Roth2005b
| Roth2005b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Roth2005b |
| Author(s) | Andrew L. Roth |
| Title | “Pop Quizzes” on the Campaign Trail Journalists, Candidates, and the Limits of Questioning |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, political news interviews, election campaign coverage, degradation ceremonies |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2005 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | The International Journal of Press/Politics |
| Volume | 10 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 28-46 |
| URL | |
| DOI | DOI: 10.1177/1081180X05276804 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
What are the “parameters of the permissible” when journalists interview political candidates? This article examines one form of hostile questioning that journalists use during election campaigns to interview select candidates. Journalists employ “pop quizzes”—on the names of international leaders, for example—in attempts to dis- credit candidates.These questions propose that the candidate should know somemat- ter of fact, and they aim to expose that the candidate lacks definite knowledge of that matter. The article examines the interactional organization of pop quiz questioning, including some practices that candidates use to resist it.This analysis explains the con- troversial character of this interviewing practice. The concluding discussion situ- ates the findings in terms of prior work on degradation ceremonies, explaining why pop quiz questions seem to do more harm to the reputations of journalists than of candidates.
Notes
