Pilnick2021

From emcawiki
Revision as of 14:44, 28 June 2021 by SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-06-28 09:44:44)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Pilnick2021
BibType ARTICLE
Key Pilnick2021
Author(s) Alison Pilnick, Rebecca O'Brien, Suzanne Beeke, Sarah Goldberg, Rowan Harwood
Title Avoiding Repair, Maintaining Face: Responding to Hard-to-Interpret Talk from People Living with Dementia in the Acute Hospital
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Communication skills training, Conversation analysis, Dementia, Patient-centred care, Repair, UK, In Press
Publisher
Year 2021
Language
City
Month jun
Journal Social Science \& Medicine
Volume
Number
Pages 114156
URL
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114156
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

People living with dementia (PLWD) are almost always admitted to the acute hospital for reasons unrelated to their dementia, finding themselves in the unfamiliar environment of a Health Care of Older Persons acute ward. The effect of this environment creates a challenge not just for a PLWD themselves, but also for the staff who care for them. Concerns have been raised by both policy makers and staff about the quality of communication between hospital staff and PLWD. Using conversation analysis, we examined 41 video recordings of healthcare professional (HCP)/PLWD interactions collected across three acute inpatient wards in a large teaching hospital in the UK. In this paper, we focus our analysis on hard-to-interpret talk (talk where there are problems in hearing, speaking and/or understanding), and the ways in which healthcare professionals respond to this. Repair of hard- to- interpret talk is common in ordinary interaction, but we find that HCPs in this setting use a range of approaches to avoid direct repair. These approaches are: the use of non-committal responses and continuers such as `yeah' or nods; the use of repetitions or partial repetitions; responding to the emotional tone displayed in the PLWD's utterance; closing the current topic and shifting to the next; and treating the PLWD's talk as related to the task at hand. We suggest that the use of these approaches may be one way in which HCPs manage respecting the personhood of the PLWD, by preserving face and enabling a continuation of an interaction in which the PLWD can take an active part. Our paper provides an empirical demonstration of the high level of interactional skill involved in dementia care work. It also illustrates how these skills can be described and specified, and hence incorporated into the recommendations and tips that are produced for communication with PLWD.

Notes