Coulter2009
Revision as of 11:41, 23 November 2019 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
| Coulter2009 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Coulter2009 |
| Author(s) | Jeff Coulter |
| Title | Rule-following, rule-governance and rule-accord: Reflections on rules after Rawls |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Sociology, Ethnomethodology, Wittgenstein, Language, Rules, Interpretation, Rawls |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2009 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Classical Sociology |
| Volume | 9 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 389–403 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1468795X09344449 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this discussion, I describe my introduction to Rawls’ famous paper on rules and situate this in a broader intellectual context. I then attempt to locate its significance within developments in linguistics (especially in speech-act analysis) and also in ethnomethodology. My main idea is that Rawls’ concept of a ‘constitutive rule’ is in deep harmony with many of Wittgenstein’s insights into the same thematic.
Notes
