Ragan1984
Revision as of 11:49, 21 November 2019 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Sandra L. Ragan; Robert Hopper |Title=Ways to leave your lover: a conversational analysis of literature |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Ragan1984 |Ye...")
| Ragan1984 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ragan1984 |
| Author(s) | Sandra L. Ragan, Robert Hopper |
| Title | Ways to leave your lover: a conversational analysis of literature |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1984 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Communication Quarterly |
| Volume | 32 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 310–317 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/01463378409369568 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
A conversational analysis of lovers’ exiting dialogues in contemporary fiction revealed three metacommunicative strategies used to terminate a romantic relationship: (1) suspension of the conversational rule of “let it pass;”; (2) zero‐sum strategizing; and(3) consensus on dissensus (i.e., agreement to disagree). The study suggests that fiction is a viable source for conversational data. Particularly germane to research on disengagement strategies, fictive dialogue permits examination of the interactive work of communicators as they accomplish relationship termination.
Notes
