Wickes-Emmison2007

From emcawiki
Revision as of 04:13, 10 July 2019 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Rebecca Wickes; Michael Emmison; |Title=They are all ‘doing gender’ but are they are all passing? A case study of the appropriation...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Wickes-Emmison2007
BibType ARTICLE
Key Wickes-Emmison2007
Author(s) Rebecca Wickes, Michael Emmison
Title They are all ‘doing gender’ but are they are all passing? A case study of the appropriation of a sociological concept
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Doing gender, Ethnomethodology
Publisher
Year 2007
Language English
City
Month
Journal The Sociological Review
Volume 55
Number 2
Pages 311-330
URL
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00707.x
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The concept of ‘doing gender’ was placed on the sociological agenda by West and Zimmerman. In their seminal paper published in 1987, they provided a systematic theory of gender as a routine and ongoing process and outlined a distinctly eth- nomethodological approach to investigating how gender is enacted, understood and rendered accountable.West and Zimmerman’s notion of ‘doing gender’ has subse- quently become a central concept in many fields of sociological research, however, upon closer examination although many authors claim to be using the concept – in effect to be doing ‘doing gender’ – the concept’s intellectual roots in ethnomethod- ology are not always recognised or reflected: in short not all are passing.The purpose of our study is to explore the career trajectory of this concept and to systematically assess the manner in which ‘doing’ has been employed. From a review of 226 journal articles, books, dissertations and association papers, we provide an overview of the uses of this construct and examine the ways in which ‘doing gender’ has been assimilated into current theoretical and methodological practice.

Notes