DHondt2011

From emcawiki
Revision as of 09:14, 30 June 2015 by DarceySearles (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Sigurd D'hondt; |Title=Ah-prefacing in Kishwahili second pair parts |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Turn-Initial Position; Turn-ta...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
DHondt2011
BibType ARTICLE
Key D'Hondt2011
Author(s) Sigurd D'hondt
Title Ah-prefacing in Kishwahili second pair parts
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Turn-Initial Position, Turn-taking, Second Pair Parts, Stance, Particle, Kishwali, :
Property "BibTag" (as page type) with input value ":" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.
Publisher
Year 2009
Language
City
Month
Journal Language in Society
Volume 40
Number
Pages 563-590
URL Link
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404511000686
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article presents a conversation-analytic account of the various usages of the Kiswahili particle ah as it is routinely employed in naturally occurring Kiswahili conversation. Adopting a strategy reminiscent of the one Heritage and others adopted for English oh, it is argued that the seemingly disparate uses of this “language-specific object” represent various context-specific particularizations of a single semantic core. The basic claim is that ah constitutes a response cry that indexes to the other interlocutors the speaker's negative evaluative stance toward a particular issue. In this capacity, it frequently occupies the turn-initial position of a second pair part. Depending on the specifics of the sequential environment, the “object” of the indexed stance is traceable to either the particular item that is being talked about or the action performed in the preceding first. In the former case, the particle is used to demonstrate the speaker's affiliation with the previous speaker. In the latter case, it is used to demonstrate his disaffiliation with the previous speaker. (Kiswahili, particle, stance, second pair parts, turn-initial position, conversation analysis, comparative perspective)

Notes