Liberman2018
Revision as of 08:07, 7 November 2018 by JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Kenneth Liberman; |Title=Objectivation practices |Tag(s)=EMCA; Objectivation; Coffee tasters; Tibetan debating; Games |Key=Liberman2018...")
| Liberman2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Liberman2018 |
| Author(s) | Kenneth Liberman |
| Title | Objectivation practices |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Objectivation, Coffee tasters, Tibetan debating, Games |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.7146/si.v1i2.110037 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Linkages between the early interactionist sociology of Simmel and Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology are explored, using illustrations drawn from the author’s research on coffee tasting, the debates of Tibetan scholar-monks, and players of board games. Garfinkel’s inquiries into the neglected objectivity of social facts are specified with concrete illustrations, and a model is developed to guide the investigation of some seminal topics in ethnomethodology. Discounting rational choice theory, voluntarism, and individualist models, this study offers an account of the objectivation practices that parties routinely employ when they collaborate in setting up an orderliness for their local affairs.
Notes
