357-406
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2009). ‘A practice for (re-)exiting a sequence: And/but/so + uh(m) + silence’. In: K. Turner & B. Fraser, eds., Language in life, and a life in language: Jacob Mey—A festschrift. Bingly, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited: 365-374
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2010 ) ‘Some Other “Uh(m)”s’, Discourse Processes, 47/2: 130-174
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2010) ‘Commentary on Stivers and Rossano: “Mobilizing Response”’,
  • Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43/1: 38-48
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2011) ‘Word repeats as unit ends’, Discourse Studies 13: 367-380,
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2013) ‘Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, Harvey Sacks (1977) ‘The preference for self- correction in the organization of repair in conversation’, Language 53: 361-82
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., Irene Koshik, Sally Jacoby, and David Olsher (2002) ‘Conversation Analysis and Applied Linguistics’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22: 3-31
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gene H. Lerner (2009) ‘Beginning to respond: well-prefaced responses to wh-questions’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/2: 91-115
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. Elinor Ochs, Sandra Thompson (1996) ‘Introduction’. In: Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1-51
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., Harvey Sacks (1973) ‘Opening up closings’, Semiotica 8: 289-327
  • Schenkein, Jim N. (1972) ‘Towards the analysis of natural conversation and the sense of “heheh”’, Semiotica 6: 344-77
  • Schenkein, Jim (1975) ‘Letzte Bemerkungen zur Ethnomethodologie’. In: Elmar Weingarten, Fritz Sack, Jim Schenkein, hrsg. (1975) Ethnomethodologie: Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagslebens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp: 416-24
  • Schenkein, Jim N., ed. (1978) Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press
  • Schenkein, Jim (1978) ‘Sketch of an analytic mentality for the study of conversational interaction’. In: Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 1-6
  • Schenkein, Jim (1978) ‘Identity negotiations in conversation’. In: J.N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 57-78
  • Schenkein, Jim (1978) ‘An introduction to the study of “socialization” through analyses of conversational interaction’, Semiotica 24: 277-304
  • Schenkein, Jim N. (1979) ‘The radio raiders story’. In: George Psathas, ed. Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 187-202
  • Schenkein, Jim N. (1980) ‘A taxonomy for repeating action sequences in natural conversation’. In: B. Butterworth, ed. Language production, vol. 1: Speech and talk. London: Academic Press: 21-57
  • Scheuer, Jann (2014) ‘Managing employees’ talk about problems in work in performance appraisal interviews’, Discourse Studies 16/3: 407-429
  • Schmitt, Reinhold (2005) ‘Zur multimodalen Struktur von turn-taking’, Gesprächsforschung- Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 6, 17-61 (www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de).
  • Schmitt, Reinhold (2006) ‘Interaction in work meetings’, Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 11/2: 69-84
  • Schneider, Barbara (2000) ‘Managers as Evaluators: Invoking objectivity to achieve objectives’, Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 36: 159-73
  • Scholtens, A., Springorum, D., red. (1986) Gespreksanalyse: uitgangspunten en methoden in gespreksanalytisch onderzoek. Overasselt: Springorum
  • Schönfeldt, Juliane, Andrea Golato (2003) ‘Repair in Chats:A Conversation Analytic Approach’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 36/3: 241-84
  • Schoot, Mirjam van der; Harrie Mazeland (2005) ‘Probleembeschrijvingen in werkbesprekingen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 27, 1-23
  • Schwabe,M.; S.J Howell, M. Reuber (2007) ‘Differential diagnosis of seizure disorders: a conversation analytic approach’, Social Science &Medicine, 65: 712-724.
  • Schwartz, Howard (1975) ‘Allgemeine Merkmale”. In: Elmar Weingarten, Fritz Sack, Jim Schenkein, hrsg. (1975) Ethnomethodologie: Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagslebens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp: 327-67 [English version published in 2002]
  • Schwartz, Howard (1976) ‘On recognizing mistakes: a case of practical reasoning in psychotherapy’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 6: 55-73
  • Seale, Clive; Christopher C. Butler, Ian Hutchby, Paul Kinnersley, Stephen Rollnick (2007) ‘Negotiating frame ambiguity: A study of simulated encounters in medical education.’
  • Communication and Medicine, 4/2: 177-188
  • Seedhouse, Paul (1997) ‘The Case of the Missing ‘No’: The Relationship between Pedagogy and Interaction’, Language Learning 47: 547-83
  • Seedhouse, Paul (1997) ‘Combining Form and Meaning’, English Language Teaching Journal

(ELTJ) 51: 336-44

  • Seedhouse, Paul (1998) ‘CA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction: A Reply to Wagner’, Journal of Pragmatics 30: 85-102
  • Seedhouse, Paul (1999) ‘The Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair in the L2 Classroom’, International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37: 59-80
  • Seedhouse, Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell
  • Seedhouse, Paul (2004), Conversation analysis methodology, Language Learning, 54/S1: 1-54
  • Seedhouse, Paul (2005) ‘Conversation analysis and language learning’, Language Teaching, 38/4: 165-187
  • Seedhouse, Paul (2006) ‘Interaction in Second Language Classrooms’, Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 11/2: 111-22
  • Seedhouse, Paul (2007) ‘On ethnomethodological CA and “linguistic CA”: A reply to Hall’,
  • The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 526-532.
  • Seedhouse, Paul (2010) ‘How research methodologies influence findings’, Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 4/1:, 1-15. Retrieved from http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_4_1/seedhouse.pdf
  • Seedhouse, Paul (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and classroom interaction’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 954- 958
  • Seilhamer, Mark Fifer (2011) ‘On doing ‘being a crank caller’: A look into the crank call community of practice’, Journal of Pragmatics 43: 677-690
  • Sena, Barbara (2002) “Aspetti teorico-metodologici della neoetnometodologia di Harold Garfinkel”, in Sociologia e ricerca sociale, N. 67, pp.35-63.
  • Seo, M.-S., Irene Koshik,(2010) ‘A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring’, Journalof Pragmatics, 42/8: 2219-2239.
  • Seppä, K., Aalto, J., Liisa Raevaara, Anssi Peräkylä (2004) A brief intervention for risky drinking — analysis of videotaped consultations in primary health care. Drug and Alcohol
  • Review 23:167-170.
  • Sert, Olcay (2013) ‘“Epistemic status check” as an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings’, Journal of Pragmatics 45/1: 13-28
  • Sert, Olcay Paul Seedhouse (2011) ‘Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics’,
  • Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5/1: 1–14.
  • Sert, Olcay; Steve Walsh (2012) ‘The interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language classrooms’, Language and Education: 1-24
  • Sharrock, Wes (1974) ‘On owning knowledge’. In: Roy Turner, ed.. Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings. Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 45-53.
  • Sharrock, Wes. (1987). ‘Individual and society’. In: R. J. Anderson, John Hughes, Wes Sharrock, eds. Classic disputes in sociology, London: Allen and Unwin: 126-56
  • Sharrock, Wes (1989) ‘Ethnomethodology’, British Journal of Sociology 40(4): 657-77.
  • Sharrock, Wes (2000) ‘Where the simplest systematics fits: a response to Michael Lynch’s “The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis”’, Text 20, 533-539.
  • Sharrock, Wes (2004) ‘What Garfinkel Makes of Schutz: The past, present and future of an alternate, asymmetric and incommensurable approach to sociology’, Theory & Science http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol5.1/sharrock.html
  • Sharrock, Wes (2011) ‘The project as an organisational environment for the division of labour’.In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 19-36
  • Sharrock, Wesley; Digby Anderson. (1979) ‘Directional Hospital Signs as Sociological Data’,
  • Information Design Journal 1/2:81-94
  • Sharrock, Wes; W., R. Anderson (1982) ‘Talking and teaching: Reflective comments on in- classroom activities’.In G.C.F.Payne, E. C.Cuff, eds. Doing teaching: The practical management of classrooms. London: Batsford Academic and Educational:170-183
  • Sharrock, Wes W., R. J. Anderson (1984) ‘The Wittgenstein connection’ (Review essay),
  • Human Studies 7/3-4: 375-386
  • Sharrock, Wes W., R. Anderson (1986) The ethnomethodologists. Chichester: Ellis Horwood
  • Sharrock, Wes, R. J. Anderson. (1982) ‘On the demise of the native: Some observations on and a proposal for ethnography’, Human Studies 5/2:119-35.
  • Sharrock, Wes , Bob Anderson (1987) ‘Work flow in a paediatric clinic’. In: Button, Graham, J.R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 244-60
  • Sharrock, Wes , Bob Anderson (1987) ‘Epilogue: the definition of alternatives: some sources of confusion in interdisciplinary discussion’. In: Button, Graham, J.R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 290-321
  • Sharrock, Wes; Bob Anderson (2011) ‘Discovering a Practical Impossibility: The Internal Configuration of a Problem in Mathematical Reasoning’,: Ethnographic Studies 12: 47-58
  • Sharrock, Wes, Graham Button (1991) ‘The social actor: Social action in real time’. In: Graham Button, ed. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences,. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 137-175
  • Sharrock, Wes , Graham Button (1997) ‘On the Relevance of Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action for CSCW’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 6/4 : 369-89
  • Sharrock, Wes , Graham Button (1997) ‘Engineering investigations: practical sociological reasoning in the work of engineers’. In: G.C. Bowker, S.L. Star, eds., Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum: 79-104
  • Sharrock, Wes, Graham Button (1999) ‘Do the right thing! Rule finitism, rule scepticism and rule following’, Human Studies 22: 193-210
  • Sharrock, Wes, Graham Button (2007) ‘The technical operations of the levers of power’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 33-50
  • Sharrock, W. W.; Graham Button (2010). ‘The structure problem in the context of structure and agency controversies’. In P. J. Martin , A. Dennis, eds., Human agents and social structures. Manchester: Manchester University Press
  • Sharrock, Wes; Graham Button (2011) ‘Conclusion: ethnomethodology and constructionist studies of technology’. In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 211
  • Sharrock, Wes, Wil Coleman (1999) ‘Seeking and finding society in the text’. In: PaulL. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 1-30
  • Sharrock, Wes; Jeff Coulter (2001) ‘Reflexions sur le raisonnement’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 75-98
  • Sharrock, Wes, Jeff Coulter (2003) ‘Dissolving the “projection problem”’. In: Mike Ball (ed.)
  • Image Work, a Special Issue of Visual Studies 18/1 ( April 2003): 74-82
  • Sharrock, Wes W; Jeff Coulter (2004) ‘TOM:A critical commentary’, Theory & Psychology: 14/5: 579-600
  • Sharrock, Wes; Dave Randall, Christian Greiffenhagen (2011) ‘Engineering the Scientific Corpus: Routine Semantic Work in (Re)constructing a Biological Ontology’, Ethnographic Studies 12: 106-125
  • Sharrock, Wes W., Roy Turner (1978) ‘On a conversational environment for equivocality’. In: J.N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press: 173-97
  • Sharrock, Wesley W., Roy Turner (1980) ‘Observation, esoteric knowledge, and automobiles’,
  • Human Studies 3:19-31
  • Sharrock, Wes , D. R. Watson (1984) ‘What’s the point of rescuing motives?’, British Journal of Sociology 34: 435-51
  • Sharrock, Wes , R. Watson (1988) ‘Autonomy among social theories: the incarnation of social structures’. In: N.G. Fielding, ed. Actions and structure: research methods and social theory. London: Sage: 56-77
  • Sharrock, Wes W. D. Rod Watson, (1988) ‘Talk and Police Work: Notes on the Traffic in Information’. In H. Coleman, ed., Working with Language, A multidisciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts. Berlin: De Gruyter: 431-49
  • Shaw, Chloe; Alexa Hepburn (2013) ‘Managing the moral implications of advice in informal interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 46/4: 344-362
  • Shaw, Chloe; Alexa Hepburn, Jonathan Potter (2013) ‘Having the last laugh: On post completion laughter particles’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 91-106
  • Shaw, Rebecca; Celia Kitzinger, (2005) ‘Calls to a home birth helpline: Empowerment in childbirth’, Social Science and Medicine, 61:2374-2383.
  • Shaw, Rebecca, Celia Kitzinger (2007) ‘Memory in interaction: an analysis of repeat calls to a home birth helpline’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40 (1): 117-44
  • Shaw, Rebecca, Celia Kitzinger (2007) ‘Problem presentation and advice-giving on a home birth helpline: a feminist conversation analytic study’, Feminism & Psychology 17: 203-213
  • Shaw, Rebecca; Celia Kitzinger (2012) ‘Compliments on a Home Birth Helpline’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45/3: 213-244
  • Sherman Heckler, Wendy (2011) ‘Discovering Work as “Experimental Demonstration” in School Science Labs ‘, Ethnographic Studies 12: 12-30
  • Sidnell, Jack (2000) ‘Primus interpares: Storytelling and male peer groups in an Indo- Guyanese rumshop’, American Ethnologist, 27/1: 72-99
  • Sidnell, Jack (2001) ‘Conversational turn-takingin a Caribbean English Creole’, Journal of Pragmatics, 33/8:1263-1290.
  • Sidnell, Jack (2004) ‘There’s risks in everything: Extreme case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony’, Discourse and Society 15(6): 745-766
  • Sidnell, Jack (2005) ‘Gesture in the pursuit and display of recognition: A Caribbean case study’, Semiotica 156 - 1/4: 55-87
  • Sidnell. Jack (2005) Talk and Practical Epistemology: The social life of knowledge in a Caribbean community. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
  • Sidnell, Jack (2006) ‘Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments’, Research on
  • Language and Social Interaction, 39 (4): 377-409
  • Sidnell, Jack (2007) ‘“Look”-prefaced turns in first and second position: launching, interceding and redirecting action’, Discourse Studies 9: 387-408
  • Sidnell, Jack (2007) ‘Repairing person reference in a small Caribbean community’. in N.J. Enfield and T. Stivers, eds. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 281-308
  • Sidnell, Jack (2007) ‘Comparative studies in conversation analysis’. Annual Review of Anthropology (36)
  • Sidnell, Jack (2008) ‘Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean communities’. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12/4: 477-503
  • Sidnell, Jack ed. (2009) Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [Series: Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics (No. 27)]
  • Sidnell, Jack (2009) Comparative perspectives in conversation analysis’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed.
  • Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 3-28
  • Sidnell, Jack (2009) ‘Language-specific resources in repair and assessments’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 304-25
  • Sidnell, Jack (2009) ‘The design and positioning of questions in inquiry testimony’. In Ehrlich, Freed, eds. “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford University Press.
  • Sidnell, Jack (2009) ‘Participation’. In: Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Ola Östman, Jef Verschueren, eds. The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam: Benjamins: 125-156
  • Sidnell, Jack (2009) ‘Sequence’. In: Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Ola Östman, Jef Verschueren, eds.
  • The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam: Benjamins: 215-239
  • Sidnell, Jack (2010) Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell
  • Sidnell, Jack (2010) ‘Conversation analysis’. In Nancy H. Hornberger, Sandra Lee McKay, eds. Sociolinguistics and Language Education. Multilingual Matters.
  • Sidnell, Jack(2010) ‘Questioning repeats in the talk of four-year old children.’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell 103-127
  • Sidnell, Jack (2010) ‘The ordinary ethics of everyday talk’. In Michael Lambek, ed. The anthropology of ordinary ethics: anthropology, language and action. Fordham University Press.
  • Sidnell, Jack (2011) “D’ you understand that honey?”: gender and participation in conversation’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 183-209
  • Sidnell, Jack (2011) ‘The epistemics of make-believe’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:131-58
  • Sidnell, Jack (2012) ‘Declaratives, questioning, defeasibility’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 45/1: 53-60
  • Sidnell, Jack (2012) ‘Basic conversation analytic methods’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 77-99
  • Sidnell, Jack (2012) ‘Turn-continuation by self and by other’, Discourse Processes, 49: 314-337
  • Sidnell, Jack; Rebecca Barnes (2013) ‘Alternative, subsequent descriptions’. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Sidnell , Jack; N. J. Enfield ( 2012 ) ‘Language diversity and social action: A third locus of linguistic relativity’, Current Anthropology , 53: 302-333
  • Sidnell, Jack; Tanya Stivers, eds. (2012) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley- Blackwell
  • Silverman, David (1997) Discourses of counselling: HIV counselling as social interaction.
  • London, etc.: Sage Publications
  • Silverman, David (1997) ‘Studying Organizational Interaction: Ethnomethodology’s Contribution to the “New Institutionalism”’, Administrative Theor y and Praxis 19: 178-95
  • Silverman, David (1998) Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Policy Press
  • Silverman, David (1998) ‘Analysing conversation’. In: C. Seale, ed. Researching society and culture. London: Sage: 261-74
  • Silverman, David (1999) ‘Warriors or collaborators: Reworking methodological controversies in the study of institutional interaction’. In S. Sarangi & C. Roberts, eds., Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 401-25
  • Silverman David (2012) ‘Beyond armed camps: A response to Stokoe’, Discourse Studies 14: 329-336
  • Silverman, David, Baker, Carolyn D. and Keogh, J. 1998 The Case of the Silent Child: Advice-Giving and Advice-Reception in Parent-Teacher Interviews. In: I. Hutchby, J. Moran-Ellis, eds., Children and Social Competence: Arenas of Action. London, Falmer: 220-40
  • Silverman, David, Anssi Peräkylä (1990) ‘AIDS counselling: The interactional organisation of talk about ‘delicate issues’, Sociology of Health and Illness 12: 293-318
  • Simmons, Katie; Amanda LeCouteur (2011) ‘“Hypothetical active-voicing”: Therapists ‘modelling’ of clients’ future conversations in CBT interactions’, Journal of Pragmatics43/13: 3177-3192
  • Simonen, Mika (2012) ‘Formulation in clinical interviews’, Communication & Medicine, 9/2: 133-143
  • Simonen, Mika (2012) ‘Mutual negotiation of the interviewee’s competence in interview interaction’. In: Gitte, Rasmussen, C.E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, eds., Evaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 119 - 144
  • Simpson, James (2005) ‘Conversational floors in synchronous text-based CMC discourse’,
  • Discourse Studies 7: 337-361.
  • Skelt, Louise (2007) ‘Damage control: closing problematic sequences in hearing-impaired interaction’. In Johanna Rendle-Short & Maurice Nevile, eds. Language as action: Australian studies in conversation analysis. Special thematic issue, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3): Available via http://publications.epress.monash.edu/loi/aral
  • Skelt, Louise (2012) ‘Dealing with misunderstandings: The sensitivity of repair in hearing impaired conversation’. In Maria Egbert, Arnulf Deppermann, eds. (2012) Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung: 56-66
  • Slack, Roger. S. (1998) ‘On the potentialities and problems of a WWW based naturalistic sociology’ Sociological Research Online, vol. 3, no. 2 [14]
  • Slack, Roger S. (2000) ‘The Ethno-Inquiries of Edward Rose’, Ethnographic Studies 5:1-26
  • Slack, Roger, Mark Hartswood, Rob Procter, Mark Rouncefield: ‘Cultures of reading: on professional vision and the lived work of mammography’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 175- 93
  • Sliedrecht, Keun Young; Tessa van Charldorp (2011) ‘Tussen spraak en schrift: de rol van samenvattingen in het politieverhoor’, Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 33/1: 34-55
  • Sloboda, Marián (2009) ‘Styling for hegemony: the West as an enemy (and the ideal) in Belarusian television news’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 137-60
  • Smith, Dorothy E. (1978) ‘”K is mentally ill”: the anatomy of a factual account’, Sociology 12: 23-53 German translation: ‘K ist geisteskrank: Die Anatomie enes Tatsachenberichtes’. In:
  • Elmar Weingarten, Fritz Sack, Jim Schenkein, hrsg. (1975) Ethnomethodologie: Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagslebens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp: 368-415
  • Smith, Dorothy E. (1981) ‘On sociological description: A method from Marx’, Human Studies4/4:
  • Smith, Dorothy E. (1983) ‘No one commits suicide: Textual analysis of ideological practices’,
  • Human Studies 6/4: 309-359
  • Smith, Dorothy E. (1990) ‘The Active Text: A textual analysis of the social relations of public textual discourse’, in her Texts, Facts and Femininity. London & New York: Routledge: 120- 58
  • Smith, G.W.H. (2003) ‘Ethnomethodological readings of Goffman’. In A.J.Treviño, ed.,
  • Goffman’s legacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield: 254-283
  • Smith, Michael Sean (2013) ‘“I thought” initiated turns: Addressing discrepancies in first-hand and second-hand knowledge’, Journal of Pragmatics 57: 318-330
  • Sorjonen, Marja-leena (1996) ‘On repeats and responses in Finnish conversation’. In: Ochs, E., Emanuel A. Schegloff, S.A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 277-327
  • Sorjonen, Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins [Pragmatics & Beyond NS 70]
  • Sorjonen, Marja-leena (2001) Simple’answers to polar questions: The case of Finnish’. In M.Selting, E.Couper-Kuhlen, eds. Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 405-431
  • Sorjonen, Marja-leena (2002) ‘Recipient Activities: The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Response in Finnish Conversations’. In: Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson, eds. The Language of Turn and Sequence. New York: Oxford University Press: 165-95
  • Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Auli Hakulinen (2009) ‘Alternative responses to assessments’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 281-303
  • Sorjonen, Marja-leena, John Heritage (1990) ‘And-prefacing as a feature of question design’. In: L. Laitinen et al. eds., Asennonvaihtoja [Changes in footing]: Essays in honour of Auli Hakulinen. Helsinki: Vastapaino
  • Sorjonen, Marja-leena; Anssi Peräkylä (2012) ‘Introduction’.In A. Peräkylä, M.L.Sorjonen, eds. Emotion in interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press 3-15.
  • Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Liisa Raevaara, Markku Haakana, Tuukka Tammi, Anssi Peräkylä (2006) ‘Lifestyle discussions in medical interviews’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 340-78
  • Sormani, Philippe (2011) ‘The Jubilatory YES! On the Instant Appraisal of an Experimental Finding’, Ethnographic Studies 12: 59-77
  • Sormani, Philippe; Esther González-Martínez, Alain Bovet, eds. (2011) Discovering Work: Ethnomethodological Studies in the Natural Sciences. Special Issue: Ethnographic Studies 12 http://www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/disciplines/sociology/about/events/ethnography/jo urnal/issue12/index.html
  • Sormani, Philippe; Esther González-Martínez, Alain Bovet (2011) ‘Discovering Work: A
  • Topical Introduction’, Ethnographic Studies 12: 1-11
  • Speer, Susan (1999) ‘Feminism and conversation analysis: An Oxymoron?’‘, Feminism and Psychology 9: 471-8
  • Speer, Susan A. (2001) ‘Reconsidering the concept of hegemonic masculinity: Discursive Psychology, Conversation Analysis, and participants’ orientations’, Feminism and Psychology11: 107-35
  • Speer, Susan A. (2002) ‘What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice’, Discourse & Society 13: 783-803
  • Speer, Susan A. (2002) ‘”Natural” and “contrived” data: a sustainable distinction?’ Discourse Studies 4: 511-25
  • Speer, Susan A. (2002) ‘Transcending the “natural” /”contrived” distinction: a rejoinder to ten Have, Lynch and Potter’, Discourse Studies 4: 543-48
  • Speer, Susan A. (2005) Gender Talk: Feminism, Discourse and Conversation Analysis. London & New York: Routledge
  • Speer, Susan A. (2005) ‘The interactional organization of the gender attribution process’,
  • Sociology 39: 67-87
  • Speer, Susan A. (2007) ‘On recruiting conversation analysis for critical realist purposes’,
  • Theory & Psychology 17/1: 125-135.
  • Speer, Susan (2008) ‘Natural and contrived data’. In: Pertti Alasuutari, Leonard Bickman, Julia Brannen eds. The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods. London, etc. Sage: 290- 312
  • Speer, Susan A.(2009) ‘Passing as a transsexual woman in the gender identity clinic’. In M. Wetherell, ed. Theorizing Identities and Social Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 116- 138
  • Speer, Susan A. (2010) ‘Pursuing views and testing commitments: The role of “worst case” hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients’. In A. Freed, S. Ehrlich, eds. Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse. Oxford University Press: 133-158
  • Speer, Susan A. (2011) ‘On the role of reported, third party compliments in passing as a “real” woman’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 155-182
  • Speer, Susan A. (2012) ‘Hypothetical questions: a comparative analysis and implications for “applied” vs. “basic” conversation analysis’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45/4: 352-374
  • Speer, Susan A. (2012). ‘“Feminist” conversation analysis: Who needs it?’, Qualitative Research In Psychology, 9/4: 292-297
  • Speer, Susan A. (2012) ‘The interactional organization of self-praise: epistemics, preferenceorganisation and implications for identity research’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 75/1: 52-79
  • Speer, Susan A., R. Green (2007) ‘On passing: The interactional organization of appearance attributions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients’. In V. Clarke & E. Peel, eds.,
  • Out in Psychology: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer Perspectives. Chichester: Wiley: 335-368
  • Speer, Susan A., Ian Hutchby (2003 a) ‘From Ethics to Analytics: Aspects of Participants’ Orientations to the Presence and Relevance of Recording Devices’, Sociology 39: 315-37 [see comment: Hammersley (2003) & rejoinder: Speer & Hutchby, 2003 b]
  • Speer, Susan A., Ian Hutchby (2003 b) ‘Methodology Needs Analytics: A Rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley’, Sociology 39: 335-59
  • Speer, Susan A., Ceri Parsons (2006) ‘Gatekeeping gender: some features of the use of hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients’, Discourse & Society 17: 785-812
  • Speer, Susan A.; Elisabeth Stokoe (2014) ‘Ethics in action: Consent-gaining interactions and implications for research practice’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53: 54-73.
  • Speier, M. (1971) ‘The everyday world of the child’. In: Douglas, J.D. ed. Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul: 188-217 (1970)
  • Speier, M. (1972) ‘Some conversational problems for interactional analysis’. In: David Sudnow, ed. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 397-427
  • Speier, M. (1973) How to observe face-to-face communication: a sociological introduction. Pacific Palisades, Cal.: Goodyear
  • Speier, M. (1976) ‘The child as conversationalist: some culture contact features of conversational interactions between adults and children’. In: M. Hammwersley, Peter Woods, eds. The process of schooling: a sociological reader. London: Rotledge & Kegan Paul: 98-103
  • Stam, Kathryn R., Jeffrey M. Stanton, Indira R. Guzman (2004) Employee resistance to digital information and information technology change in a social service agency: a membership category approach’, Journal of Digital Information, 5/4 [Article No. 274, 2004-10-20]
  • Stax, Hanne-Pernille (2004) ‘Paths to precision: probing turn format and turn-taking problems in standardized interviews’, Discourse Studies 6: 77-94
  • Steensig, Jakob (2001) ‘Notes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkish conversation’. In M. Selting, E.Couper-Kuhlen, eds. Studies in interactional linguistics.
  • Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 259-286.
  • Steensig, Jakob (2011) ‘Turn-taking in conversation’. In: Gisle Andersen, Karin Aijmer, eds.,
  • Pragmatics of Society (Handbooks of Pragmatics, vol. 5) Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter: 501-536
  • Steensig, Jakob (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and affiliation and alignment’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 944- 948
  • Steensig, Jakob; Birte Asmuß (2005) ‘Notes on disaligning ‘yes but’ initiated utterances in Danish and German conversations: Two construction types for dispreferred responses’. In Auli Hakulin en, Margret Selting, eds. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 349-373
  • Steensig, Jakob, Paul Drew (2008) ‘Introduction: questioning and affiliation/ disaffiliation in interaction’, Discourse Studies 10: 5-15
  • Steensig, Jakob, Tine Larsen (2008) ‘Affiliative and disaffiliative uses of you say x questions’,
  • Discourse Studies 10: 113-133.
