Takahashi2018

From emcawiki
Revision as of 01:21, 9 July 2018 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Junko Takahashi |Title=Practices of self-selection in the graduate classroom: Extension, redirection, and disjunction |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Takahashi2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Takahashi2018
Author(s) Junko Takahashi
Title Practices of self-selection in the graduate classroom: Extension, redirection, and disjunction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Turn-taking, Classroom interactions, Graduate
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Linguistics and Education
Volume 46
Number
Pages 70-81
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.06.002
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This study investigates the practices of student self-selection in the graduate-level American classroom. Self-selection is a crucial part of the learning process because it allows for the exchange of students’ and teachers’ views, analyses, and opinions, making these exchanges into a whole-classroom experience. Active students who make oral contributions in class are believed to learn more than those who do not (Weaver & Qi, 2005) and to enhance their critical thinking (Crone, 1997; Garside, 1996). In the graduate classroom, however, student self-selection may be challenging, as the material students tackle tends to be highly technical. Given the importance of student self-selection in this academically demanding context, more analytical attention must be devoted to uncovering the nature of participation. With 20 h of video data collected from graduate classes and analyzed through the lens of conversation analysis (CA), this study identifies three main practices employed by self-selecting speakers: extension by piling, contribution with hand-raising, and participation prefacing. Each occurs with different degrees of ‘fittedness’ to prior talk, in part evidenced in the different levels of mitigation use by the self-selectors. The findings of this study contribute to the small body of classroom discourse studies in the graduate classroom and provide a first step towards understanding how self-selections may be strategically managed or promoted.

Notes