Oloff2018a
| Oloff2018a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Oloff2018a |
| Author(s) | Florence Oloff |
| Title | Revisiting delayed completions: The retrospective management of co-participant action |
| Editor(s) | Arnulf Deppermann, Jürgen Streeck |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Video data, Multiactivity, Multiparty, Unit completion, Turn-taking, German |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 123-160 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.293.04olo |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Since Lerner coined the notion of delayed completion in 1989, this recurrent social practice of continuing one’s speaking turn while disregarding an intermediate co-participant’s utterance has not been investigated with regard to embodied displays and actions. A sequential approach to videotaped mundane conversations in German will explain the occurrence and use of delayed completions. First, especially in multi-party and multi-activity settings, delayed completions can result from reduced monitoring and coordinating activities. Second, recipients can use intra-turn response slots for more extended responsive actions than the current speaker initially projected, leading to delayed completion sequences. Finally, delayed completions are used for blocking possibly misaligned co-participant actions. The investigation of visible action illustrates that delayed completions are a basic practice for retrospectively managing co-participant response slots.
Notes
