MendesdeOliveira2024

From emcawiki
Revision as of 00:28, 12 March 2024 by JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Milene Mendes de Oliveira; Melisa Stevanovic; |Title=Interculturality and decision making: Pursuing jointness in online teams |Tag(s)=EM...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
MendesdeOliveira2024
BibType ARTICLE
Key MendesdeOliveira2024
Author(s) Milene Mendes de Oliveira, Melisa Stevanovic
Title Interculturality and decision making: Pursuing jointness in online teams
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Interculturality, Intercultural competence, Decision-making, Proposals, Ideals
Publisher
Year 2024
Language English
City
Month
Journal Intercultural Pragmatics
Volume 21
Number 1
Pages 1-32
URL Link
DOI 10.1515/ip-2024-0001
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Current times call for continuous communication across countries, negotiations on several levels, and the creation of international relationships based on dialogue and participation. Those ideals are often pursued in intercultural communication contexts and written about, as a desideratum, in the Intercultural Communication literature. However, how can this be achieved concretely? In this article, we analyze how decisions are taken by newly founded intercultural teams of higher-education students playing a so-called intercultural game online via Zoom. The game revolves around the creation of a development plan for a fictitious city. In our study, we conducted a conversation-analytic investigation of decision-making processes by players oriented towards the ideal of ‘intercultural speakers’ as the ones mediating between different points of view and giving voice to all parties in an inclusive way. We illustrate our analysis with examples that range from unilateral decision making to decisions achieved through highly collaborative processes. We point to how expectations of inclusion-oriented interactional moves in intercultural situations are sometimes at odds with how these interactions and the related decision-making processes actually unfold.

Notes