  • Sterponi, Laura (2003) ‘Account episodes in family discourse: The making of morality in everyday interaction’, Discourse Studies 5: 79-100
  • Sterponi, Laura (2004) ‘Construction of rules, accountability and moral identity by high- functioning children with autism’, Discourse Studies, 6/2: 207-228.
  • Sterponi, Laura (2009) ‘Accountability in family discourse: socialization into norms and standards and negotiation of responsibility in Italian dinner conversations’, Childhood 16: 441-459
  • Sterponi, Laura, Alessandra Fasulo (2010) ‘How to go on: intersubjectivity and progressivity in the communication of a child with autism’. Ethos, 38, 1, 116-142
  • Stetson, Jeff (1999) ‘Victim, offender and witness in the emplotment of news stories’. In: Paul L. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 77-110
  • Stevanovic, Melisa (2011) ‘Participants’ deontic rights and action formation: the case of declarative requests for action’, InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures, No. 52, URL: <http://www.inlist.uni-bayreuth.de/issues/52/>
  • Stevanovic, Melisa (2012) ‘Establishing joint decisions in a dyad’, Discourse Studies 14: 779-803
  • Stevanovic, Melisa (2012) ‘Prosodic salience and the emergence of new decisions: on approving responses to proposals in Finnish workplace interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 843-862
  • Stevanovic, Melisa (2013) ‘Managing participation in interaction: the case of humming’, Text &Talk; 33/1: 113-137
  • Stevanovic, Melisa (2013) ‘Constructing a proposal as a thought: A way to manage problems in the initiation of joint decision-making in Finnish workplace interaction’, Pragmatics 23/3
  • Stevanovic, Melisa; Anssi Peräkylä (2012) ‘Deontic authority in interaction: the right to announce, propose, and decide’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45/4: 297-321
  • Stevanovic, Melisa; Anssi Peräkylä (2014) ‘Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations’,
  • Language in Society 43/2 :185 - 207
  • Stivers, Tanya (1998), ‘Pre-diagnostic Commentary in Veterinarian-Client Interaction’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 241-77
  • Stivers, Tanya (2001) ‘Negotiating who presents the problem: Next speaker selection in pediatric encounters’, Journal of Communication 51(2), 1-31
  • Stivers, Tanya (2002) ‘Participating in decisions about treatment: Overt parent pressure for antibiotic medication in pediatric encounters’. Social Science & Medicine 54: 1111-30.
  • Stivers, Tanya (2002) ‘”Symptoms only” and “Candidate diagnoses”: Presenting the problem in pediatric encounters. Health Communication 14: 299-338.
  • Stivers, Tanya (2003) ‘”No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction’.
  • Human Communication Research. 30:260-93.
  • Stivers, Tanya (2005) ‘Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights From Second Position’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 38: 131-58
  • Stivers, Tanya (2005) ‘Non-antibiotic treatment recommendations: delivery formats and implications for parent resistance’, Social Science & Medicine 60: 949-64
  • Stivers, Tanya (2005) ‘Parent resistance to physicians’ treatment recommendations: one resource for initiating a negotiation of the treatment decision’. Health Communication, 18, 41- 74.
  • Stivers, Tanya (2006) ‘Treatment decisions: negotiations between doctors and patients in acute care encounters’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 279-312
  • Stivers, Tanya (2007) Prescribing under pressure: Parent-physician conversations and antibiotics. New York, etc. Oxford University Press
  • Stivers, Tanya (2007) ‘Alternative recognitionals in person reference’, in N.J. Enfield and T. Stivers, eds. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 73-96
  • Stivers, Tanya (2008) ‘Stance, alignment and affiliation during story telling: When nodding is a token of preliminary affiliation’, Research on Language in Social Interaction, 41/1: 29-55.
  • Stivers, Tanya (2010) ‘An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation ’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/10 :2772-2781
  • Stivers, Tanya (2011) ‘Morality and question design: ’of course’ as contesting a presupposition of askability’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 82-106
  • Stivers, Tanya (2011) ‘Language socialization in children’ s medical encounters’. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, B.B. Schieffelin, eds. The handbook of language socialization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell: 247-267
  • Stivers, Tanya (2012) ‘Sequence organization’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The
  • Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 191-209
  • Stivers, Tanya, Nicholas J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, Jan Peter De Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon. Stephen C. Levinson (2009). ‘Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation’,
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106/26: 10587-10592.
  • Stivers, Tanya; Nick J. Enfield (2010). ‘A coding scheme for question-response sequences in conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/10: 2620-2626.
  • Stivers, Tanya, N.J. Enfield, S.C. Levinson, eds. (2010), special issue on ‘Question-Response Sequences in Conversation across Ten Languages’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/10: 2615-2860
  • Stivers, Tanya, Makoto Hayashi (2010) ‘Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints’, Language in Society, 39/1: 1-25
  • Stivers, Tanya, John Heritage (2001) ‘Breaking the sequential mold: Answering ‘more than the question’ during comprehensive history taking’, Text 21: 151-85
  • Stivers, Tanja, Asifa Majid (2007) ‘Questioning children: Interactional evidence of implicit racial bias in medical interviews, Social Psychology Quarterly 70(4): 424-41.
  • Stivers, Tanya; Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig (2011) ‘Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction’. In: Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 3-24
  • Stivers, Tanya; Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig, eds. (2011) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Stivers, Tanya, Jeffrey D. Robinson (2006) ‘A preference for progressivity in interaction’,
  • Language in Society 35: 367-92
  • Stivers, Tanya, Federico Rossano (2010) ‘Mobilizing response’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43/1: 3-31 [cf. Comments by Couper-Kuhlen & Schegloff]
  • Stivers,Tanya, Federico Rossano (2010) A scalar view of response relevance’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43/1: 49-56 [a response to comments by Couper-Kuhlen & Schegloff]
  • Stivers, Tanya; Frederico Rossano (2012) ‘Mobilising response in interaction: a compositional view of questions’. In J. P. De Ruiter, ed., Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Stivers, Tanya, Sidnell, Jack (2005) ‘Multi-Modal Interaction.’ Semiotica 156 (1/4):1-20
  • Stivers,Tanya; Jack Sidnell (2012) ‘Introduction’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 1-8
  • Stockill, Clare (2007) ‘Trust the Experts? Notes and observations on choice and control inchildbirth. A response to Crossley. Feminism & Psychology, 17: 571 - 577
  • Stockill, Clare, Celia Kitzinger (2007) ‘Gendered “People”: how linguistically non-gendered terms can have gendered interactional relevance’, Feminism & Psychology 17(2): 224-36.
  • Stoddart, Ken (1986) ‘The presentation of everyday life: some textual strategies for “adequate ethnography”’, Urban Life 15: 103-21
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth H. (2000) ‘Towards a conversation analytic approach to gender and discourse’, Feminism and Psychology 10: 552-63
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth H. (2000) ‘Constructing topicality in university students’ small-group discussion: A conversation analytic approach’, Language & Education 14(3): 184-203
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth.H. (2003) ‘Mothers, single women and sluts: gender, morality and membership categorisation in neighbour disputes’, Feminism and Psychology 13/3: 317-44
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth (2006) On ethnomethodology, feminism, and the analysis of categorial reference to gender in talk-in-interaction’, Sociological Review 54/3: 467-94
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth H. (2006) ‘Public intimacy in neighbour relationships and complaints’,
  • Sociological Research Online 11/3 <www.socresonline.org.uk/11/3/stokoe.html>
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth(2009) ‘Doing actions with identity categories: complaints and denials in neighbour disputes’, Text & Talk 29/1: 75-97
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth (2009) ’“For the benefit of the tape”: Formulating embodied conduct in designedly uni-modal recorded police-suspect interrogations’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 1887-1904
  • Stokoe, Elisabeth (2009) ‘“I’ve got a girlfriend”: Police officers doing ‘self-disclosure’ in their interrogations of suspects’, Narrative Inquiry 19/1: 154-182
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth (2010) ‘“I’m not gonna hit a lady”: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women’, Discourse & Society 21/1: 59- 82
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth (2010) ‘“Have You Been Married, or …?”: Eliciting and accounting for relationship histories in speed-dating interaction’, Research on Language & Social Interaction43/3: 260-282
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth (2011) ‘“Girl - woman - sorry!”: on the repair and non-repair of consecutive gender categories’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 85-111
  • Stokoe, Elisabeth (2011) ‘Simulated interaction and communication skills training: the ’conversation analytic role-play method”’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 119-139
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth; ed. (2012) Special issue on ‘Categories and Social Interaction: Current Issues in Membership Categorization’, Discourse Studies 14/3
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth (2012) ‘Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis’, Discourse Studies 14/3: 277-303
  • Stokoe Elizabeth (2012) ‘Categorial systematics’, Discourse Studies 14/3: 345-354,
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth (2013) The (in)authenticity of simulated talk: comparing role-played and actual interaction and the implications for communication training’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46:2, 165-185
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth (2013). ‘Overcoming barriers to mediation in intake calls to services: Research-based strategies for mediators’, Negotiation Journal, 29/3: 289–314
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth H., Derek Edwards (2006) ‘Story formulations in talk-in-interaction’,
  • Narrative Inquiry 16 (1): 59-68 [also: in M. Bamberg, ed., Narrative: State of the art. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 69-79]
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth H., Derek Edwards (2007) ‘“Black this, black that”: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations’. Discourse & Society 18/3: 337-72
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth, Derek Edwards (2008) ‘“Did you have permission to smash your neighbour’s door?” Silly questions and their answers in police—suspect interrogations’,
  • Discourse Studies 10/1: 89-111.
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth H., Alexa Hepburn (2005) ‘“You can hear a lot through the walls”: Noise formulations in neighbour complaints. Discourse & Society, 16 (5), 647-673 [also in J. Potter, ed., (2007) Discourse and psychology. London: Sage: 468-493]
  • Stokoe, Elisabeth, Alexa Hepburn, Charles Antaki (2012). ‘Beware the “Loughborough School”? Interaction and the politics of intervention’, British Journal of Social Psychology. 51, 486-496
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth H., Janet Smithson (2001) ‘Making gender relevant: conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction’, Discourse & Society 12/2: 243-69 [also in J. Sunderland, ed.. (2006) Language and gender: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge: 184-89]
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth H., Janet Smithson (2002) ‘Gender and sexuality in talk-in-interaction: Considering a conversation analytic perspective’. In P. McIlvenny (Ed.), Talking gender and sexuality: Conversation, performativity and discourse in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 79-110
  • Stokoe, Elizabeth H., Ann WeatheraIl (2002) ‘Gender, language. conversation analysis and feminism’, Discourse & Society 13/6: 707-13
  • Stommel, Wyke (2008) ‘Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community’, Language@Internet, 5, article 5.
  • Stommel, Wyke (2012) ‘Salutations, closings and pronouns: Some aspects of recipient design in online counselling’, Communication & Medicine, 9/2: 145-158
  • Stommel, Wyke; Fleur van der Houwen (2013) ‘Formulations in “trouble” chat sessions. In: I. Kupferberg & I. Gilat, eds, Computer-mediated troubled talk. Special Issue: Language@Internet, 10, article 3, n.p
  • Stommel, Wyke; Tom Koole (2010) ‘The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member’, Discourse Studies 12: 357-378
  • Streeck, Jürgen; Charles Goodwin, Curtis LeBaron, eds. (2011) Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [Series: Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives]
  • Streeck, Jürgen; Charles Goodwin and Curtis LeBaron (2011) ‘Embodied interaction in the material world: an introduction’. In: Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, Curtis LeBaron, eds.
  • Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1-26
  • Streeck, Ulrich (2004) Auf den ersten Blick. Psychotherapeutische Beziehungen unter dem Mikroskop. [At first site: psychotherapeutic relationships under the microscope] Stuttgart: Klett- Cotta
  • Streeck, Ulrich (2008) ‘A psychotherapist’s view of conversation analysis’. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 173-87
  • Stribling, Penny, John Rae (2010) ‘Interactional Analysis of scaffolding in a mathematical task in ASD’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell: 185-208
  • Stribling, Penny, John Rae, Paul Dickerson (2009) ‘Using conversation analysis to explore the recurrence of a topic in the talk of a boy with an autism spectrum disorder’, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23/8: 555-582
  • Strong, Tom; Robbie Busch, Shari Couture (2008) ‘Conversational evidence in therapeutic dialogue’, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 34/3: 388-405
  • Stukenbrock, Anja (2014) ‘Take the words out of my mouth: Verbal instructions as embodied practices’ Journal of Pragmatics 65: 80-102
  • Suchman, Lucy (1987) Plans and situated action: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Suchman, Lucy A. (1988) ‘Representing practice in cognitive science’, Human Studies 11: 305-25
  • Suchman, Lucy (1993) ‘Technologies of accountability: of lizards and airplanes’. In: Graham Button, ed. Technology in working order: studies of work, interaction and technology. London: Routledge: 113-26
  • Suchman, Lucy (1993) ‘Do Categories Have Politics: The Language-Action Perspective Reconsidered’. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 1-14
  • Suchman, Lucy (1993) ‘Response to Vera and Simon’s Situated Action: A Symbolic Interpretation’, Cognitive Science 17, 1993: 71-75
  • Suchman, Lucy (1994) ‘Do categories have politics?: The language/action perspective reconsidered,’ Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2: 177-190
  • Suchman, Lucy (1994) ‘Working relations of technology production and use’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2: 21-39
  • Suchman, Lucy (1996) ‘Constituting shared workspaces’. In: Y. Engeström, D. Middleton, eds.
  • Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:35-60
  • Suchman, Lucy (1996) ‘Supporting articulation work’. In: R. Kling, ed. Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and social choices. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press: 407-23
  • Suchman, Lucy (1997) ‘Centers of communication: a case and some themes’. In: L.B.Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, B. Burge, eds. Discourse, tools and reasoning: essays in situated cognition.
  • Berlin: Spinger: 41-62
  • Suchman, Lucy (2000) ‘Making a case: “Knowledge” and “Routine” work in document production’. In Luff, Paul, J. Hindmarsh, C. Heath, eds., Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Systems Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 29-45
  • Suchman, Lucy (2000) ‘Embodied practices of engineering work’, Mind, Culture and Activity, 7/1&2: 4-18
  • Suchman, Lucy (2000) ‘Organising alignment: a case of bridge-building’, Organization, 7/2: 311- 327
  • Suchman, Lucy (2002) ‘Practice-based design of information systems : notes from the hyperdeveloped world’, Information Society, 18/2: 139-144
  • Suchman Lucy (2002) ‘Located accountabilities in technology production’, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14(2): 91-105
  • Suchman, Lucy A. (2005) ‘Affiliative Objects’, Organization, 12/3: 379-399
  • Suchman, Lucy A. (2007) Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Suchman, Lucy, A., Jeanette Blomberg, Julian E. Orr, Randall Trigg (1999). ‘Reconstructing technologies as social practice’, The American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 392-408.
  • Suchman, Lucy A.; Jeanette Blomberg, Randall Trigg, (2002) ‘Working artefacts: Ethnomethods of the prototype’, British Journal of Sociology, 53/2: 163-179
  • Suchman, Lucy, Brigitte Jordan, (1988) ‘Computerization and women’s knowledge’. In: K. Tijdens et al. eds. Women, work and computerization: forming new alliances. Amsterdam: North- Holland: 153-60
  • Suchman, Lucy, Brigitte Jordan, (1990) ‘Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews’,
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85: 232-41
  • Suchman, Lucy, Brigitte Jordan (1997) ‘Computerization and Women’s Knowledge. In: Philip Agre, Douglas Schuler, eds. Reinventing Technology, Rediscovering Community: Critical Explorations of Computing as a Social Practice. Greenwich, CT: Ablex: 97-105
  • Suchman, Lucy, Brigitte Jordan (1991) ‘Validity and the Collaborative Construction of Meaning in Face-to-Face Surveys’. In: Judy Tanur, ed., Questions about Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys. New York: Russell Sage: 241-70
  • Suchman, L.; K. Markakis, H. Beckman, R Frankel (1997) ‘A mode of empathic communication in the medical interview’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 4/277: 1680-1681.
  • Suchman, Lucy A., Randy H. Trigg (1991) ‘Understanding Practice: video as a medium for reflection and design’. In: J. Greenbaum, M. Kyng, eds. Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum: 65-89
  • Suchman, Lucy A., Randy H. Trigg (1993) ‘Artificial Intelligence as Craftwork’. In S. Chaiklin, J. Lave, eds., Understanding Practice: perspectives on activities and context. New York: Cambridge University Press: 144-78
  • Suchman, Lucy; Randall Trigg, Jeanette Blomberg (2002) ‘Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype’, British Journal of Sociology. 53: 163-80
  • Sudnow, David (1965) ‘Normal crimes: sociological features of a penal code in a public defender’s office’, Social Problems 12: 255-76
  • Sudnow, David (1967) Passing on: the social organization of dying. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
  • Sudnow, David (1972) ‘Temporal parameters of interpersonal observation’. In: David Sudnow, ed. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 259-79
  • Sudnow, David, ed. (1972) Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press
  • Sudnow, David (1978) Ways of the hand: the organization of improvised conduct. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  • Sudnow, David (1979) Talk’s body: a meditation between two keyboards. New York: Knopf
  • Sudnow, David (1983) Pilgrim in a microworld. London: Heinemann
  • Sudnow, David (2001) Ways of the Hand: A Rewritten Account. Cambridge, Mass. M.I.T. Press
  • Summerfield, Tracey; Alec McHoul (2005) ‘Family as a commonsensical device and its place in law’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 18: 243-261
  • Summerville, Jennifer, Barbara Adkins (2007) ‘Enrolling the citizen in sustainability: membership categorization, morality and civic participation’, Humand Studies 30/4: 429-446
  • Svahn, Johanna Ann-Carita Evaldsson, (2013) ‘Talking moral stances into being: the interactional management of moral reasoning in Aggression Replacement Training (ART) classroom sessions,
  • Text &Talk 33/6: 793-815
  • Svennevig, Jan (1999) Getting acquainted in conversation. A study of initial interactions.

(Pragmatics & Beyond New Series), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Svennevig, Jan (2001) ‘Institutional and conversational modes of talk in bureaucratic consultations’. In Anne Hvenekilde, Jacomine Nortier, eds. Meetings at the crossroads. Studies of multiculturalism and multilingualism in Oslo and Utrecht. Oslo: Novus: 106-35
  • Svennevig, Jan (2001) ‘Ja, jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegian’. In H.Vater, O.Letnes eds. Modality and more. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier:143-165
  • Svennevig, Jan (2003) ‘Echo answers in native/non-native interaction’, Pragmatics 13: 285-309
  • Svennevig, Jan (2004) ‘Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance’, Discourse Studies 6: 489-516
  • Svennevig, Jan (2008) ‘Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair’, Journal of Pragmatics 40/2: 333-348
  • Svennevig, Jan (2008) ‘Exploring leadership conversations’, Management Communication Quarterly 21, 529-536
  • Svennevig, Jan (2010) ‘Pre-empting reference problems in conversation’, Language in Society39/2, 173-202
  • Svennevig, Jan (2011) ‘Leadership style in managers’ feedback in meetings’. In: Jo Angouri, Meredith Marra, eds., Constructing Identities at Work. London: Palgrave: 17-39.
  • Svennevig, Jan, ed. (2012) Special Issue on ‘Interaction in Workplace Meetings’ Discourse Studies 14/1
  • Svennevig, Jan (2012) ‘Interaction in workplace meetings’, Discourse Studies 14/1: 3-10,
  • Svennevig, Jan (2012) ‘The agenda as resource for topic introduction in workplace meetings’,
  • Discourse Studies 14/1: 53-66
  • Svennevig, Jan (2012) ‘On being heard in emergency calls. The development of hostility in a fatal emergency call’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1393-412
  • Svennevig, Jan; Ronny Johansen (2011) ‘Sociopragmatic variation in the sequential organizationof talk’. In: Gisle Andersen, Karin Aijmer, eds. Pragmatics of Society (Handbooks of Pragmatics, vol. 5) Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter: 473-500
  • Svensson, Marcus Sanchez; Christian Heath, Paul Luff (2007) ‘Instrumental action: The timely exchange of implements during surgical operations’. In L. Bannon, I. Wagner, C. Gutwin, R. Harper, K.Schmidt eds. ECSCW 2007: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer - Supported Cooperative Work. London: Springer: 41-59.
  • Svensson, Marcus Sanchez,Paul Luff, Christian Heath (2009) ‘Embedding instruction in practice: Contingency and collaboration during surgical training. Sociology of Health&Illness, 31/6: 889- 906.
  • Svinhufvud, Kimmo; Sanna Vehviläinen (2013) ‘Papers, documents, and the opening of an academic supervision encounter’, Text &Talk; 33/1: 139-166
  • Swinkels, Marloes (1997) ‘”Een prettige vlucht”’ [“Have a nice flight” a study of check-in conversations]. In: Ludwien Meeuwesen & HannekeHoutkoop-Steenstra (red.), Sociale Interactie in Nederland. Utrecht: ISOR: 63-82
  • Szczepek-Reed, Beatrice (2004) ‘Turn-final intonation revisited’. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, C. Ford eds. Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 97-117
  • Szczepek-Reed, Beatrice (2006) Prosodic orientation in English conversation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Szczepek Reed, Beatrice (2009) ‘Prosodic orientation: A practice for sequence organization in broadcast telephone openings’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/6: 1223-1247
  • Szczepek Reed, Beatrice (2010) ‘Speech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-cultural talk-in- interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 42/4: 1037-1059
  • Szczepek-Reed, Beatrice (2010) Analysing conversation: An introduction to prosody. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Szczepek Reed, Beatrice (2010) ‘Intonation phrases in natural conversation: A participants’ category?’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 191-212[see: Anward, Jan (2010) ‘Making units: Comments on Beatrice Szczepek Reed “Intonation phrases in natural conversation: A participants’ category?”’. In: Dagmar Barth- Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 213-216 ]
  • Szczepek Reed, Beatrice (2013) ‘Rhythm and timing in interaction’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 4990-4995
  • Szczepek Reed, Beatrice(2013) ‘Conversation analysis and prosody’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed.
  • The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1082-1086
  • Szczepek Reed, Beatrice (2014) ‘Phonetic practices for action formation: Glottalization versus linking of TCU-initial vowels in German’, Journal of Pragmatics 62: 13-29
  • Szczepek Reed, Beatrice; Geoffrey Raymond, eds. (2013) Units of Talk – Units of Action. Amsterdam: Benjamins
  • Szczepek Reed, Beatrice; Geoffrey Raymond (2013) ‘The question of units for language, action and interaction’. In: Beatrice Szczepek Reed, Geoffrey Raymond, eds. Units of Talk – Units of Action. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 1 – 10
  • Szczepek Reed, Beatrice; Darren Reed, Elizabeth Haddon (2013) ‘NOW or NOT NOW: Coordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classes’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 46/1: 22-46
  • Szymanski, Margaret H. (1999). Re-engaging and dis-engaging talk in activity. Language in Society 28:1-23.
  • Szymanski, Margaret H. (2003) ‘Producing Text through Talk: Question-answering Activity in Classroom Peer Groups’, Linguistics and Education 13/4: 533-563
  • Szymanski, Margaret, Paul M. Aoki, Rebecca E. Grinter, Amay Hurst, James D. Thornton, Allison Woodruff (2008). ‘Sotto voce: Facilitating social learning in a historic house’, Computer- Supported Cooperative Work 17: 5-34.
  • Szymanski, Margaret H., Erik Vinkhuyzen, Paul M. Aoki, Allison Woodruff (2006) ‘Organizing a remote state of incipient talk: Push-to-talk mobile radio interaction’, Language in Society 35: 393-418
  • Taino, Liisa (2003) ‘”When shall we go for a ride?” A case of the sexual harassment of a young girl’, Discourse & Society 14: 173-90
  • Takagi, Tomoyo (1999) ‘”Questions” in argument sequences in Japanese’, Human Studies 22:397-423
  • Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen (2005) ‘Contingent requests: their sequential organization and turn shape’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(2), 159-177
  • Tanaka, Hiroko (1999) ‘Grammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-American English: The display of context, social identity and social relation’, Human Studies 22: 363-95
  • Tanaka, Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  • Tanaka, Hiroko (2000) ‘Turn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction’,Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 1-38
  • Tanaka, Hiroko (2000) ‘The particle ne as a turn-management device in Japanese conversation’.
  • Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1135-76.
  • Tanaka, Hiroko (2001) ‘Adverbials for turn-projection in Japanese: Towards a demystification of the “telepathic” mode of communication’, Language in Society 30: 559-587.
  • Tanaka, Hiroko (2001) ‘The implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japanese conversation: complementisers as pivotal devices’. In: M. Selting, E. Kouper-Kuhlen,, eds., Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 81-109
  • Tanaka, Hiroko (2004) ‘Prosody for marking transition-relevance places in Japanese conversation: The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objects’. In: Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Cecilia E. Ford, eds. Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 63-96
  • Tanaka, Hiroko (2005) ‘Grammar and the “timing” of social action: Word order and preference organization in Japanese’, Language in Society 34, 389-430
  • Tanaka, Hiroko (2008) ‘Delaying dispreferred responses in English: From a Japanese perspective’,
  • Language in Society 37/4: 487-513
  • Tanaka, Hiroko (2010) ‘Multimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle Huun: Displaying involvement without topical engagement’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 303-332 [see: Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar (2010) ‘Response tokens-A multimodal approach: Comments on Hiroko Tanaka “Multimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle Huun”’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010)
  • Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 333-338]
  • Tanaka; Hiroko (2013) ‘The Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement of epistemic coherence’, Journal of Pragmatics 55: 51-67
  • Tanaka, Hiroko, Mihoko Fukushima (2002) ‘Gender orientations to outward appearance in Japanese conversation: a study in grammar and interaction’, Discourse & Society 13/6: 749-65
  • Tapsell, Linda (2000) ‘Using applied conversation analysis to teach novice dietitians history taking skills’, Human Studies 23: 281-307
  • Tarplee, Clare (1996) ‘Working on young children’s utterances: prosodic aspects of repetition during picture labelling’. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen, M. Selting, eds. Prosody in conversation: interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 406-35
  • Tarplee, Clare (2010) ‘Next turn and intersubjectivity: a conversation analytic perspective on the role of ‘feedback’ in children’s language acquisition’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds.
  • Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell: 3-22
  • Tarplee, Clare, E. Barrow (1999) ‘Delayed echoing as an interactional resource: a case study of a 3-year-old child on the autistic spectrum’. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 13: 449-82
  • Taylor, Alex S., Richard Harper (2003) ‘The gift of the gab?: a design oriented sociology of young people’s use of mobiles’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12/3: 267-296
  • Tekdemir Yurtdas, Göklem (2012). Repetitions in Turkish: Talk among Friends [39 paragraphs].
  • Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13/2, Art. 22, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1202227.ten Have, Paul see Have, Paul ten
  • Terasaki, Alene Kiku (2004) ‘Pre-announcement sequences in conversation’. In: Gene H. Lerner, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 171-223
  • Terkourafi, Marina, Chryso Hadjidemetriou, Alexandra Vasilopoulou, eds. (2010) ‘Greek Conversation Analysis’, special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10/2
  • Theobald, Maryanne (2013) ‘Ideas as “possessitives”: Claims and counter claims in a playground dispute’, Journal of Pragmatics 45/1: 1-12
  • Tholander, Michael (2011) ‘Mundane whistleblowing: Social drama in assessment talk’,
  • Discourse Studies 13: 69-92
  • Ticca, Claudia Anna (2013) ‘The emergence of laughter during serious talk in bilingual medical consultations’. In: Phillip Glenn, Elizabeth Holt, eds. Studies of laughter in interaction. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 107-130
  • Tiitinen, Sanni; Johanna Ruusuvuori (2014) ‘Using formulations and gaze to encourage parents to talk about their and their children’s health and well-being’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47/1: 49-68
  • Toerien, Merran; A.Irvine, Paul Drew, Roy Sainsbury (2011) ‘Should mandatory jobseeker interviews be personalised? The politics of using conversation analysis to make effective practice’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 140-160
  • Toerien, Merran, Celia Kitzinger (2007) ‘Emotional labour in the beauty salon: turn design of task-directed talk’, Feminism & Psychology 17: 162-172.
  • Toerien, Merran, Celia Kitzinger (2007) ‘Emotional labour in action: navigating multiple involvements in the beauty salon’, Sociology 41: 645-662
  • Toerien, Merran; Rebecca Shaw, Roderick Duncan, Markus Reuber (2011) ‘Offering patients choices: A pilot study of interactions in the seizure clinic’, Epilepsy & Behavior 20: 312-320
  • Tolins, Jackson (2013) ‘Assessment and direction through nonlexical vocalizations in music instruction’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 46/1: 47-64
  • Tolmie, Peter; Andy Crabtree (2013) ‘A day out in the country’. In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds. Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 159-190
  • Tolmie, Peter; Mark Rouncefield (2011) ‘Organisational acumen’. In: Mark Rouncefield & Peter Tolmie, eds. Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate: 37-56
  • Tolmie, Peter; Mark Rouncefield, eds. Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate
  • Tolmie, Peter; Mark Rouncefield (2013) ‘Reading for pleasure: Bedtime stories’. In: Peter Tolmie, Mark Rouncefield, eds. Ethnomethodology at Play. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 54-71
  • Tolson, Andrew (2012) ‘“You’ll need a miracle to win this election” (J. Paxman 2005): Interviewer assertiveness in UK general elections 1983-2010’, Discourse, Context & Media 1/1: 45-53
  • Travers, Max (1997) The reality of law: Work and talk in a firm of criminal lawyers. Ashgate: Dartmouth, Aldershot
  • Travers, Max (2001) ‘Ethnométhodologie, analyse de conversation et droit’. In: Dupret, Baudouin (ed.) ‘Le droit en action et en contexte. Ethnométhodologie et analyse de conversation dans la recherche juridique’ [Law in action and in context: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis in research in the field of law] Droit et Société, No 48: 349-66
  • Travers, Max (2001) ‘Work, technology and the small office’, Ethnographic Studies 6: 73-82
  • Travers, Max (2006). ‘Understanding talk in legal settings: What law and society studies can learn from a conversation analyst (with replies from John Conley and Doug Maynard)’. Law and Social Inquiry, 31/2: 447–498.
  • Travers, Max (2012) The sentencing of children: Professional work and perspectives.
  • Washington, DC: New Academia Publishing
  • Travers, Max, John F. Manzo, eds. (1997) Law in Action: Ethnomethodological & Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Co.
  • Traverso, Véronique (2002) ‘Transcription et traduction des interactions en langue étrangère’ cahiers de praxématique 39: 77-99
  • Traverso, Véronique (2009) ‘The dilemmas of third-party complaints in conversation between friends’, Journal of Pragmatics, 41/12: 2385-2399
  • Traverso, Véronique (2014) ‘Positionnements identitaires multiples dans une réunion plurilingue: traces dans l’interaction et effets structurants’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 67-86
  • Traverso,Véronique, Renata Galatolo (2008) ‘Accès multiples au(x) contexte(s) : l’exemple de cuisinières en action’, VERBUM, Tome XXVIII, N° 2-3, 2006 , pp. 231-256.
  • Trinder, Liz; Alan Firth, Christopher Jenks (2010) ‘“So presumably things have moved on since then?” The management of risk allegations in child contact dispute resolution’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 24/1: 29-53
  • Trinder Liz, Christopher Jenks, Alan Firth.(2010) ‘Talking children into being in absentia: Children as a strategic and contingent resource in family court dispute resolution’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 22/2: 234-257.
  • Trognon, A., Dausendschön-Gay, U., Krafft, U., Riboni, C., eds. (1994) La construction interactive du quotidien. [The interactive construction of everyday life] Nancy, Presses universitaires de Nancy
  • Tulbert, Eve; Marjorie Harness Goodwin (2011) ‘Choreographies of attention: multimodality in a routine family activity’. In: Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, Curtis LeBaron, eds. Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 79-92
  • Turk, Monica J. (2004) ‘Using and in Conversational Interaction’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 37: 219-61
  • Turk, Monica J. (2007) ‘Self-referential gestures in conversation’, Discourse Studies 9: 558-566
  • Turner, Roy (1971) ‘Words, utterances, activities’. In: J.D. Douglas, ed. Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1970): 169-87
  • Turner, Roy (1972) ‘Some formal properties of therapy talk’. In: David Sudnow, ed. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 367-96
  • Turner, Roy, ed. (1974) Ethnomethodology: selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin
  • Turner, Roy (1976) ‘Utterance positioning as an interactional resource’, Semiotica 17: 233-54
  • Turowetz, Jason; Matthew M Hollander (2012) ‘Assessing the experience of speed dating’,
  • Discourse Studies 14: 635-658
  • Tutt, Dylan; Jon Hindmarsh (2011) ‘Reenactments at work: demonstrating conduct in data sessions’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/3: 211-236
  • Tuula Tykkyläinen (2010) ‘Achieving intersubjectivity in task interaction: comparing typically developing children and children with SLI initiating repair’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell: 227-248
  • Twer, Sheldon (1972) ‘Tactics for determining persons’ resources for depicting, contriving, and describing behavioral episodes’. In: David Sudnow, ed. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 339-66
  • Vallis, Rhyll (1999) ‘Members’ methods for entering and leaving #IRCbar: a conversation analytic study of internet relay chat’. In: K. Chalmers, S. Bogitini and P. Renshaw (eds), Educational Research in New Times. Flaxton: PostPressed, 117-27
  • Vallis, Rhyll (2001) ‘Applying membership categorization analysis to chat-room talk’. In: A. McHoul and M. Rapley (eds), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum, 86-99
  • Van Charldorp Tessa C. (2011) ‘The coordination of talk and typing in police interrogations’,
  • Crossroads for Language, Interaction and Culture 8: 61-92
  • Van Charldorp, Tessa (2013) ‘The intertwining of talk and technology: How talk and typing are combined in the various phases of the police interrogation’, Discourse & Communication 7/2: 221 -240
  • Van De Mieroop, Dorien; Jonathan Clifton (2012) ‘The interactional negotiation of group membership and ethnicity: The case of an interview with a former slave’, Discourse & Society 23: 163-183
  • Van Praet, Ellen (2009) ‘Staging a team performance: a linguistic ethnographic analysis of weekly meetings at a British embassy’, Journal of Business Communication 46/1: 80-99.
  • Vasilopoulou, Alexandra; Hadjidemetriou, Chryso; Terkourafi, Marina (2010) ‘Introducing Greek Conversation Analysis’ Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10/2 157-185
  • Vayreda, Agnès; Charles Antaki (2009) ‘Social Support and Unsolicited Advice in an Online Bipolar Disorder Forum. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 931-942
  • Vayreda, Agnès; Charles Antaki (2011) ‘To vaccinate or not? The disqualification of commercial sources of health advice in an online forum’, Communication & Medicine, 8/ 3: 273-282
  • Vehviläinen, Sanna (2000). ‘Counsellors’ responses to students’ troubles-talk in counselling encounters in Finnish career guidance training’. In Michael Seltzer, Christian Kullberg, Sören Peter Olesen, Ilmari Rostila, eds., Listening to the welfare state. Aldershot: Ashgate: 138-180
  • Vehviläinen, Sanna (2001). ‘Evaluative advice in educational counselling: the use of disagreement in the ‘stepwise entry’ to advice’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 34(3): 371-98
  • Vehviläinen, Sanna (2003) ‘Avoiding providing solutions: orienting to the ideal of students’ self- directedness in counselling interaction’, Discourse Studies 5: 389-414
  • Vehviläinen, Sanna (2003) ‘Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction’,
  • Text 23/4: 573-606
  • Vehviläinen, Sanna (2008) ‘Identifying and managing resistance in psychoanalytic interaction’. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 120-38
  • Vehviläinen, Sanna (2009) ‘Student-initiated advice in academic supervision’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42/2: 163-190
  • Vehviläinen, Sanna (2009) ‘Problems in the research problem: critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53/ 2: 185-201
  • Vehviläinen, Sanna M. (2012) ‘Question-prefaced advice in feedback sequences of Finnish academic supervisions’. In: Limberg, Holger; Miriam A. Locher, eds., Advice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 31-52
  • Vehviläinen, Sanna, Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki and Ivan Leudar (2008) ‘A review of conversational practices of psychotherapy’. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles, Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, Ivan Leudar, eds. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 188-97
  • Velkovska, Julia (2011) ‘Faire collectif sur internet. Formes de reconnaissance et de régulation dans les activités d’écriture électronique’. in Berger, M., Cefaï, D., Gayet-Viaud, C. (dir.), Du civil au politique. Ethnographies du vivre-ensemble. Peter Lang - Éditions Scientifiques Internationales, Bruxelles: 323-354
  • Velkovska Julia; Zouinar Moustafa, (2007) ‘Interaction visiophonique et formes d’asymétrie dans la relation de service’, Réseaux 144: 225-264
  • Velkovska, Julia; Zouinar Moustafa (2012) ‘Jugements et émotions dans les interactions institutionnelles’, ethnographiques.org, n° 25 - décembre ‘Filmer le travail : chercher, montrer, démontrer’ [on-line; http://www.ethnographiques.org/2012/Velkovska,Zouinar]
  • Vetlugin, Oleg (2000) ‘Preparations for voluntary death: the social organisation of suicidal concerns’, Ethnographic Studies 5: 68-93
  • Vine, Elaine W. (2008) ‘CA and SCT: strange bedfellows or useful partners for understanding classroom interactions?’, Discourse Studies 10: 673-693.
  • Vinkhuyzen, Erik; Margaret H. Szymanski (2005). Would you like to do it yourself? Service requests and their non-granting responses. In K. Richards and P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying conversation analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 91-106
  • Vinkhuyzen, Erik, Jack Whalen (2007) ‘Expert system technology in work practice: a report on service technicians and machine diagnosis’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 135-58
  • Vinkhuyzen, Erik, Marilyn Whalen, Margaret Szymanski (2006) ‘Security, efficiency, and customer service in calls to a financial services organization’, Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 11/2: 53-68
  • Viterna, Jocelyn S., Douglas W. Maynard (2002) ‘How uniform is standardization? Variation within and across survey research centers regarding protocols for interviewing’. In: Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & Johannes van der Zouwen, eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley: 365-97
  • Vöge, Monika (2010) ‘Local identity processes in business meetings displayed through laughter in complaint sequences’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/6: 1556-1576
  • Vöge, Monika; Johannes Wagner (2010) ‘Social Achievements and Sequential Organization of Laughter: Studies in the Honor of Gail Jefferson’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/6: 1469-1473vom Lehn, Dirk (2006) ‘Embodying experience: A video- based examination of visitors’ conduct and interaction in museums. European Journal of Marketing, 40:1340-1359.vom Lehn, Dirk (2013) ‘Withdrawing from exhibits: The interactional organisation of museum visits’. In: Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, Maurice Nevile eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter: 65-90.vom Lehn, Dirk; Christian Heath, Jon Hindmarsh (2005) ‘Examining exhibits: Interaction in museums and galleries’, Communication & Cognition, 38/3-4: 229-247
  • Voutilainen, Liisa (2012) ‘Responding to emotion in cognitive psychotherapy’.In A.Peräkyl ä, M.-L.Sorjonen, eds. Emotion in interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 235-255.
  • Voutilainen, Liisa; Pentti Henttonen, Mikko Kahri,, Maari Kivioja, Niklas Ravaja, Mikko Sams, Anssi Peräkylä (2014) ‘Affective stance, ambivalence, and psychophysiological responses during conversational storytelling’, Journal of Pragmatics, 68/1: 1–24
  • Voutilainen, Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, Johanna Ruusuvuori (2010) ‘Recognition and interpretation: responding to emotional experience in psychotherapy’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43/1: 85-107
  • Voutilainen, Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, Johanna Ruusuvuori (2010) ‘Professional non-neutrality: criticising the third party in psychotherapy’, Sociology of Health & Illness. 32/5: 798-816
  • Voutilainen, Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, Johanna Ruusuvuori (2010) ‘Misalignment as a Therapeutic Resource’, Qualitative Research in Psychology. 7/4:299-315
  • Voutilainen, Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, Johanna Ruusuvuori (2011) ‘Therapeutic change in interaction: Conversation analysis of a transforming sequence’, Psychotherapy Research 21/3: 348-365
  • Voysey, Margaret (1975) A constant burden: the reconstitution of family life. London: Routlegde & Kegan Paul
  • Voysey Paun, Margaret (2006) A constant burden: the reconstitution of family life. Aldershot: Ashgate [reprint of Voysey (1975) in the series ‘Ashgate Classics in Sociology’; with a new introduction by the Author]
  • Wadensjö, Cecilia (2008) ‘The shaping of Gorbachev: On framing in an interpreter-mediated talk-show interview’, Text & Talk 28 | 1: 119-146
  • Wagner, Johannes (1995) ‘Negotiating activity’ in technical problem solving. In A. Firth, ed., The Discourse of Negotiation. Studies of Language in the Workplace. Oxford: Pergamon: 223-46.
