Sherman2023

From emcawiki
Revision as of 01:06, 21 November 2023 by JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Tamah Sherman; František Tůma; |Title=Claiming insufficient knowledge in pairwork and groupwork classroom activities |Tag(s)=EMCA; Cla...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Sherman2023
BibType ARTICLE
Key Sherman2023
Author(s) Tamah Sherman, František Tůma
Title Claiming insufficient knowledge in pairwork and groupwork classroom activities
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Claims of insufficient knowledge, Learning in interaction, Conversation analysis, Epistemics, Multimodality, Groupwork
Publisher
Year 2023
Language English
City
Month
Journal Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
Volume 43
Number December 2023
Pages 100758
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100758
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This conversation analytic paper explores how students in pair and groupwork tasks produce and respond to claims of insufficient knowledge (CIKs). Based on 7 h of video recordings of peer interaction from 18 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classes in Czech secondary schools, we analyze how students express and negotiate their epistemic status using CIKs: when producing a CIK, the current speaker assumes a not-knowing status, thus making the imminent speaker change more relevant, as the next speaker then typically reveals his or her epistemic status. We also show that when a CIK is produced dyadic interactions in second position, the first speaker then produces a knowledge display response, or another CIK, resulting in abandoning the question, which differs from sequences that can be found in frontal teaching. The findings also show that CIKs can be used to resume task-related talk and initiate repair sequences focusing on language issues that the task comprises. Thus, CIKs can be viewed as central interactional resources for students to manage the task, i.e., to invite others to contribute, to resume their talk, or to abandon the current question, and to initiate repair sequences focusing on problematic items from the task.

Notes