Tseliou2020
Tseliou2020 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Tseliou2020 |
Author(s) | Eleftheria Tseliou |
Title | Discourse Analysis and Systemic Family Therapy Research: The Methodological Contribution of Discursive Psychology |
Editor(s) | Matthias Ochs, Maria Borcsa, Jochen Schweitzer |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy process research, Systemic family therapy, Discursive psychology, Rhetorical analysis, Intersubjective approach, Ideological dilemmas, Methodology |
Publisher | |
Year | 2020 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 125-141 |
URL | Link |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_8 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Systemic Research in Individual, Couple, and Family Therapy and Counseling |
Chapter |
Abstract
In this chapter I aim to discuss specific ways in which the theoretical and methodological approach of discursive psychology could contribute to systemic family therapy research. Despite its resonance with systemic family therapy, up-to-date systemic family therapy research has minimally explored its methodological potential for the study of therapeutic dialogue. In this chapter, following a brief overview of discursive psychology, I will discuss three specific theoretical and methodological proposals which indicate its potential, due to their affinity with systemic, family therapy tenets. These include a rhetorical, argumentative perspective to the study of therapeutic conversations; an intersubjective, “systemic” perspective to psychological phenomena like identity; and a historically and politically informed perspective to the study of therapeutic discourse, as depicted in the notion of ideological dilemmas. While providing examples from family therapy studies, I will conclude with a critical appraisal of the methodological potential of discursive psychology for systemic family therapy research.
Notes