  • Wagner, Johannes (1995) ‘What makes a discourse a negotiation?’. In K. Ehlich, J. Wagner, eds., The Discourse of Business Negotiation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 9-36.
  • Wagner, Johannes, ed. (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language data’. Special Issue of
  • Journal of Pragmatics 26/2: 145-259
  • Wagner, Johannes (1996) ‘Language aquisition through foreign language interaction - a critical review of studies in Second Language Aquisition’. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 215-35
  • Wagner, Johannes (1998) ‘On doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhouse’. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 103-113.
  • Wagner, Johannes (1998) ‘Silences in international communication’. In D. Albrechtsen et al., eds.,
  • Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy. Odense: University Press, 79-91.
  • Wagner, Johannes (2009) ‘Whose transcripts? Some thoughts about transcription, stereotype and gourmet joking. In B. Fraser, K. Turner, eds., Language in life, and a life in language: Jacob Mey—A festschrift. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald: 415–22
  • Wagner, Johannes (2010) ‘Gail Jefferson 1938-2008’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42/6: 1474-1475
  • Wagner, Johannes (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and transcription and data’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1114-1121
  • Wagner, Johannes, Alan Firth (1997) ‘Communication strategies at work’. In: E. Kellerman, Gabriele Kasper, eds. Communication strategies: psycholinguistics and sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 323-44
  • Wagner, Johannes; Kristian Mortensen, eds. (2013) Conversation Analysis, a volume in Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 1057-1127
  • Wagner, Johannes; Monika Vöge, eds. (2010) Laughter in Interaction. Special Issue in Honor of Gail Jefferson. Journal of Pragmatics, 42/6: 1469-1576
  • Wakin, W.A., Don H. Zimmerman (1999) ‘Reduction and specialization in emergency and directory assistance calls’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 32:
  • Walker, Gareth (2004) ‘On some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turns in talk-in-interaction’. In E.Couper-Kuhlen, C.E. Ford, eds. Sound patterns in interaction: Cross- linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 147-169
  • Walker, Gareth (2007) ‘On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics, 39/12: 2217-2243
  • Walker, Gareth (2012) ‘Phonetics and prosody in conversation’. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: 455-74
  • Walker, Gareth (2013) ‘Young children’s use of laughter after transgressions’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 46/4: 363-382
  • Walker, Esther (1995) ‘Making a bid for change: formulations in union/managment negotiations’. In: A. Firth, ed. The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon: 101-40
  • Walker, Traci (2004 ) ‘’Repetition’ repairs: The relationship of phonetic structure and sequence organization’. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, C. E. Ford, eds., Sound patterns in interaction: Cross- linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 273 - 298
  • Walker, Traci; Paul Drew, John Local (2011) ‘Responding indirectly’, Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2434-2451
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2001) ‘Balancing the competing interests in seminar discussion: Peer referencing and asserting vulnerability’, Issues in Applied Linguistics 12: 29-50
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2002) ‘Expressing noncomprehension in seminar discussion’, Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1711-31
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2005) ‘The unofficial businesses of repair initiation: Vehicles for affiliation and disaffiliation’. In A. Tyler et al., eds., Language in use: Cognitive and discourse perspectives on language and language learning. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press:163-75
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2005) ‘Peer tutoring in a graduate writing center: Identity, expertise and advice resisting’, Applied Linguistics 26/2: 141-68
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2002) ‘Displaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussion’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35: 453-479.
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2003) ‘Also as a discourse marker: Its use in disjunctive and disaffiliative environments’, Discourse Studies 5: 415-36
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2007). ‘Complex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetries’, Text and Talk, 27(1): 107-37
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2007) ‘The multi-functionality of accounts in advice giving’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(3): 367-69
  • Waring, Hansun Z. (2008). ‘Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities’, The Modern Language Journal, 92/4: 577-594
  • Waring, Hansun Z. (2009). ‘Moving out of IRF: A single case analysis’, Language Learning, 59/4: 796-824.
  • Waring, Hansun Z. (2011). ‘Learner initiatives and learning opportunities’, Classroom Discourse, 2/2: 201-218
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2012) ‘The advising sequence and its preference structures in graduate peer tutoring at an American university’. In: Limberg, Holger; Miriam A. Locher, eds., Advice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 97-118)
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2012). ‘Yes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the language classroom’, Language and Education, 26/5: 451-469.
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2012). ‘Doing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterances’, Language and Communication, 32: 265-275.
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang (2012). ‘“Any questions?:” Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroom’, TESOL Quarterly, 46/4: 722-752.
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang; Sarah Creider, Tara Tarpey, Rebecca Black (2012) ‘A search for specificity in understanding CA and context’, Discourse Studies14: 477-492
  • Waring, Hansun Z.; Barbara Hruska, B. (2011). ‘Getting and keeping Nora on board: A novice elementary ESOL student teacher’s practices for lesson engagement’, Linguistics and Education, 22, 441-455.
  • Waring, Hansun Zhang; Barbara Hruska, (2012). ‘Problematic directives in pedagogical interaction’, Linguistics and Education, 23: 289-300.
  • Watermeyer, Jennifer, Claire Penn (2009) ‘The organization of pharmacist-patient interactions in an HIV/Aids clinic’, Journal of Pragmatics 41/10: 2053-2071
  • Watson, Graham, Robert M. Seiler, eds. (1992) Text in Context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage
  • Watson, D. Rodney (1976) ‘Some conceptual issues in the social identification of victims and Offenders.’ In: Emilio C. Viano, ed. Victims and Society., Washington, DC: Visage,
  • Watson, D. Rodney. (1976) ‘Sociological theory and the analysis of strategies of educational Redress.’ International Review of Education 22: 41-62.
  • Watson, D. Rod (1978) ‘Categorization, authorization and blame negotiation in conversation’,
  • Sociology 5: 105-13
  • Watson, D. Rod (1981) ‘Conversational and organisational uses of proper names: an aspect of counsellor-client interaction’. In: Atkinson, Heath, eds.: 91-106
  • Watson, D. Rod (1983) ‘The presentation of victim and motive in discourse: the case of police interrogations and interviews’, Victimology 8: 31-52 [reprinted in: Travers, M. & John F. Manzo, eds. (1997) Law in Action: Ethnomethodological & Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Co.: 77-97]
  • Watson, D. Rod (1986) ‘Doing the organizations work: an examination of a crisis intervention centre’. In: Fisher & Todd, eds.: 911-20
  • Watson, D. Rod (1987) ‘Interdisciplinary considerations in the analysis of proterms’. In: Graham Button,, J.R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 261-89
  • Watson, D. Rod (1990) ‘Some features of the elicitation of confessions in murder interrogations’. In: George Psathas, ed. Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America: 263- 96
  • Watson, Rod (1992) ‘The understanding of language use in everyday life: Is there a common ground?’. In: Watson, Graham, R.M. Seiler, eds., Text in Context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage: 1-19
  • Watson, Rod (1983) ‘Goffman, Talk and Interaction: Some Modulated Responses’, Theory, Culture and Society 2: 103-08
  • Watson, Rod (1994) ‘Harvey Sack’s sociology of mind in action’, Theory, Culture & Society 11: 169-86
  • Watson, Rod (1994) ‘Catégories, séquentialité et ordre social: un nouveau regard sur l’oeuvre de Sacks’. In: B. Fradin, L. Quéré, J. Widmer, eds. (1994) L’enquête sur les catégories. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]: 151-84
  • Watson, Rod (1995) ‘Some Potentialities and Pitfalls in the Analysis of Process and Personal Change in Counselling and Therapeutic Interaction’. In J. Siegfried, ed., Professional and Everyday Discourse as Behavior Change. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Watson, Rod (1997) ‘Some general reflections on ‘Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the analysis of conversation’. In: Hester, S., Peter Eglin, eds., Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 49-76
  • Watson, Rod (1997) ‘Ethnomethodology and textual analysis’. In: David Silverman, ed.
  • Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage: 80-98
  • Watson, Rod (1998) ‘Ethnomethodology, Consciousness and Self’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 5/2: 202-23
  • Watson, Rod (1999) ‘Driving in the forest and mountains: a pure and applied ethnography’,
  • Ethnographic Studies 4: 50-60
  • Watson, Rod (1999) ‘Reading Goffman on Interaction’. In G Smith (ed) Goffman and Social Organisation: Studies in a Sociological Legacy. London: Routledge: 138-55
  • Watson, Rod (2000) ‘The Character of “Institutional Talk”: A Response to Hester and Francis’,
  • Text, 20: 377-91
  • Watson, Rod (2000) ‘“Interpretive” Sociology in Great Britain: The State of the Art’. Swiss Review of Sociology 26: 507-29
  • Watson, Rodney (2001) ‘Continuité et transformation de l’ethnométhodologie’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 17-30
  • Watson, Rod (2005) ‘The visibility arrangements of urban public space: conceptual resources and methodological issues in analysing pedestrian movements’, Communication and Cognition 38/3-4
  • Watson, Rod (2006) ‘Tacit knowledge’, Theory, Culture & Society, 23/ 2-3: 208-210
  • Watson, Rod (2006) ‘La confiance comme phenomene pour la sociologie’. In A. Ogien, L. Quéré, eds. Les Moments de la Confiance. Paris: Economica Publishers: 143-168.
  • Watson, Rod (2009) ‘Harvey Sacks’. In: Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Ola Östman, Jef Verschueren, eds.
  • The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam: Benjamins: 206-214
  • Watson, Rod (2009) Analysing Practical and Professional Texts: A Naturalistic Approach. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate
  • Watson, Rod (2009) ‘Constitutive practices and Garfinkel’s notion of trust: revisited’, Journal of Classical Sociology 9/4: 475-499
  • Watson, Rod (2014) ‘Trust in interpersonal interaction and cloud computing’. In: Richard H. R. Harper, ed. Trust, Computing, and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 172-198
  • Watson, Rod; Andrew P. Carlin (2012) ‘“Information”: Praxeological Considerations’, Human Studies 35/2: 327-345
  • Watson, Rod, Jeff Coulter (2008) ‘The Debate over Cognitivism’, Theory, Culture & Society,25(2): 1-17
  • Watson, D. Rod, Wes W. Sharrock (1991) ‘Something on accounts’, D.A.R.G. Newsletter 7/2: 3- 12
  • Watson, D. Rodney, T.S. Weinberg (1982) ‘Interviews and the interactional construction of accounts of homosexual identity’, Social Analysis 11: 56-78.
  • Watson, Patrick, Christian Greiffenhagen (2009) ‘Press scrums: some preliminary observations’. In. Richard Fitzgerald, William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 115- 36
  • Weatheral, Ann (2002) ‘Towards understanding gender and talk-in-interaction’, Discourse & Society 13/6: 767-781
  • Weatherall, Ann (2011) ‘I don’t know as a prepositioned epistemic hedge’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44: 317-337
  • Weathersbee, T. Elizabeth, Douglas W. Maynard (2009) ‘Dialling for donations: practices and actions in the telephone solicitation of human tissues’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31/6: 803-816 [reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010)
  • Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell: 17-30]
  • Webb, Helena (2009) ‘"I’ve put weight on cos I’ve bin inactive, cos I’ve ’ad me knee done": moral work in the obesity clinic’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31/6: 854-871 [reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010) Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell: 66-82]
  • Webb, Helena; Christian Heath, Dirk vom Lehn, William Gibson (2013) ‘Engendering response: professional gesture and the assessment of eyesight in optometry consultations’,
  • Symbolic Interaction 36/2: 137-158
  • Webb, Helena; Dirk vom Lehn, Christian Heath, Will Gibson, Bruce J. W. Evans (2013) ‘The problem with “problems”: The case of openings in optometry consultations’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 46/1: 65-83
  • Weber, Tilo (2003, May). ‘There is no Objective Subjectivity in the Study of Social Interaction’ [53 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research[On-line Journal], 4(2). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-03/2-03weber-e.htm
  • Weeks, Peter (1985) ‘Error-Correction Techniques and Sequences in Instructional Settings: Toward a Comparative Framework. Human Studies 8: 195-233
  • Weeks, Peter (1990) ‘Musical time as a practical accomplishment: a change in tempo’, Human Studies 13: 323-59
  • Weeks, Peter (1996) ‘A rehearsal of a Beethoven passage: An analysis of correction talk’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29: 247-90
  • Weeks, Peter (1996) ‘Synchrony lost, synchrony regained: the achievement of musical coordination’, Human Studies 19: 199-228
  • Weeks, Peter (2002) ‘Performative error-correction in music: a problem for ethnomethodological description’, Human Studies 25: 359-85
  • Weijts,Wies; Hanneke Houtkoop, Patricia Mullen (1993) ‘Talking delicacy: Speaking about sexuality during gynecological consultations’. Sociology of Health & Illness, 15/3: 295-314.
  • Weilenmann, Alexandra; Daniel Normark, Eric Laurier (2014) ‘Managing walking together: The challenge of revolving doors’, Space and Culture, 17/2: 122-136
  • Weinberg, Darin (2012) ‘The social construction of self knowledge: A commentary on the legacy of Melvin Pollner’, The American Sociologist 43:76-84
  • Weingarten, Elmar Fritz Sack (1975) ‘Ethnomethodologie: Die methodische Konstruction der Realität’. In: Elmar, Weingarten, Fritz Sack, Jim Schenkein, hrsg. (1975) Ethnomethodologie: Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagslebens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp: 7-25
  • Weingarten, Elmar, Fritz Sack, Jim Schenkein, hrsg. (1975) Ethnomethodologie: Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagslebens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp
  • Weiste, Elina; Anssi Peräkylä (2013) ‘A comparative conversation analytic study of formulations in psychoanalysis and cognitive psychotherapy’, Research on Language and Social Interaction46/4: 299-321
  • West, Candace (1979) ‘Against our will: Male interruptions of females in cross-sex conversation’,
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327: 81-97
  • West, Candace (1983) ‘“Ask me no questions”:An analysis of queries and replies in physician - patient dialogues’. In S.Fisher, A.D.Todd, eds. The social organization of doctor-patientcommunication. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics: 75-106.
