Waring2020b
Revision as of 11:55, 8 February 2023 by HansunWaring (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Hansun Zhang Waring |Title=Beyond neutrality and adversarialness: The case of platform questions |Editor(s)=Hansun Zhang Waring & Elizab...")
| Waring2020b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Waring2020b |
| Author(s) | Hansun Zhang Waring |
| Title | Beyond neutrality and adversarialness: The case of platform questions |
| Editor(s) | Hansun Zhang Waring & Elizabeth Reddington |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, questions |
| Publisher | Bloomsbury |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | |
| URL | |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Communicating with the Public: Insights from conversation Analysis |
| Chapter | Beyond neutrality and adversarialness: The case of platform questions |
Abstract
One type of TV interview where the IR questioning practices may fall outside the bounds of neutrality and adversarialness concerns programming designed to promote the interviewees (IEs) and/or the missions and agendas of their institutions. In this particular context, the interviewers appear to be charged with a different sort of task—one that supports the IEs’ communication with the public, often on behalf of the institution. In this chapter, I show how this particular task is accomplished interactionally via the deployment of what I call platform questions.
Notes
