Antaki2003
Revision as of 08:47, 31 October 2019 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
| Antaki2003 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Antaki2003 |
| Author(s) | Charles Antaki, Michael Billig, Derek Edwards, Jonathan Potter |
| Title | Discourse analysis means doing analysis: a critique of six analytic shortcomings |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Discursive Psychology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2003 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Analysis Online |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
A number of ways of treating talk and textual data are identified which fall short of discourse analysis. They are: (1) under-analysis through summary; (2) under-analysis through taking sides; (3) under-analysis through over-quotation or through isolated quotation; (4) the circular identification of discourses and mental constructs; (5) false survey; and (6) analysis that consists in simply spotting features. We show, by applying each of these to an extract from a recorded interview, that none of them actually analyse the data. We hope that illustrating shortcomings in this way will encourage further development of rigorous discourse analysis in social psychology.
Notes