  • West, Candace (1984) ‘When the doctor is a‘lady’: Power, status and gender in physician-patient encounters’, Symbolic Interaction 7/1: 87-106.
  • West, Candace (1984) Routine Complications: Trouble with Talk between Doctors and Patients. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
  • West, Candace (1990) ‘Not just “doctor’s orders”: directive-response sequences in patients’ visits to women and men physicians’, Discourse and Society 1: 85-112
  • West, Candace (1995) ‘Women’s competence in conversation’, Discourse & Society 6: 107-31
  • West Candace (1996) ‘Ethnography and orthography: a (modest) methodological proposal’,
  • Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 25: 327-352
  • West, Candace (2006) ‘Co-ordinating closings in medical interviews: producing continuity of care’. In: John Heritage, Douglas W. Maynard, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 379- 415
  • West, Candace, Sarah Fenstermaker (1993) ‘Power, inequality, and the accomplishment of gender: An ethnomethodological view’. In: P. England (ed.) Theory on gender/Feminism on theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
  • West, Candace, Sarah Fenstermaker (1995) ‘Doing difference’, Gender and Society 9: 8-37
  • West, Candace, Richard Frankel (1991) ‘Miscommunication in medicine.” in Nikolas Coupland, Howard Ciles, John Wiemann, eds. Miscommunication and problematic talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage 210-228
  • West, Candace, Angela Garcia (1988) ‘Conversational shift work: a study of topical transition between women and men’, Social Problems 35: 551-75
  • West, Candace, Don. H. Zimmerman (1987) ‘Doing gender’, Gender and Society 1: 125-51
  • West, Candace, Don. H. Zimmerman (1991) ‘Doing gender’. In J.Lorber, S.A. Farrel (eds) The social construction of gender. London: Sage
  • Westerman, Michael. A. (2011). ‘Conversation analysis and interpretive quantitative research on psychotherapy process and problematic interpersonal behavior’. Theory & Psychology, 21/2 155-178
  • Wetherell, M. (1998) ‘Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue’, Discourse & Society 9: 387-412
  • Whalen, Jack (1991) ‘Conversation Analysis’. In: E.F. Borgatta & M.L. Borgatta, eds. The encyclopedia of sociology. New York: Macmillan
  • Whalen, Jack (1995) ‘A technology of order production: Computer-aided dispatch in public safety communication’. In. Paul ten Have & George Psathas, eds. Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 187-230
  • Whalen, Jack (1995) ‘Expert systems versus systems for experts: computer-aided dispatch as a support system in real world environments’. In: Thomas, P., ed., The Social and Interactional Dimensions of HumanComputer Interfaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 161-83
  • Whalen, Jack, Eric Vinkhuyzen (2000) ‘Expert systems in (inter)action: diagnosing document machine problems over the telephone’. In Paul Luff, J. Hindmarsh, C. Heath, eds., Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Systems Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 92-140
  • Whalen, Jack, Marilyn Whalen, Kathryn Henderson (2002) ‘Improvisational choreography in teleservice work’, British Journal of Sociology 53: 239-59
  • Whalen, Jack, Don H. Zimmerman (1998) ‘Observations on the display and management of emotion in naturally occurring activities: the case of “Hysteria”in calls to 9-1-1’, Social Psychological Quarterly 61: 141-59
  • Whalen, Jack, Don H. Zimmerman (2005) ‘Working a call: Multiparty management and interactional infrastructure in calls for help. In: Carolyn Baker, Michael Emmison, Alan Firth, eds.
  • Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines Amsterdam: John Benjamins 309–345
  • Whalen, Jack, Don H. Zimmerman, Marilyn R. Whalen, (1988) ‘When words fail: a single case analysis’, Social Problems 35: 333-62
  • Whalen, Marilyn R. (1995) ‘Working toward play: complexity in children’s fantasy activities’,
  • Language in Society 24: 315-48
  • Whalen, Marilyn R., Jack Whalen, Robert J. Moore, Geoffrey Raymond, Margaret Szymanski, Erik Vinkhuyzen (2004) ‘Studying workscapes as a natural observational discipline’. In: Phillip LeVine, Ron Scoloon, eds., Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press: 109-29
  • Whalen, Marilyn R., Don H. Zimmerman, (1987) ‘Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help’, Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 172-85
  • Whalen, Marilyn R., Don H. Zimmerman, (1990) ‘Describing trouble: practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police’. Language in Society 19: 465-92
  • Whelan, Pauline (2012) ‘Oxymoronic and sociologically monstrous? Feminist conversation analysis’, Qualitative Research in Psychology , 9/4: 279-291
  • White, Geoffrey M., Albert B. Robbilard (1990) ‘Doctor talk and Hawaiian ‘talk story’: the conversational organization of a clinical encounter’. In: W. von Raffler-Engel, ed. Doctor-patient interaction. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 197-213
  • Whitehead, Kevin A. (2009) ‘“Categorizing the categorizer”: The management of racial common sense in interaction’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 72/4: 325-342
  • Whitehead, Kevin A. (2011) ‘An ethnomethodological, conversation analytic approach to investigating race in South Africa’, South African Review of Sociology, 42/3: 1-22
  • Whitehead, Kevin A. (2012) ‘Racial categories as resources and constraints in everyday interactions: Implications for non-racialism in post-apartheid South Africa’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35/7: 1248-1265
  • Whitehead, Kevin A. (2012) ‘Moving forward by doing analysis’, Discourse Studies 14: 337-343
  • Whitehead, Kevin A. (2013) ‘Managing self/other relations in complaint sequences: the use of self-deprecating and affiliative racial categorizations’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46/2: 186-203
  • Whitehead, Kevin A.; Gene H. Lerner (2009) ‘When are persons‘ white’? On some practical asymmetries of racial reference in talk-in-interaction’, Discourse & Society,20/5: 613-641.
  • Wickes, Rebecca, Michael Emmison (2007) ‘They are all ‘doing gender’ but are they are all passing? A case study of the appropriation of a sociological concept’, The Sociological Review55:2: 311-30
  • Wide, Camilla. (2014) ‘The functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spoken Swedish’,
  • Journal of Pragmatics 63: 35-47
  • Widmer, Jean (1982) ‘Remarques sur les classements d’âge’, Revue suisse de sociologie 9: 337-64
  • Widmer, Jean (1986) Langage et action sociale; aspects philosophique en sémiotiques du langage dans la perspective de l’ethnomethodologie. Editions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse
  • Widmer, Jean (1987) ‘Quelques usages de l’âge: explorations dans l’organisation du sens’,
  • Lexique 5: 127-227
  • Widmer, Jean (1989) ‘Formes de communications et division du travail et changement dans une administration publique’. In: Langage et travail, 1989: 397-405
  • Widmer, Jean (2001) ‘Catégorisation, tours de parole et sociologie’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 207-38
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence (1971) ‘On meaning by rule’. In: Jack D. Douglas, ed. Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul: 107-35 (1970)
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence (1974) Language and social reality: the case of telling the convict code. The Hague: Mouton
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence (1974) ‘Telling the code’. In: Turner, Roy, ed. Ethnomethodology: selectedreadings. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 144-72
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence (1980) ‘Behavioristic operationalism and the lifeworld: chimpanzees and chimpanzee researchers in face-to-face interaction’, Sociological Inquiry 50: 75-103
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence (1988) ‘From resource to topic: some aims of conversation analysis’. In: J. Anderson, ed., Communication Yearbook 11. Beverly Hills: Sage: 444-54
  • Wieder, D.Lawrence (1993) ‘Colloquy: On Issues of Quantification in Conversation Analysis’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 151-226
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence (1999) ‘Ethnomethodology, Conversation, Analysis, Microanalysis, and the Ethnography of Speaking (EM-CA-MA-ES): resonances and basic issues’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 163-71
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence (2006) ‘Book Symposium: Remarks on Ken Liberman’s dialectical practice in Tibetan philosophical culture: an ethnomethodological inquiry into formal reasoning’, Human Studies 29: 387-392
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence, S. Pratt (1990) ‘On being a recognizable Indian among Indians’. In: D. Carbaugh, ed. Cultural communication and intercultural contact. Hillsdale: Erlbaum: 45-64
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence, Steven Pratt (1990) ‘On the occasioned and situated character of members’ questions and answers, “is he or she a real Indian?”’, In: D. Carbaugh, ed. Cultural communication and intercultural contact. Hillsdale: Erlbaum: 65-75
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence, Don H. Zimmerman (1974) ‘Generational Experience and the Development of Freak Culture’, Journal of Social Issues, 30, 2, 137-162
  • Wieder, D. Lawrence; Don H. Zimmerman, Geoffrey Raymond (2010) ‘UCLA: Then and Now’. In W. Leeds-Hurwitz, ed., The Social History of Language and Social Interaction Research: People, Places, Ideas, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
  • Wilkinson, Ray (1995) ‘Aphasia: conversation analysis of a non-fluent aphasic’. In M. Perkins, S. Howard, eds. Case Studies in Clinical Linguistics. London:Whurr
  • Wilkinson, Ray (1999). ‘Conversation Analysis and Aphasia: Introduction’. Aphasiology 13(4-5), 251-258.
  • Wilkinson, Ray (1999). Sequentiality as a problem and a resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology 13(4), 327-343.
  • Wilkinson, Ray (2004). ‘Reflecting on talk in speech and language therapy: some contributions using conversation analysis. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders39(4), 497-503
  • Wilkinson, Ray (2006) ‘Applying conversation analysis to aphasic talk: From investigation to intervention’, Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 11/2: 99-110
  • Wilkinson, Ray (2007) ‘Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences’, Journal of Pragmatics39/3: 542-569
  • Wilkinson, Ray (2009) ’Projecting a reference in aphasic talk and normal talk, Discourse Processes, 46/2&3: 206-225
  • Wilkinson, Ray (2011) ‘Changing interactional behaviour: using conversation analysis in intervention programmes for aphasic conversation’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 32-53
  • Wilkinson, Ray (2013) ‘Conversation analysis and communication disorders’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 962-967
  • Wilkinson, Ray, ed. (2013) ‘Conversation analytic investigations of dysarthria and hearing impairment’, special issue of Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4/11
  • Wilkinson, Ray (2013) ‘Conversation analytic investigations of dysarthria and hearing impairment: The impact of motor and sensory impairments on social interaction’, Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4/1:1-26
  • Wilkinson, Ray, Suzanne Beeke, Jane Maxim (2003). ‘Adapting to conversation: on the use of linguistic resources by speakers with fluent aphasia in the construction of turns at talk’. in: Charles Goodwin, ed. Conversation and Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press, 59-89.
  • Wilkinson, Ray, Suzanne Beeke, Jane Maxim (2010) ‘Formulating actions and events with limited linguistic resources: enactment and iconicity in agrammatic aphasic talk’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43/1: 57-84
  • Wilkinson, Ray; Steven Bloch, Michael Clarke (2011) ‘On the use of graphic resources in interaction by people with communication disorders’. In: Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, Curtis LeBaron, eds. Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 152-68
  • Wilkinson, Ray, K. Bryan, S. Lock, K. Bayley, Jane Maxim, C. Bruce, A. Edmundson, D. Moir. (1998). ‘Therapy using conversation analysis: helping couples adapt to aphasia in conversation’.
  • International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 33, 144-149
  • Wilkinson, Ray , M. Gower, Suzanne Beeke, Jane Maxim (2007). ‘Adapting to conversation as a language-impaired speaker: changes in aphasic turn construction over time’, Communication and Medicine 4(1), 79-97.
  • Wilkinson, Sue. (2006) ‘Analysing interaction in focus groups’. In P. Drew, G. Raymond, D.Weinberg, eds. Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London: Sage: 72-93
  • Wilkinson, Sue (2011) ‘Gender, routinization and recipient design’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 112-134
  • Wilkinson, Sue (2011) ‘Constructing ethnicity statistics in talk-in-interaction: Producing the “White European”’, Discourse & Society 22: 343-361,
  • Wilkinson, Sue (2011) ‘Improving ethnic monitoring on a telephone helpline’. In: Charles Antaki, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan: 75-97
  • Wilkinson, Sue, Celia Kitzinger (2003) ‘Constructing identities: a feminist conversation analytic approach to positioning in action’, in R. Harré and F. Moghaddam, eds. The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political and Cultural Contexts. Westport, CT: Praeger: 157-80.
  • Wilkinson, Sue, Celia Kitzinger (2006) ‘Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation’, Social Psychology Quarterly 69/2: 150-82
  • Wilkinson, Sue, Celia Kitzinger (2007) ‘Conversation analysis, gender and sexuality’. In Ann Weatherall, Bernadette Watson, Cindy Gallois, eds., Language, Discourse and Social Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan: 206-230
  • Wilkinson, Sue; Ann Weatherall (2011) ‘Insertion Repair’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/1: 65-91
  • Williams, Robin (2007) ‘The problem of dust: forensic investigation as practical action’. In: Stephen Hester, David Francis, eds. Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate: 195-210
  • Wilson, Thomas P. (1970) ‘Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation”,
  • American Sociological Review 35 (4): 697-710.
  • Wilson, Thomas P. (1971) ‘Normative and interpretive paradigms in sociology’. In: Jack D. Douglas, ed. Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge.
