Bonacina-Pugh2020

From emcawiki
Revision as of 04:48, 16 July 2021 by SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-07-16 11:48:20)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Bonacina-Pugh2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Bonacina-Pugh2020
Author(s) Florence Bonacina-Pugh
Title Legitimizing multilingual practices in the classroom: the role of the ‘practiced language policy’
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, conversation analysis, classroom interaction, multilingualism, language policy, France, Legitimacy
Publisher
Year 2020
Language
City
Month apr
Journal International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Volume 23
Number 4
Pages 434–448
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/13670050.2017.1372359
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper revisits the notion of ‘legitimate language’ [e.g. Bourdieu 1977. “The Economics of Linguistic Exchange.” Social Science Information 16 (6): 645–668] as it relates to multilingualism in educational contexts. Since Heller [1996. “Legitimate Language in a Multilingual School.” Linguistics and Education 8: 139–157] developed the notion of ‘legitimate language’ to encompass issues of language choice, there has been a consensus that a legitimate language is a language that is appropriate in a given situation. However, a crucial issue remains to be addressed, namely that of knowing what benchmark do classroom participants use to know when a language is appropriate, that is, legitimate or not. To address this issue, this paper takes as an example the case of an induction classroom for newly-arrived immigrant children in France where multiple languages have been observed. A Conversation Analysis of a set of audio-recorded interactions reveals that whilst languages other than French are not legitimised by top-down language policies and ideologies held at the societal and institutional levels, they are nevertheless seen as legitimate according to the local ‘practiced language policy’ [Bonacina-Pugh 2012. “Researching ‘Practiced Language Policies’: Insights from Conversation Analysis.” Language Policy 11 (3): 213–234]. This paper thus argues for a multi-layered understanding of legitimacy and shows how in the classroom under study, and possibly in other multilingual classrooms, practiced language policies play a key role in the legitimisation of multilingual language practices.

Notes

Publisher: Routledge: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1372359