Roca-Cuberes2016

From emcawiki
Revision as of 02:00, 23 April 2016 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Carles Roca-Cuberes |Title=Diagnosing as an Interactional Achievement in Psychiatric Interviews |Editor(s)=Jessica Nina Lester; M...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Roca-Cuberes2016
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Roca-Cuberes2016
Author(s) Carles Roca-Cuberes
Title Diagnosing as an Interactional Achievement in Psychiatric Interviews
Editor(s) Jessica Nina Lester, Michelle O'Reilly
Tag(s) EMCA, Psychiatry, Diagnosis, Mental Health
Publisher
Year 2016
Language
City
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 191-208
URL Link
DOI 10.1057/9781137496850_11
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

What is involved in exploring a patient’s mental state? How is a diagnosis or a decision about a patient’s psychopathological status accomplished? How do psychiatrists make patients talk about their problems? The first encounter, in a psychiatric hospital, between a psychiatrist and the prospective patient is quite significant for the fate of the latter. In a psychiatric intake interview (PII) the psychiatrist’s official task is to determine whether a person should be hospitalised – voluntarily or involuntarily – as a patient on the basis of the person’s observable behaviour during the interview. Customarily, this implies that the psychiatrist needs to solicit the patient to talk about the problems that brought him/her to hospital and make a decision regarding the candidate patient’s mental state. In the other type of psychiatric interview, the subsequent psychiatric interview, the psychiatrist’s assignment is to monitor the behavioural progress of a psychiatric in-patient, with the view to a possible future discharge. For example, in the adult psychiatric treatment interview, psychiatrists are charged with asking questions of the patients with appropriate depth and pace (Thompson & McCabe, Chapter 20, this volume).

Notes