Edwards2000

From emcawiki
Revision as of 11:05, 27 October 2019 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Edwards2000
BibType ARTICLE
Key Edwards2000
Author(s) Derek Edwards
Title Extreme case formulations: softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Discursive Psychology
Publisher
Year 2000
Language
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 33
Number 4
Pages 347–373
URL Link
DOI 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_01
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Extreme case formulations (ECFs) were identified by Pomerantz (1986) as expressions using extreme terms such as all, none, most, every, least, absolutely, completely, and so forth, whose uses are to defend or justify a description or assessment, especially in case of challenge. In this study, orientations to the extremity of ECFs are initially shown in how and when they are sometimes qualified or softened. Yet ECFs are overwhelmingly not softened. Further examination shows how ECFs can work as devices for doing "nonliteral," in the sense of being not accountably accurate descriptions. Rather, their extremity might be taken to display investment in, or stance toward, some state of affairs. In addition to Pomerantz's observations, therefore, ECFs can (a) display various kinds of "investment" on the part of the speaker (e.g., commitment, certainty, caring, determination, a critical or positive attitude, etc.) and (b) provide for a range of nonliteral, metaphoric uses (interpretable as "it seemed as if (extreme X)," "let us proceed as if (extreme Y)," or "take (extreme Z) as ironic, a joke, a tease, etc.").

Notes