  • London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1970): 57-70
  • Wilson, Thomas P. (1982) ‘Qualitative oder quantitative Methoden in der Sozialforschung’,
  • Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 34: 487-508
  • Wilson, Thomas P. (1991) ‘Social structure and the sequential organization of interaction’. In: Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, eds. Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press: 22-43
  • Wilson, Thomas P. (2003) ‘Garfinkel’s Radical Program’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 36: 487-94
  • Wilson, Thomas P., J. Wiemann, Don H. Zimmerman (1984) ‘Models of turntaking in conversational interaction’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3: 159-83
  • Wilson, Thomas P., Don H. Zimmerman, (1986) ‘The structure of silence between turns in two- party conversation’, Discourse Processes 9 : 375-90
  • Winchatz, Michaela R., Alexander Kozin (2008) ‘Comical hypothetical: arguing for a conversational phenomenon’, Discourse Studies 10: 383-405.
  • Winiecki, Don (2008) ‘The expert witnesses and courtroom discourse: applying micro and macro forms of discourse analysis to study process and the ’doings of doings’ for individuals and for society’, Discourse & Society 19: 765-781
  • Winship, Christopher; Christopher Muller (2011) ‘Ethnomethodology and consequences: comment on Emirbayer and Maynard’s “pragmatism and ethnomethodology”’, Qualitative Sociology 34: 283-286
  • Wolff, Stephan (1995) Text und Schuld: Die Rhetorik psychiatrischer Gerichtsgutachten. [Text and guilt: the rhetorics of psychiatric advice] Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter
  • Wong, Jean (2000). ’Delayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker English conversation’. Applied Linguistics 21:244- 67.
  • Wong, Jean; Hansun Zhang Waring (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York. Routledge.
  • Woodruff, Allison, Paul M. Aoki (2004). ’Push-to-talk social talk’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 13(5- 6):409- 41.
  • Woodruff, Allison; M. H. Szymanski,, R. E. Grinter,, P. Aoki (2002). ‘Practical strategies for integrating a conversation analyst in an interactive design process’ . In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. London, ACM Press: 19-28
  • Wooffitt, Robin (1992) Telling tales of the unexpected: the organization of factual discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf
  • Wooffitt, Robin C. (2000) ‘Some Properties of the Interactional Organisation of Displays of Paranormal Cognition in Psychic-sitter Interaction’, Sociology 43: 457-79
  • Wooffitt, Robin C. (2001) ‘Raising the dead: reported speech in medium-sitter interaction’,
  • Discourse Studies 3: 351-74
  • Wooffitt, Robin (2005) ‘From process to practice: language, interaction and ‘flashbulb’ memories’, In: Hedwig te Molder, Jonathan Potter, eds. Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 203-25
  • Wooffitt, Robin (2005) Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London, etc. Sage Publications
  • Wooffitt, Robin (2006) The language of mediums and psychics: the social organization of everyday miracles Aldershot: Ashgate
  • Wooffit, Robin (2007) The dead in service of the living’. In: Elizabeth, Holt, Rebecca Clift, eds.
  • Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 244-69
  • Wooffitt, Robin,. Simon Allistone, S. (2005) ‘Towards a Discursive Parapsychology: Language and the Laboratory Study of Anomalous Communication’. Theory & Psychology 15: 325-355.
  • Wooffitt, Robin Simon Allistone (2008) ‘Participation, procedure and accountability: `you said’ speech markers in negotiating reports of ambiguous phenomena’, Discourse Studies 10: 407-427
  • Wooffitt, Robin, Colin Clark (1998) ‘Mobilizing discourse and social identities in knowledge talk’. In: Charles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe, eds. Identities in Talk. London, Sage: 107-20
  • Wooffitt, Robin, Nicola Holt (2010) ‘Silence and its organization in the pragmatics of introspection’, Discourse Studies 12: 379-406
  • Wooffitt, Robin; Nicola Holt (2011) ‘Introspective discourse and the poetics of subjective experience’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/2: 135-156
  • Wooffitt, Robin, Sue Widdicombe (2006) ‘Interaction in Interviews’ In Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, Darin Weinberg, eds. Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London, etc. Sage: 28-49
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1977) ‘Sharing: some notes on the organization of talk in a therapeutic community’, Sociology 11: 333-50
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1981) ‘The management of grantings and rejections by parents in request sequences’, Semiotica 37: 59-89
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1981) ‘Two request forms for four years olds’, Journal of Pragmatics 5: 511-23
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1981) ‘Children’s use of address terms’. In: Peter French and Margaret MacLure, eds. Adult-child conversation. New York: St. Martins: 142-58
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1984) ‘Some aspects of children’s use of “please” in request sequences’. In: Peter Auer, A. di Luzio, eds., Interpretive sociolinguistics. Tübingen: … Verlag: 147-63
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1986) ‘Rules in action: orderly features of action that formulate rules’. In: J. Cook-Gumperz, W.A. Corsaro, J. Streeck, eds., Children’s worlds and children’s language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 147-68
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1989) ‘Remarks on the methodology of conversation analysis’. In: D. Roger, Peter Bull, eds., Conversation: an interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 238-58
  • Wootton, Anthony (1989) ‘Speech from and to a severely retarded young Down’s Syndrome child’. In: M. Beveridge, G Conti-Ramsden, I. Leudar (eds), The language and communication of mentally handicapped people. London: Chapman
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1990) ‘Pointing and interaction initiation: the behaviour of young children with Down’s syndrome when looking at books’. Journal of Child Language 17: 565-89
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1991) ‘Obtaining an object from a young child: the social organization of a set of practices’, Sociological Studies of Child Development 4: 155-79
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1994) ‘Object transfer, intersubjectivity and third position repair: early developmental observations of one child’, Journal of Child Language 21 543-64
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (1997) Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. [Reprinted in paperback, 2005]
  • Wootton, Anthony. J. (1999) ‘An investigation of delayed echoing in a child with autism’, First Language, 19,359-381
  • Wooton, Anthony J. (2002/2003) ‘Interactional Contrasts Between Typically Developing Children and Those with Autism, Asperger’s Syndrome, and Pragmatic Impairment’, Issues in Applied Linguistics 13/2
  • Wootton, Anthony (2005) ‘Interactional and sequential configurations informing request format selection in children’s speech’. in: Hakulinen, Auli, Margret Selting, eds. (2005) Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 185-207
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (2006) ‘Children’s practices and their connections with “mind”’, Discourse Studies 8: 191-198
  • Wootton, Anthony J. (2007) ‘A puzzle about Please: repair, increments, and related matters in the speech of a young child’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40 ( 2-3): 171-98
  • Wootton, Anthony(2010) ‘The sequential skills of a two year old: one child’s use of the word “actually”’. In: Hilary Gardner, Michael Forrester, eds. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: insights from conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell 59-73
  • Wowk, Maria T. (1984) ‘Blame allocation, sex and gender in a murder Interrogation’, Women’s Studies International Forum 7: 75-82
  • Wowk, Maria T. (1989) ‘Emotion talk’. In: B. Torode, ed. Text and Talk as Social Practice.
  • Dordrecht/Providence, R.I.: Foris Publications: 51-71
  • Wowk, Maria (2007) ‘Kitzinger’s feminist conversation analysis: Critical observations’, Human Studies 30/2: 131-55
  • Wowk, Maria T., Andrew P. Carlin (2004 ) ‘Depicting a Liminal Position in Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorization Analysis: The Work of Rod Watson’
  • Human Studies 27: 69-89
  • Wright, Melissa (2011) ‘The phonetics-interaction interface in the initiation of closings in everyday English telephone calls’, Journal of Pragmatics: 43/4: 1080-1099
  • Wrobbel, E.D. (2003) ‘The Interactional Construction of Self-Revelation: Creating an “Aha” Moment’. In: Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, Jenny Mandelbaum, eds. Studies in Language and
  • Social Interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahweh, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum: 353-62
  • Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk: A conversation analysis of Mandarin final particles. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series]
  • Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006). ‘Initiating repair and beyond: The use of two repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin conversation’. Discourse Processes, 41, 67-109
  • Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) ‘Repetition in the initiation of repair’. in: Jack Sidnell, ed.
  • Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 31-59
  • Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) ‘A conversation analysis of self-praising in everyday Mandarin interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/13: 3152-3176
  • Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) ‘Managing turn entry: The design of EI-prefaced turns in Mandarin conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics, 66: 139–161.
  • Wynn, Rolf, Michael Wynn (2006) ‘Empathy as an interactionally achieved phenomenon in psychotherapy: Characteristics of some conversational resources’, Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1385-97
  • Yasui, Eiko (2013) ‘Collaborative idea construction: Repetition of gestures and talk in joint brainstorming’, Journal of Pragmatics 46/1: 157-172
  • Yearley,S.; J.D. Brewer, (1989) ‘Stigma and conversational competence: A conversation analytic study of the mentally handicapped’, Human Studies 12:1-2: 97-115
  • Yoon, K.E. (2010) ‘Questions and responses in Korean conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics42/10: 2782-2798
  • Yu, Changrong (2013) ‘Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: A multimodal analysis’, Journal of Pragmatics 50: 1-22
  • Zappulli, Luisa (2001) ‘Les savoirs en action. La répartition géographique des auditeurs de justice à l’intérieur du dispositif de formation professionnelle’. In: Dupret, Baudouin (ed.) ‘Le droit en action et en contexte. Ethnométhodologie et analyse de conversation dans la recherche juridique’ [Law in action and in context: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis in research in the field of law] Droit et Société, No 48: 417-37
  • Zappulli, Luisa (2005) ‘Savoirs professionnels et sens commun en milieu judiciaire : l’activité professionnelle du médecin légiste dans le parquet de Lecce’ [Professional and Commonsense Knowledge in a Judicial Setting : The Forensic Doctor at Work in the Prosecution Office of Lecce], Droit et Société #61: 683-700
  • Zayts, Olga; Stephanie Schnurr (2011) ‘Laughter as medical providers’ resource: negotiating informed choice in prenatal genetic counseling’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/2: 1-20
  • Zemel, Alan;Timothy Koschmann, (2011) ‘Pursuing a question: Reinitiating IRE sequences as a method of instruction’, Journal of Pragmatics 43/2: 475-88
  • Zemel, Alan; Timothy Koschmann (2014) ‘“Put your fingers right in here”: Learnability and instructed experience’ Discourse Studies 16/2: 16: 163-183
  • Zemel, Alan; Timothy Koschmann, Curtis LeBaron(2011) ‘Pursuing a response: prodding recognition and expertise within a surgical team’. In: Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, Curtis LeBaron, eds. Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 227-42
  • Zemel, Alan, Timothy Koschmann, Curtis LeBaron, Paul Feltovich (2008) ‘“What are we missing?” Usability’s indexical ground’, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 17: 63-85.
  • Zemel, Alan, Fatos Xhafa, Murat Cakir (2007). ‘What’s in the mix? Combining coding and conversation analysis to investigate chat-based problem-solving’, Learning and Instruction, 17/4: 405-415
  • Zimmerman, Don H. (1969) ‘Record-keeping and the intake process in a public welfare agency’. In: S. Wheeler, ed. On record: files and dossiers in American life. New York: Russell Sage: 319- 45
  • Zimmerman, Don H. (1971) ‘The practicalities of rule use’. In: Jack D. Douglas, ed.
  • Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1970): 221-38
  • Zimmerman, Don H. (1978) ‘Ethnomethodology’, The American Sociologist 13: 6-15
  • Zimmerman, Don H. (1984) ‘Talk and its occasion: the case of calling the police’. In: D. Shiffren, ed. Meaning, form and use in context: linguistic applications. (Georgetown Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics) Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press:210-28
  • Zimmerman, Don H. (1988) ‘On conversation: the conversation analytic perspective’. In: J. Anderson, ed., Communication Yearbook 11. Beverly Hills: Sage: 406-32
  • Zimmerman, Don H. (1992) ‘Achieving context: openings in emergency calls’. In: Graham Watson, R.M. Seiler, eds. Text in Context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage: 35- 51
  • Zimmerman, Don H. (1992) ‘The interactional organization of calls for emergency’. In: Paul Drew, John Heritage, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 418-69
  • Zimmerman, Don (1993) ‘Acknowledgement tokens and speakership incipiency revisited’,
  • Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 179-94
  • Zimmerman. Don H. (1999) ‘Horizontal and vertical comparative research in language and social interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 195-203
  • Zimmerman, Don H. (1998) ‘Identity, context and interaction’. In: Charles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe, eds. Identities in Talk. London, Sage: 87-106
  • Zimmerman, Don H. (2007) ‘Mind and institution: an interactional perspective’, Contemporary Sociology-a Journal of Reviews 36/3: 219-221
  • Zimmerman, Don H, Deirdre Boden (1991) ‘Structure-in-Action’. In: Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, eds. Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press: 3-21
  • Zimmerman, Don H., Melvin Pollner (1971) ‘The everyday world as a phenomenon’. In: Jack D. Douglas, ed. Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge.
  • London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1970): 80-103
  • German translation: ‘Die Alltagswelkt als Phänomen’. In: Elmar Weingarten, Fritz Sack, Jim Schenkein, hrsg. (1975) Ethnomethodologie: Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagslebens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp:64-104
  • Zimmerman, Don, Candace West (1975) ‘Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation’. In: B. Thorned, N. Henley, eds. Language and sex: difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass. Newbury House: 105-29
  • Zimmerman, Don H., D. Lawrence Wieder (1977) ‘You can’t help but get stoned: notes on the social organization of marijuana smoking’, Social Problems 25: 198-207
  • Zimmerman, Erica (2007) ‘Constructing Korean and Japanese interculturality in talk: ethnic membership categorization among users of Japanese’, Pragmatics 17: 71-94
  • Zinken, Jörg; Eva Ogiermann (2011) ‘How to propose an action as objectively necessary: The case of polish trzeba x (“One Needs to x”)’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/3:263-287
  • Zinken, Jörg; Eva Ogiermann (2013)‘Responsibility and action: invariants and diversity in requests for objects in british english and polish interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 46/3: 256-276
  • Zucchermaglio, Cristina, Francesca Alby (2005) Gruppi e tecnologie al lavoro. Roma: Laterza
  • Zucchermaglio, Cristina, Francesca Alby, eds. (2006): Psicologia culturale delle organizzazioni. Roma:Carocci