Williams2016

From emcawiki
Revision as of 01:47, 23 April 2016 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Val Williams; Marcus Jepson; Lisa Ponting; Kerrie Ford |Title=Inclusive Conversation Analysis with Disabled People |Editor(s)=Miche...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Williams2016
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Williams2016
Author(s) Val Williams, Marcus Jepson, Lisa Ponting, Kerrie Ford
Title Inclusive Conversation Analysis with Disabled People
Editor(s) Michelle O'Reilly, Jessica Nina Lester
Tag(s) EMCA, Disability, Membership Categorization Analysis
Publisher
Year 2016
Language
City
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 82-100
URL Link
DOI 10.1057/9781137496850_5
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Disability Studies (DS) approaches lie at the heart of this chapter, which concerns itself with an analysis of interactions in which people with the label of intellectual disabilities (ID) engage with social care workers. An intellectual disability, by definition, is a lifelong impairment, which involves cognitive limitations as well as difficulties with social functioning, and coping with everyday life (Emerson & Heslop, 2010). However, the category is very broad, differentiated, and often blurred (Williams, Swift, & Mason, 2015), and there are strong reasons for avoiding a prior impairment-related definition. In Disability Studies, the very notion of disability is critiqued and questioned, with social model adherents following Oliver (1990) in viewing disability as the product of a disabling society which fails to include disabled people. While not denying the embodied reality and impact of impairments on the individual (see Shakespeare, 2006; Shakespeare & Watson, 2001; Thomas, 2004), this chapter is simply more interested in the way in which categories of disability emerge from particular social circumstances, contexts and interactions. In conducting the research, we have worked closely to include people with the label of ID as active participants in the research process, and we aim to explore some different ways in which this can be achieved in research about interaction.

Notes