Luck2013

From emcawiki
Revision as of 03:37, 24 September 2021 by SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-09-24 10:37:38)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Luck2013
BibType ARTICLE
Key Luck2013
Author(s) Rachael Luck
Title Articulating (Mis)Understanding across Design Discipline Interfaces at a Design Team Meeting
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ambiguity, Conversation Analysis, Coordination, Design Meetings, Uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Year 2013
Language
City
Month may
Journal AI EDAM
Volume 27
Number 2
Pages 155–166
URL
DOI 10.1017/S089006041300005X
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Communication is both the problem and the solution to misunderstanding. It is the human communicative ability to display understanding to resolve misunderstandings that plays an important part in the organization of the design inputs to a construction project. Ambiguity and uncertainty, as different forms of misunderstanding, are studied in this article, as they are manifest in the conversation at a design meeting. In this setting the coordination of both in situ design activities and the planning of design tasks takes place in real time, in conversation. Exhibited are several ways that design ambiguities and uncertainties can be seen in the interactional details of a multidisciplinary design team's conversation, to then report on how different design expertise featured in the raising of, and attempts at resolving, the misunderstandings that arose. In the course of this meeting, ambiguity and uncertainty were observed not as neat, discrete phenomena but were interwoven in the conversation. This characteristic poses difficulties in the disambiguation of the problem-solving response to each form of misunderstanding and further develops our understanding of design as it is communicated and conducted in social interaction. Finally, some implications from this study are put forward to inform the design of support for collaborative design.

Notes