Eisenmann2023a

From emcawiki
Revision as of 08:33, 9 December 2024 by JakubMlynar (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Eisenmann2023a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Eisenmann2023a
Author(s) Clemens Eisenmann, Jakub Mlynář, Jason Turowetz, Anne Warfield Rawls
Title “Machine Down”: making sense of human–computer interaction – Garfinkel’s research on ELIZA and LYRIC from 1967 to 1969 and its contemporary relevance
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Human-computer interaction, Artificial intelligence, AI Reference List, Chatbots, Information objects, Ethnomethodology, Conversation analysis, Indexicality, Sequentiality, History of computing, Harold Garfinkel, Harvey Sacks, ELIZA effect
Publisher
Year 2024
Language English
City
Month
Journal AI & Society
Volume 39
Number
Pages 2715–2733
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/s00146-023-01793-z
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper examines Harold Garfinkel’s work with ELIZA and a related program LYRIC from 1967 to 1969. AI researchers have tended to treat successful human–machine interaction as if it relied primarily on non-human machine characteristics, and thus the often-reported attribution of human-like qualities to communication with computers has been criticized as a misperception—and humans who make such reports referred to as “deluded.” By contrast Garfinkel, building on two decades of prior research on information and communication, argued that the ELIZA and the LYRIC “chatbots” were achieving interactions that felt human to many users by exploiting human sense-making practices. In keeping with his long-term practice of using “trouble” as a way of discovering the taken-for-granted practices of human sense-making, Garfinkel designed scripts for ELIZA and LYRIC that he could disrupt in order to reveal how their success depended on human social practices. Hence, the announcement “Machine Down” by the chatbot was a desired result of Garfinkel’s interactions with it. This early (but largely unknown) research has implications not only for understanding contemporary AI chatbots, but also opens possibilities for respecifying current information systems design and computational practices to provide for the design of more flexible information objects.

Notes