Simonen2023

From emcawiki
Revision as of 09:52, 25 October 2023 by JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Mika Simonen; |Title=Dogs responding to human utterances in embodied ways |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; Dogs; Embodied; Interspec...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Simonen2023
BibType ARTICLE
Key Simonen2023
Author(s) Mika Simonen
Title Dogs responding to human utterances in embodied ways
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation analysis, Dogs, Embodied, Interspecies pragmatics, Multimodal interaction, Summons
Publisher
Year 2023
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 217
Number November 2023
Pages 69-84
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.09.004
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article introduces the notion of interspecies pragmatics and suggests that embodied CA studies can inform such pragmatics. The aim of the study was to investigate how dogs provide embodied responses to human utterances when a human is about to throw a ball for them to catch. Studying dogs' recipiency in interaction requires that multimodal approaches be taken into consideration. The data were collected with GoPro cameras attached to two dogs: each dog brought a first-person camera perspective to the analysis and, when they looked at each other, they also provided a third-person camera angle. The findings based on this multi-camera CA approach demonstrate that when dogs produce embodied responses to human utterances, they can distinguish Goffman's addressed recipient from the unaddressed recipient. Compared to human response production planning time (600–1200 ms), dog response planning time proved much faster (a maximum of 200 ms in this context). Another interesting methodological finding was that the distance between the speaker and recipient influenced the transcription of reaction times in turns-of-talk, as sound travels at only 0.3 m/ms. By contrast, embodied actions observed from video material contained no such transcription-related limitations due to the far higher speed at which light travels.

Notes