Kidwell2009a
| Kidwell2009a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kidwell2009a |
| Author(s) | Mardi Kidwell |
| Title | 'What happened?': An epistemics of before and after in 'at-the-scene' police questioning preview |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Epistemics, Police, Questioning |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2009 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 42 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 20–41 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351810802671727 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
When police arrive at the scene of a possible crime or accident, they make inquiries of participants to determine what sort of prior events have transpired to lead to the situation. Examination of unedited sections of a reality television show based on police work (among other data) demonstrates that officers' use of What happened? typically elicits (and/or pursues) a narrative, an “ontogeny” of how a particular problem event came to be. In this article, I analyze how answerers in these police–citizen interactions construct narratives to put themselves in the best light, particularly via techniques of what, along the lines of Sacks' (1984) term “doing being ordinary,” might be called doing being extraordinary. Although the What happened? question confers on the answerer an authority to answer as “someone who was there,” officers nevertheless mobilize their commonsense understandings of events as temporally unfolding and accountably ordered phenomena to monitor and challenge the plausibility of answerers' accounts.
Notes
