Kunitz2021a

From emcawiki
Revision as of 06:21, 22 December 2023 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Silvia Kunitz |Title=Instruction-Giving Sequences in Italian as a Foreign Language Classes: An Ethnomethodological Conversation Ana...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Kunitz2021a
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Kunitz2021a
Author(s) Silvia Kunitz
Title Instruction-Giving Sequences in Italian as a Foreign Language Classes: An Ethnomethodological Conversation Analytic Perspective
Editor(s) Silvia Kunitz, Numa Markee, Olcay Sert
Tag(s) EMCA, Instructions, Foreign Language Learning, Italian
Publisher Springer
Year 2021
Language English
City Cham
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 133–161
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-52193-6_7
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Classroom-Based Conversation Analytic Research: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Pedagogy
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper adopts an ethnomethodological, conversation analytic approach to analyze the social organization of the instruction-giving sequences that were accomplished by a teacher of Italian as a foreign language during the last phase of a writing task conducted in pairs. Specifically, the paper explores the linguistic, prosodic and embodied resources mobilized by the teacher as she engages in various rounds of instruction giving to prompt each pair of students to read their texts aloud. As the analysis shows, while the first round (targeting the first pair of students) is rather lengthy and subject to repair, the last round (targeting the last pair of students) consists of a minimal summons-answer sequence. Such minimization results from the students’ increased familiarity with the task. That is, by the time the teacher is about to select the last group of students as next speakers, these students have already listened to multiple rounds of instruction-giving sequences and seen multiple implementations of the task. Overall, the paper contributes to the research concerning the mundane, yet complex, social action of doing pedagogical instructions. The implications of these empirical findings for teacher education are discussed at the end of the chapter.

Notes