Kurtic-etal2009

From emcawiki
Revision as of 06:42, 21 January 2019 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Emina Kurtic; Guy J. Brown; Bill Wells; |Title=Fundamental frequency height as a resource for the management of overlap in talk-in-...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Kurtic-etal2009
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Kurtic-etal2009
Author(s) Emina Kurtic, Guy J. Brown, Bill Wells
Title Fundamental frequency height as a resource for the management of overlap in talk-in-interaction
Editor(s) Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Nicole Dehé, Anne Wichmann
Tag(s) EMCA, Overlapping talk, Prosodic design, Fundamental frequency
Publisher Emerald
Year 2009
Language English
City
Month
Journal
Volume 8
Number
Pages 183-204
URL
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series 8
Howpublished
Book title Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics: Studies in Pragmatics
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Overlapping talk is common in talk-in-interaction. Much of the previous research on this topic agrees that speaker overlaps can be either turn competitive or noncompetitive. An investigation of the differences in prosodic design between these two classes of overlaps can offer insight into how speakers use and orient to prosody as a resource for turn competition. In this paper, we investigate the role of fundamental frequency (F0) as a resource for turn competition in overlapping speech. Our methodological approach combines detailed conversation analysis of overlap instances with acoustic measurements of F0 in the overlapping sequence and in its local context. The analyses are based on a collection of overlap instances drawn from the ICSI Meeting corpus. We found that overlappers mark an overlapping incoming as competitive by raising F0 above their norm for turn beginnings, and retaining this higher F0 until the point of overlap resolution. Overlappees may respond to these competitive incomings by returning competition, in which case they raise their F0 too. Our results thus provide instrumental support for earlier claims made on impressionistic evidence, namely that participants in talk-in-interaction systematically manipulate F0 height when competing for the turn.

Notes