Clift2023

From emcawiki
Revision as of 01:42, 2 December 2023 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Rebecca Clift |Title=Embodied scepticism: facial expression and response relevance |Editor(s)=Lorenza Mondada; Anssi Peräkylä |Ta...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Clift2023
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Clift2023
Author(s) Rebecca Clift
Title Embodied scepticism: facial expression and response relevance
Editor(s) Lorenza Mondada, Anssi Peräkylä
Tag(s) EMCA, Response Cries, Goffman, Face, Scepticism
Publisher Routledge
Year 2023
Language English
City
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 170–194
URL Link
DOI 10.4324/9781003094111-10
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title New Perspectives on Goffman in Language and Interaction: Body, Participation and the Self
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This chapter extends some of the observations that Goffman made on a class of vocalisations he called ‘response cries’ (1978) to the domain of the multi-modal by examining an embodied practice in English interaction: a particular facial expression that 1) has particular compositional features and 2) occurs in a particular sequential position. Compositionally, this expression consists of raised eyebrows and pursed lips; sequentially, it is produced in response to a claim made by a co-participant. Instances from both institutional and mundane interaction are examined here. These show participants may or may not be gazing at their co-participant; the expression is not necessarily designed to get uptake. In this respect, this facial expression resembles Goffman’s ‘response cries’ in being produced in the presence of others, but not necessarily designed to get responses from those others. Response relevance is seen to be shaped as much by sequential position as features of composition. This facial expression is shown, when analysed in its sequential environment, to constitute an embodied display of scepticism.

Notes