Soederstroem2019

From emcawiki
Revision as of 07:50, 13 May 2020 by JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ola Söderström |Title=Precarious encounters with urban life: The city/psychosis nexus beyond epidemiology and social constructivism |T...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Soederstroem2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Soederstroem2019
Author(s) Ola Söderström
Title Precarious encounters with urban life: The city/psychosis nexus beyond epidemiology and social constructivism
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Video analysis, Schizophrenia, Interdisciplinarity, Psychiatry, Geography, Urbanity
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal Geoforum
Volume 101
Number
Pages 80-89
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.029
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The article analyses the specific sense of precarity experienced in cities by persons living with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. It aims to bring a social science perspective on precarity as embodied affect into conversation with perspectives on psychosis in the life sciences. To do so the article focuses on two moments in an interdisciplinary research process involving psychiatrists, linguists and geographers. The first is an epistemic moment describing the co-design of a research laboratory across the social and the life sciences to study participants' precarious encounters with urban situations. The second is an ontological moment discussing the results of co-experimentation across disciplines in the research team. It shows how collaboration within the team led to a redefinition of our respective analytical categories and discusses empirical findings concerning factors of urban stress and protection for persons living with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The conclusion situates the socio-natural analysis of urban precarity developed in the paper within broader contemporary discussions on the study of bio-social entanglements. Arguing for epistemological plurality and ontological contamination, the paper is both a methodological contribution to contemporary debates in geographies of health and a contribution to studies of urban precarity.

Notes