Antaki2007
Revision as of 12:07, 16 February 2016 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
| Antaki2007 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Antaki2007 |
| Author(s) | Charles Antaki |
| Title | Mental-health practitioners’ use of idiomatic expressions in summarising clients accounts |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 39 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 527–541 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.009 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article is about how some British mental-health professionals use idiomatic expressions (like ‘for all the world’, ‘at the end of the day’, ‘once in a blue moon’ and so on) in their dealings with clients. I found that the practitioner sometimes directly or indirectly attributed these expressions to the client. In each case the practitioner was exploiting what Drew and Holt (1988) report is an interactionally terminal feature of idioms: their supposed universality and unchallengeability. The effect was to achieve some institutional objective: to close down a topic, to render it comparatively harmless, or, in at least one case, to problematize it and make it fit for therapy.
Notes
