Mason1997
Revision as of 05:14, 18 January 2016 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Tom Mason |Title=An Ethnomethodological Analysis of the Use of Seclusion |Tag(s)=EMCA; seclusion; psychiatry |Key=Mason1997 |Year=1997 |...")
| Mason1997 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Mason1997 |
| Author(s) | Tom Mason |
| Title | An Ethnomethodological Analysis of the Use of Seclusion |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, seclusion, psychiatry |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1997 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Advanced Nursing |
| Volume | 26 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 780–789 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00411.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The use of seclusion in psychiatric practice is a contentious issue. This paper reports on an ethnomethodological approach to understanding the decision-making process in the use of seclusion. Through first-level and second-level reasoning analysis, three themes emerged which underscored the subjects' rationalization process. These were: (a) mechanistic searching, (b) frame conflict, and (c) asylum status. This research suggests that the decision to use seclusion is based on a complex interplay of cultural and organizational factors rather than due to the presentation of symptoms by the patient.
Notes
