Skedsmo2020

From emcawiki
Revision as of 23:19, 27 August 2020 by JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Kristian Skedsmo |Title=Other-initiations of repair in Norwegian Sign Language |Tag(s)=EMCA; Norwegian Sign Language; Conversation Analy...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Skedsmo2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Skedsmo2020
Author(s) Kristian Skedsmo
Title Other-initiations of repair in Norwegian Sign Language
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Norwegian Sign Language, Conversation Analysis, Other-initiation of repair, Multimodal communication, Signed interaction, Face-to-face interaction, Sign language interactions
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality
Volume 3
Number 2
Pages
URL Link
DOI 10.7146/si.v3i2.117723
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

During the last five decades, a substantial amount of research has been conducted into conversational repair (Schegloff, Jefferson, & Sacks, 1977), and especially other-initiation of repair (OIR). A vast part of the research has been on spoken English, without considering or having access to embodied practices. Through a series of examples, this explorative paper provides a brief overview of formats and subtypes of other-initiation of self-repair employed in Norwegian Sign Language (NTS). Special attention is given to the implicit open-class repair-initiation “freeze-look”, as identified by Manrique (2016), Manrique and Enfield (2015), and Manrique, Enfield, Levinson, Crasborn, and Floyd (2017) in Argentine Sign Language, and to the subtype of restricted repair-initiations categorized as candidate offers. The data has been extracted from a corpus of informal multi-person conversations among deaf adult co-workers, recorded at their workplaces.

The results show a high degree of overlap with formats found in spoken languages, but also highlight features that seem to be unique to signed languages and the visual mode of communication. The examples presented take the form of summaries, transcriptions, uncensored video clips, and series of stills.

Notes