Jefferson2002
Revision as of 04:17, 12 February 2016 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
| Jefferson2002 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Jefferson2002 |
| Author(s) | Gail Jefferson |
| Title | Is “no” an acknowledgment token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(–) tokens |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Acknowledgements, Affiliation, Continuer, US English, British English |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2002 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 34 |
| Number | 10-11 |
| Pages | 1345–1383 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00067-X |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This study investigates uses of the response-token ‘no’ by British and American speakers. Results of the study indicate that the token is used differently by members of those two cultures: ubiquitously—as a ‘continuer’—by the British, and selectively—as an ‘affiliative’—by Americans.
Notes
