Theobald2015a

From emcawiki
Revision as of 11:44, 13 December 2019 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Theobald2015a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Theobald2015a
Author(s) Maryanne Theobald, Susan Danby, Jóhanna Einarsdóttir, Jane Bourne, Desley Jones, Sharon Ross, Helen Knaggs, Claire Carter-Jones
Title Children’s perspectives of play and learning for educational practice
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Child development, Children, Children's play, Education, Learning
Publisher
Year 2015
Language English
City
Month
Journal Education Sciences
Volume 5
Number 4
Pages 345–362
URL Link
DOI 10.3390/educsci5040345
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Play as a learning practice increasingly is under challenge as a valued component of early childhood education. Views held in parallel include confirmation of the place of play in early childhood education and, at the same time, a denigration of the role of play in favor for more teacher-structured and formal activities. As a consequence, pedagogical approaches towards play, the curriculum activities that constitute play, and the appropriateness of play in educational settings, have come under scrutiny in recent years. In this context, this study investigates children’s perspectives of play and how they understand the role of play and learning in their everyday activities. This article reports on an Australian study where teacher-researchers investigated child-led insights into what counts as play in their everyday classroom activities. Children (aged 3–4 years) described play as an activity that involved their active participation in “doing” something, being with peers, and having agency and ownership of ideas. Children did not always characterize their activities as “play”, and not all activities in the preschool program were described as play. The article highlights that play and learning are complex concepts that may be easily dismissed as separate, when rather they are deeply intertwined. The findings of this study generate opportunities for educators and academics to consider what counts as “play” for children, and to prompt further consideration of the role of play as an antidote to adult centric views of play.

Notes