Yang2019

From emcawiki
Revision as of 10:07, 16 April 2019 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Zi Yang |Title=Turn allocation within the medical-service-seeking party in Chinese accompanied medical consultations |Tag(s)=EMCA; Chine...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Yang2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Yang2019
Author(s) Zi Yang
Title Turn allocation within the medical-service-seeking party in Chinese accompanied medical consultations
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Chinese, Medical consultation, Multiparty interaction, Turn allocation
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 143
Number
Pages 135-155
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.005
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Unlike micro-local studies on turn allocation, this study combines macro- and micro-local (Traverso, 2004) perspectives to explore turn allocation of the multi-participant medical-service-seeking1 (MSS) party composed of the patient and his/her companion in accompanied medical consultations in China. Through both qualitative and quantitative analyses of the transcription of 20 audio recorded consultations in China, the talk distribution within the MSS party is examined in terms of the structural organization of a medical visit. Features of the talk distribution in different phases of the medical consultation and factors influencing turn allocation are explored. It is found that talk is not equally distributed within the MSS party, and all phases other than the opening and the closing witness a significant or marginally significant difference in talk contribution by the patient and the companion. Factors influencing turn allocation within the MSS party vary from phase to phase: epistemic gradient, sick-role-triggered activity transfer and coalition to offset power asymmetry are among the most important. The paper sheds light on the study of polylogue, enables cross-cultural comparisons of medical consultations, and has methodological implications for further studies of medical conversations.

Notes