Deppermann2000
| Deppermann2000 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Deppermann2000 |
| Author(s) | Arnulf Deppermann |
| Title | Ethnographische Gesprächsanalyse: Zu Nutzen und Notwendigkeit von Ethnographie für die Konversationsanalyse1 |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, conversation analysis, ethnography, context, discourse analysis, qualitative methods, methodology, sociology of language, sociolinguistics, adolescents' slang |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2000 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 96-124 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
A rigid empirical and phenomenologically based methodology provides for con- versation analysis' advantages over other approaches to the study of discourse. This superiority, however, is seriously flawed at one point: CA misconstrues the indispensable role interpretation plays for the analysis of discourse. It therefore neglects the preconditions and the effects by which the analysts' knowledge in- evitably shapes the process and the results of conversation analytic studies. One sort of knowledge that is most important in this respect is ethnographic know- ledge. It is shown that there are several systematic issues which favor or even re- quire ethnographic knowledge to be used in order to improve and validate a con- versation analytic study. The paper closes with a discussion of criteria for the adequacy to appeal to bits of ethnographic knowledge when analysing talk-in-inter- action.
Notes
